Pyramid Quest (40 page)

Read Pyramid Quest Online

Authors: Robert M. Schoch

Tags: #History, #Ancient Civilizations, #Egypt, #World, #Religious, #New Age; Mythology & Occult, #Literature & Fiction, #Mythology & Folk Tales, #Fairy Tales, #Religion & Spirituality, #Occult, #Spirituality

BOOK: Pyramid Quest
7.27Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
INSCRIPTIONS ON AND WITHIN THE GREAT PYRAMID
REPORTS OF EXTERNAL INSCRIPTIONS
According to some accounts, the original casing stones of the Great Pyramid were covered with hieroglyphic inscriptions. This may seem odd, given that no inscriptions (other than those in the relieving chambers) have been found inside the Great Pyramid. Indeed, it is not certain that there ever were any original inscriptions, as opposed to later graffiti, on the outside of the Great Pyramid.
On this point, Petrie (1883, pp. 217-219) elaborates:
With regard to the many records of inscriptions on the outside of the Pyramid, a few words are necessary. From the time of Herodotus down to the 15th century, inscriptions are continually mentioned, and their great abundance is described with astonishment by travellers. This has led to the supposition that the builders had left records inscribed on the outside, although not a letter is to be found on the inside. But against the possibility of this view, it must be remembered that no early inscriptions are found on the casing remaining at the Great Pyramid, nor on any of the innumerable fragments of those stones, nor on the remaining casing of the Second Pyramid, nor on that of the Third Pyramid, nor on the casing of the South Pyramid of Dahshur, nor on the casing of the Pyramid of Medum, nor on occasional blocks uncovered at the Sakkara Pyramids. In fact, not a single example of hieroglyphs has ever been seen on any casing, nor on any fragments of casing. The truth then about these numberless inscriptions appears to be that they were all travellers’ graffiti. Strabo says that the characters were like old Greek, but were not readable; this points to Phoenician or Cypriote graffiti. The accounts of the inscriptions given by the Arabs also show that they were mere graffiti; Abu Masher Jafer (before 886 A.D.) mentions Mosannad (i.e., Himyaritic) letters; Ibn Khordadbeh (10th cent.) also mentions Musnad letters; Masudi (11th cent.) describes them as being in various different languages; Ibn Haukal (11th cent.) says they were in Greek. Abu Mothaffer (
alias
Sibt Al Jauzi, died 1250 A.D.) gives the fullest account, mentioning seven sorts of writing : (1) Greek, (2) Arabic, (3) Syriac, (4) Musnadic, (5) Himyaritic (or Hiritic or Hebrew in different MSS.), (6) Rumi, (7) Persian. William of Baldensel (1336 A.D.) mentions Latin; and Cyriacus (1440 A.D.) mentions Phoenician. Whether these travellers all understood exactly what they were talking about may be doubted; but at least none of them describe hieroglyphs, such as they must have been familiar with on all the tombs and other monuments; and they agree in the great diversity of the languages inscribed. The earlier travellers also do not describe such a great number of inscriptions as do the Arabic writers; suggesting that the greater part recorded in later times were due to Roman and Coptic graffiti.
Now among the hundreds of pieces of casing stones that I have looked over, very few traces of inscription were to be seen; this was, however, to be expected, considering that the pieces nearly all belonged to the upper casing stones, out of the reach of mere travellers. Three examples of single letters were found, two Greek and one unknown; and on the W. side, in one of the excavations, a piece was discovered bearing three graffiti, one large one attracting lesser scribblers, as in modern times. The earliest inscription was probably of Ptolemy X., showing portions of the letters Π TO ........... C ω T ....... ; the next was a Romano-Greek of a certain MAP KIOCK ...... ; and over that an Arab had roughly hammered in ..... maj ...... This is the only example of continuous inscriptions yet found, and it belonged to one of the lowest courses; it is now in the Bulak Museum. Thus, all the fragments and the descriptions point to the existence of a large body of graffiti, but do not give any evidence of original hieroglyphic inscriptions.
