The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (110 page)

The good news for our children is that they no longer need worry about becoming some random, insignificant cog in a huge wheel but conversely, the bad news is that the corporate-controlled state has no other use for them, either.
 
We have all become or are about to become, to paraphrase the immortal words of the Elite stooge, Henry Kissinger, a generation of ‘useless eaters’.

Children want to learn; in fact they are eager to feast on knowledge but by the end of fifteen or sixteen years of state education only the most dedicated and brainwashed still derive enjoyment from learning.
 
The government education system will literally destroy a child’s interest in learning as it is indeed designed to do.
 
In fact, many students, now used to such modern educational devices as the Internet and computers, are classified by the dinosaurs of the education system in conjunction with Big Pharma (the pharmaceutical cartel) as having ADHD ‘Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder’.
 
These ‘abnormal children’, for some strange reason just cannot seem to handle out-dated, centuries-old educational systems since they already have access to much more interesting methods of self-learning.
 
So, what do the authorities do with these ‘misfits’?
 
They drug them to dumb them down and make them compliant and unresponsive whilst labelling them as a ‘problem child’ so that they can handle sitting in an uncomfortable wooden chair and reading uninteresting facts out of dingy old books all day long.

If you are a young person wondering about your future, one of the last things you should consider doing is paying to go to a college or University.
 
If your main intention is to learn however, there is no excuse for not doing so completely outside of any organised school system.
 
Thanks to the internet the world is at your fingertips so take advantage of it before the governments begin to shut it down.
  
And, of course, no school education can compete with real life experiences; travel is one of the best educations anyone can ever have.
 

However, education or more specifically further education or tertiary education is now being used as a cash-cow both for governments and for the banksters who enslave us, alike.
 
Here is the gist of the plan:

Step 1.
 
Ensure that the benefits of a University or college education are aggressively ‘sold’ to the public by the expedient of substantially increasing the criteria by which candidates qualify for jobs in the first place.
 
ie. Ensure that more and more jobs can only be performed by ‘graduates’ thus dramatically increasing the uptake of University and college places.

Step 2.
 
Lower the standard of examinations to ensure that more and more students pass them and thus qualify for tertiary education.

Step 3.
 
Gradually, in a series of small steps, increase tuition fees and thus by default the amount of money that needs to be borrowed by students in order to complete their courses.
 
Significantly in Britain in 2011, tuition fees tripled literally overnight, thus ensuring that student debt to the bankers becomes an almost intolerable burden.
 
Indeed, in the future, some students will never be able to pay back these manufactured debts.

The effect of this is that many students, whether or not they actually graduate, will have debt burdens exceeding £100,000, before they start in employment and attempt to obtain mortgages.
 
If repaid over 30 years, this debt represents a £500,000 windfall for the banks and in the event of default, even more.
 
As a result, once entrapped in this way, escape will be nigh on impossible, the bondage will become permanent and future lives and careers will be impaired or ruined, before they even start in many cases.

In Britain at least, there is currently a moratorium on repayments before a certain age and/or income level is attained, but not so in the US where Congress ended bankruptcy protections, refinancing rights, statutes of limitations, truth-in-lending requirements, fair debt collection and state usury laws when applied to federally guaranteed student loans. As a result of this abomination, lenders may freely deduct from salaries, income tax refunds, earned income tax credits, as well as Social Security and disability income to assure defaulted loan payments.
 
In addition, defaulting may cause loss of professional licenses and status, making repayment even harder or impossible.
 
How long before this insidious state of affairs comes to pass elsewhere, do you suppose?
 
My guess would be ‘fairly imminently’, to be frank.

As a result of this, for many people, permanent debt bondage is assured.
 
In addition, no appeals process allows determinations of default challenges under a process letting lenders rip-off borrowers, often in perpetuity.
 
