Aliens and the Antichrist: Unveiling the End Times Deception (18 page)

If we key in on the first destructive event that this passage speaks of, several facts are revealed that place this scripture into unity with the other scriptures that also document the flood of Lucifer. First, what time in Earth’s history describes a cataclysmic event of the magnitude described by Jeremiah? This passage states that God destroyed every single city that existed on the entire Earth. The only event in Earth’s history aside from the flood of Lucifer that comes close to this is the flood of Noah, but all those aboard the ark survived the flood of Noah, while this particular event left no trace of life whatsoever (no men.not even birds). This event also included earthquakes on a global scale (mountains were trembling and hills were moving—all of which crushed a large animal population deep within the Earth, leaving behind much of the fossil record we have today), as well as a darkness that overshadowed the entire Earth; none of these details were documented in the account of the flood of Noah. One could argue that darkness was caused by clouds, but clouds don’t completely block out the light of the sun to the degree that the context of this scripture stipulates.

This flood that Jeremiah speaks of can’t possibly be the flood of Noah.

A second item of interest in this scripture is the fact that the heavens were in existence, as well as Earth, when this destruction took place. Concerning the heavens, lights from the heavens were withheld from shining on Earth, thereby causing the darkness across the face of the Earth, as spoken of in Genesis 1:2. This darkness wasn’t removed until day four of the restoration of Earth into a habitable state. In essence the wording of Jeremiah 4:23-27 not only resembles the wording of Genesis 1:2, it also harmonizes with it perfectly, so that we have clues pointing us back to Genesis 1:2 to help us fill in a few more details that are quietly hiding between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2.

What are these details that many people today aren’t aware of? The biggest detail here is the fact that before Adam and Eve were created, there were men (some of which were translated into angels—note that they used to be men, but we know that at least some of them became angels, because Lucifer was their king). Furthermore there were also cities on Earth at this time predating Adam and Eve. We probably can’t imagine how advanced this society was; they had possibly billions of years of uninterrupted progress in which to enjoy their lives and experiment, and seek and discover the mysteries of the cosmos. Even one of these beings would be capable of completely revolutionizing the Earth of today. What would people be like if they lived so long they could obtain a doctorate in every field of study that existed? We simply can’t imagine how intelligent these beings really were, and in some cases, still are—concerning those that were angels.

As stated earlier, I knew of the pre-Adamite interpretation of Jeremiah 4:2327 before I wrote
Aliens in the Bible;
I read about it on the Watcher site. The information I was missing in order to accept it, however, was how this scripture harmonizes with Isaiah and Ezekiel when using the law of double reference. Without the law of double reference, it appeared to be taken out of context, but putting the law together with Genesis, Isaiah, and Ezekiel makes the pieces of the puzzle fit together too perfectly to ignore.

Then there’s the New Testament, which also lends support to the flood of Lucifer.

2. The Flood of Lucifer Mentioned in the New Testament

When speaking from the New Testament, who better to start with than Jesus Christ? What did Jesus have to say about the flood of Lucifer?

In Matthew 13:35, Jesus used a curious expression: “from the foundation of the world,” which lost a vital component of its meaning in the King James translation. Further investigation into this phrase actually reveals that it should have been translated “from the overthrow of the social world.”

Matthew 13:35
(bold emphasis added)

That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret
from the foundation of the world.

The Greek word for “world,” being “kosmos,” means social system or social world, order, or arrangement. As for the Greek word for “foundation,” it has two meanings in Greek. The first is the noun, “themelios,” and the verb related to it, “themelioo.” These are ordinary words used for the foundation of a literal building, or of an organization, or of the work of a person. Places where this word was translated as such are found in Matthew 7:25, Luke 6:48-49, 1 Corinthians 3:11, Ephesians 2:20, and Hebrews 6:1.

Matthew 7:25
(bold emphasis added)

And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was
founded
upon a rock.

Luke 6:48-49

He is like a man which built an house, and dug deep, and laid the
foundation
on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was
founded
upon a rock. But he that hears and doeth not, is like a man that without a
foundation
built a house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.

1   Corinthians 3:11

For other
foundation
can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
Ephesians 2:20
(bold emphasis added)

And are built upon the
foundation
of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone.

Hebrews 6:1
(bold emphasis added)

Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the
foundation
of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God.

The second interpretation of this word is the noun “katabole” and its corresponding verb, “katabollo,” which are not the ordinary words for foundation, as they are sometimes translated in the New Testament. While
Strong’s Enhanced Lexicon
offers the less common definition of “katabole”, listed as G2602, it begins with a direct reference to its corresponding verb, G2598 for “katabollo.”
²⁵
Looking up the word “katabollo” in
Strong’s Enhanced Lexicon
reveals that it actually means “to throw down” or “cast down,” and it is translated with this meaning in 2 Corinthians 4:9, and Revelation 12:10.

