Antonelli - 03 - The Judgment (49 page)

I did not want to hear it. Turning away, I bent over a basin and threw water on my face. “I have to find a phone,” I said as I dried my face with a paper towel. “I have to call the hospital.”

“Look, damn it,” he said, struggling to contain himself, “you’re in the middle of a murder trial. You have a witness on the stand.

You can’t go walking in and out of the courtroom like you’ve got more important things to do somewhere else.”

I wheeled around. “I have to call the hospital,” I repeated, glaring at him. “I shouldn’t have left there last night. I should be there now, not here.”

“What about the kid? What’s going to happen to him?”

“I don’t care what happens to him! Don’t you understand? I don’t care! I only care what happens to her. I should be there now.”

“Let the doctors do their job, and you do yours!” he insisted.

“You can’t do anything for her by sitting around the hospital.”

“I have to be there!”

“No, you don’t.”

“Yes, I do. Maybe if you’d been there with your wife,” I screamed, taunting him, “instead of spending all your time trying to be a lawyer … !”

The anger, the frustration, all the nameless fear that had boiled up inside me, blinding me to everything except what I felt, vanished in an instant and I realized what an awful, unspeakable thing I had done. I reached for his arm, but he pulled away.

“I didn’t mean that,” I said, shaking my head at how easily I had fallen into a state of mind in which the worst thing I could ever have said to him had become a weapon I was only too eager to use.

“I’m really sorry,” I said. “I didn’t mean it.”

The color in his face had returned to normal. He sniffed a couple of times and cleared his throat. “You better straighten your tie,” he said. His voice was quiet, subdued. “I shouldn’t have grabbed you like that.”

He bent his head, biting the inside of his lip. When he looked up, he searched my eyes. “There’s nothing worse than living with the thought that you could have saved somebody and you didn’t.

Don’t let that happen to you.”

I turned back to the mirror and adjusted my tie. “I’ll see you in court.”

The door swung shut behind him, and I gripped the sink with both hands and hung my head and tried to convince myself that there was some excuse for what I had done. I turned on the faucet, threw some more water on my face, and then pulled another paper towel from the metal dispenser. Flynn had ignored my apology and felt sorry for me that I had done something that made me feel I had to make one. It was a measure of his strength, and a measure of my weakness.

When I returned to the courtroom, I stood at the corner of the counsel table, waited until Judge Bingham brought court back into session, and before the echo of his voice had finished fading away began to ask my first question.

“Tell us, Dr. Fox: Is the defendant retarded or in any other way mentally deficient?”

“No, Danny—that’s the name he was given, whether by his mother or someone else I don’t know—is not retarded. He has an intelligence in the normal range, but precisely where in that range, I can’t say for sure.”

“Why can’t you say for sure?”

“Because he can’t read, and because he has a very limited vo-cabulary, and because he knows next to nothing about numbers.

I could not run all of the tests I would normally do with a child.”

“But Danny isn’t a child, is he?” I looked across to where Danny was sitting. He was grinning at Dr. Fox, waving at him whenever he caught his eye. “He’s a full-grown adult.”

“Physically, yes; mentally, he’s a child, a very young child. A very innocent child, I might add.”

Cassandra Loescher rose from her chair ready to object, thought better of it, and sat down.

“Would you explain that last remark, Dr. Fox? What do you mean: a very innocent child?”

There was something inherently kind about Clifford Fox, something that flickered unceasingly from beneath the shadows of his melancholy eyes. No matter how often he had been deceived and disappointed by what they became as adults, he could always find something to hope for in children. He smiled at me.

“Did you ever read
Robinson Crusoe
as a boy?”

I thought he was going to describe Danny as isolated and alone, without skill or training. “But Robinson Crusoe was a well-educated man, with a knowledge of all the principles of modern science at his disposal. Danny can’t read.”

“No, Mr. Antonelli. He’s not like Robinson Crusoe; he’s like Friday. He has no education, but he isn’t for that reason stupid, and he knows how to survive in the situation in which he finds himself. Reverse it: not Robinson Crusoe on the island, Friday in London, and you have something close to what I mean.”

