Montcalm and Wolfe: The Riveting Story of the Heroes of the French & Indian War (36 page)

The House had failed to carry its point. The result disappointed Franklin, and doubly disappointed the Quakers. His maxim was: Beat the Governor first, and then beat the enemy; theirs: Beat the Governor, and let the enemy alone. The measures that followed, directed in part by Franklin himself, held the Indians in check, and mitigated the distress of the western counties; yet there was no safety for them throughout the two or three years when France was cheering on her hell-hounds against this tormented frontier.

As in Pennsylvania, so in most of the other colonies there was conflict between assemblies and governors, to the unspeakable detriment of the public service. In New York, though here no obnoxious proprietary stood between the people and the Crown, the strife was long and severe. The point at issue was an important one,—whether the Assembly should continue their practice of granting yearly supplies to the Governor, or should establish a permanent fund for the ordinary expenses of government,—thus placing him beyond their control. The result was a victory for the Assembly.

Month after month the great continent lay wrapped in snow. Far along the edge of the western wilderness men kept watch and ward in lonely blockhouses, or scoured the forest on the track of prowling war-parties. The provincials in garrison at forts Edward, William Henry, and Oswego dragged out the dreary winter; while bands of New England rangers, muffled against the piercing cold, caps of fur on their heads, hatchets in their belts, and guns in their mittened hands, glided on skates along the gleaming ice-floor of Lake George, to spy out the secrets of Ticonderoga, or seize some careless sentry to tell them tidings of the foe. Thus the petty war went on; but the big war was frozen into torpor, ready, like a hibernating bear, to wake again with the birds, the bees, and the flowers.
¹

1
Memoirs of an American Lady
(Mrs. Schuyler), Chap. VI. A genuine picture of colonial life, and a charming book, though far from being historically trustworthy. Compare the account of Albany in Kalm, II. 102.

2
James Gray to John Gray,
11
July,
1755.

1
The young author of this letter was, like his brother, a victim of the war.
“Permit me, good sir, to offer you my hearty condolence upon the death of my friend Jack, whose worth I admired, and feel for him more than I can express. . . . Few men of his age had so many friends.”
Governor Morris to Shirley,
27
Nov
. 1755.
“My heart bleeds for Mr. Shirley. He must be overwhelmed with Grief when he hears of Capt. John Shirley’s Death, of which I have an Account by the last Post from New York, where he died of a Flux and Fever that he had contracted at Oswego. The loss of Two Sons in one Campaign scarcely admits of Consolation. I feel the Anguish of the unhappy Father, and mix my Tears very heartily with his. I have had an intimate Acquaintance with Both of Them for many Years, and know well their inestimable Value.”
Morris to Dinwiddie,
29
Nov
. 1755.

2
Bigot au Ministre,
27
Août,
1755.

3
Bigot au Ministre,
5
Sept
. 1755.

4
Minutes of a Council of War at Oswego,
18
Sept
. 1755.

1
Minutes of a Council of War at Oswego,
27
Sept
. 1755.

2
On the Niagara expedition,
Braddock’s Instructions to Major-General Shirley. Correspondence of Shirley,
1755.
Conduct of Major-General Shirley
(London, 1758). Letters of John Shirley in
Pennsylvania Archives,
II.
Bradstreet to Shirley,
17
Aug
. 1755. MSS. in Massachusetts Archives.
Review of Military Operations in North America
.
Gentleman’s Magazine,
1757, p. 73.
London Magazine,
1759, p. 594. Trumbull,
Hist
.
Connecticut,
II. 370.

3
Johnson to the Lords of Trade,
3
Sept
. 1755.

4
Johnson to the Lords of Trade,
17
Jan
. 1756.

5
John Shirley to Governor Morris,
12
Aug
. 1755.

1
On this affair, see various papers in
N
.
Y
.
Col
.
Docs
., VI., VII. Smith,
Hist
.
New York,
Part II., Chaps. IV., V.
Review of Military Operations in North America
. Both Smith and Livingston, the author of the
Review,
were personally cognizant of the course of the dispute.