2   Corinthians 4:9
(bold emphasis added)

Persecuted, but not forsaken;
cast down,
but not destroyed.
Revelation 12:10

And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is
cast down,
which accused them before our God day and night.

The actual meanings of these two words in the original Greek are pivotal to understanding many passages in the New Testament that refer to the flood of Lucifer. In all occurrences except Hebrews 11:11, the word “katabole,” which I already explained is a variation of “katabollo,” is the word used in the Greek language, and it’s directly connected with the Greek word “kosmos,” referring to an ancient social order that was destroyed at a time predating human history. In
all
instances, the phrase “foundation of the world” should have been translated as “overthrow (or disruption, or ruin) of the social world,” but this translation was specifically avoided. Why was it avoided?

The translators correctly understood this phrase to refer to a time that marks the beginning of the world (as re-created in Genesis 1:2 through Genesis 2:25), rather than to the flood of Noah. This understanding was derived from the fact that the expressions before and since the disruption of the world in scripture refer to God loving his Son, of choosing men in Christ, and of Christ being foreordained “before the disruption of the world” (John 17:24; Ephesians 1:4; 1 Peter 1:19-20).

John 17:24
(bold emphasis added)

Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou loved me before the
foundation of the world.

Ephesians 1:4
(bold emphasis added)

According as He hath chosen us in him before the
foundation of the world,
that we should be holy and without blame before him in love.

1 Peter 1:19-20
(bold emphasis added)

But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: Who verily was foreordained before the
foundation of the world,
but was manifest in these last times for you.

Scripture also speaks of things kept secret, of God planning a kingdom, of prophets being slain, of a book of life being prepared, of the world of the six days of re-creation, and of Christ suffering in death only once, since the disruption of the world (Matthew 13:35, 25:34; Luke 11:50; Hebrews 4:3, 9:26; Revelation 13:8, 17:8). All of these scriptures clearly point to an eternal past rather than to the flood of Noah, because God has always loved his Son, he always knew which men he was going to choose in Christ, Christ was always foreordained for the mission he undertook—and the list goes on. It would make no sense to make such statement using the flood of Noah as a line of demarcation, yet the phrase “disruption of the social world,” would easily be mistaken as the flood of Noah by many who read it. Because of this, the translation became “foundation of the world,” which bears with it a much simpler explanation, rather than “overthrow of the social world,” even though the actual translation doesn’t match up exactly with what the Greek words really intended.

So the translation “foundation of the world” has always been clearly distinguished from the flood of Noah (in the English language), as it should be, but the fact that there have been two worldwide destructions (documented in the Bible) in Earth’s history, rather than one, was greatly obscured in this distinguishing process. This was a most unfortunate side effect of the English translation that was chosen.

Fortunately, scripture is highly redundant concerning important events, and this property has saved the original translation for us today. Any truth that can be found in scripture can usually be arrived at by a number of different scriptures that all point to the same thing from multiple angles. Evidence of the flood of Lucifer is infused throughout both the New and Old Testaments, so this translation has not been lost.

Further adding to the preservation of scripture is the fact that the Greek and Hebrew translations are all available for free to anyone who wants to download them from the Internet. My personal recommendation is the Bible software program I previously mentioned, called e-Sword (
http://www.e-sword.net/
bibles.html).
²⁶
E-Sword includes Greek and Hebrew references, lexicons, topical guides, and a number of other resources, all for free. With tools like e-Sword, researchers can simply look up a word, such as “foundation,” and see for themselves the things I’m talking about here. I challenge anyone reading this who doubts me to use this program. Look up Matthew 13:35, 25:34, Luke 11:50; John 17:24; Ephesians 1:4; Hebrews 4:3, 9:26; 1 Peter 1:20; and Revelation 13:8, 17:8. All these scriptures speak of a “disruption of the social world,” rather than the “foundation of the world.”

Christ himself taught, as recorded by the Holy Spirit through Matthew, Luke, and John, that there was a disruption or ruin of the social order on Earth at a point in time that marks the beginning of humanity in this current age. He mentioned such a doctrine four times while on Earth (Matthew 13:35, 25:34; Luke 11:50; John 17:24), and twice to John on Patmos after he had ascended to heaven (Revelation 13:8, 17:8). All of these references were obscured in translation, because the translators were trying to distinguish this event as the beginning of the creation (or more accurately, the re-creation) of Earth, rather than to the flood of Noah. Not all was lost, however; there were enough clues left behind in order for the people of today to put the pieces of this ancient puzzle back together.

Aside from Jesus’s use of the phrase “disruption of the social world,” the apostle Peter also used phrases distinguishing the line of demarcation that was drawn when the world was destroyed in the flood of Lucifer. In 2 Peter 3:6-7, Peter referred to the world that existed before the flood of Lucifer as “the world that then was.” The Greek word for “world” is “kosmos,” which, as previously stated, means social system. The social system “that then was” is specifically differentiated from the social system of today. Why did Peter do this?