Read Claude Levi-Strauss: The Poet in the Laboratory Online

Authors: Patrick Wilcken

Tags: #Biographies & Memoirs, #Professionals & Academics, #Social Scientists & Psychologists, #History, #Americas, #South America, #Brazil, #Politics & Social Sciences, #Anthropology, #Cultural

Claude Levi-Strauss: The Poet in the Laboratory (12 page)

BOOK: Claude Levi-Strauss: The Poet in the Laboratory
8.36Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads
The choice of the village had been somewhat arbitrary—the fisherman who acted as a guide had been keen to visit the
aldeia
because he had heard that the Bororo grew tobacco, a crop that was not cultivated downstream. He was right, and at the end of the expedition they returned with three hundred tobacco plants given to them by the Bororo.
61
On this somehow appropriate contingency rested Lévi-Strauss’s first real experience of ethnographic fieldwork. The material he gathered would stay with him for the rest of his life, reemerging at intervals. Much later, Salesian missionary accounts of Bororo myth would provide the central thread of the
Mythologiques
quartet that crowned his academic career.
During his stay of just three weeks, he documented a spectrum of Bororo ritual and cosmology—weddings, funerary rites and myths—and added to his collection of indigenous artifacts. “We were immersed in the wealth and fantasy of an exceptional culture . . . It was a society that had abolished time, and after all what greater nostalgia could we have than to abolish time and then to live in a sort of present tense which is a constantly revitalized past and preserved as it was dreamt in myth and belief,” Lévi-Strauss remembered in the 1960s, when he was interviewed in his office at the Collège de France.
62
Yet what caught his eye was something altogether more prosaic. As in the frontier zone, he became fascinated with the layout of the village—a circle of family huts around a central longhouse reserved for the men. Quizzing the Bororo through an interpreter, Lévi-Strauss surveyed each hut and plotted their relationships to one another. He drew diagrams in the earthen yard of the various imaginary dividing lines, the sectors they formed and the complex network of rights, duties, hierarchy and reciprocity through which they were defined.
The emergent scheme was involved, yet elegant. An invisible north- south axis divided the village into moieties (that is, two intermarrying descent groups); within the moieties were clans, and within the clans, a tripartite system of castelike grades. Marriage was permitted only between moieties and within grades, with a procession of men, once married, crossing the yard to live on the other side—in their in-laws’ huts. The village circle was then quartered by an east-west axis running parallel to the river, the upstreamers organizing the downstreamers’ funerals, and vice versa. What resulted was “a ballet in which two village moieties strive to live and breathe each through and for the other; exchanging women, possessions and services in fervent reciprocity; intermarrying their children, burying each other’s dead . . .”
63
So integral was this system to the Bororo that Silesian missionaries had learned early on that changing the village layout led to a rapid cultural meltdown.
Just as with the Caduveo face designs, Lévi-Strauss was struck by the geometry of human culture. In this small tribal settlement on a scrubby clearing in a remote corner of Mato Grosso, a set of rules—computerlike in their dispassionate symmetry—had evolved over time. Guided by a “smokescreen of institutions,” the Bororo lived out orderly lives.
64
What looked like a motley rural hamlet was in fact a precision machine. The circular-hut plans spread out across the vast central Brazilian plateau as a common feature of the Ge linguistic group. Lévi-Strauss could only hint at what this might mean in broader anthropological terms, but he would later look back on the Bororo with affection and an exaggerated sense of their influence on the development of his theories. In the early 1990s, he explained to a French documentary crew:
I have the feeling now when I try to reconstitute my intellectual history—it’s very difficult because I have a terrible memory—I have the feeling that I was always what later became known as “structuralist” even when I was a child. But meeting the Bororo who were the great theoreticians of structuralism—that was a godsend for me!
65
 
An old-fashioned ethnographic inventory survives on film, similar to the footage of the Caduveo, with the natives acting out life scenes for the camera: a Bororo pulling back the string on his bow (but not actually firing it); two men laboriously making fire by rotating a stick on a wooden base; a shuffling dance; Bororo men testing their physical strength by balancing 1.5-meter-high discs made of grasses and dried palm stalks on their heads; a canoeing scene. The flickering, speeded-up images carry the strange power of the amateur-shot silent film—a mystery, an emotional charge, a melancholy—reinforced by a fleeting glimpse of Lévi-Strauss himself. The camera tracks the Bororo as they paddle long, slender canoes down the river. For a few stray frames a figure in colonial garb appears leaning back on a branch, smoking a cigarette as he watches the canoes glide by.
 