When one considers the large number of graffiti which are to be seen on every ancient building of importance, it seems almost impossible but that the Great Pyramid—one of the most renowned and visited of all—should not have been similarly covered with ancient scribbles, like the host of modern names which have been put upon it since the casing was removed. The statues of Ramessu II., at Abu Simbel, bear quantities of Greek graffiti, in fact, some of the earliest Greek inscriptions known, besides Phoenician and Roman; the top of the temple of Khonsu at Karnak is crowded with the outlines of visitors’ feet, with their names and par ticulars appended, in hieroglyphic, demotic, and Greek; the inscriptions on the colossi of Amenhotep III. (“the Memnons”) at Thebes, and on the Sphinx at Gizeh are well known; the long scribbles in demotic on the temple walls at Thebes have lately been examined; the corridors of Abydos bear early Greek graffiti; the passage of the S. Pyramid of Dahshur has two hieroglyphic graffiti, besides Greek; and there is scarcely any monument of importance in Egypt but what shows the scribbling propensities of mankind; be they Egyptians, Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, or the worst sinners of modern times, Hellenes and Americans.
From about the ninth century A.D. on, the Great Pyramid (as well as the other pyramids and structures on the Giza Plateau) was used as a quarry, and much of the casing stone of the Great Pyramid is believed to have been removed to build the mosque of Sultan Hasan, around 1356 (see Petrie, 1885, p. 92). Since the stripping of the casing stones, the Great Pyramid has accumulated a prodigious amount of graffiti on the exposed core masonry. In the latter class, we may include the formal “hieroglyphic inscription” placed on the upper west side of the exposed “arch” over the original entrance by the German Egyptologist Karl Richard Lepsius in honor Kaiser Friedrich Wilhelm IV of Prussia (Smyth, 1877, p. 7 n.; Pochan, 1978, p. 4), apparently during his expedition of 1843-1844 (Verner, 2001, p. 191). As Pochan points out (1978, pp. 3-4), under the arch of the original entrance, inscribed in the space between the two “humps” of the “lintel,” is a curious sequence of four “letters” (referred to as a tetragram by Pochan) that, to the best of my knowledge, have never been definitively deciphered. Being in an area that was originally covered with the casing stone, it is perhaps hard to conceive that they were inscribed earlier than medieval times, and in fact they may simply be modern (nineteenth or twentieth century) random graffiti. However, Kingsland (1932, p. 27) notes that approximately 25 feet of stone masonry has been removed from the area of the original entrance, and there may have been more blocks in front of the current surviving blocks that form a triangular arch over the entrance. If this was the case, there may have originally been a recess or chamber above the original entrance, and this four-letter inscription may have been carved in the southern end of the recess even before the casing was removed. Doreal (1938, 1992, p. 37) may be referring to this inscription when he writes:
The entrance to the Great Pyramid is on the north side and consists of a square surmounted by a triangle. The square symbolizes the four-lettered word, Yod-He-Vau-He, the Tetragrammaton, the Lost Word through which the Divine Light created all things in the material plane. The triangle, a symbol of the immortality of the soul, rises to a point where it vanishes in Infinity.
Tastmona (1954, pp. 130-131) also refers to the Tetragrammaton, the Ineffable Name of God, the four consonants Y H V H, where the true vowels are unknown and therefore the pronunciation is unknown, the Shem Hammephorash. Tastmona (1954, p. 130) believes that Jehovah’s identity is enciphered in the Giza pyramids, and it appears that, for Tastmona, Jehovah is a comet, or more specifically a triad of comets. Tastmona also claimed to have discovered the correct pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton in the spring of 1933 (Tastmona, 1954, contents page, chap. 10 summary), although he did not publish this pronunciation. Whether or not the four letters under the lintel of the entrance to the Great Pyramid have anything to do with the Tetragrammaton is an open question, and not one explicitly addressed by Doreal or Tastmona.
Four-letter inscription (tetragram) found over the original entrance of the Great Pyramid between the two “humps” of the carved stone under the gable. It is unclear when these four apparent letters, which have so far eluded interpretation, were placed there. They could be ancient, medieval, or modern. Photograph courtesy of Robert M. Schoch.
Possibly the four “letters” of this tetragram on the Great Pyramid are related to the classical concepts of the four elements (earth, air, fire, and water) or properties (wet, dry, hot, and cold), or the Gnostic concept that nature, wisdom, and science rest on the four principles of Silence, Profundity, Intelligence, and Truth (Hall, 2003, p. 116, quoting Albert Pike).
HIEROGLYPHS CARVED INTO THE PYRAMID OR REPRESENTED BY PASSAGES
The ceiling of the Subterranean Chamber is not flat but has several similarly shaped irregularities in it that Pochan (1978, p. 14, and see his figure captions) in particular has interpreted as “mysterious letters” or “enigmatic marks carved in the rock.” My sense is that these “mysterious letters” or “symbols” are simply the result of the techniques used to quarry out the ceiling area, the ceiling having never been smoothed and finished.
