Complete Works of Wilkie Collins (2316 page)

Dickens had to return to London after the middle of March for business connected with a charitable Home established at Shepherd’s-bush by Miss Coutts, in the benevolent hope of rescuing fallen women by testing their fitness for emigration, of which future mention will be made, and which largely and regularly occupied his time for several years. On this occasion his stay was prolonged by the illness of his father. His health had been failing latterly, and graver symptoms were now spoken of. “I saw my poor father twice yesterday,” he wrote to me on the 27th, “the second time between ten and eleven at night. In the morning I thought him not so well. At night, as well as any one in such a situation could be.” Next day he was so much better that his son went back to Malvern, and even gave us grounds for hope that we might yet have his presence in Hertfordshire to advise on some questions connected with the comedy which Sir Edward Lytton had written for the Guild. But the end came suddenly. I returned from Knebworth to London, supposing that some accident had detained him at Malvern; and at my house this letter waited me. “Devonshire-terrace, Monday, thirty-first of March 1851. . . . My poor father died this morning at five and twenty minutes to six. They had sent for me to Malvern, but I passed John on the railway; for I came up with the intention of hurrying down to Bulwer Lytton’s to-day before you should have left. I arrived at eleven last night, and was in Keppel-street at a quarter past eleven. But he did not know me, nor any one. He began to sink at about noon yesterday, and never rallied afterwards. I remained there until he died — O so quietly. . . . I hardly know what to do. I am going up to Highgate to get the ground. Perhaps you may like to go, and I should like it if you do. I will not leave here before two o’clock. I think I must go down to Malvern again, at night, to know what is to be done about the children’s mourning; and as you are returning to Bulwer’s I should like to have gone that way, if
Bradshaw
gave me any hope of doing it. I wish most particularly to see you, I needn’t say. I must not let myself be distracted by anything — and God knows I have left a sad sight! — from the scheme on which so much depends. Most part of the alterations proposed I think good.” Mr. John Dickens was laid in Highgate Cemetery on the 5th of April; and the stone placed over him by the son who has made his name a famous one in England, bore tribute to his “zealous, useful, cheerful spirit.” What more is to be said of him will be most becomingly said in speaking of
David Copperfield
. While the book was in course of being written, all that had been best in him came more and more vividly back to its author’s memory; as time wore on, nothing else was remembered; and five years before his own death, after using in one of his letters to me a phrase rather out of the common with him, this was added: “I find this looks like my poor father, whom I regard as a better man the longer I live.”

He was at this time under promise to take the chair at the General Theatrical Fund on the 14th of April. Great efforts were made to relieve him from the promise; but such special importance was attached to his being present, and the Fund so sorely then required help, that, no change of day being found possible for the actors who desired to attend, he yielded to the pressure put upon him; of which the result was to throw upon me a sad responsibility. The reader will understand why, even at this distance of time; my allusion to it is brief.

The train from Malvern brought him up only five minutes short of the hour appointed for the dinner, and we first met that day at the London Tavern. I never heard him to greater advantage than in the speech that followed. His liking for this Fund was the fact of its not confining its benefits to any special or exclusive body of actors, but opening them generously to all; and he gave a description of the kind of actor, going down to the infinitesimally small, not omitted from such kind help, which had a half-pathetic humour in it that makes it charming still. “In our Fund,” he said, “the word exclusiveness is not known. We include every actor, whether he be Hamlet or Benedict: the ghost, the bandit, or the court physician; or, in his one person, the whole king’s army. He may do the light business, or the heavy, or the comic, or the eccentric. He may be the captain who courts the young lady, whose uncle still unaccountably persists in dressing himself in a costume one hundred years older than his time. Or he may be the young lady’s brother in the white gloves and inexpressibles, whose duty in the family appears to be to listen to the female members of it whenever they sing, and to shake hands with everybody between all the verses. Or he may be the baron who gives the fête, and who sits uneasily on the sofa under a canopy with the baroness while the fête is going on. Or he may be the peasant at the fête who comes on the stage to swell the drinking chorus, and who, it may be observed, always turns his glass upside down before he begins to drink out of it. Or he may be the clown who takes away the doorstep of the house where the evening party is going on. Or he may be the gentleman who issues out of the house on the false alarm, and is precipitated into the area. Or, if an actress, she may be the fairy who resides for ever in a revolving star with an occasional visit to a bower or a palace. Or again, if an actor, he may be the armed head of the witch’s cauldron; or even that extraordinary witch, concerning whom I have observed in country places, that he is much less like the notion formed from the description of Hopkins than the Malcolm or Donalbain of the previous scenes. This society, in short, says, ‘Be you what you may, be you actor or actress, be your path in your profession never so high or never so low, never so haughty or never so humble, we offer you the means of doing good to yourselves, and of doing good to your brethren.’“