He had my attention, and more importantly, that of the jury.

Clifford Fox was a marvel of sense and intuition who had listened to the murmurs of a childlike heart and turned them into a blood-chilling account of human indifference and utter depravity. More even than the story he told, the innocence of the manner in which he told it concentrated your mind. You could almost see the burning cigarettes shoved against Danny’s pale skin; you would have sworn you could hear at least the echoes of his screams, until you learned that the screaming only made them want to do it more. Then you heard the silence, and the silence itself became unendurable.

Asking questions, moving him first in one direction, then another, I kept Fox on the stand until he had told the jury everything he had managed to put together from the long hours he had spent talking quietly with the strange young man who sat next to me accused of murder. When he described the way Danny had been kept a prisoner, shackled to a metal frame bed, soiled in his own feces, or chained to a stake in the backyard and made to sleep outside in the dirt and cold, jurors wiped their eyes or used a handkerchief to blow their nose. If the trial had ended right then, that jury would have returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty before they had reached the door to the jury room. I asked one last question.

“Dr. Fox, based on your examination, is the defendant, in your professional opinion, capable of an act of murder?”

It called for a conclusion, an opinion about the ultimate issue in the case. I expected an objection, but Loescher did not rise to make one. Resting her chin on her folded hands, she watched the witness and tried to pretend that she had heard nothing new and that she was as certain of what she was doing as she had been before. I expected a one-word answer, but I did not get that either.

Shifting his weight to his other hip, Dr. Fox crossed his legs and leaned against the arm of the witness chair. “Not if you mean a planned, premeditated act of violence in which he deliberately set out to kill another human being.”

I tried to save it. “That is the definition of murder. Thank you, Dr. Fox,” I said as I sat down.

Fox had been on the stand answering my questions for three hours; in fifteen minutes Loescher managed to undo much of what I had managed to accomplish. Her first question played off my last.

“In other words, Dr. Fox, there are circumstances in which the defendant would be capable of an act of violence, correct?”

Fox raised his eyebrows the way he did at the end of every question, a signal that he was about to answer. “There are circumstances in which all of us are capable of acts of violence.”

With her arms folded in front of her, Loescher moved closer to the witness stand, a slightly amused expression on her mouth.

“Self-defense, for example? To protect himself from harm—or what he perceived to be a threat of harm?”

The eyebrows went up again. “Yes, of course. As I say—”

“So it would be your opinion, would it not, that if the defendant was somewhere he should not have been—a parking structure, for example—and were surprised there, thought that someone was going to harm him, he could in those circumstances commit an act of violence?”

“It’s possible, but—”

“According to your testimony,” she went on before he could finish, “the defendant was subjected to physical torture, sexual abuse, things worse than any of us have ever had to imagine, isn’t that correct?”

“Yes, there is no question—”

“And isn’t it also true, Dr. Fox, that people who are abused as children frequently engage in acts of abuse themselves? And isn’t it also true, Dr. Fox, that children who are subjected to the kind of violence you’ve described here today become not only capable of violence but turn out to be almost incapable of anything else?”

Fox held his ground. “Not this kind of violence,” he replied, sitting straight up. He shuddered with disgust. “No, that isn’t the way someone reacts to that kind of torture. Besides, you forget—”

“Dr. Fox, let me ask you—”

“Objection, your honor.” I was on my feet, pointing angrily at Loescher. “She didn’t let the witness finish his answer.”

Bingham looked at Loescher. Loescher looked at the witness.

The witness looked at Bingham. “You may finish what you started to say,” said the judge.

“I was going to say two things. First, the reaction to the kind of long-term, systematic torture to which the defendant was subjected is fear, not aggression. Second, his feelings of weakness and vulnerability were intensified by his isolation. You have to remember: This is someone who has never been to school, never been around other children, around other people except the ones who abused him.”

Cardinal Richelieu said that give him any seven sentences a man had ever uttered and he could have him condemned; Loescher could have done it with five. She took Fox’s answer as if it was what she had wanted to hear all along.