Marsham Adams (1933, p. 54 n.) suggested that the carved stone currently found immediately under the arch over the original entrance might represent the hieroglyph for the horizon (“Horizon of Heaven” in the words of Adams). Kingsland (1932, pp. 27-28) contends that, if anything, this stone resembles the hieroglyph for mountain, but ultimately Kingsland dismisses it as not an original form of the pyramid at all but simply the result of damage as explorers or vandals tried to hack into the pyramid. However, perhaps lending support to Adams’s suggestion, Richard Wilkinson includes in his book
Symbol and Magic in Egyptian Art
(1999, pp. 166-167) a section entitled “Objects as Hieroglyphs and Hieroglyphs as Objects,” in which he says (p. 167): “The importance of hieroglyphic forms as symbolic images in Egyptian culture cannot be overestimated, and the projection of such forms onto natural and constructed objects is extremely frequent.” Wilkinson even discusses and illustrates the horizon hieroglyph specifically in this context, although not mentioning the form identified by Adams over the entrance of the Great Pyramid.
Adams also suggests that various passages and structures within the Great Pyramid form hieroglyphs, including a “sacred hieroglyphic symbol peculiar to Thoth” (Adams, 1933, pp. 66-67) and hieroglyphs representing the Nile River, divinity, the territory of the holy dead, the ankh as a symbol of life, the scepter of Ptah as spirit of divine fire, the scepter of Anup, guide of the soul (Adams, 1933, pp. 90-91). For instance, consider the Well leading down to the Grotto,
together with the line where the interior masonry is bounded by the natural rock through which entrance or initiation into the interior masonry is obtained from below—the entrance impassable by the postulant until the soul is restored to him. Then, if we indicate the image of the Well itself, shining in its own living but invisible waters, as seen by the soul from above, just as the Creator looks down on His own image in the universe, we obtain the symbol of the “Ankh,” or mirror of Life. (Adams, 1933, p. 90)
INSCRIPTIONS IN THE RELIEVING CHAMBERS
I have entered the so-called Relieving Chambers twice, on the evening of November 24, 2003, and on the evening of May 20, 2004, to view the hieroglyphic inscriptions discovered by Howard Vyse and documented in his work
Operations Carried on at the Pyramids of Gizeh in 1837: With an Account of a Voyage into Upper Egypt, and an Appendix
(1840, 1:277-284). Most of the hieroglyphs occur in Lady Arbuthnot’s Chamber and in Campbell’s Chamber, and there are some prominent hieroglyphics (but no cartouches) on the western end of Nelson’s Chamber. All of the hieroglyphs recorded by Vyse in the plates of his work appear to be present, although perhaps somewhat degraded and the worse for exposure since they were first uncovered in the 1830s. There is an incredible amount of nineteenth-and early twentieth-century graffiti defacing these chambers, indicative of the travails they have suffered at the hands of modern humans.
Having had a chance to see the chambers of construction and their inscriptions firsthand, I am convinced that (1) the inscriptions are genuinely ancient and contemporary with the construction of this part of the Great Pyramid, and (2) Howard Vyse and his associates did their best to accurately transcribe and record the inscriptions. Most of the inscriptions are upside down, and they were clearly done quickly and crudely, and before the limestone blocks were set in place (one can see that some of the inscriptions continue under other blocks that were set immediately on top of them or against them). Clearly these ancient inscriptions were never meant to be viewed in the future, and I agree with the assessment that they are “quarry marks.” The ancient inscriptions have incrustations over them in places, and are very different in appearance from the nineteenth- and twentieth-century inscriptions. I can imagine how difficult it must have been for Howard Vyse and his associates to even make out many of the inscriptions without modern electrical lighting techniques and given the filth when the chambers were first opened by blasting. Lepre (1990, p. 109) points out that it was in Campbell’s Chamber in particular that numerous bats set up their nests in modern times. It would be understandable if the hieroglyphic inscriptions went unnoticed by Howard Vyse and his men initially when entering the chambers.

Other books

The Lacey Confession by Richard Greener
Princesses by Flora Fraser
Let's Be Frank by Brea Brown
Critical Mass by Whitley Strieber
The Assault by Brian Falkner
Still Into You by Andrews, Ryleigh
The School Play Mystery by David A. Adler