Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole (29 page)

IT MIGHT BE WORTH PAYING MORE FOR YOUR YARD WORK

Then there was the child rape case illustrating the perils of cheap lawn care. In 2012, immigrant Francisco Marquez Martinez, thirty-eight, raped a twelve-year-old girl after coming to mow her family’s lawn a day early when the girl and her nine-year-old sister were home alone. He asked to come inside when it began to rain, but she refused, so Marquez forced his way in, chased the girl to her parents’ bedroom, then to the bathroom, where he raped her in the bathtub.

The internet was ablaze with the news that a thirty-eight-year-old landscaper had raped a client’s twelve-year-old girl. But not one newspaper stated that Marquez was an immigrant, much less an illegal immigrant. The truth first emerged when Marquez’s lawyer argued that his client had confessed only because he didn’t speak English. Still, somehow, Marquez managed to convey through his government-provided translator, in the alternative: He didn’t do it; he did it, but the girl seduced him; the sex was consensual; he thought she was seventeen; and, on final thought, he didn’t have sex with her at all since he’s a married man who preached at his church.

These were the headlines about the case from the only newspaper on Nexis that covered the story, at all, the
Winston-Salem Journal
:

          
“Girl Says Man Hired by Family to Mow Lawn Raped Her”

          
“Man Accused of Raping Girl Told Police He Thought She Was Older”

          
“Man Accused of Raping Girl, 12, Tells Different Version of Incident”

          
“Man Gets 25 Years for Rape of Girl, 12”
²⁵

So again, readers would know the child rapist was a “man.” The
Winston-Salem Journal
was absolutely clear on that point. It isn’t a space problem: The newspaper was capable of packing all sorts of information into its headlines, such as the fact that the rapist was hired to mow the lawn, that he claimed he thought she was older, and that he was sentenced to twenty-five years. What’s the matter with “Illegal Alien Gardener Convicted of Raping Girl, 12”?

The
Journal
’s articles on the case religiously noted that the paper “does not identify victims of sexual assault or their families.” (Except when the accused is a Kennedy or a Clinton.) Why not add: “or information about rape suspects’ immigration status”? It’s perfectly obvious that rape victims aren’t being identified, but readers have no way of knowing that “man” means “immigrant.”

SPOT THE IMMIGRANT!

CASE NO. 2
| HOMECOMING DANCE

I
N 2009, A ONE-HUNDRED-POUND SIXTEEN-YEAR-OLD WHITE GIRL WAS GANG-RAPED
by about a dozen men outside her homecoming dance at Richmond High School in San Francisco’s Bay Area. She had gotten bored with the dance and gone outside to call her father for a ride home when a boy she’d known since the seventh grade invited her to drink brandy with his friends in the courtyard.

BRUTAL ATTACK

The men got her drunk, at one point forcing brandy down her throat. Over the next few hours, the girl, an English honors student, was savagely beaten, gang
-
raped, sodomized, raped with a foreign object, and dragged over the concrete by her feet to the dumpster. The men even urinated on her.
¹
The attack was so brutal, one of the suspects tried to help his case by immediately admitting to the police, “I’ll be straight up with you, all I did was pee on her and take her ring.”
²
When the ringleader was arrested, he
shouted that it wasn’t rape because she was so drunk, “she didn’t even know what was going on.” In the alternative, he said, “She wanted it—she wanted all of us.”
³

Throughout the two-hour gang rape, other men stood and watched—some cheering—without calling the police. One witness said he thought she was dead: “I saw people, like, dehumanizing her; I saw some pretty crazy stuff. . . . She was pretty quiet; I thought she was like dead for a minute but then I saw her moving around, I was like, ‘Oh.’”
⁴
The victim, called “Jane Doe,” survived, but was left with bone fractures, burns, hypothermia, and head lacerations. She was in too much pain for nurses to insert a speculum for the rape exam,
⁵
though they did remove the foliage from her anus.
⁶

Here are the first few paragraphs from a classic MSM column about the Richmond gang rape:

          
Los Angeles Times

          
November 7, 2009

          
Saturday Home Edition

          
A Deeper Lesson in Gang Rape

          
by Sandy Banks
⁷

          
When a public tragedy like this occurs,

It’s a “tragedy”! I don’t remember the fake UVA fraternity gang rape being called a “tragedy.”

          
. . . it is our instinct—our responsibility, even—to try to understand it. We look for clues to its cause, its meaning in personal stories, official actions and social forces.

              
Are the kids deranged? Did the school do something wrong? Is this just a reflection of a violent culture?

Is it the school’s fault? America’s violent culture? She couldn’t possibly be referring to a foreign culture we’re required to import because Democrats need votes . . .

          
In the Richmond gang rape case, I was surprised that so many readers made race the subtext. And they took me to task for not mentioning the race of the victim or her attackers.

YOU DIDN’T MENTION THE RACE OF THE VICTIM OR HER ATTACKERS?????????

          
“The discomfort you folks feel in acknowledging racial attacks on whites prevents you from writing the facts,” one reader’s e-mail said.

              
I admit to feeling “discomfort” as I tried to get a grip on the racial dimensions of the assault. The victim was white; her attackers were described to me by students as mostly Latino, with one black and one white.

Actually, the “white” one was a Mexican, too—one of our famous “white Hispanics,” Cody Smith. That’s according to the victim,
⁸
who had known him since seventh grade.
⁹
And the charges against Smith were later dismissed.
¹⁰

          
But I didn’t mention race in my column because I don’t believe that explains the attack. . . . Gang rape—and bystander inaction—didn’t migrate here from across the border; it’s not the province of any one ethnic group, income level or generation.

Journalists are supposed to report facts, not decide what “explains” the crimes they’re reporting on and then give us only the facts that support their side.

