Tales of London's Docklands (2 page)

Philip Connolly
September 2006

A
CKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I
would like to take this opportunity to thank the following family and friends for coaxing me into writing this book of stories and making it possible for me to do so. Foremost among them are my former workmates in the Port of London, men with whom I worked in the docks, on the wharfs and deepwater anchorages on the River Thames, dockers and stevedores, OST clerks and ships clerks, Freemen of the River, lightermen, bargemen, tugboat men and lock gatekeepers. Without their wit, humour and shenanigans, strength and skills, and in some circumstances their courage, these stories could never have been written.

Then, of course, there were the mobile canteen tea ladies. What would we have done without their sometimes cynical comments and rapturous laughter – especially when they saw us plastered in cement dust, moving towards them as if we were concrete statues, or when we were covered in Rhodesian blue or Canadian white asbestos fibres that gave us the appearance of being large lumps of mouldy cheese, or plastered all over with carbon black or red or yellow ochre powder, or stinking to high heaven of fish meal, or reeking from the stench of a cargo of wet animal skins. Even I have been known to blush at some of their witticism.

Then there is Mrs Denise Leppard, without whom these stories wouldn't have been written; Mrs Christine Morrad, who has read through them; and the late Daniel John Foley MBE JP, the venerable Welfare Officer of Sector 3, Dock Labour Compound, the London Dock Labour Board, Tilbury Docks. He was my friend and mentor without whose gentle, forceful and persistent persuasion I should never have received the further education necessary for me to be capable of compiling these stories. The late Mr J.B. Allen, the Principal Education Officer at the Adult Education Centre, New Road, Chatham, understood my reluctance to attend adult education classes because of my semi-literacy. He gave me separate lessons and the confidence to carry on with my studies – a wise and good friend. The late Keith Thurley (Professor of Industrial Relations and Personnel Management) was my very extraordinary, patient and ultra-academic tutor at the London School of Economics and Political Science. I often sought his wise counsel. Mr Philip Connolly, my shrewd and knowledgeable friend, watches over my work and was responsible for the publication of a book of my poems.

Then lastly, but most importantly, I must thank my wife, Iris Kathleen, whose patience with me is quite simply beyond belief. She has nursed me through numerous accidents and tends to my injuries still. What more could one ask of anyone? Bless her.

I
NTRODUCTION

It is difficult for me to know where to start with these
Tales of London's Docklands.
The period covered in this book is 1954 to 1960 when a shipboard accident put an end to my active days as a docker crane driver. Arguably the tales should begin when I was a child, not really knowing what ports, docks, dockers and stevedores were or what they represented. Nor was I any the wiser as to what was meant by certain snippets of conversations that took place in our home.

The first major clue to my father's occupation came when I was 7 years of age and attended Church Street School, Gravesend. The school overlooked the Thames and Tilbury Docks on the far shore. The schoolmaster was looking across the river. Without turning to face the class he said: ‘Henry! Your father is a stevedore, isn't he?' (He always called a boy by his Christian name when he was in the mood to cane him.)

‘No, sir,' I replied. ‘I don't think so, sir. He's a docker, sir.'

‘I said,' he repeated, ‘your father is a stevedore, isn't he, Henry?'

Because I was ignorant as to the difference between a docker and stevedore, and had no particular wish to get thrashed, I simply replied, ‘Yes, sir!' The master turned and faced the class, ‘Yes, sir!' he repeated, ‘and one day
you
shall all be working over there' (the
you
bit meant he was referring to the whole class), ‘for
you
are what is generally known in polite society as nonentities.'

As I lived with my family on a council estate, I had already learned what was meant by polite society, but not about ‘nonentities'. At the time his snide remark went over my head, but I had already discovered that polite society was about as polite as most civil servants were civil to people they considered to be beneath them.

