Stop the Coming Civil War: My Savage Truth

In accordance with the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, the scanning, uploading, and electronic sharing of any part of this book without the permission of the publisher constitutes unlawful piracy and theft of the author’s intellectual property. If you would like to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), prior written permission must be obtained by contacting the publisher at [email protected]. Thank you for your support of the author’s rights.

P
eople can justify a government’s controversial policies and actions for only so long until they see a pattern of abuse of power. Then, even the most devout supporters of any regime must decide if they support these extreme policies and actions or oppose them.

With the current government, this point of no return was reached for some when they slowly realized the extent of the vast National Security Agency spying scandal.

For others it was the release of known Islamist terrorists from the Guantanamo Bay prison without congressional knowledge.

For most Americans, the flood of tens of thousands of illegal immigrants from Central America purposely created by
the administration to overwhelm our southern borders was the final straw.

Still other supporters kept justifying one extremist act after another, justifying the president’s policies and actions with rationalizations that included saying that those who opposed them were “right-wing conspirators,” “racists,” “Obama haters,” and the like.

Yet for those of us who study governments that have taken nations from freedom to fascism, the handwriting has been on the wall for many years.

My question is this: Will the Obama inner circle of extremist left-wing radicals trigger an event that will provoke an American insurrection, even a civil war?

Is this concern to be dismissed as a “right-wing conspiracy”?

Let me explain to you what is happening.

The desperate Democrats are all pursuing policies of race and class warfare. As their failures and many deceits become clearer to the people, as the war they’re fighting against the freedoms promised in the U.S. Constitution materializes, they are counting on minority voters to turn out for them at the ballot box. Look at these excerpts from some of their speeches to high school and college graduates.

Here’s Michelle Obama, the First Lady. Is she trying to agitate these children? Stir them up to do what?

How do you feel about the First Lady stirring up such racial enmity in this speech? How would you feel if I told you that I believe it’s not an isolated incident?

Here’s what Attorney General Eric Holder said in his graduation speech:

Do you hear what Eric Holder said? He told his audience that black males are targeted, not because they cause more disruption and violence in the classroom, but because they are black. It’s
Animal Farm
. It’s upside down. It’s doublespeak. It’s everything we were warned about since the dawn of social engineering in this country.

Tim Geithner, a spoiled, rich white boy from Queens who had everything handed to him as he grew up, has the nerve to “get down” with the other administration doublespeakers to push a biased and untruthful racial message:

Finally, here is none other than Nancy Pelosi, a very wealthy woman, acting as if she’s a member of the Occupy Wall Street movement. When you read this, you’ll understand that these four graduation speakers are trying to exacerbate class and racial division in this country:

Do you understand what Pelosi is doing?

She’s inciting the graduating seniors from the University of California, Berkeley, an institution that once was a hotbed of free speech but where students and faculty now fear speaking their minds to express an opinion that doesn’t agree with the opinion of those in power. In my view, Pelosi is inciting them to become “disruptors.”

Why would these four people put forth what I see as a message of class and racial division to graduating college seniors on the same weekend, with Pelosi further telling her audience to go out and become disruptors?

Why would they spread the message of racial inequality?

Not to be outdone by the race-baiting, Democrat Jay Rockefeller espoused his view that “skin color” was behind the rejection of our Euro-African president’s failed policies.
²

How do you feel about this government’s stoking racial divisions?

Why do they do it?

I’m telling you, they’re setting the stage for more confrontations between citizens of the United States and their government.

From the arguably traitorous foreign policy decisions to the bloated, biased, incompetent bureaucracy, the current administration is aiding and abetting our terrorist enemies while refusing to provide medical support to the soldiers who have fought against the very enemies this administration seems to be supporting.

