The Best Little Boy in the World (32 page)

Read The Best Little Boy in the World Online

Authors: John Reid; Andrew Tobias

Tags: #Reid, #Social Science, #Gay Men, #Parenting, #Gay Men - United States - Biography, #Coming Out (Sexual Orientation), #General, #United States, #Gay Studies, #Biography, #Biography & Autobiography, #John, #Family & Relationships

BOOK: The Best Little Boy in the World
4.26Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub

 

Tomorrow the movers come to take my stuff to Washington. I wouldn't have minded moving myself in a U-Haul, but with IBM selling at $400 a share, we don't do things that way. Monday I start work again. Frankly I've missed the discipline. For the past six weeks I've been sleeping late, working at the kitchen table in my not-too-clean cutoffs, crumbs on the floor, dishes piled in the sink—no one around to make me feel important or needed, no one for me to need or take to lunch, no one to argue with. I think I'll just leave the sink the way it is and buy a new set of kitchenware in Washington. The bottom layer of dishes has probably been there for close to two months now, and I might not be able to get them clean even if I could bring myself to try. The only thing I hate more than setting the table is doing the dishes.

There is not time to play out the Peyton Place romances I could tell you about. How I fell for an impossibly unattainable model named Randy who turned out to be both attainable and an impossible bore; how when Randy was unattainable, it was because he was busy falling for Golden Boy, who was still too hung up on Dennis Moyer to take any notice—while Dennis himself had chanced to run into Hunter, Chris' new lover, while Chris was away; how Dennis fell for Hunter (and subsequently for Chris, and subsequently for your humble narrator); how

Hunter was beginning to feel that leaving Craig, his lover of the past four years, for Chris may not have been such a good idea after all and in the meantime was quoted as saying to Golden Boy: "I wonder what would have happened if I had met you before I met Chris?"; how a GB-Hunter fling was not forthcoming both because GB remembered the consequences of his last fling with one of Chris' lovers (your humble narrator, again) and also because it was about that time that words filtered back to GB of Hunter's thing with Dennis, which naturally drove GB up his own patented Wailing Wall; or how they all lived happily ever after.

I don't expect you to remember that for Tuesday's quiz; but I have read it over, and it is accurate—even if it leaves out a few characters along the way. The "they all lived happily ever after" part I just threw in to try to regain control of the sentence. Whether that part is accurate remains to be seen. Give it a military background and you might turn that one incestuous sentence into a gay
War and Peace.
You might, that is, if you were a novelist. But even if I were a novelist, I'm not sure there is anything awfully "novel" in what we were doing. Isn't this what many kids were doing in the tenth grade? Billy and Janey just broke up because Janey told Mike she would go to the dance with him. But when Herbie heard what Mike had done to his best friend Billy, Herbie tackled Mike extra hard in the scrimmage and broke Mike's ankle. Now Mike can't take Janey to the dance, but now Billy won't take her either: Billy doesn't ever want to have anything to do with Janey and is in the depths of despair, but is taking little Mary Ann out behind the greenhouse, anyway, just to keep in practice.

The difference between the movies
Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice
and
Bob and Daryl and Ted and Alex
, besides the difference in their Motion Pictures Guild ratings, is that more combinations and permutations of relationships are likely to occur in the latter. The mathematical sign for permutations is "!". I begin to understand why when I think of Chris and GB and Hunter and Dennis and me!

I don't mean to make light of all the "intrigue" and emotion of the last two years. At times I was entirely caught up in it. Certainly, whenever I knew GB and Chris were together without me, I felt left out and, despite myself, jealous. But even if I had time to detail all our comings and goings, I am sure it would be of interest only to our little group, not to you.

Now the group is being broken up geographically. Chris was graduated from Harvard Business School in June and has left for a management training program with his new employer in Atlanta. I am going to Washington, $38 from Atlanta by Eastern night coach and 20 cents a minute by phone.

Golden Boy won a Rotary fellowship to study for a year at the London School of Economics and will be leaving shortly for England, if he can tear himself away from one of the pro football players I've alluded to. Golden Boy finally got over Dennis Moyer, at least partially, with the rationalization that he was too good for Dennis and that Dennis wasn't even perceptive enough to realize it. Dennis will be in Boston next year, and for the indefinite future, with his law firm.

Hunter is back with his pre-Chris lover, Craig, perhaps for another four years or another forty. Probably for another four months. But that unkind prediction just reflects my innate hostility toward Hunter for having diverted some of Chris' attention from me to himself and for having hurt Chris. Randy, who wasn't really part of our group, but who found himself in my
War and Peace
paragraph anyway, is looking for modeling jobs in New York. His last job was an Army recruiting ad. You know: Join the Action Army and be a real man like me.

 

Parker Martinson, Mr. Paranoia, came over yesterday to say good-bye. I will miss our daily telephone conversations. My daily therapy for him was at least as much therapy for me: There is perhaps no better way to make someone conscious of his own good fortune—to make him happy—than to give him the task of cheering up someone else.