2
Dumas au Ministre,
24
Juillet,
1756.

1
Mémoires de Famille de l’Abbé Casgrain,
cited in
Le Foyer Canadien,
III. 26, where an extract is given from an order of Dumas to Baby, a Canadian officer. Orders of Contrecœur and Ligneris to the same effect are also given. A similar order, signed by Dumas, was found in the pocket of Douville, an officer killed by the English on the frontier.
Writings of Washington,
II. 137,
note
.

2
Rev
.
Claude Godefroy Cocquard, S. J
.,
à son Frère, Mars
(?), 1757.

3
Extract in
Writings of Washington,
II. 145,
note
.

4
Letters of Dinwiddie,
1755.

1
Writings of Washington,
II. 143.

1
See a crowd of party pamphlets, Quaker against Presbyterian, which appeared at Philadelphia in 1764, abusively acrimonious on both sides.

2
The productive estates of the proprietaries were taxed through the tenants.

3
The proprietaries offered to contribute to the cost of building and maintaining a fort on the spot where the French soon after built Fort Duquesne. This plan, vigorously executed, would have saved the province from a deluge of miseries. One of the reasons assigned by the Assembly for rejecting it was that it would irritate the enemy. See
supra,
p. 60.

4
A Brief View of the Conduct of Pennsylvania for the year
1755.

1
Morris to Shirley,
16
Aug
. 1755.

2
Morris to Sir Thomas Robinson,
28
Aug
. 1755.

1
Colonial Records of Pa.,
VI. 584.

2
Message of the Assembly to the Governor,
29
Sept
. 1755 (written by Franklin), in
Colonial Records of Pa.,
VI. 631, 632.

3
Writings of Franklin,
III. 447. The Assembly at first suppressed this paper, but afterwards printed it.

4
Trent to James Burd,
4
Oct
. 1755.

1
Adam Hoops to Governor Morris,
3
Nov
. 1755.

2
Colonial Records of Pa.,
VI. 682.

3
Message of the Governor to the Assembly,
8
Nov
. 1755, in
Colonial Records of Pa.,
VI. 684.

1
Message of the Assembly to the Governor,
11
Nov
. 1755, in
Colonial Records of Pa.,
VI. 692. The words are Franklin’s.

2
Message of the Governor to the Assembly,
22
Nov
. 1755,
in Colonial Records of Pa
., VI. 714.

3
Pennsylvania Archives,
II. 485.

4
Ibid.,
II. 487.

5
See
Conspiracy of Pontiac,
II. 143, 152.

1
A Remonstrance,
etc., in
Colonial Records of Pa.,
VI. 734.

2
Mante, 47; Entick, I. 377.

3
This remarkable bill, drawn by Franklin, was meant for political rather than military effect. It was thought that Morris would refuse to pass it, and could therefore be accused of preventing the province from defending itself; but he avoided the snare by signing it.

4
Minutes of Council,
27
Nov
. 1755.

1
On Pennsylvanian disputes,—
A Brief State of the Province of Pennsylvania
(London, 1755).
A Brief View of the Conduct of Pennsylvania
(London, 1756). These are pamphlets on the Governor’s side, by William Smith, D.D., Provost of the College of Pennsylvania.
An Answer to an invidious Pamphlet, intituled a Brief State,
etc.
(London, 1755). Anonymous.
A True and Impartial State of the Province of Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia, 1759). Anonymous. The last two works attack the first two with great vehemence. The
True and Impartial State
is an able presentation of the case of the Assembly, omitting, however, essential facts. But the most elaborate work on the subject is the
Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania,
inspired and partly written by Franklin. It is hotly partisan, and sometimes sophistical and unfair. Articles on the quarrel will also be found in the provincial newspapers, especially the
New York Mercury,
and in the
Gentleman’s Magazine
for 1755 and 1756. But it is impossible to get any clear and just view of it without wading through the interminable documents concerning it in the
Colonial Records of Pennsylvania
and the
Pennsylvania Archives
.

