Read Dead by Sunset: Perfect Husband, Perfect Killer? Online
Authors: Ann Rule
Tags: #General, #Murder, #Social Science, #True Crime, #Criminology
him.
"I wasn't going to talk about certain things," Brad said, "but it
looks like I'll have to."
He smiled.
"It appeared she was seeing
other men.
Want to hear about it?"
Brad had slipped into a familiar refrain, but Upham didn't encourage
it.
Instead, he asked if there was another reason for his divorce from
Sara, and Brad said that his marriage began to disintegrate when the
"tax thing" started to fall apart.
"In 1990?"
Upham asked.
"Before," Brad replied.
"We had tax problems.
There were certain
accusations.
Certain disclosures."
Upham asked Brad if he recalled a stipulated money judgment and
dissolution-of-marriage document he had signed on September 21,1991
þironically on the fifth anniversary of Cheryl's murder.
In that
document, Brad had admitted to most of Sara's accusations and agreed to
pay her a fifty-thousand-dollar judgment against him.
"The boys got
the farm," Brad said vaguely.
"I don't remember the
fifty-thousand-dollar judgment.
I can't remember certain events taking
place .
. . can't remember denying Sara visits and phone calls with
the children....
I just wanted out.
I wanted nothing to do with her."
Upham remarked
that Brad's divorce from Sara was "eerily reminiscent" of the last days
of his marriage to Cheryl.
Brad didn't get it.
He said that he
suspected Sara of drugging his chiidren to control them.
"I still
do.
They're like Stepford children.... My boys have one motherþ Cheryl "
Upham had cross-examined Brad for three hours.
He was unruffled but
Brad looked exhausted, stress tightening his face into a deeply lined
mask.
When the letters that he had been sending to his sons while they were
living with Sara were admitted into evidence, Brad panicked.
He didn't
want the envelopes in evidence.
Anyone who had seen those envelopes
understood why.
Judge Alexander allowed Brad to hold back the
envelopes with their vicious and suggestive cartoons.
And when court
recessed, he grabbed for the stack of letters and hurriedly ripped the
envelope off each one.
On re-direct, Brad took the stand to try to patch up the huge rents
Upham had torn in his case.
His own explanations were really all he
had, the witnesses from his long list never materialized.
Now, to
refute the prosecution's witnesses, he launched another tirade against
the women in his life.
He hinted that Sara was a lesbian who was using
her money to keep his sons from him.
"It's been the boys and me, and
now Sara has the children.... We're going to sue Sara and get our farm
back together....
the boys and I will be back together."
Judge Alexander warned Brad that he was sliding toward closing argument
rather than giving testimony.
Ignoring the warning, Brad again listed the faults of Loni Ann,
Cynthia, Lauren, and of course Cheryl.
He covered old territory,
oblivious to the damage he was inflicting on his case as, once again,
the details about his whereabouts and activities on the night of the
murder changed slightly.
Brad apparently feared that the jury had
noticed his security leg brace, because he explained to them that he
had a bad leg and wore a brace.
"I had cancer of the bone when I was
little, but it got better so I could play football in high school and
college...."
He was rambling and Alexander was running out of patience.
He warned
Brad to finish up.
"I've done a lot of depositions," Brad said.
"I've always tried to be honest."
Judge Alexander warned him again.
When Brad veered back into his financial affairs and once again began
to quote dollar figures, Alexander told him that there was no need to
re-cover old ground.
He looked at Upham and said, "Any request for
recross will be viewed with great disfavor."
"No questions," Upham said wisely.
Brad wanted to call Judge Alexander as a witness, and Alexander
explained that the judge of a trial cannot be called to the stand.
"I'm not sure that's your call," Brad said rudely.
"Well, in my courtroom, it is.
You've rested your case," Alexander
said flatly.
"I move for a judgment of acquittal," Brad said.
"Denied."
Only Alexander had managed to keep the trial from becoming a "Keystone
Kourt," and he tried again to save Brad from his own ferocious ego.
He offered him one more chance to change his plea from "not guilty" to
"manslaughter in the first degree."