Parker's "problem" is that he is about five on my scale from one to ten. I think being five has the most potential for pleasure and the most for pain. If you can master and feel comfortable with bisexuality, you can love everyone and have everyone love you. You can see beauty in twice as many faces; you can live a richer, fuller life. If, like Parker, you can't master it, it can bug you no end. Parker won't allow himself to enjoy guys; his sexual appetite for guys distracts him from enjoying girls. He has built "his problem" into a veritable institution in his mind, even if he does take some consolation from his cosmic miserableness, as I used to.

Relax, Parker. Tell Hank, Parker. Tell everyone. Enjoy it. You can't possibly be happy if you hate yourself, if you don't like the image you have of yourself. I think happiness is being satisfied with what you are. Shock treatments aren't going to change you, Parker. You are always going to like guys as well as girls. It will be easier for you to change your opinion of yourself than for you to change your fundamental sexual orientation. You should be proud and delighted that you have the best of both worlds.

Just the other day, Parker, I was asking Chris whether if science came up with a pill to make gays straight, he would take it. He asked, "Could I still like boys?" You see? To him the best deal would be the deal
you
have: to be able to make it with chicks the way you do, to have sex with them, to have dinner with them, to marry them and have a family with them, the way you will—but to like boys, too. I envy you, too, Parker. I wish I liked girls, too. Maybe I wish it only in an abstract way, since the whole thought really kind of turns me off; but it's still a nice idea in theory.

"Would
you
take that pill and make yourself straight?" Parker asked me. No, I wouldn't. That would make me an entirely different person.
That would be like killing myself.
I have learned to love my array of quaint fuck-ups. That's the trick, Parker: If you just make up your mind to like yourself, you will be happy. Once happy, you will have all the more reason to like yourself. It's as much a self-fulfilling prophecy as anything else: To like yourself, you have to think you're nifty. To be nifty, you have to be happy. To be happy, you have to like yourself. To like yourself, you have to think you're nifty. To be nifty, you have to be happy. To be happy, you have to like—

"That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard," said Parker.

I know. It's very much like a religion: I define myself as happy. I take it on faith. It may sound irrational, this defining myself as happy—but what religion
is
rational? What rational purpose
is
there for living? What rationality underlies society's prejudice against homosexuals? Hmmmm, Parker?

"Well, that may work out for you, but whatever you do, don't you ever tell anyone about
me.
Promise me that."

"Okay, Parker, I promise. Don't forget to visit me. I hear 'the bushes' in Washington are out of sight."

 

I haven't managed to say all I wanted to or to say it properly or in a way that would inspire the indignation I wanted you to feel. Throughout the book I have felt like adding footnoted apologies to gay readers for sounding simpleminded, naive, and supercilious. It should go without saying that having tried so hard for years to remain ignorant of it and having been out a relatively short time, I don't know that much about homosexuality. I only know what it was like for me to come to terms—or to begin to, anyway—with my own.

Dr. David Reuben, on the other hand, purports to know a great deal about homosexuality. Indeed, Dr. David Reuben, a psychiatrist, claims to know
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex but Were Afraid to Ask.
Since his book has sold some 8,000,000 copies to date, it is likely that his chapter on homosexuality has been more widely read than any other.

Dr. Reuben explains that homosexual encounters are generally impersonal. A guy goes down to a bowling alley, sits on a toilet in the men's room, plays footsie with the guy in the next stall. They exchange notes on pieces of toilet paper, then suck each other's penises, then leave. "No feeling, no sentiment, no nothing," explains Dr. Reuben. "
Are all homosexual contacts as impersonal as that?
No. Most are much more impersonal." Dr. Reuben explains that most of us don't even have time to write notes or even to close the bathroom stall door for a measure of privacy. "A masturbation machine might do it better," he explains.
"But
all
homosexuals aren't like that, are they?
Unfortunately, they are just like that," he says.

 

Last night I went down to Sporters to say good-bye to some friends. The only notable occurrence was my meeting an Air Force sergeant who was passing through Boston. He was originally from Albuquerque, New Mexico. He had been engaged to be married for three years, but kept putting off the marriage. Last year he broke off the engagement and came out. Aged twenty-six.
Aged twenty-six.
I wonder how many people there are on the earth, this instant, who are ostensibly straight, but who have this terrible shameful secret gnawing out their insides, making them miserable. How many are there like that—aged eleven? Sixteen? Twenty-two? Twenty-six? Thirty-four? Forty-seven? Eighty-three?

 

 

 

I told them. They said that so far as they were concerned, I was still the best little boy in the world.

Other books

E is for Evidence by Sue Grafton
Bloodliner by Robert T. Jeschonek
The Cotton-Pickers by B. TRAVEN
Sweet Hearts by Connie Shelton
Querida Susi, Querido Paul by Christine Nöstlinger
His Expectant Lover by Elizabeth Lennox
ThornyDevils by Lawless, T. W.
The Winner by David Baldacci
Protecting Truth by Michelle Warren