Complete Works of Wilkie Collins (2351 page)

OUR MUTUAL FRIEND.

The publication of
Our Mutual Friend
, in the form of the earliest stories, extended from May 1864 to November 1865. Four years earlier he had chosen this title as a good one, and he held to it through much objection. Between that time and his actual commencement there is mention, in his letters, of the three leading notions on which he founded the story. In his water-side wanderings during his last book, the many handbills he saw posted up, with dreary description of persons drowned in the river, suggested the ‘long shore men and their ghastly calling whom he sketched in Hexam and Riderhood, “I think,” he had written, “a man, young and perhaps eccentric, feigning to be dead, and
being
dead to all intents and purposes external to himself, and for years retaining the singular view of life and character so imparted, would be a good leading incident for a story;” and this he partly did in Rokesmith. For other actors in the tale, he had thought of “a poor impostor of a man marrying a woman for her money; she marrying
him
for
his
money; after marriage both finding out their mistake, and entering into a league and covenant against folks in general:” with whom he had proposed to connect some Perfectly New people. “Everything new about them. If they presented a father and mother, it seemed as if they must be bran new, like the furniture and the carriages — shining with varnish, and just home from the manufacturers.” These groups took shape in the Lammles and the Veneerings. “I must use somehow,” is the remark of another letter, “the uneducated father in fustian and the educated boy in spectacles whom Leech and I saw at Chatham;” of which a hint is in Charley Hexam and his father. The benevolent old Jew whom he makes the unconscious agent of a rascal, was meant to wipe out a reproach against his Jew in
Oliver Twist
as bringing dislike upon the religion of the race he belonged to.

Having got his title in ‘61 it was his hope to have begun in ‘62. “Alas!” he wrote in the April of that year, “I have hit upon nothing for a story. Again and again I have tried. But this odious little house” (he had at this time for a few weeks exchanged Gadshill for a friend’s house near Kensington) “seems to have stifled and darkened my invention.” It was not until the autumn of the following year he saw his way to a beginning. “The Christmas number has come round again” (30th of August 1863) — ”it seems only yesterday that I did the last — but I am full of notions besides for the new twenty numbers. When I can clear the Christmas stone out of the road, I think I can dash into it on the grander journey.” He persevered through much difficulty; which he described six weeks later, with characteristic glance at his own ways when writing, in a letter from the office of his journal. “I came here last night, to evade my usual day in the week — in fact to shirk it — and get back to Gad’s for five or six consecutive days. My reason is, that I am exceedingly anxious to begin my book. I am bent upon getting to work at it. I want to prepare it for the spring; but I am determined not to begin to publish with less than five numbers done. I see my opening perfectly, with the one main line on which the story is to turn; and if I don’t strike while the iron (meaning myself) is hot, I shall drift off again, and have to go through all this uneasiness once more.”

He had written, after four months, very nearly three numbers, when upon a necessary rearrangement of his chapters he had to hit upon a new subject for one of them. “While I was considering” (25th of February) “what it should be, Marcus,
who has done an excellent cover, came to tell me of an extraordinary trade he had found out, through one of his painting requirements. I immediately went with him to Saint Giles’s to look at the place, and found — what you will see.” It was the establishment of Mr. Venus, preserver of animals and birds, and articulator of human bones; and it took the place of the last chapter of No. 2, which was then transferred to the end of No. 3. But a start with three full numbers done, though more than enough to satisfy the hardest self-conditions formerly, did not satisfy him now. With his previous thought given to the story, with his Memoranda to help him, with the people he had in hand to work it with, and ready as he still was to turn his untiring observation to instant use on its behalf, he now moved, with the old large canvas before him, somewhat slowly and painfully. “If I were to lose” (29th of March) “a page of the five numbers I have proposed to myself to be ready by the publication day, I should feel that I had fallen short. I have grown hard to satisfy, and write very slowly. And I have so much — not fiction — that
will
be thought of, when I don’t want to think of it, that I am forced to take more care than I once took.”