The truth is that there now exists a conspiratorial alliance of lenders, guarantors, servicers, and collection companies enriching themselves hugely at the borrowers’ expense, thriving on extortionate fees and related schemes.
 
It is essentially a government-sanctioned racket, scamming millions of indebted victims.
 
Lenders thrive on bad debts, deriving income from inflated service-charges, default and collection fees.
 
Today we have created a paradise for the unscrupulous lenders as default rates soar and people begin to drown in debt and student loans have become a dramatically increasing percentage of that overall debt.

The end product of all this is that several education policy experts have predicted serious implications for future graduates…

“If you have a lot of people finishing or leaving school [entrapped in] debt, their choices may be very different than the generation before them.
 
Things like buying a home, starting a family, starting a business, saving for their own kids’ education may not be an option if they're trying to repay student debt. There’s much more awareness about student borrowing than there was 10 years ago.
 
People either are in debt or know someone in debt.”
 
Lauren Asher, President of the Institute for College Access and Success

Many of them have their own personal horror stories about how predatory lenders, servicers, guarantors, and collection companies rip them off under a totally escape-proof system.
 
In fact the entire scheme amounts to nothing more or less than legalised theft and enslavement, in fact in much the same way as the banksters treat their investors and steal from them with impunity.

“About two-thirds of the people I see attended Universities.
 
Most did not complete their programme, and no one I have worked with has ever gotten a job in the field they were supposedly trained for.
 
For them, the negative (debt default) mark on their credit report is the number one barrier to moving ahead in their lives.
 
It doesn't just delay their ability to buy a house; it gets in the way of their employment prospects, finding an apartment, almost anything they try to do.” Deanne Loonin, National Consumer Law Centre attorney

Western society today is characterised by a combination of rising prices, rising poverty, unemployment, mortgage foreclosures, homelessness, hunger, student debt entrapment and despair, completely mocking the notion of a fair and equitable society.
 
Instead we have a corrupt political duopoly, sucking public wealth into the already-bulging coffers of the super-rich, neglecting public want and needs, waging permanent war and driving other nations down the road of permanent war leading to tyranny and ultimately, ruin.
 
Anyone attending a college or University in an attempt to ‘get ahead’ of the rest in the labour market will unfortunately be several years behind those who go directly into a job from school and what is much, much worse, will no doubt be in debt for the rest of their life.

So-called ‘charities’ for the most part are nothing more or less than a means of extracting even more money from the masses to swell the already overflowing coffers of the mega-rich.
  
We need to collectively realise that we are being scammed on a massive scale and every time we respond to the emotional blackmail emanating from these highly dubious institutions 24/7, we are no more contributing to a ‘good cause’ than we are in buying the corporate rubbish masquerading as ‘consumer goods’, which largely originate from the same sources, as the large charities are more often than not, simply a thinly-disguised front for propounding corporate policy and interests.

It very much goes against ‘the grain’ to actually even attempt to write this section, such is the power of the propaganda directed at us, but write it and fight the internal conflict I must, if we are to put an end to this hoax.
 
But firstly let me state for the avoidance of doubt, that I have nothing but admiration, except maybe tinged with a little sadness, for the millions that freely give what little spare time they have as voluntary workers for many of these utterly unscrupulous organisations.
 
These people are some of the most selfless on the planet and yet they are being deceived on a monstrous scale by the Elite bloodsuckers who perpetuate this state of affairs without even so much as a mild attack of conscience.

Whether we are being almost literally accosted in the street by someone thrusting a collecting box at us, or subjected to massive multi-million pound advertising campaigns in the media, the name of the game is indeed emotional blackmail of the most insidious yet persuasive kind.
 
There is something innate in the human psyche (apart from those psychopaths who prey upon us) which engenders in us a need to show others that we are essentially, ‘good’ and ‘caring’ people and it is this desire that is subtly turned against us to perpetrate the hoax of charitable donations.