“I see,” she said, raising her eyebrows in turn. “He was isolated, ignorant and vulnerable and afraid. Correct?”

“Yes,” he replied without hesitation. “Exactly.”

Peering down at her midnight blue high heel shoes, that same irritating amused expression returned to her mouth. “Exactly,” she repeated, savoring the word as if it had a value only she understood. “And when you say vulnerable, you mean, don’t you, someone easily taken advantage of, someone without the ability to distinguish between those who mean him well and those who mean him ill?”

“Yes, absolutely.”

She looked down again and repeated this word as well. “And because he was never around other children, because he’s never been around other people, he would be more eager to please someone he thought might be a friend, someone he thought he could trust, someone he thought wouldn’t hurt him?”

“Yes, without question.”

“Without question,” she repeated, moving one shoe slightly ahead of the other. “So, if Mr. Antonelli is right—if there is someone behind both the murder of Judge Jeffries and Judge Griswald, someone able to convince others to do the killing for him—someone as vulnerable, as susceptible to suggestion as the defendant would be the perfect candidate, would he not?”

“No, you don’t—”

Whirling away, she jabbed her finger toward the defendant and talked right over the witness. “He could have killed Judge Griswald because he was caught doing something he shouldn’t have done, or he could have killed him because someone told him to, or he could have killed him for a thousand other strange reasons and there is nothing in your training, your experience, or your psy-chological evaluation of the defendant that can tell us otherwise, is there?” she demanded.

Fox waited until he was sure she was done. “I’m not sure Danny could kill anyone, even in self-defense.”

She rounded on him, staring hard as she drew herself up to her full height. “You didn’t say that at the beginning. Would you like to have the court reporter read back your testimony—the part where you said there were circumstances in which everyone is capable of violence?”

” ‘Acts of violence,’ ” I corrected without rising from my chair.

Loescher looked at me, a blank expression on her face, then looked up at the bench.

“An ‘act of violence’ suggests a single, perhaps unique, event;

‘capable of violence’ suggests a disposition. Dr. Fox said ‘acts of violence,’ your honor. Perhaps Ms. Loescher would like the court reporter to read it back to her,” I said, parrying her false smile with one of my own.

She had made her point, and I had made mine; she moved immediately to something else. “You never saw John Smith—the defendant—until some time after he was brought into custody, correct?”

“Yes, that’s correct.”

“When you first saw him, he was clean-shaven, with short hair like he has now, wearing clean clothing, correct?”

“Yes.”

“Are you aware of what he looked like when he was first brought in? Are you aware that he had long greasy hair, a long, filthy beard, with rags for clothing and cardboard stuffed into his shoes because the soles were falling off?”

“That’s my understanding.”

“Is it also your understanding that his body was covered with vermin, that there was lice in his hair, as well as other places; that he was so infested, so filthy, that his clothes had to be cut off and he had to be deloused—fumigated? Isn’t it true, Dr. Fox, that the defendant—who sits here today in a navy blue suit and tie, looking like a young professional—was living like an animal?”

Fox nodded sadly. “That’s my understanding, yes.”

“Like an animal,” she repeated, casting a sidelong glance toward the jury as she returned to her place at the counsel table.

It was one of the most effective cross-examinations I had ever seen, and it changed everything. I had planned to call the defendant as the next witness for the defense. It was all supposed to be very straightforward. The psychologist would provide a sketch of what Danny’s life had been like, and then, with Danny on the stand, the jurors could see for themselves how timid and harmless he really was and how eager to please. But Loescher had used the words of my own witness to show that precisely that vulnerability, that eagerness to please, could have led him to kill in exactly the way I had suggested. She had done to me what I had tried to do to her: taken the strength of my case and turned it into what now seemed a weakness. She was good—far better than I had imagined—and I was in trouble, serious trouble. The only thing I was sure of was that I could not afford to let her subject Danny to that kind of withering cross-examination. If I called him at all, it would be at the very end, the last witness for the defense, and only then if I had no other choice.