XI

1712-1756

M
ONTCALM

War declared · State of Europe · Pompadour and Maria Theresa · Infatuation of the French Court · The European War · Montcalm to command in America · His early Life · An intractable Pupil · His Marriage · His Family · His Campaigns · Preparation for America · His Associates · Lévis, Bourlamaque, Bougainville · Embarkation · The Voyage · Arrival · Vaudreuil · Forces of Canada · Troops of the Line, Colony Troops, Militia, Indians · The Military Situation · Capture of Fort Bull · Montcalm at Ticonderoga

On the eighteenth of May, 1756, England, after a year of open hostility, at length declared war. She had attacked France by land and sea, turned loose her ships to prey on French commerce, and brought some three hundred prizes into her ports. It was the act of a weak Government, supplying by spasms of violence what it lacked in considerate resolution. France, no match for her amphibious enemy in the game of marine depredation, cried out in horror; and to emphasize her complaints and signalize a pretended good faith which her acts had belied, ostentatiously released a British frigate captured by her cruisers. She in her turn declared war on the ninth of June: and now began the most terrible conflict of the eighteenth century; one that convulsed Europe and shook America, India, the coasts of Africa, and the islands of the sea.

In Europe the ground was trembling already with the coming earthquake. Such smothered discords, such animosities, ambitions, jealousies, possessed the rival governments; such entanglements of treaties and alliances, offensive or defensive, open or secret,—that a blow at one point shook the whole fabric. Hanover, like the heel of Achilles, was the vulnerable part for which England was always trembling. Therefore she made a defensive treaty with Prussia, by which each party bound itself to aid the other, should its territory be invaded. England thus sought a guaranty against France, and Prussia against Russia. She had need. Her King, Frederic the Great, had drawn upon himself an avalanche. Three women—two empresses and a concubine—controlled the forces of the three great nations, Austria, Russia, and France; and they all hated him: Elizabeth of Russia, by reason of a distrust fomented by secret intrigue and turned into gall by the biting tongue of Frederic himself, who had jibed at her amours, compared her to Messalina, and called her
“infâme catin du Nord”;
Maria Theresa of Austria, because she saw in him a rebellious vassal of the Holy Roman Empire, and, above all, because he had robbed her of Silesia; Madame de Pompadour, because when she sent him a message of compliment, he answered,
“Je ne la connais pas,”
forbade his ambassador to visit her, and in his mocking wit spared neither her nor her royal lover. Feminine pique, revenge, or vanity had then at their service the mightiest armaments of Europe.

The recovery of Silesia and the punishment of Frederic for his audacity in seizing it, possessed the mind of Maria Theresa with the force of a ruling passion. To these ends she had joined herself in secret league with Russia; and now at the prompting of her minister Kaunitz she courted the alliance of France. It was a reversal of the hereditary policy of Austria; joining hands with an old and deadly foe, and spurning England, of late her most trusty ally. But France could give powerful aid against Frederic; and hence Maria Theresa, virtuous as she was high-born and proud, stooped to make advances to the all-powerful mistress of Louis XV., wrote her flattering letters, and addressed her, it is said, as
“Ma chère cousine.”
Pompadour was delighted, and could hardly do enough for her imperial friend. She ruled the King, and could make and unmake ministers at will. They hastened to do her pleasure, disguising their subserviency by dressing it out in specious reasons of state. A conference at her summer-house, called Babiole, “Bawble,” prepared the way for a treaty which involved the nation in the anti-Prussian war, and made it the instrument of Austria in the attempt to humble Frederic,—an attempt which if successful would give the hereditary enemy of France a predominance over Germany. France engaged to aid the cause with twenty-four thousand men; but in the zeal of her rulers began with a hundred thousand. Thus the three great Powers stood leagued against Prussia. Sweden and Saxony joined them; and the Empire itself, of which Prussia was a part, took arms against its obnoxious member.

Never in Europe had power been more centralized, and never in France had the reins been held by persons so pitiful, impelled by motives so contemptible. The levity, vanity, and spite of a concubine became a mighty engine to influence the destinies of nations. Louis XV., enervated by pleasures and devoured by
ennui,
still had his emotions; he shared Pompadour’s detestation of Frederic, and he was tormented at times by a lively fear of damnation. But how damn a king who had entered the lists as champion of the Church? England was Protestant, and so was Prussia; Austria was supremely Catholic. Was it not a merit in the eyes of God to join her in holy war against the powers of heresy? The King of the Parc-aux-Cerfs would propitiate Heaven by a new crusade.

