 | 34. Benjamin Fletcher Wright, Jr.,
American Interpretations of Natural Law: A Study in the History of Political Thought
(Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1931), pp. 45.
|
| 35. Joseph Declareuil,
Rome the Law-Giver
(London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner; New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1927), p. 3.
|
| 36. Barry Nicholas,
An Introduction to Roman Law
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962), p. 1.
|
| 37. Nicholas,
An Introduction to Roman Law
, pp. 12.
|
| 38.
Digest
CXL, 84101. Given the nature of the compilation of the
Digest
, the absence of the phrase from earlier texts does not mean that it had not been used previously.
|
| 39. Declareuil,
Rome the Law-Giver
, pp. 2829.
|
| 40. Declareuil,
Rome the Law-Giver
, p. 4. This "astonishing second life of Roman law," as Nicholas calls it, provided Europe with a common stock of legal thought and many common legal rules. There are therefore to this day "two great families of law" of European origin: the common law of England, predominant in the English-speaking world, and Roman or civil law, embracing almost all the countries of Europe and the state of Louisiana. See Nicholas,
Introduction to Roman Law
, p. 2.
|
| 41. Robert Mark Wenley,
Stoicism and Its Influence
(New York: Longmans, Green, 1927), p. 130.
|
| 42. Gerard Watson, "The Natural Law and Stoicism," in
Problems in Stoicism
, ed. A. A. Long (London: Athlone Press, 1971), p. 225.
|
| 43. Edward Gibbon,
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
, ch. 44, first paragraph.
|
| 44. D'Entrèves,
Natural Law
, p. 32.
|
|