Three events in the early summer of 2014 make very clear what this government’s positions are:

• The release of five radical Islamist leaders from Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for the return of an American soldier who deserted his post and may have aided and abetted the enemy in Afghanistan

• Inviting hundreds of thousands of Central American children and young adults—some of them known gang members with distinguishing gang tattoos—to enter the United States illegally and then providing food and shelter for them before sending them off to “friends and relatives” in other U.S. cities

• What I see as the intentional refusal to provide critical medical treatment for injured and ill American servicemen through the Veterans Affairs medical system

Let me take you through the Gitmo detainees exchange first.

According to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, the president of the United States approved the transfer of five of the most dangerous long-term Gitmo inmates to the country of Qatar in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl, an American soldier who is described by some of his fellow soldiers—as many as six of them were killed attempting to find and rescue Bergdahl after he left his post—as a “deserter.”
³

The White House, of course, quickly denied that the president had made the call on the prisoner exchange and fingered Hagel as the one who had made the decision.
⁴

The result of the prisoner deal was not that five terrorists were freed while one American soldier was released. In fact, I argue that the reason the Obama administration released Bergdahl might well have been that he was an Islamist sympathizer as well. The ultimate result may prove to be that six terrorist sympathizers were released in this swap.

All five of the Gitmo detainees were involved with the Taliban in Afghanistan when we invaded that country after the 9/11 attacks. One was a commander of the main force fighting against Americans, another was a Taliban governmental interior minister. Yet another was a Taliban provincial governor who also served as a coordinator of Taliban fighting forces. Two others were Taliban intelligence and communications officers.

These released detainees are not going to grab a rifle and head to the battlefield. They are hard-core terrorist leaders—commanders, intelligence and communications officers, Taliban government officials—who are most likely to return to
positions of leadership. All of them had been held at Gitmo for more than a decade.

When the American people and Congress finally got the word that the exchange had been made, they were outraged. As Hillary Clinton was referring to them as “these five guys” and claiming that they “are not a threat to the United States,”
⁵
even Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, couldn’t contain her disapproval of the swap.

The
Washington Post
explained that the president likely broke the law that required him to provide notification to Congress at least thirty days before executing such an exchange, and the leftist rag went so far as to acknowledge that other American soldiers would now be much more likely to be kidnapped and held for further prisoner exchanges because of Obama’s action.
⁶

In the wake of this action, we really have to ask the question: What kind of an administration would make a swap of this type unless they were utterly incompetent or they wanted to put these five terrorists back on the battlefield?

Obama’s foreign policy mistakes continue to threaten our national security.

Because the president refused to conclude a status of forces agreement with Iraq and subsequently withdrew all American troops from that country, our former ally has become so politically divided and its central government so weakened that the most vicious of all terrorist groups, known as the Islamic State of Iran and Syria (ISIS), has used captured American weapons and vehicles along with military force to take over significant swaths of territory in Iraq and Syria. The group went so far as
to declare the formation of a new Islamic caliphate in the territory it has captured.
⁷

Do you want to know how distorted and perverse America’s foreign policy has become under this president?

The U.S. troops our president has sent to Iraq to “advise” Iraqis and coordinate a defense against ISIS are fighting alongside Iranian troops sent to Iraq for the same purpose!
⁸

Making Iran an ally seems to be coordinated by the Oval Office.

Is it possible that our president will need to be removed from office by his own Democratic Party in the same way Neville Chamberlain was removed by his own Labor Party in England for giving in to Hitler’s demands as World War II was beginning?

Are you starting to see why I titled this chapter “Graduating to Treason?”

Do you understand how this administration’s policies are dividing the American people and threatening our freedom?

Because of the administration’s immigration policies and its refusal to uphold existing immigration law, tens of thousands of illegal immigrants from Central America were housed on U.S. Army bases. Many were saying that the administration not only allowed these immigrant children to cross into our country, but that they actually encouraged the illegal immigrants.

The evidence of this surfaced just before this book went into production.

In mid-June, several websites posted notices that the federal government had publicly advertised on the government website Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps.gov) for
a vendor to escort tens of thousands of illegal alien children to locations around the United States. Here’s the text of that ad: