Read Half a Life: A Memoir Online
Authors: Darin Strauss
Tags: #Biography & Autobiography, #Personal Memoirs, #Literary, #Family & Relationships, #Death; Grief; Bereavement
2
“An accident isn’t necessarily ever over.”
—Diane Williams
At college, I spent a lot of my first year with physics and psychology books, gulping down studies and figures. I took solace in math: you’re doing forty, and the girl with the bicycle cuts ten feet in front of you—impact will arrive in something like 700 milliseconds. Human perception time—not only to see a hazard, but to understand one as such—is generally accepted to saw off some 220 milliseconds. Next, the mostly neural job of getting foot to brake demanded another 500 milliseconds. It seemed I was exculpated by 20 milliseconds.
These numbers I sought in the library. There was a pattern: sometimes when I sat bucketed in an easy chair, or studied coursework in my lap, I’d tell myself it was time for a washroom break or something. But then I’d find myself in the physical-science stacks, my fingers tapping over books, making sure that my reassuring numbers were still there, that they were still reassuring.
It was always the same, even before I knew I was being sued. It took about forty minutes and then I would end up on my feet—placemarking my textbook, leaving it in the cushions, and shambling off. One time I passed a friend who was going through microfiche—the old whir
of newspapers, the blue of ink and gray flashing in front of her head—and I began to tear up, out of panic. Because the library was double-edged. It had my relief in it and my guilt: my physics numbers in the upstairs collections, and, down by periodicals, the record of me and Celine. Had my friend found out, was she searching for me in a Long Island tabloid?
I
still
didn’t know that legal threats were gathering, attempts at authorized ruin, cold winds from home. Regardless, I was thinking about Celine as often as ever. I internalized my cares about conventionality and appearances.
The moments before the crash became a kind of VHS tape, over-rented, overplayed, stripped: the colors scratched away, the sound wobbly—until I didn’t try to remember at all, and the tape would burst into high-def vividness. Hair, bicycle, reflector. I’d be doing something mundane, like removing a soda from an icy case at the Mini Mart. And while my fingers closed around the damp, solid aluminum, I would think:
Celine Zilke will never feel a can in her grip again
. I was also muddling through the soundstage brightness of occasional flashback. I’d rush to class, take a corner, look at some kids hackey-sacking on the quad and see the gross anatomy of a bicycle lying in the street. Or Celine’s glassy face.
It never occurred to me to petition for antidepressants or sign myself in for another psychotherapy go-round. I knew what was troubling me. Depression as a chemical shortcoming, a chronic formless mope, could be handled: a pill could gather it and sink it down its hole. But for what seemed an
appropriate response to a problem that couldn’t be fixed—that sort of depression struck me as without cure.
And without much choice, I made sure that another potential cure wasn’t available. No friend could cheer me, could talk me out of anything. The people I lived with and ate with at college didn’t know. No one who encountered me in classrooms, at a frat party, in the campus center, noticed the fierce inner battles I’d fought to make the different Darins into a Darin that friends could recognize. Coming back to my room, I always worked up a cheerful face—abstracted but busy. What if someone had said, “Hey, is something wrong?”
I didn’t know the right answer, and didn’t have confidence in how I’d respond.
So I quietly indulged in the self-pity that, in the venerable tradition of sad people everywhere, I felt entitled to.
I began college under-read. Bookishness, rigorous thought, affection for time-consuming study—my public high school hadn’t prepared me for any of it. Besides, until Celine I’d been a lazy student, an underachiever. But somehow freshman year, a faked understanding—a rarefied reference, a split-second attempt to scale the tower—got me through. Oh yes, that’s
so
right, and wasn’t it Kafka who said …? Gibberish, bullshit. But I felt I had to look smart enough for two. (Not necessarily to
be
smart enough. It was still largely about appearances, still largely social.)
Freshman year, I took a “Death & Dying” class. Generous helpings of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, side plates of
When Bad Things Happen to Good People
, and other softbrained texts—solemn, whispering titles like “Meditations.” I believed I could depend on a professor—student privilege, so I went ahead and wrote my midterm about the accident. A lot of the coursebooks had line-drawn covers showing pine trees or lonely outcroppings of rocks. The grad student who ran this touchy-feely seminar urged me to nose around, to “check out Celine’s side of things.”