 
IN NOVEMBER 1936, Lévi-Strauss and Dina sailed for Europe to winter in France. Stowed in the hold were crates of indigenous artifacts, sourced mainly from the Caduveo and the Bororo, with a handful of objects from the Terena (neighbors of the Caduveo) and the Kaingang. In one case was a set of Bororo bull-roarers, slender wooden boards tapered at each end and painted with arcs and dots. The bull-roarers made a low humming sound when spun from a length of twine—the drone of spirits greatly feared by the women. The Bororo had reluctantly traded them on the condition that Lévi-Strauss lock them in a chest and not open it until he had reached Cuiabá.
Along with the bull-roarers, the Lévi-Strausses had amassed a spectacular ethnographic collection of hides, headdresses and musical instruments from a poorly documented part of Brazil. Indiens du Matto Grosso
66
would be the first exhibition organized under the auspices of the Musée de l’Homme, although as the museum was not yet opened to visitors, the collection was put on display at the Wildenstein Gallery, at the corner of the rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré and the rue La Boétie. But perhaps there was something appropriate in the alternative arrangements—a year later the same gallery would host a major exhibition featuring leading surrealist artists.
According to Lévi-Strauss, the exhibition received “a polite appraisal,”
67
but a review in the Brazilian
Jornal do Comércio
was effusive:
Many intellectuals, travelers, artists and curious people visited the art gallery in the evening, admiring around a thousand objects—ceramics, skins, masks, hammocks, flutes, hunting bows and arrows and other examples of indigenous art gathered by the Strausses from their visit to the Bororo and other tribes. Professor Lévi-Strauss gave explanations of these objects fascinating to the visitors, who were astonished and seduced by the originality and the beauty of this exhibition.
68
 
Some of these objects—a shuttlecock, a funerary clarinet, a spectacular armadillo-claw pendant adorned with feathers, mother-of-pearl discs and porcupine quills—can still be seen today, in a glass case in the Musée du quai Branly. What remains striking are the colors of the decorative feathers: shocking reds and yellows that, after decades in storage, are still vivid enough to pierce the museum’s penumbra.
More than the exhibition, Lévi-Strauss’s first significant academic publication, “Contribution à l’étude de l’organisation sociale des Indiens Bororo”—a detailed analysis of the Bororo clan/moiety structure and its relationship to the village layout for the
Journal de la Société des Américanistes
69
—signaled his entry into the small world of 1930s French anthropology. Marcel Mauss, no less, hailed the Lévi-Strausses as “the great hopes for French study of the Americas.”
70
The article, which appeared late in 1936, was greeted with excitement by specialists and would travel widely, being remarked on in Brazil, the United States and France. Even hardened field-workers, like the great German anthropologist Curt Unckel, who had adopted the native name Nimuendajú and spent years on solo expeditions into central Brazil, were intrigued. Nimuendajú wrote him an encouraging letter saying that he hoped Lévi-Strauss would have the opportunity to carry out a proper long-term study in the future. He also wrote to Robert Lowie in the United States about Lévi-Strauss and his work, opening up a link to American academia that would soon prove vital.
Lévi-Strauss later said that the enthusiasm around his early work was not so much due to its “slim merit”
71
as its good timing—South America was the new frontier of western-hemisphere anthropology, and U.S. scholars were looking with interest at the work that was beginning to come out of Brazil. In truth he was disappointed by the brevity of his contact with the Caduveo and the Bororo, and modest about the significance of his findings. Replying to Nimuendajú, he explained: “My stay among the Bororo was unfortunately very short; I could only get an idea of certain problems, but I need to return and stay for a long period this time, to try and solve them. I hope you will excuse the poverty of my responses”—a self-deprecating tone that, although absent from
Tristes Tropiques
, he would later cultivate when questioned about the quality of his fieldwork.
72
On more sensitive issues, where the building up of trust was crucial, his fleeting visits were not enough. Bartering for artifacts sometimes degenerated into farce. When Lévi-Strauss began negotiating for a hairpiece—the only object passed from mother to daughter among the Bororo—the women flew into a rage.
73
He tried, and failed, to collect a full set of physical anthropological data from the Caduveo and the Bororo (a part of his research that was written out of subsequent accounts), as he explained in an interview with a journalist from the Brazilian newspaper
O Jornal
on his return from the field:
We collected only a few anthropometric measurements, and only from male Indians, because the women were shy and reserved. It was impossible to obtain measurements of skeletons and bones from both the Caduveo and the Bororo of Rio Vermelho . . . Blood type was also not obtained, because the Indians refused to cooperate, and they also made it difficult to obtain photographic negatives as they feared death and curses.
74
 
