Authors: Ian Rankin
Are the skills of journalist Jim Stevens mirrored by those of Rebus? Do the two men respect the similarities between them? And what do they each feel about drawing close to the ‘big fish’? Does the act of reading a crime story put the reader in a similar role to that of either detective or investigative journalist and, if so, in what way?
What contrasts does Jim Stevens make between ‘old-fashioned’ crime, such as the ‘families’ of 1950s Glasgow gangsters, and the ‘new’ crime wave, such as drug-dealing? And which does he favour?
What do you make of Rebus’s behaviour towards the woman he picks up at the Rio Grande Bingo Hall?
‘
Was nothing arbitrary in this life?
’
Rebus wonders
. ‘
No, nothing at all. Behind the seemingly irrational lay the clear golden path of the design
.’ Consider how even in his debut novel Ian Rankin explores this notion.
Are there any signs remaining that Ian Rankin toyed with the idea of killing Rebus off at the end of
Knots & Crosses
?
If Ian Rankin had envisaged
Knots & Crosses
to be the opener for the lengthy and detailed series the Rebus books were to become, how could he have allowed his plotting to draw to a close in a more open-ended manner? And might this have made the narrative stronger ultimately?