I thought nosing around was a terrible idea. (
Everybody can master a grief but those who have it
was a Shakespeare line I circled during a survey class.) But I was an obedient student. I had become, after leaving Glen Head, accommodating of any rule; I’d had to become less like a chance-taker who might have once been involved in an accident.
So I falteringly did what the grad student had asked. I grubbed up addresses, wrote letters, rooted out old phone numbers, butted into lives: the other bicyclist from that morning, a girl Celine had played field hockey with, a chem-lab partner—anyone I could trace down from her world.
I learned that Celine had remade herself in the months before her death. She had become a born-again. And once I found my way to her field-hockey friend, I discovered something that for years changed how I felt about Celine’s death.
Our phone chat was short and intense:
“I’m really really sorry to call like this. Because, well—” Immediately I was thrashing around. Talking too fast, explaining too much. “Because I sort of, I’m taking this class and need to find out more about, you know,
her
. Because of the class and the class leaders thought one really helpful thing might be to—”
“Wasn’t that diary thing weird?” the girl said.
What diary thing?
“Oh,” the girl said. She’d overstepped. “I guess I assumed you knew.”
I could feel my heart, its sudden and loud
lubdub
, blood lurching through the aorta.
“So you don’t know?” she said.
Celine had written, right before the crash, something to the effect of: “Today I realized that I am going to die.” It had been her mother who told this field-hockey friend about it.
“Thank you,” I said, and hung up. I may even have said it again, after laying the phone down. It was like a pressure along every part of my body had been snipped away: cut ropes flinging out crazily, weights tumbling from arms, shoulders, head.
Today I realized that I am going to die
. They were just eight words. I’d already grabbed them for dear life.
Celine, I decided, had died on purpose. That’s why she’d turned right in front of my car. (From what I understood, her family hadn’t been much invested in religion, and that’s why that born-again stuff not only came as a surprise, but actually had struck me as dispositive, somehow.) For me, the suicide note—or, rather, the hypothetically suicidal journal entry—settled it.
The first trial deposition came when I’d been away at college for a month. I caught a Greyhound home, and then Dad and I ambled over to the Nassau County courthouse, positive that this whole thing was a formality, that the Zilkes hadn’t really decided to come after me. That they still maintained—as everyone did—I wasn’t at fault.
(I don’t know how the letter summoning me to the courthouse wasn’t a dead giveaway. I guess that’s how naïve I was.)
At the courthouse, Dad and I met the lawyer my insurance company had detailed to us: curly hair, wireframe glasses. This was on Mineola’s Franklin Avenue, behind a grove of telephone poles. The lawyer and I shook hands, and above his soft grip his face was pale and serious. This was not the face of mere formality. As he hurried us down the lobby (lights and footsteps spanking off the marble floor), he told me I was being “litigated against.” Wait, the Zilkes are
coming after
me? In the flurry of information, I didn’t catch the guy’s name. Why would they sue me, after their promise? It wasn’t until the elevator doors shut that I felt control over my features and bodily functions return.
My dad and I followed the lawyer into a room in the
lower floors. And here the lawyer divulged the cruel, galactic sum the Zilkes could get from me if the trial went horribly wrong. (It was beyond what the insurance company even covered; it was more money, I was sure, than I would ever have.) The low-ceilinged place we entered was called a Special Hearings room. I had to recalibrate myself again: Mr. Zilke sat about ten feet from me.
All at once I could see him bringing me that iced tea in his front room. And now he wouldn’t look me in the eye.
I’d imagined this deposition would take place in a judge’s cozy chambers—polished wooden desk; a sort of brass-based, green,
LA Law
-ish lamp. Instead we’d all sidled one-by-one into this chalky and hideously lit sub-basementy place. A long plastic table commandeered most of the room.
“You okay?” my father asked me.
“Yeah,” I said. I raised my chin, spoke confidently, and meant it.
“Yes.”
And as fast as that, under the burnished presence of a judge, the event began. Right away the Zilkes’ lawyer trained his expertise on me.