Some twenty-five years later, when I was a student at the London School of Economics and Political Science, I happened to be reading through the Education Acts (that's the sort of thing one is expected to do when being schooled at such a grandiose institute) when I suddenly remembered that word, ‘nonentities', and reflected on what the schoolmaster had said. Then I realized why all the lads in my form at the secondary school I had been obliged to attend were consigned to remain in the ‘lower classes' for ever. We were the sons of dockers, stevedores, coal porters and other groups of men who worked in the docks, on the river or in associated employment, and of course the unemployed were included in this lowly social group. We were, you see, the children whose parents were not in ‘full-time remunerative employment'. That, then, was the reason why we, the children of the river, were not allowed to sit the eleven-plus examination for a place at the grammar school. I suppose, therefore, that short bit of verbal enlightenment from the schoolmaster was the closest I ever came as a child to finding out where my father was employed, or what it was to mean to me in later life.

Not that we children ever saw much of our father. This was because he left the house each morning long before we younger ones were got up for school (my elder sisters had left school and were working by the time my memory of that period came to life), and more often than not he arrived back home after we were put to bed. Sometimes he would not come in till the next day if a ship was due to sail on the morning's early tide. Then he would be required to work day and night to complete its loading or discharging operation. This was because he was a ‘perm', a permanently employed docker for a stevedoring company, paid a monthly guaranteed full back-wage. As such, he was committed to fulfil that guarantee by working day and night if he ‘fell into debt', that is if he had not earned enough money within the month to repay the monthly guarantee to his employer.

Perms were physically burned-out human shells by the time they reached 40 years of age. One old docker once told me he had been called before a stevedoring contractors manager one day and informed that his services were no longer required. When he asked why, he was told, ‘We've had your steel. Now you can take your old iron somewhere else.' This was a typical employer's attitude. Labour was cheap and abundant. Dozens of men were waiting for every available job. The situation was simply any employer's dream.

I did notice each day when I got up to go to school that one of the docker's hooks that had hung on the copper-pipe picture rail in our living room the evening before was missing. I should have been able to determine what sort of cargo my father was working that day by the type of hook missing from the picture rail. But it was to be many years before I came to learn that lesson the hard way.

Each hook was different from the others. One was short handled for use on general cargo, in other words packages, cases and cartons. These contained anything from cars to cocoa powder, ammunition, bristles, carbon black and such like. Another was a pad hook (an oval-shaped thick steel plate with short spikes on its surface designed to grip sacks and not to penetrate into the contents) to be used in bag work – for example, sacks of asbestos, cocoa beans or dried blood. The third was a bag hook (a short-handled tool with two hooks), also used for bag work where contents would not be damaged by the use of a hook. The fourth was a long-handled hook for use on wet or dry wood pulp. Wood pulp was imported in bales, mainly from the Scandinavian countries, Russia and Canada; it was bound in wire straps, and each bale weighed 3–4 hundredweight.

Hooks were essential tools in the docks. They gave the user an extended arm and also extra leverage in moving cargo. They were also dangerous as weapons. Other equipment, such as shovels, ropes and wires, cargo nets, ore baskets, loading boards and running boards, was provided by the shipping line or the stevedoring contractor, that is the company contracted to service the ship. However, mechanical appliances such as quay cranes and mobile cranes, used in transit sheds and warehouses, were invariably the property of the Port Authority. There were exceptions, for example, electrically operated trucks. When these were used they would be charged against a gang's earnings as an extra man on the daily ‘tick note'. In other words, the gang actually paid to hire the truck from the employer.

Another childhood memory that sticks in my mind is the pungent smell of camphorated oil. My mother used to massage my father's back with it when he came home exhausted after having worked the clock round. She would then crack and whisk two raw eggs into a glass of milk and he would drink it. He then went to bed for several hours, got up, washed and shaved, dressed, had a meal and made his way to one of the allotments he kept. He would spend several hours digging and planting seeds to produce crops for his family, then come home to get ready to return to the docks and more work.