I do not include within this category, small local charities, run by and for victims of various kinds of suffering or injustice, but all those world-wide and nationwide, household-name type charities, whose names with whom we are all so familiar.

We should also consider the more basic issue of why these grand-scale charities are needed in our supposed enlightened times, anyway.
 
Are we not supposed to be civilised beings?
 
Or are we so un-civilised that we cannot or will not adequately feed and otherwise generally care for every under-privileged member of our species?
 
Have you even ever asked yourself the question as to why this may be the case?
 
If the mega-rich really wanted poverty and hardship to end, they could do so almost overnight by expending a small amount of the daily interest from their enormous fortunes.
 
The very fact that they do not, speaks volumes to me.
 
Put another way, why should we, those of us who are strictly speaking just above the poverty line, contribute from our meagre disposable incomes, whilst the rich sit back and happily allow this state of affairs to continue?
 
The answer is, because they can.

Then there is the question of the patronage of charities.
 
The patron of a charity is usually a high-profile personality, whose names are highly sought-after for patronage in the full knowledge that as this is a so-called ‘well-respected’ person, ensuring that the charities will be more high-profile and thus attract even more of the public’s money.
 
For example, the Queen of England is patron to over 600 charities.
 
Yes, that is correct – over 600!
 
Do you really believe that this woman, head of the most ruthless family on the planet and personally responsible, directly and indirectly (along with the rest of her genocidal brood) for millions of deaths worldwide in her own lifetime, actually cares a damn about starving children or victims of the wars that her and her ilk are responsible for causing in the first place?
 
I think not somehow.

Indeed some charities have been with us for centuries and so it is blatantly obvious to me that the reasons for the charity’s founding in the first place have not been solved.
 
So realistically speaking, that charity has failed in its objectives to exacerbate or end the problems it was set-up to counteract.
 
If a charity did succeed in solving the problems it was created to fight, then it would in effect be responsible for its own demise, logically, would it not?
 
Of course this is a paradox that will never be reconciled whilst charities continue to so successfully deprive the masses of their hard-earned funds.

Here are some examples from many instances.

Whenever funds need to be raised to feed the starving millions, to bring clean water to those without, to build homes and habitats for those in need and to help rescue the victims of natural disasters or famine, one person always seems to be prominent – none
 
other than ‘Sir’ Robert Geldof himself, the original 1970s ‘teenage rebel’.

“I think Band Aid was diabolical... Bob Geldof is a nauseating character.
 
Many people find that very unsettling, but I'll say it as loud as anyone wants me to.
 
In the first instance, the record itself was absolutely tuneless.
 
One can have great concern for the people of Ethiopia, but it's another thing to inflict daily torture on the people of England.
 
It was an awful record considering the mass of talent involved.
 
And it wasn't done shyly; it was the most self-righteous platform ever in the history of popular music.”
 
Morrissey of the British band ‘The Smiths’, referring to the hit song, ‘Do They Know its Christmas’

Since then, Geldof and others such as Bono of the rock band U2 have almost made new careers of being figureheads of poverty relief whilst reaping the benefits these events provide them, that is name and face recognition.  For instance, in November 2008, Geldof was paid $100,000 in Australia for a brief speech addressing Third World poverty whilst Bono was recently implicated in a scandal relating to his own charity and its total lack of actual monetary contributions to the causes it is said to support, despite its £12m per annum turnover.

Brian Johnson, lead singer of AC/DC, said that people like Geldof and Bono should dip into their own bank accounts, as do the members of AC/DC and give without publicity, rather than being ‘pop impresarios of poverty’.

Michael Chussodovsky scathingly dissected Geldof's role in this financial charade, thus…
“Most casual observers might assume that the money generated by corporate sponsors, DVD sales, performance royalties and direct contributions would be funnelled into various charitable organizations aiding the poorest people of developing nations around the world.
 
They would be wrong.”

Instead, as Chussodovsky illustrates, the money raised in almost every instance, is used to pay off the corporate creditors of indebted countries.
 