          
Just ask the woman who told me about the gang rape of her college roommate at a fraternity party in 1972 on the University of Virginia campus.

Excellent counterexample! A non-disprovable story from forty years ago.

          
It was gossip fodder on campus, but the girl was too ashamed to come forward. “It was never reported, no one was ever arrested and all the perpetrators are now probably lawyers [and] businessmen,” she wrote.

We’ll be here all week if we’re allowed to start citing gossip that includes words like “probably.”

Why is it that whenever immigrants commit a shocking gang rape, newspaper columnists wander off into fictitious rapes committed by white fraternity members? I’m not saying there has never been a gang rape at a college fraternity that resulted in actual convictions. I am saying that if that had happened, we would know about it. In fact, the media would never stop talking about it. A white fraternity gang rape would be world-famous. There would be Hollywood movies, television documentaries, Broadway plays, a plaque, a law named after the incident, women’s studies courses—perhaps entire college majors on the case. At the very least, it would not be hard to find.

By contrast, the way we know about immigrant gang rapes—often the only way we know—is that there are case numbers, defendants, and convictions. Usually there are a few people in the community who know the facts, so the truth seeps out, in spite of media censorship.

We know the facts of the Richmond gang rape not because of bald accusations of the sort regularly printed in the
New York Times
about hoax campus rapes, but because there were trials, sworn testimony, and DNA evidence against specific named defendants. The men convicted for the
gang rape attack were Manuel Ortega, twenty; Elvis Torrentes, twenty-three; Ari Morales, seventeen; Marcelles Peter, eighteen; Jose Montano, nineteen; and John Crane Jr., forty-three—five Mexicans and one African American.

The rape of a high school sophomore at her homecoming dance is not a hazy memory of something my college roommate told me about: Ortega admitted in court that he initiated the rape, beat up the victim, ripped her clothes off, forced his penis into her mouth, and dragged the unconscious girl around the courtyard. Other witnesses testified in court that Ortega also stomped on the girl’s head and tried to penetrate her with a skateboard.
¹¹

WE DIDN’T EVEN NOTICE THEIR RACE!

As for Ms. Banks’s claim that she didn’t even notice that the gang rapists were Mexican and their victim white, YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME. The media
always
notice race. It is the first thing they look for in any crime—hoping against hope to have finally found Tom Wolfe’s “great white defendant.” They’ll even turn a Hispanic perpetrator white, as the
New York Times
did with George Zimmerman. After the police shooting in Ferguson, did anyone need to ask:
Hey, does anyone know the race of the cop or the race of the guy he shot?

Like Banks, the author of the
New York Times
’ (sole) article on the Mexican gang rape also studiously avoided any mention of the attackers’ ethnicity. It began: “Around 4 p.m. on Oct. 24 of last year, Cynthia Avalos saw a short young man with close-cropped brown hair walking near Richmond High School, drunk.”
¹²
The man was lead rapist Ortega. How is the fact that he is short or had “close-cropped hair” relevant? Does that explain the attack? Are gang rapes the province of any one stature or hairstyle?

The reason the Richmond rapists’ Mexican-ness is wildly relevant is that the rape never had to happen. A sixteen-year-old girl at her homecoming dance was gang-raped and left for dead because the Democrats need
more voters. We could save a lot of soul-searching about “our” violent culture if journalists didn’t hide the fact that gang rapes are generally committed by people who are not
from
our culture. Outside of a fictional television drama—and secondhand tales of college rapes that might have occurred forty years ago—you are not going to find a group of white men raping young girls. Gang rape, child rape, elder rape, and murder rape are highly correlated with specific ethnic groups—ethnic groups we are bringing to America by the busload. Sixteen-year-old honors students in Richmond, California, have no familiarity with the cultural norms being imposed on the nation, which no one asked for, which Americans didn’t consent to, and about which they certainly have received no warning.

10

HERE’S A STORY,
ROLLING STONE
!

T
HE MEDIA BALANCE OUT THEIR CENSORSHIP OF NEWS ABOUT IMMIGRANT
rapists with false accusations of rape against American white men. The whiter and more American, the better—white cops, white prosecutors, white lacrosse players, white military contractors, white fraternity members. (Tawana Brawley, Duke lacrosse, Jamie Leigh Jones, and the
Rolling Stone
’s hoax gang rape.) Instead of body cameras on cops, what we really need are body cameras on journalists and neurotic women.

The fake rape cases always produce a blizzard of articles with such titles as: “Does Privilege Breed Contempt?,”
¹
“When Peer Pressure, Not a Conscience, Is Your Guide,”
²
and “Why Soldiers Rape: Culture of Misogyny, Illegal Occupation, Fuel Sexual Violence in Military.”
³
It’s getting to be like a decades-long performance art piece to see if the media can get people to believe that white American men are huge gang rapists.

The
New York Times
alone has ceaselessly run front-page stories, editorials, letters, and book-length articles on the subject of alleged, but unproved, date rapes on college campuses.
⁴
In the nine months between March 29, 2006,
and the end of 2006, the
Times
ran more than fifty stories about a rape at Duke University
that never happened
.
⁵
It’s as if the media were prospecting for ice in the Mojave Desert. Are you sure you don’t want to try the Antarctic? If the
Times
dedicated 1 percent as much coverage to rapes committed by foreigners on U.S. soil, it might actually reduce the number of women who are raped by helping remove the main perpetrators from the country.

In order to get the
Times
’ attention, here are a few immigrant rapes that took place on college campuses:

       
   
In March 2013, two Penn State girls were kidnapped and sexually assaulted by a couple of illegal aliens from Mexico, after the illegals offered the girls a ride to their dormitory. The attacks were interrupted when a campus police officer saw a woman’s leg dangling out of the Mexicans’ pick-up truck.
⁶