The first number was launched at last, on the first of May; and after two days he wrote: “Nothing can be better than
Our Friend
, now in his thirtieth thousand, and orders flowing in fast.” But between the first and second number there was a drop of five thousand, strange to say, for the larger number was again reached, and much exceeded, before the book closed. “This leaves me” (10th of June) “going round and round like a carrier-pigeon before swooping on number seven.” Thus far he had held his ground; but illness came, with some other anxieties, and on the 29th of July he wrote sadly enough. “Although I have not been wanting in industry, I have been wanting in invention, and have fallen back with the book. Looming large before me is the Christmas work, and I can hardly hope to do it without losing a number of
Our Friend
. I have very nearly lost one already, and two would take one half of my whole advance. This week I have been very unwell; am still out of sorts; and, as I know from two days’ slow experience, have a very mountain to climb before I shall see the open country of my work.” The three following months brought hardly more favourable report. “I have not done my number. This death of poor Leech (I suppose) has put me out woefully. Yesterday and the day before I could do nothing; seemed for the time to have quite lost the power; and am only by slow degrees getting back into the track to-day.” He rallied after this, and satisfied himself for a while; but in February 1865 that formidable illness in his foot broke out which, at certain times for the rest of his life, deprived him more or less of his inestimable solace of bodily exercise. In April and May he suffered severely; and after trying the sea went abroad for more complete change. “Work and worry, without exercise, would soon make an end of me. If I were not going away now, I should break down. No one knows as I know to-day how near to it I have been.”

That was the day of his leaving for France, and the day of his return brought these few hurried words. “Saturday, tenth of June, 1865. I was in the terrific Staplehurst accident yesterday, and worked for hours among the dying and dead. I was in the carriage that did not go over, but went off the line, and hung over the bridge in an inexplicable manner. No words can describe the scene.
I am away to Gads.” Though with characteristic energy he resisted the effects upon himself of that terrible ninth of June, they were for some time evident; and, up to the day of his death on its fatal fifth anniversary, were perhaps never wholly absent. But very few complaints fell from him. “I am curiously weak — weak as if I were recovering from a long illness.” “I begin to feel it more in my head. I sleep well and eat well; but I write half a dozen notes, and turn faint and sick.” “I am getting right, though still low in pulse and very nervous. Driving into Rochester yesterday I felt more shaken than I have since the accident.” “I cannot bear railway travelling yet. A perfect conviction, against the senses, that the carriage is down on one side (and generally that is the left, and
not
the side on which the carriage in the accident really went over), comes upon me with anything like speed, and is inexpressibly distressing.” These are passages from his letters up to the close of June. Upon his book the immediate result was that another lost number was added to the losses of the preceding months, and “alas!” he wrote at the opening of July, “for the two numbers you write of! There is only one in existence. I have but just begun the other.” “Fancy!” he added next day, “fancy my having under-written number sixteen by two and a half pages — a thing I have not done since
Pickwick!
” He did it once with
Dombey
, and was to do it yet again.

The book thus begun and continued under adverse influences, though with fancy in it, descriptive power, and characters well designed, will never rank with his higher efforts. It has some pictures of a rare veracity of soul amid the lowest forms of social degradation, placed beside others of sheer falsehood and pretence amid unimpeachable social correctness, which lifted the writer to his old place; but the judgment of it on the whole must be, that it wants freshness and natural development. This indeed will be most freely admitted by those who feel most strongly that all the old cunning of the master hand is yet in the wayward loving Bella Wilfer, in the vulgar canting Podsnap, and in the dolls’ dressmaker Jenny Wren, whose keen little quaint weird ways, and precocious wit sharpened by trouble, are fitted into a character as original and delightfully conceived as it is vividly carried through to the last. A dull coarse web her small life seems made of; but even from its taskwork, which is undertaken for childhood itself, there are glittering threads cast across its woof and warp of care. The unconscious philosophy of her tricks and manners has in it more of the subtler vein of the satire aimed at in the book, than even the voices of society which the tale begins and ends with. In her very kindliness there is the touch of malice that shows a childish playfulness familiar with unnatural privations; this gives a depth as well as tenderness to her humours which entitles them to rank with the writer’s happiest things; and though the odd little creature’s talk is incessant when she is on the scene, it has the individuality that so seldom tires. It is veritably her own small “trick” and “manner,” and is never mistakeable for any one else’s. “I have been reading,” Dickens wrote to me from France while he was writing the book, “a capital little story by Edmond About —
The Notary’s Nose
. I have been trying other books; but so infernally conversational, that I forget who the people are before they have done talking, and don’t in the least remember what they talked about before when they begin talking again!” The extreme contrast to his own art could not be defined more exactly; and other examples from this tale will be found in the differing members of the Wilfer family, in the riverside people at the Fellowship Porters, in such marvellous serio-comic scenes as that of Rogue Riderhood’s restoration from drowning, and in those short and simple annals of Betty Higden’s life and death which might have given saving virtue to a book more likely than this to perish prematurely. It has not the creative power which crowded his earlier page, and transformed into popular realities the shadows of his fancy; but the observation and humour he excelled in are not wanting to it, nor had there been, in his first completed work, more eloquent or generous pleading for the poor and neglected, than this last completed work contains. Betty Higden finishes what Oliver Twist began.