Henceforth France was to turn her strength against her European foes; and the American war, the occasion of the universal outbreak, was to hold in her eyes a second place. The reasons were several: the vanity of Pompadour, infatuated by the advances of the Empress-Queen, and eager to secure her good graces; the superstition of the King; the anger of both against Frederic; the desire of D’Argenson, minister of war, that the army, and not the navy, should play the foremost part; and the passion of courtiers and nobles, ignorant of the naval service, to win laurels in a continental war,—all conspired to one end. It was the interest of France to turn her strength against her only dangerous rival; to continue as she had begun, in building up a naval power that could face England on the seas and sustain her own rising colonies in America, India, and the West Indies: for she too might have multiplied herself, planted her language and her race over all the globe, and grown with the growth of her children, had she not been at the mercy of an effeminate profligate, a mistress turned procuress, and the favorites to whom they delegated power.

Still, something must be done for the American war; at least there must be a new general to replace Dieskau. None of the Court favorites wanted a command in the backwoods, and the minister of war was free to choose whom he would. His choice fell on Louis Joseph, Marquis de Montcalm-Gozon de Saint-Véran.

Montcalm was born in the south of France, at the Château of Candiac, near Nîmes, on the twenty-ninth of February, 1712. At the age of six he was placed in the charge of one Dumas, a natural son of his grandfather. This man, a conscientious pedant, with many theories of education, ruled his pupil stiffly; and, before the age of fifteen, gave him a good knowledge of Latin, Greek, and history. Young Montcalm had a taste for books, continued his reading in such intervals of leisure as camps and garrisons afforded, and cherished to the end of his life the ambition of becoming a member of the Academy. Yet, with all his liking for study, he sometimes revolted against the sway of the pedagogue who wrote letters of complaint to his father protesting against the “judgments of the vulgar, who, contrary to the experience of ages, say that if children are well reproved they will correct their faults.” Dumas, however, was not without sense, as is shown by another letter to the elder Montcalm, in which he says that the boy had better be ignorant of Latin and Greek, “than know them as he does without knowing how to read, write, and speak French well.” The main difficulty was to make him write a good hand,—a point in which he signally failed to the day of his death. So refractory was he at times, that his master despaired. “M. de Montcalm,” Dumas informs the father, “has great need of docility, industry, and willingness to take advice. What will become of him?” The pupil, aware of these aspersions, met them by writing to his father his own ideas of what his aims should be. “First, to be an honorable man, of good morals, brave, and a Christian. Secondly, to read in moderation; to know as much Greek and Latin as most men of the world; also the four rules of arithmetic, and something of history, geography, and French and Latin
belles-lettres,
as well as to have a taste for the arts and sciences. Thirdly, and above all, to be obedient, docile, and very submissive to your orders and those of my dear mother; and also to defer to the advice of M. Dumas. Fourthly, to fence and ride as well as my small abilities will permit.”
¹

If Louis de Montcalm failed to satisfy his preceptor, he had a brother who made ample amends. Of this infant prodigy it is related that at six years he knew Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, and had some acquaintance with arithmetic, French history, geography, and heraldry. He was destined for the Church, but died at the age of seven; his precocious brain having been urged to fatal activity by the exertions of Dumas.

Other destinies and a more wholesome growth were the lot of young Louis. At fifteen he joined the army as ensign in the regiment of Hainaut. Two years after, his father bought him a captaincy, and he was first under fire at the siege of Philipsbourg. His father died in 1735, and left him heir to a considerable landed estate, much embarrassed by debt. The Marquis de la Fare, a friend of the family, soon after sought for him an advantageous marriage to strengthen his position and increase his prospects of promotion; and he accordingly espoused Mademoiselle Angélique Louise Talon du Boulay,—a union which brought him influential alliances and some property. Madame de Montcalm bore him ten children, of whom only two sons and four daughters were living in 1752. “May God preserve them all,” he writes in his autobiography, “and make them prosper for this world and the next! Perhaps it will be thought that the number is large for so moderate a fortune, especially as four of them are girls; but does God ever abandon his children in their need?