In effect, the entire focus of the money generated by Live8 was to provide direct funds to corporations that were ‘owed money’ by these impoverished nations.

As if that were not sufficiently outrageous, the reality is actually much worse than that.   Those same monetary amounts contributed by Live8 to these private corporations to provide more relief to them for the money they had lent to these impoverished nations was then deducted from the direct aid packages and social service programmes formerly contributed by the G8 to these countries.

As Chussodovsky also clearly states, “For each dollar of 'debt cancellation' to the international financial institutions, the G8 will reduce the flow of foreign aid to these countries.
 
In other words, the foreign aid earmarked to finance much needed social programs will now go directly into the coffers of the IMF and the World Bank.”

Moreover, the International Monetary Fund and The World Bank and The African Development Bank never write-off their debts.
 
So what was being promoted and touted around the world as a way to help some of the poorest countries on the planet was actually a covert exercise in paying off international financial institutions for aid they had previously lent these nations, whilst guaranteeing the reduction of the same amount in future funding for these very programmes.

In effect, Live Aid and Live8 were nothing more or less than gigantic propaganda pieces and financial con tricks to repay private institutions and their criminal friends at the IMF and World Bank.  Live8 acted as a direct reimbursement process for the creditors of the poorest countries on the planet, while further binding these countries, their industries and exports, to the future predations of the World Bank and IMF. 

This allowed them to impose even more social control on their political processes by insisting on ‘democratic reforms’ commensurate with the same sort the West has imposed on Iraq, Afghanistan and now Egypt and Libya, thereby allowing Western governments to control the election process and the officials who will come to power in these countries while insisting on ‘free market reforms’, all of which does nothing more than to diminish their sovereignty while transferring ever more overt socio-political control to nations outside these countries and the corporate predators that lurk there ever-ready to exploit new markets.  This arrangement also makes it impossible for these countries to default on their debt, perpetually keeping them in the cycle of debt-repayment and financial servitude.

Frauds like Geldof have promoted this Elite, globalist charade, enjoying the fame and royalty income which their appearance on world-wide television provides, whilst at the same time turning a cynically blind eye to the financial sleight of hand going on behind the scenes which does nothing more than to keep these countries and peoples steeped in poverty whilst reducing the social services these countries so desperately need.

Geldof supposedly organised all of the Live8 concerts (the 20th anniversary of Live Aid) in 2005, on his mobile phone.
 
This is a very interesting concept considering the fact that he is supposed to be ‘Mr. Anti-establishment’ and a ‘champion of the poor and hungry’.
 
If that is indeed the case then the question needs to be asked as to how he managed to get several governments to co-operate with him and endorse his plans so easily?
 
Why did these governments not just tell him politely to ‘go away’ or indeed any other two-word phrase with the same implication?
 
Actually, I can almost guarantee that if Bob Geldof really was assisting starving Africans to the detriment of the money-interests in the ways popularly described, then he would almost certainly have ended the same way as John Lennon, JFK, RFK and MLK and others whose motivations were against the best interests of the Elite, let alone being fêted as a saintly figure.
 

Ever wondered why ‘Sir’ Bob was given an honorary knighthood (as an Irishman he is not entitled to a ‘regular’ knighthood)?
 
Was it for helping the world’s poor and oppressed perchance?
 
Or was it more likely to be for his contribution to the financial bottom-lines of the World Bank, the IMF and the Bank of International Settlements – all run and owned by our Royal and Elite masters?
 
Geldof was used by them as the ‘good guy’ to promote their greed as a charitable event and good old Bob, for his part was only too willing to comply.
 
Did he do it knowingly or unknowingly?
 
Was he paid for his services or did he give all his free time willingly and without thought of remuneration?
 
I know where my vote would be cast on that particular issue.

The picture below tells us all we need to know about ‘Sir’ Bob’s real affiliations…