Read Farm Boys: Lives of Gay Men from the Rural Midwest Online
Authors: Unknown
As a 1975 graduate of Evansville (Wisconsin) High School, I was honored to receive the Helen Smith Literary Award, named for a local writer. Dr. Smith’s early encouragement has been important to me.
I dedicate this work to my abundantly loving mate, Bronze Quinton, and to my splendid parents, David and Catharine Fellows.
Interview subjects were recruited by publicizing the Gay Farm Boys Project through press releases sent during the summer of 1992 to twenty-six gay and lesbian community publications in the midwestern United States. These included: Chicago, Illinois—
Gay Chicago, Outlines
;
Windy City Times;
Rockford, Illinois—
Rock River News;
Indianapolis, Indiana—
Fever, Indiana Word;
Ann Arbor, Michigan—
Michigan Tribune, Out and About;
Detroit , Michigan—
Cruise, Metra;
Minneapolis, Minnesota—
Equal Time, GAZE;
Kansas City, Missouri—
Alternative News;
St. Louis, Missouri—
News-Telegraph;
Omaha, Nebraska—
New Voice;
Cincinnati, Ohio—
Nouveau Midwest;
Cleveland, Ohio—
Gay People’s Chronicle
,
Valentine News;
Columbus, Ohio—
Free Press, Gaybeat;
La Crosse, Wisconsin—
Leaping La Crosse News;
Madison, Wisconsin—
Frontiersman;
Milwaukee, Wisconsin—
In Step, Wisconsin Light;
Wausau, Wisconsin—
Lifeline;
Westby, Wisconsin—
New Beginnings.
To give the editors of these publications flexibility in publicizing the project, the appeal for interview subjects was provided in two forms—as a standard press release and a letter to the editor. The text of the standard release follows:
Farm Boys Sought for Interviews
Are you a gay man who grew up on a farm? If so, your experience as a farm boy is an important and largely neglected part of gay culture. Urban experiences are central to the lives of most gay men, but they’re far from being the whole story.
The Gay Farm Boys Project is intended to give gay men who grew up on farms—whether or not they are still involved in farming—a chance to talk about their experiences and the ways in which their farm upbringings have influenced their lives.
If you are a gay man who grew up in a farming household and you think you might be interested in contributing to this cultural research project by talking about your experiences, please contact Will Fellows at [phone number] for more
information or to arrange for an interview. You can write to Fellows at [P.O. box address].
A gay farm boy himself, Fellows is an experienced researcher and writer who would like to consider your story for inclusion in a book based on the “gay farm boys” theme. Whatever your age and whatever your life is about now, your story is a unique and valuable part of gay culture. If anonymity is desired, names and other key details can be changed.
Approximately 120 men responded by telephone and mail to this publicity. A few emphasized the importance of discretion and anonymity in this initial contact, but most seemed trusting and uninhibited in their responses. Some of those who wrote sent brief notes requesting that more information be sent, sometimes to a post office box address. Others wrote longer, more engaging letters describing their interest in the project and their qualifications for being interviewed. For example, one man wrote:
I grew up in the sixties on a small farm in a Mennonite community in a rural area south of Cleveland, Ohio. The whole family took an active part in the daily chores of milking cows, plowing, working the gardens, cleaning the pens, killing chickens on Saturdays, and acting like saints in church on Sundays. The horrors on the farm for this guy were too many, and now in my forties I live in a suburban area outside of Cleveland.
After those days in the country, I don’t have and won’t have even a pet, at least not four-legged.
Apparent in some letters and phone conversations was an assumption, suspicion, or hope that the Gay Farm Boys Project would prove to be a networking service for men in rural areas, men with fantasies about “farm boys,” men with fantasies about sex with animals, or some combination thereof. One man wrote from rural Minnesota:
I am interested in your research and how you plan to process the information. Is this for your edification? A chance to compare notes with other respondents and form some sort of support group? An opportunity to meet others in the same boat and socialize? Or what? You may have tapped a good market for this kind of research. As I expect you know, the chance to make rural contacts is very limited.
