Lord will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet
choose Israel;” because, contemplating a future
period, He declares that the collection of the
residue of the people, whom He had appeared to
have forsaken; would be a sign of the stable and
sure election, which had likewise seemed to fail.
When He says also, in another place, “I have
chosen thee, and not cast thee away,” He
commends the continual course of His signal
liberality and paternal benevolence. The angel, in
Zachariah, speaks more plainly: “The Lord shall
choose Jerusalem again;” as though His severe
chastisement had been a rejection, or their exile
had been an interruption of election; which,
nevertheless, remains inviolable, though the
tokens of it are not always visible.
VI. We must now proceed to a second degree of
election, still more restricted, or that in which the
Divine grace was displayed in a more special
manner, when of the same race of Abraham God
rejected some, and by nourishing others in the
Church, proved that He retained them among His
children. Israel at first obtained the same station
as his brother Isaac, for the Spiritual covenant
was equally sealed in him by the symbol of
circumcision. He is cut off; afterwards Esau;
lastly, an innumerable multitude, and almost all
Israel. In Isaac the seed was called; the same
calling continued in Jacob.
God exhibited a similar example in the rejection of
Saul, which is magnificently celebrated by the
Psalmist: “He refused the tabernacle of Joseph,
and chose not the tribe of Ephraim, but chose the
tribe of Judah;” and this the sacred history
frequently repeats, that the wonderful secret of
Divine grace may be more manifest in that
364 P A T
F I T Z H U G H
change. I grant, it was by their own crime and
guilt that Ishmael, Esau, and persons of similar
characters, fell from the adoption; because the
condition annexed was, that they should faithfully
keep the covenant of God, which they perfidiously
violated. Yet it was a peculiar favor of God, that
He deigned to prefer them to other nations; as it is
said in the Psalms: “He hath not dealt so with any
nation; and so for His judgments, they have not
known them.”
But I have justly said that here are two degrees to
be remarked; for in the election of the whole
nation, God has already shown that in His mere
goodness He is bound by no laws, but is perfectly
free, so that none can require of Him an equal
distribution of grace, the inequality of which
demonstrates it to be truly gratuitous. Therefore
Malachi aggravates the ingratitude of Israel,
because, though not only elected out of the whole
race of mankind, but also separated from a sacred
family to be a peculiar people, they perfidiously
and impiously despised God their most beneficent
Father.
“Was not Esau Jacob's brother? Saith the Lord:
yet I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau.” For God
takes it for granted, since both were sons of a holy
father, successors of the covenant, and branches
from a sacred root, that the children of Jacob
were already laid under more than common
obligations by their admission to that honor; but
Esau, the first-born, having been rejected, and
their father, though inferior by birth, having been
made the heir, He proves them guilty of double
ingratitude, and complains of their violating this
two-fold claim.
THE BELL WITCH: THE FULL ACCOUNT
365
VII. Though it is sufficiently clear, that God, in
his secret counsel, freely chooses whom He will,
and rejects others, His gratuitous election is but
half displayed till we come to particular
individuals, to whom God not only offers
salvation, but assigns it in such a manner, that
the certainty of the effect is liable to no suspense
or doubt.
These are included in that one seed mentioned by
Paul; for though the adoption was deposited in
the hand of Abraham, yet many of his posterity
being cut off as putrid members, in order to
maintain the efficacy and stability of election, it is
necessary to ascend to the head, in whom their
heavenly Father has bound His elect to each
other, and united them to Himself by an
indissoluble bond. Thus the adoption of the
family of Abraham displayed the favor of God,
which He denied to others; but in the members of
Christ there is a conspicuous exhibition of the
superior efficacy of grace; because, being united
to their head, they never fail of salvation.
Paul, therefore, justly reasons from the passage of
Malachi which I have just quoted, that where God,
introducing the covenant of eternal life, invites
any people to Himself, there is a peculiar kind of
election as to part of them, so that he does not
efficaciously choose all with indiscriminate grace.
The declaration, “Jacob have I loved,” respects the
whole posterity of the patriarch, whom the
prophet there opposes to the descendants of
Esau.
Yet this is no objection to our having in the
person of one individual a specimen of the
election, which can never fail of attaining its full
effect. These, who truly belong to Christ, Paul
correctly observes, are called “a remnant,” for
366 P A T
F I T Z H U G H
experience proves, that of a great multitude the
most part fall away and disappear, so that often
only a small portion remains. That the general
election of a people is not always effectual and
permanent, a reason readily presents itself,
because, when God covenants with them, He does
not also give the Spirit of regeneration to enable
them to preserve in the covenant to the end; but
the eternal call, without the internal efficacy of
grace, which would be sufficient for their
preservation, is a kind of medium between the
rejection of all mankind and the election of the
small number of believers.
The whole nation of Israel was called “God's
inheritance,” though many of them were
strangers; but God, having firmly covenanted to
their Father and Redeemer, regards that
gratuitous favor rather than the defection of
multitudes; by whom His truth was not violated,
because His preservation of a certain remnant to
Himself, made it evident that His calling was
without repentance. For God's collection of a
Church for himself, from time to time, from the
children of Abraham, rather than from the
profane nations, was in consideration of his
covenant, which, being violated by the multitude,
He restricted to a few, to prevent a total failure.