There were eleven in our family including Mum and Dad. We children were three boys and six girls. Between the First and Second World Wars millions of people were unemployed and their families were starving. That did not happen to my family. This was entirely due to my father's hard work. He spent forty-seven years in the docks with one good hand – the other had been shot through in the battle of the Somme.

Those, of course, were the good old days. My father was obliged to retire from the docks on his 68th birthday in 1965. He found himself another job and worked on till he was 73 before finally retiring. He died in his 87th year. He was physically and mentally worn out by hard work, war wounds (both physical and mental) and injuries he had sustained in the docks.

For my part, I entered the port transport industry as a registered dock worker in April 1954, through the good offices of the Port of London Authority. I was entered on the Port Authority ‘A' list, a preference list of dockers who were called off for work by the authority's labour master and allocated to specific jobs throughout the docks. I left the Port Authority when a traffic officer in charge of a job I was working on refused to pay dirty-handling money on asbestos. (That was before asbestos was recognized as a dangerous substance.) I then went on ‘the free call' for employment with the stevedoring labour contractors.

The people I worked with in the docks were all ex-servicemen, men who had been involved in battles wherever battles had been fought by British forces during conflicts that went back as far as the South African War at the end of the nineteenth century. Others had served in the two world wars or had been involved in battles fought in India, Persia and Palestine between 1918 and 1939. The Malayan Emergency, Korean War, Cyprus, Kenya and Suez were yet to come for many of those released from military service on the ‘Z' Reserve List. They were hard, tough men with phenomenal stamina and a bloody-minded sense of humour. They looked after their own people at work just as they had had to look after each other in the services. When they took part in sports, they played as hard as they worked. It was a great honour and privilege to have known them and been accepted on equal terms by them.

My first morning's work as a docker was to whitewash quayside bollards. At midday I was paid off and returned to the Dock Labour Board compound for the afternoon muster. Then I was sent to a job removing 4-hundredweight drums of arsenic from rail trucks. My brother was the ganger and welcomed me with: ‘Ah! Henry, you've run into a bit of luck. We've got 250 tons to strike out of open rail trucks. If we get the job finished by half past four we may be transferred to the next shed and get two hours' overtime striking freight off lorries.'

My brother made sure we finished the job by half past four, and we did transfer to the adjoining shed and worked till 7 p.m. We hoisted our tonnage to 400 tons that afternoon. In those days the Port Authority piecework rate was 2
s
6
d
per deadweight ton per eight-handed gang or two-fifths measurement, whichever was the greater, or so we were led to believe. That was 3
d
3 farthings per man for each ton of cargo handled. Not too bad for a first afternoon; I wasn't to be that lucky again for several years.

The tales that follow are still vivid in my memory, more than four decades after the accident that took me away from working on the docks. They are colourful glimpses of a world long since disappeared. However, to save any possible embarrassment to relatives or friends, the names of the characters who appear in these pages have been changed.

1

D
OCKERS OR
F
ILM
S
TARS
?

E
ric was a year younger than me. Although we had been to the same school in Gravesend and I had encountered him as a boy, we came from different areas within the Borough and never got to know each other for two specific reasons. First, his father was a shipwright, employed by a ship repair company that operated within Tilbury Docks and on vessels on the River Thames. He was therefore classed as an artisan in full-time remunerative employment. This meant Eric was prime candidate for the A and B forms when we were at school. The second reason we didn't get to know each other was that I was a docker's son. Dockers were not considered to be in full-time remunerative employment, as they were subject to the vagaries of shipping cycles. That meant there were possibly periods when they were obliged to sign on the dole. So, I, my father's youngest son, languished in C forms until my last term at school when I reached the pinnacle of my academic career, as it then stood, by being elevated as a senior schoolboy into Form 4, the top class. But this was undoubtedly due to a change in national policy under the Education Act of 1944, rather than to the intentions of county authority education policy or of the school staff, who had been totally indoctrinated by previous statutes, which were designed to provide a minimum level of education for the children of the labouring classes.