“ ‘Aux petits des oiseaux il donne la pâture,

Et sa bonté s’étend sur toute la nature.’ ”

He was pious in his soldierly way, and ardently loyal to Church and King.

His family seat was Candiac; where, in the intervals of campaigning, he found repose with his wife, his children, and his mother, who was a woman of remarkable force of character and who held great influence over her son. He had a strong attachment to this home of his childhood; and in after years, out of the midst of the American wilderness, his thoughts turned longingly towards it.
“Quand reverrai-je mon cher Candiac!”

In 1741 Montcalm took part in the Bohemian campaign. He was made colonel of the regiment of Auxerrois two years later, and passed unharmed through the severe campaign of 1744. In the next year he fought in Italy under Maréchal de Maillebois. In 1746, at the disastrous action under the walls of Piacenza, where he twice rallied his regiment, he received five sabre-cuts,—two of which were in the head,—and was made prisoner. Returning to France on parole, he was promoted in the year following to the rank of brigadier; and being soon after exchanged, rejoined the army, and was again wounded by a musket-shot. The peace of Aix-la-Chapelle now gave him a period of rest.
¹
At length, being on a visit to Paris late in the autumn of 1755, the minister, D’Argenson, hinted to him that he might be appointed to command the troops in America. He heard no more of the matter till, after his return home, he received from D’Argenson a letter dated at Versailles the twenty-fifth of January, at midnight. “Perhaps, Monsieur,” it began, “you did not expect to hear from me again on the subject of the conversation I had with you the day you came to bid me farewell at Paris. Nevertheless I have not forgotten for a moment the suggestion I then made you; and it is with the greatest pleasure that I announce to you that my views have prevailed. The King has chosen you to command his troops in North America, and will honor you on your departure with the rank of major-general.”

The Chevalier de Lévis, afterwards Marshal of France, was named as his second in command, with the rank of brigadier, and the Chevalier de Bourlamaque as his third, with the rank of colonel; but what especially pleased him was the appointment of his eldest son to command a regiment in France. He set out from Candiac for the Court, and occupied himself on the way with reading Charlevoix. “I take great pleasure in it,” he writes from Lyons to his mother; “he gives a pleasant account of Quebec. But be comforted; I shall always be glad to come home.” At Paris he writes again: “Don’t expect any long letter from me before the first of March; all my business will be done by that time, and I shall begin to breathe again. I have not yet seen the Chevalier de Montcalm [
his son
]. Last night I came from Versailles, and am going back to-morrow. The King gives me twenty-five thousand francs a year, as he did to M. Dieskau, besides twelve thousand for my equipment, which will cost me above a thousand crowns more; but I cannot stop for that. I embrace my dearest and all the family.” A few days later his son joined him. “He is as thin and delicate as ever, but grows prodigiously tall.”

On the second of March he informs his mother, “My affairs begin to get on. A good part of the baggage went off the day before yesterday in the King’s wagons; an assistant-cook and two liverymen yesterday. I have got a good cook. Estève, my secretary, will go on the eighth; Joseph and Déjean will follow me. To-morrow evening I go to Versailles till Sunday, and will write from there to Madame de Montcalm [
his wife
]. I have three aides-de camp; one of them, Bougainville, a man of parts, pleasant company. Madame Mazade was happily delivered on Wednesday; in extremity on Friday with a malignant fever; Saturday and yesterday, reports favorable. I go there twice a day, and am just going now. She has a girl. I embrace you all.” Again, on the fifteenth: “In a few hours I set out for Brest. Yesterday I presented my son, with whom I am well pleased, to all the royal family. I shall have a secretary at Brest, and will write more at length.” On the eighteenth he writes from Rennes to his wife: “I arrived, dearest, this morning, and stay here all day. I shall be at Brest on the twenty-first. Everything will be on board on the twenty-sixth. My son has been here since yesterday for me to coach him and get him a uniform made, in which he will give thanks for his regiment at the same time that I take leave in my embroidered coat. Perhaps I shall leave debts behind. I wait impatiently for the bills. You have my will; I wish you would get it copied, and send it to me before I sail.”