Half an hour before he rose to speak I had been called out of the room. It was the servant from Devonshire-terrace to tell me his child Dora was suddenly dead. She had not been strong from her birth; but there was just at this time no cause for special fear, when unexpected convulsions came, and the frail little life passed away. My decision had to be formed at once; and I satisfied myself that it would be best to permit his part of the proceedings to close before the truth was told to him. But as he went on, after the sentences I have quoted, to speak of actors having to come from scenes of sickness, of suffering, aye, even of death itself, to play their parts before us, my part was very difficult. “Yet how often is it with all of us,” he proceeded to say, and I remember to this hour with what anguish I listened to words that had for myself alone, in all the crowded room, their full significance: “how often is it with all of us, that in our several spheres we have to do violence to our feelings, and to hide our hearts in carrying on this fight of life, if we would bravely discharge in it our duties and responsibilities.” In the disclosure that followed when he left the chair, Mr. Lemon, who was present, assisted me; and I left this good friend with him next day, when I went myself to Malvern and brought back Mrs. Dickens and her sister. The little child lies in a grave at Highgate near that of Mr. and Mrs. John Dickens; and on the stone which covers her is now written also her father’s name, and those of two of her brothers.

One more public discussion he took part in, before quitting London for the rest of the summer; and what he said (it was a meeting, with Lord Carlisle in the chair, in aid of Sanitary reform) very pregnantly illustrates what was remarked by me on a former page. He declared his belief that neither education nor religion could do anything really useful in social improvement until the way had been paved for their ministrations by cleanliness and decency. He spoke warmly of the services of Lord Ashley in connection with ragged schools, but he put the case of a miserable child tempted into one of those schools out of the noisome places in which his life was passed, and he asked what a few hours’ teaching could effect against the ever-renewed lesson of a whole existence. “But give him, and his, a glimpse of heaven through a little of its light and air; give them water; help them to be clean; lighten the heavy atmosphere in which their spirits flag, and which makes them the callous things they are; take the body of the dead relative from the room where the living live with it, and where such loathsome familiarity deprives death itself of awe; and then, but not before, they will be brought willingly to hear of Him whose thoughts were so much with the wretched, and who had compassion for all human sorrow.” He closed by proposing Lord Ashley’s health as having preferred the higher ambition of labouring for the poor to that of pursuing the career open to him in the service of the State; and as having also had “the courage on all occasions to face the cant which is the worst and commonest of all, the cant about the cant of philanthropy.” Lord Shaftesbury first dined with him in the following year at Tavistock-house.

Shortly after the Sanitary meeting came the first Guild performances; and then Dickens left Devonshire-terrace, never to return to it. What occupied him in the interval before he took possession of his new abode, has before been told; but two letters were overlooked in describing his progress in the labour of the previous year, and brief extracts from them will naturally lead me to the subject of my next chapter. “I have been” (15th of September) “tremendously at work these two days; eight hours at a stretch yesterday, and six hours and a half to-day, with the Ham and Steerforth chapter, which has completely knocked me over — utterly defeated me!” “I am” (21st of October) “within three pages of the shore; and am strangely divided, as usual in such cases, between sorrow and joy. Oh, my dear Forster, if I were to say half of what
Copperfield
makes me feel to-night, how strangely, even to you, I should be turned inside out! I seem to be sending some part of myself into the Shadowy World.”

end of the second volume.

THE LIFE

OF

VOUME III

CHAPTER I.

DAVID COPPERFIELD AND BLEAK HOUSE.

1850-1853.

Interest of
Copperfield
— Scott, Smollett, and Fielding — Too close to the Real — Earlier and Later Methods — Dickens at Hatton-garden (1837) — Originals of Boythorn and Skimpole — Last Glimpse of Leigh Hunt (1859) — Changes made in Skimpole — Self-defence — Scott and his Father — Dickens and his Father — Sayings of John Dickens — Skimpole and Micawber — Dickens and David — Self-portraiture not attempted — The Autobiographic Form — Consistent Drawing — Design of David’s Character — Tone of the Novel — The Peggottys — Miss Dartle — Mrs. Steerforth — Betsey Trotwood — A Country Undertaker — The Two Heroines — Contrast of Esther and David — Plot of the Story — Incidents and Persons interwoven — Defects of
Bleak House
— Success in Character — Value of Critical Judgments — Pathetic Touches — Dean Ramsay on
Bleak House
and Jo — Originals of Chancery Abuses.

Dickens never stood so high in reputation as at the completion of
Copperfield
. The popularity it obtained at the outset increased to a degree not approached by any previous book excepting
Pickwick
. “You gratify me more than I can tell you,” he wrote to Bulwer Lytton (July 1850), “by what you say about
Copperfield
, because I hope myself that some heretofore deficient qualities are there.” If the power was not greater than in
Chuzzlewit
, the subject had more attractiveness; there was more variety of incident, with a freer play of character; and there was withal a suspicion, which though general and vague had sharpened interest not a little, that underneath the fiction lay something of the author’s life. How much, was not known by the world until he had passed away.