The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions (1153 page)

(1928): see
MISSION
.

 
Back
  -  
 
New Search

Jesse
.

Father of King
David
(1 Samuel 16). His importance in Christian tradition derives from the messianic prophecy of Isaiah 11. 1. This led in the late Middle Ages to an iconographical composition showing a tree springing from Jesse and ending in Jesus.

 
Back
  -  
 
New Search

Properly called the Society of Jesus, a
religious order
of clerks regular founded by
Ignatius Loyola
. It received papal approval in 1540. The spirituality of the Society is based upon the
Spiritual Exercises
of Ignatius, a thirty-day series of retreat meditations which most Jesuits undertake twice during their training. The power of the Jesuits in the 17th and 18th cents. gave rise to considerable hostility in political circles of Europe, and also in some religious ones, particularly among the
Jansenists
. In 1773 the Society was formally suppressed by Clement XIV, but restored again in 1814 by Pius VII. From then on the Society showed itself especially devoted to the Holy See.

 
Back
  -  
 
New Search

(d. 30 or 33 CE).
Jewish religious teacher, and in traditional Christian belief the unique
incarnation
of God. (For the name ‘Jesus Christ’ see
CHRIST
.)
Jesus was born before the death of King Herod (4 BCE), of pious parents Joseph and
Mary
, of Nazareth in Galilee. According to Matthew and Luke, Mary conceived Jesus by the operation of the
Holy
Spirit while remaining a virgin: see
VIRGIN BIRTH
. Jesus is once called a ‘carpenter’ (Mark 6. 3, unless the alternative reading referring to his believed father is preferred), but nothing is known of his life (apart from the fact that he had brothers and sisters) until he began to preach publicly. Probably his first work was alongside
John the Baptist
in the Jordan valley (John 3. 22 ff.), Jesus himself having been baptized by John (Mark 1. 9). The gospels, however, place most of his career in Galilee and N. Palestine generally. Probably this career lasted only two or three years, before he was arrested and executed, having made a deliberate journey to Jerusalem for
Passover
.
Jesus preached about the
kingdom of God
, and specifically of its imminent approach. Jesus, however, speaks of it sometimes as future (Matthew 6. 10), sometimes as already present (Matthew 12. 28, Luke 11. 20), and at other times as something which cannot be described except indirectly through
parables
(Mark 4. 30). Jesus taught and acted (especially in healing) in a way which manifested the ‘power’ (
dunamis
) and ‘authority’ (
exousia
), not of himself but of God, whom he characterized as both king and father, addressing him as
Abba
. This provoked the fundamental question of Mark 6. 2 which is the beginning of
Christology
.
How Jesus thought of himself in relation to this coming kingdom is uncertain. Clearly he mediated through himself an effect of God which transfigured his own life and transformed the lives of others. From the wellattested fact that Jesus addressed God as Abba (Aramaic, ‘father’), it could be inferred that he was Son of God; but Jesus did not use this expression as an exclusive title for himself. His most significant reference to himself seems to have been as ‘the
son of man
’.
Jesus selected an intimate band of twelve disciples (Mark 3. 14), but there are many sayings about the challenge of following him (e.g. Mark 8. 34) which seem to be addressed to his adherents generally. It is striking that there is no clear evidence that Jesus formed any kind of institution for his followers.
In his teaching, he often challenged the teaching of others, while remaining within the Jewish religion of the
Torah
(e.g. in attending synagogue, Matthew 4. 23, 9. 35; Luke 4. 16 ff.; John 6. 59). Often where he appears to criticize the biblical commandments themselves (e.g. Matthew 5. 21–48) his own dictates are more rather than less exacting, or even on a different plane altogether. His summary of Torah (
kelal
) was in effect a context-independent command (see
ETHICS
,
CHRISTIAN
).
The gospels record that Jesus was executed by
crucifixion
by the Roman authorities in Judaea. Jesus clearly made his way deliberately to Jerusalem (the Gk. uses strong words of necessity concerning his determination to leave the relative security of Galilee and to go to Jerusalem), because it was only in Jerusalem that the issue could be resolved, whether his teaching was ‘from God or men’. It is equally clear that the initial offence of Jesus had to do with his threat to the authority of the Temple in deciding the true interpretation of Torah (the same issue which was raised by Stephen, Acts 7. 11 f.). This (as an offence) goes back to Deuteronomy 17. 8–13, which states that an obstinate teacher (see
REBELLIOUS ELDER
), who insists on his own opinion against the majority, must be brought before ‘the judge who shall be in those days’ (i.e. the highest authority), and if he rejects the decision on his teaching, he must be executed—because two interpretations of Torah must necessarily destroy Israel. The so-called ‘trial’ of Jesus was initially an investigation to see whether he came into the category of an obstinate teacher who insisted on his own opinion. Whether it was necessary or simply convenient to hand Jesus over to the Romans for the punishment which Deuteronomy requires is uncertain; the charge then would have involved Jesus’ threat to the Roman administration by his threat to the religious establishment which co-operated with the Romans.
There is good reason, therefore, to believe that Jesus anticipated his own death (the necessity of the journey to Jerusalem carries that implication, since Jesus knew that his teaching and actions came, not from himself, but from God, and that they were not subject to human authority). If the connection with Daniel 7 is correct, then he saw his death as the fulfilment of Israel's true destiny; and he saw it also as a
lutron
(ransom, in terms of a current dispute between Pharisees and Sadducees) for the sins of ‘many’ (Mark 10. 45). Such an interpretation is inherent above all in the
eucharistic
words at the
Last Supper
.
Jesus was executed and laid in a tomb on Friday; according to the gospels on Sunday morning his tomb was found to be empty. Beyond this point the three gospels Matthew, Luke, and John offer various and differing accounts of appearances of Jesus to his followers. These appearances are also mentioned by Paul (1 Corinthians 15. 5–8) as among the earliest traditions he knew, and (more than the empty tomb) lie at the basis of the Christian belief that Jesus had risen from the dead (see
RESURRECTION OF CHRIST
).
In Islam Jesus is generally called
s
ibn Maryam (Jesus, son of Mary) in the
Qur
n
. He is one of the
Prophets
, a line which began with
Adam
and ended with
Mu
ammad
. He is mentioned, together with Zakariy
,
John
, and Elias, as one of the ‘Righteous’ (6. 85). Like Adam, he was created from dust (3. 59). The Qur
n concentrates on the beginning and the end of
s