"This would be your last chance," Alexander said.
"Murder is life in
the penitentiary with various minimums."
Brad huddled with Kevin Hunt, who obviously was urging him to take the
judge's advice.
But Brad would have none of it.
He was going for a
straight "not guilty" verdict.
It was 3:27
P.M three days before Christmas Eve, and at last the time had come for
final arguments.
Although few knew it, Scott Upham was suffering from a violent case of
forty-eight-hour flu that day.
But his voice never betrayed his queasy
stomach and pounding headache, and when a wave of dizziness hit him, he
managed to make holding on to the lectern look like a strong posture
rather than a need for support.
He had not come this far to back off
now.
Upham told the jury that their job was to decide what was worthy of
belief and what was not, what was relevant and what was not.
They must
consider "direct evidence" such as eyewitness testimony and
"circumstantial evidence"þa chain of circumstances pointing to an
obvious conclusion.
"Murder is the intentional taking of the life of a
human being," he said.
"I'm here to tell you the defendant is guilty
of murder."
It would take twelve jurors to convict, and only ten to acquit.
With flawless memory, Upham went over the story of the lives of Brad
and Cheryl.
He had done so back in October when the trial began, and
now the story was familiar and the jury had a chance to judge for
themselves who was telling the truth.
"Cheryl was scared," Upham said.
"She changed her will, the
beneficiary of her life insurance."
Gesturing toward Brad, he said,
"This is the public Mr. Cunningham.
Cheryl knew the private Mr.
Cunningham.
. .
the temper, selfish, no empathy, competitive.
He's willing to act on
his propensity to destroy .
. . feels very comfortable, very at ease,
in hurting other people.
The kids are my possessions."
Cheryl wanted
peace.
What an enemy he was!
Relentless.
He has staying power, and he'll do
anything to get his way."
What a horror Cheryl had lived through.
This jury had neverþand would
neverþhear about what Brad had done to his first three wives, not in a
criminal case, but they had come to know Cheryl, and their eyes moved
from Upham to Brad as Upham spoke.
"The note [Cheryl left] and her
conversation with Betty were sufficient to convict," he said, "but
there's more."
He listed the strongest points of an already strong
case: Brad's threatening and obsessive behavior before Cheryl's murder,
his inconsistent alibis for the time of her death, his flight to evade
questioning.
"He told Sara on Monday evening," Upham said, ""I'd
better not answerþI'm digging too many holes, and I've got too many
holes to fill now."
" Upham recalled all the people Brad had accused of lying: Karen
Aaborg, Jim Ayers, Dr. Sardo, Jess, Jim Karr, Sara.
"Finally, he says
Cheryl lied to her mother and her brother in her last note.... The
innocent do not behave like that.
The innocent don't have to lie to
that degree.
He viciously murdered Cheryl Keeton, and he's lied.... He
lured Cheryl Keeton from the safety of her home.
Because of her love
for those children, she went.
Cheryl has told us what the truth is in
her conversation with her mother and in her note.
Bradly Morris
Cunningham murdered me."
" Brad and Upham had been allotted a total of two hours each for final
arguments.
Upham could speak once more, Brad could speak only once,
and he was clearly nervous.
But he had now formulated a timetable for
the night of the murder that warred with that established by the Oregon
State Police, and Mike Shinn, and Upham and his staff.
By adding a few
minutes here and shaving a few there, he set out to prove the
prosecution wrong.
As he spoke, Brad warmed to his subject and became animated.
He
insisted that, had he been the killer, there would have been a window
of only nine minutes and forty-eight seconds in which he could have
driven from the death site back to the Madison Tower, disposed of his
bloody clothing, driven through the gate, parked, gone up the elevator,
and unlocked the door "with a four-year-old boy in tow."
He asked,
"How could you get back to the Mobile station that fast?
I don't run
fourminute miles.
It would take at least seven minutes to run
back...."
No, he insisted, his Sunday evening had not been spent the way Upham
said.
He could account for every minute of the time between 7:30 and
10:00.
"I made popcorn.
Michael and I had to leave the room because