These early, impressionistic spells of fieldwork set the tone of Lévi-Strauss’s whole method as it later developed. He combined rapid assimilation of situations and ethnographic materials with boldly intuitive model-building. Time and again these hit-and-run tactics would pay off, bringing out fresh perspectives. Anthropologists could get bogged down in detail, trapped inside their own stale arguments; after years of patient cultural excavation, there was a tendency to lose sight of the overall design. In contrast, Lévi-Strauss captured a culture through fragments, filling the gaps in his mind, conjuring models as if from thin air.
 
IN MARCH 1937, Lévi-Strauss returned with his wife to São Paulo for his third and final academic year, determined to make the most of what he knew would be his last spell in Brazil. While making plans for a major, long-term ethnographic expedition, he went on a number of smaller trips, on one occasion even fitting in some impromptu fieldwork. In July, he went on the road with Jean Maugüé and René Courtin, a law graduate from the University of Montpellier who had just joined the French mission. Traveling in Courtin’s new Ford, their goal was to go “as far as his car would take us” in a roughly northerly direction out of São Paulo.
75
They dressed for the part: Maugüé in boots, a cotton cloth shirt, a wide-brimmed straw hat, armed with a knife and a revolver; Courtin in flannel trousers and a woolen jacket, with a shotgun and cartridges “as if he were about to set off on a hunting trip in the Cévennes”; while Lévi-Strauss was in his familiar colonial explorer’s uniform with his camera about his neck and a “Sherlock Holmes-style” sun helmet.
76
They drove up through the coffee plantations of Campinas, on to Uberlândia and across the rapids of the Paranaíba River. From there Courtin’s Ford broke free, motoring across semiarid plains studded with giant anthills. Stranded in empty fields, they passed by the building blocks of Goiânia, the future state capital. A hundred or so half-built houses stood alongside a hotel—a massive cement box dumped on the red flats. It was a brutalist architectural statement that took Lévi-Strauss aback: “Only the fear of disaster could justify the existence of the block-house,” he later wrote, a disaster that “had, in fact, occurred, and the silence and immobility all around was its ominous aftermath.”
77
They pushed on to the diamond-trading center of Goiás Velho, a baroque town of cobbled streets and pastel-fronted Italianate eighteenth-century houses set in rolling palm-topped hills. Farther north still, the road petered out at the Araguaia River, a major waterway that disgorged into the mouth of the Amazon a farther thirteen kilometers downstream.
BOOK: Claude Levi-Strauss: The Poet in the Laboratory
8.36Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

Steal: A Bad Boy Romance by Whiskey, D.G.
Lord of the Hollow Dark by Kirk, Russell
Love's Magic by Traci E. Hall
Being Hartley by Allison Rushby
And Then Came You by Maureen Child
Brotherhood and Others by Mark Sullivan
I Am The Local Atheist by Warwick Stubbs
Do Not Disturb by Stephanie Julian