Lastly, the general adoption of the seed of
Abraham was a visible representation of a greater
blessing, which God conferred on the few out of
the multitude.
This is the reason that Paul so carefully
distinguishes the descendants of Abraham
according to the flesh, from His Spiritual children
called after the example of Isaac. Not that the
mere descent from Abraham was a vain and
unprofitable thing, which could not be asserted
THE BELL WITCH: THE FULL ACCOUNT
367
without depreciating the covenant; but because to
the latter alone the immutable counsel of God, in
which He predestinated whom He would, was of
itself effectual to salvation. But I advise my
readers to adopt no prejudice on either side, till it
shall appear from adduced passages of Scripture
what sentiments ought to be entertained. In
conformity, therefore, to the clear doctrine of the
Scripture, we assert, that by an eternal and
immutable counsel, God has once for all
determined, both whom He would admit to
salvation, and whom He would condemn to
destruction. We affirm that this counsel, as far as
concerns the elect, is founded on His gratuitous
mercy, totally irrespective of human merit; but
that to those whom He devotes to condemnation,
the gate of life is closed by a just and
irreprehensible, but incomprehensible, judgment.
In the elect, we consider calling as an evidence of
election, and justification as another token of its
manifestation, till they arrive in glory, which
constitutes its completion. As God seals His elect
by vocation and justification, so by excluding the
reprobate from the knowledge of His name and
the sanctification of His Spirit, He affords an
indication of the judgment that awaits them.
Here I shall pass over many fictions fabricated by
foolish men to overthrow predestination. It is
unnecessary to refute things, which, as soon as
they are advanced, sufficiently prove their own
falsehood. I shall dwell only on these things
which are subjects of controversy among the
learned, or which may occasion difficulty to
simple minds, or which impiety speciously pleads
in order to stigmatize the Divine justice. 93
93 John Calvin,
The Institutes of the Christian Religion
.
368 P A T
F I T Z H U G H
Appendix I:
The Bells in Mississippi
M UCH HAS BEEN SAID about the Bells who
moved to Mississippi and had various
encounters with Kate. As was mentioned
earlier, the families of Jesse Bell and Alex Porter
moved to Mississippi in hopes of escaping from Kate.
It is unclear if this was the real reason, for they did
not move until many years after Kate had left the Bell
home in Tennessee. The families who moved to
Mississippi were still not free from Kate, however.
Those who moved to Mississippi were tormented just
as they were in Tennessee many years beforehand.
Unlike most accounts of Kate in Tennessee, the
Mississippi accounts are undocumented and the
product of stories passed from generation to
generation – pure folklore. This is not to say that the
Mississippi accounts are false, but that no “hard
evidence” exists to substantiate their occurrence. We
do know by examining the public records of
Mississippi that Jesse Bell, Alex Porter (and his wife,
Esther Bell), and later, Elizabeth (Bell) Powell, did in
fact emigrate to and live in Mississippi after the
hauntings in Tennessee.
While the Porters experienced very few encounters
with Kate after moving to Mississippi, the same
cannot be said of Jesse Bell’s family, who were
frequently subjected to Kate’s tricks. A number of
THE BELL WITCH: THE FULL ACCOUNT
369
their descendants in the area today still experience
unexplainable encounters they believe to be the
doings of Kate.
The most popular Mississippi account of Kate
deals with the daughter of John Thomas Bell (son of
Jesse Bell), who fell in love with a farm overseer who
died at the height of their affair. After the overseer’s
death, strange things began to happen on the farm
and around the small community of Eureka, just
outside present-day Batesville.
The farm overseer had been interested in Bell’s
daughter since he first started working on the farm.
Over time, he watched her mature into a beautiful,
young woman. As she matured, the overseer spent
more and more time with her – walking her to the
outbuildings and helping with chores, taking her
fishing at nearby Long Creek, and occasionally
helping her with schoolwork. Over the course of
time, a deep love fell between the two and they
became inseparable.
Both knowing that Bell would strongly disapprove
of their relationship because of their ages and the
business relationship he had with the overseer, they
decided to keep it a secret – hoping to marry once
she became older and he could find work on some
other farm. Several of the farmhands noticed the
seeming attraction between the two but never said a
word. Before long, Bell himself began to notice that
something seemed to be going on between them.
Anywhere he saw one, the other would be nearby –
and always with a seemingly good excuse for being
there. The relationship between Bell’s daughter and
the farm overseer was short-lived, however.
One late-summer afternoon, the overseer went to
an outbuilding to fetch some nails for one of the new
farmhands. Not having a candle with him, he
methodically ran his hands up and down the shelves
370 P A T
F I T Z H U G H
looking for the right sized nail. As he reached both
arms over his head to feel along the top shelf, he
suddenly felt a strong blow to his stomach, followed
by an intense, “stinging” sensation.
In pain, he stepped backwards and out the door
where in the daylight he saw two small streams of
blood coming from his stomach. He grew very weak
as he stood in the hot sun, eventually dropping to his