How far did her body fly?
Before I opened my mouth, I realized the confidence had been a bluff, a kind of performance for my father and myself, too. It was the weighted bat you swing bravely in the on-deck circle, which can’t stop your knees from buckling when you step up to the plate.
How much did your car skid on the grass of the median before it came to a stop?
With a hunter’s eye, the Zilkes’ lawyer
targeted small rifts in my self-assurance and certainty.
Five cars around, why did she turn into
yours?
The lawyer flexed his eyebrows as he spoke—eyebrows that didn’t believe me, that were already garnishing wages, spending the balance of a salary I hadn’t earned yet.
“I don’t know,” I said.
Over and again, question after question. “Don’t know. Not sure.” I looked at my father for solace. This wasn’t anything we’d expected. All he could do was watch me. Mr. Zilke, of course (there was a great deal of intensity at the table), saw that I was looking to my father.
“I don’t know,” I said, each time more softly than the last. “I don’t know.”
“What
do
you know?”
Then the Zilkes’ lawyer inhaled through his nose and shut his eyes, slowly. A man visibly calming himself.
He came back from his settle-down place and continued. His style was a kind of word fog in which I couldn’t make out any detail, only the growing sense of being lost and wrong: “What’s the exact amount of seconds, son, between when you saw her and you killed her with your car? Because, right now, it doesn’t
seem
like, with your answers—or lack of answers—there’s any, shall we say, it’s just that you strike me as someone who might be telling less than the fullest extent of the truth. Do you follow me?”
He searched my eyes, and for a moment, I got to search his. I made out, to my surprise, what looked like regret. Something shaky in the face, there in the spry brows—a
remorse about the power and edge that experience has over anxiety and weakness. (This was my thinking then.) “Take your time, son,” he said.
In any court setting, where people have nothing to do but lean forward and listen, silences feel drawn-out. They convey an impression of somebody using the shade of a few extra moments to put together a hasty lie. I wasn’t going to lie, though; I just didn’t want to give the only answer I had. But now their lawyer’s eyebrows hiked up as he waited for me to answer. My lawyer’s did, too. I probably had no choice but to hand over my one skimpy truth. Even Dad’s eyebrows were starting to pyramid. It seemed so artificial, somehow, that I couldn’t simply step out from behind this table and head off into the telephone-pole orchard out there on Franklin Avenue.
“I don’t
know
how many, exactly,” I said. My face and the room seemed to be the same smarting temperature. Someone’s chair leg scraped against the floor. And the Zilkes’ lawyer, resetting himself, sat waiting for more.
“One second?” I said—a guessing game. “Half of one?” I was lucky I didn’t just fall thwap onto the floor.
“So which, then?” the lawyer said. “One second or half? We’re all here to listen to what you have to say.”
Mr. Zilke, meanwhile, was bashful with his gaze until it failed him; he turned from the questioning and kept his eyes on his watch, on his cuffs. (Mrs. Zilke, like my own mother, wasn’t there.)
More questions for me.
Were you drunk?
The Zilkes’
lawyer had the structural design of a Saint Bernard, sags and weight and flaccidity.
Can you prove you weren’t drunk?
(He’d later ask a policeman who’d been at the accident similar questions. Q: “How can you be sure young Mr. Strauss wasn’t drunk?” A: “I’ve been a police officer for years. He wasn’t drunk. I could tell.” Q: “Were you derelict in your duty in not giving him a breathalyzer?” Etc.)
“Mr. Vancini, approach, please,” the judge said, interrupting. Robed in the prestige of the state, he was the one relaxed figure in the room. The judge leaned forward to whisper something. Without ever having been in a court (or a Special Hearings room), I realized I knew the ins and outs of this place—lawyers approaching the bench; my having made the official promise to tell the truth; direct and cross and redirect examinations—just as everyone in the country did: from TV. Which is to say in my bones.
(Weeks later, when I got to see the court reporter’s transcript, I read what the judge had actually murmured to the Zilkes’ lawyer. “Mr. Vancini,” he had said, “we all know how fond of money you are. If you don’t stop badgering this young man, I will take some money from you, via a fine.”)