The allure of the farm-boy fantasy was brought home to me in an imploring letter from a man in suburban Chicago. Would I help him make pen-pal connections with midwestern farm boys who might be interested in hosting a city boy for a couple of days? “I love the country, and I’ve always wanted to have an adventure with a real cute farm boy way out there in the loft of the barn—wake up to fresh ground coffee, scrambled eggs with sausage, toast, and a good horse ride. I’m crazy for blond, blue-eyed hunks.” Although I could appreciate the difficulties of making satisfying connections, I did not intend the project to serve matchmaking purposes.
Thus, I avoided interviewing men whose interest in the project appeared to hinge greatly on
the prospect of social or sexual networking possibilities.
A man in Chicago wrote to say that his years on a dairy farm in Ohio had given him “many tales to tell of sex with animals. Is this what you are interested in? Do you want all the naughty but nice details?” He would tell me all about it if I promised I was not with the cops. Two men in Canada sent along cartoons relating to bestiality. I had no desire to avoid the exploration of this subject, which seems to be quite strongly linked with farm life in the popular imagination. However, I had no interest in interviewing individuals whose responses to the project appeared to be entirely salacious in nature. My preference was to involve those who evinced broader imagination and greater thoughtfulness related to the stated themes of the project. Overall, I was very pleased with the magnitude and caliber of the response to my press release.
In addition to those recruited for interviews through publicity, I enlisted a relatively small number of subjects personally. These men were generally friends or acquaintances, or strangers referred to me by people I knew. All prospective interview subjects were sent the following letter describing the project and the interview process:
Thanks for your interest in the Gay Farm Boys Project. This cultural research project is intended to give you—a gay man who grew up in a farming household—a chance to talk about your experiences and the ways in which your farm upbringing has influenced your life. I am gay, grew up on a dairy farm, and am an experienced interviewer and writer. Your words will be used as part of a book based on the “gay farm boys” theme.
Life stories rooted in farm childhoods have been largely neglected in the growing literature that documents the lives of gay men in the U.S. If you grew up on a farm—whether or not you are still farming—I welcome your participation in changing this situation. Whatever your age and whatever your life is about now, your story is a unique and valuable part of gay culture.
Here are some basic details about being interviewed:
Between the spring of 1992 and the autumn of 1993, I conducted interviews with seventy-five men from rural farming backgrounds. Ages of subjects ranged from twenty-five to eighty-four years, with men in their twenties, thirties, and forties representing more than three-quarters of those interviewed. All subjects were European-American, reflecting the vastly dominant ethnic profile of the rural farming population in the mid-western U.S.
Most of the men I interviewed lived in, or near, relatively large mid-western cities and were no longer engaged in farming. This prevailing profile may result from a number of factors. First, this research project was publicized in gay and lesbian community publications centered primarily in larger cities. In addition, a greater proportion of gay-identified men from rural farming backgrounds may live in larger cities rather than small cities and towns or rural areas. Further, several men living in small towns and rural areas declined to be interviewed for reasons that appeared to center around concern about their identities being revealed.
The men I interviewed seemed to possess a wide range of sometimes mixed motives for agreeing to participate: they hoped that by telling their stories they could contribute to illuminating people’s minds and hearts, thus making a positive difference for future generations; they were simply responding enthusiastically to a project that struck them as “a great idea,” and wanted to help out so that the project would be successful; they wanted to tell what they considered to be interesting stories about their lives. A self-therapeutic motive was evident in some interviews; these subjects seemed to be influenced by a confessional or cathartic impulse to tell all, perhaps in an effort to pull together life’s loose ends and enhance their self-understanding. It was evident, as well, that some subjects hoped that their participation would assist them in meeting other men with similar backgrounds, interests, and values.
Most interviews were conducted in the midwestern United States,
including the states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, and Nebraska. One interview was held in California. Subjects participated with the understanding that they would not be paid for any use that might be made of interview material. Most interviews were two to three hours in length, exploring many facets of the individual’s life. I was often surprised and moved by the extent to which the men I interviewed seemed to make open books of their lives. I took a casual, conversational, free-form approach to interviewing, letting the subject have primary influence on the structure of the interview. While the scope of my questioning was consistent from one interview to another, the sequencing of, and relative emphasis given to, the various lines of inquiry were influenced greatly by the ways in which each subject was inclined to talk about his own life. A summary of the major areas of inquiry follows.