DR. MARIGOLD AND TALES FOR AMERICA.

He had scarcely closed that book in September, wearied somewhat with a labour of invention which had not been so free or self-sustaining as in the old facile and fertile days, when his customary contribution to Christmas became due from him; and his fancy, let loose in a narrower field, resumed its old luxury of enjoyment. Here are notices of it from his letters. “If people at large understand a Cheap Jack, my part of the Christmas number will do well. It is wonderfully like the real thing, of course a little refined and humoured.” “I do hope that in the beginning and end of this Christmas number you will find something that will strike you as being fresh, forcible, and full of spirits.” He described its mode of composition afterwards. “Tired with
Our Mutual
, I sat down to cast about for an idea, with a depressing notion that I was, for the moment, overworked. Suddenly, the little character that you will see, and all belonging to it, came flashing up in the most cheerful manner, and I had only to look on and leisurely describe it.” This was
Dr. Marigold’s Prescriptions
, one of the most popular of all the pieces selected for his readings, and a splendid example of his humour, pathos, and character. There were three more Christmas pieces before he made his last visit to America:
Barbox Brothers
,
The Boy at Mugby Station
, and
No Thoroughfare:
the last a joint piece of work with Mr. Wilkie Collins, who during Dickens’s absence in the States transformed it into a play for Mr. Fechter, with a view to which it had been planned originally. There were also two papers written for first publication in America,
George Silverman’s Explanation
, and
Holiday Romance
, containing about the quantity of half a shilling number of his ordinary serials, and paid for at a rate unexampled in literature. They occupied him not many days in the writing, and he received a thousand pounds for them.

The year after his return, as the reader knows, saw the commencement of the work which death interrupted. The fragment will hereafter be described; and here meanwhile may close my criticism — itself a fragment left for worthier completion by a stronger hand than mine.

But at least I may hope that the ground has been cleared by it from those distinctions and comparisons never safely to be applied to an original writer, and which always more or less intercept his fair appreciation. It was long the fashion to set up wide divergences between novels of incident and manners, and novels of character; the narrower range being left to Fielding and Smollett, and the larger to Richardson; yet there are not many now who will accept such classification. Nor is there more truth in other like distinctions alleged between novelists who are assumed to be real, or ideal, in their methods of treatment. To any original novelist of the higher grade there is no meaning in these contrasted phrases. Neither mode can exist at all perfectly without the other. No matter how sensitive the mind to external impressions, or how keen the observation to whatever can be seen, without the rarer seeing of imagination nothing will be arrived at that is real in any genuine artist-sense. Reverse the proposition, and the result is expressed in an excellent remark of Lord Lytton’s, that the happiest effort of imagination, however lofty it may be, is that which enables it to be cheerfully at home with the real. I have said that Dickens felt criticism, of whatever kind, with too sharp a relish for the indifference he assumed to it; but the secret was that he believed himself to be entitled to higher tribute than he was always in the habit of receiving. It was the feeling which suggested a memorable saying of Wordsworth. “I am not at all desirous that any one should write a critique on my poems. If they be from above, they will do their own work in course of time; if not, they will perish as they ought.”