The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (47 page)

I strongly suspect that the introduction and proliferation of psychometric testing for job applicants, especially in the public sector, has a hidden and nefarious agenda.
 
Rather than being used to determine the candidates most suitable for specific jobs in a positive sense, this testing is being used to actually uncover and employ those with psychopathic and/or sociopathic tendencies.
  
This fact would neatly explain why there has been a huge paradigm shift in those we deal with in ‘authority’ and whose arrogance, intransigence, inflexibility and often sheer bloody-mindedness seems to have increased exponentially in the last few years.

This has led to a fundamental change in the relationship between the general populace and those wearing suits and uniforms and indeed any of those people who act as an interface between the public and an institution or corporation.
 
Up until a short time ago, people undertaking these jobs still actually believed (and behaved as if) their role was to serve the public, but not any longer.
 
Such old-fashioned values of courtesy and willingness to help have now been replaced increasingly by ‘jobsworths’ who waste no opportunity to flaunt and emphasise their ‘authority’ in any way possible, even on occasions going out of their way to be deliberately awkward or confrontational, resulting of course in extreme frustration which can often flare into anger and sometimes even violence.
 

How often do we now see notices in banks, local and central government offices and other institutions dealing directly with the public that state words to the effect of, ‘this company/department has a zero-tolerance policy regarding verbal and physical assaults upon our staff’?
 
All very commendable of course, but we should also question as to why these incidents would appear now to have become relatively commonplace.
 
Could it be that their staff are actually selected and employed in the first place because in psychometric tests they exhibited the kind of intransigence that engenders such frustrations?
 
I believe this to be a strong possibility.
 
This has all been systematically planned and foisted upon us as we ‘slept’ in our apathetic states, in order to further destabilise society and cause maximum inconvenience and disruption with a long-term view to discouraging and making unacceptable any form of protest or dissent, even against gross injustice.
 
We are meant to just simply ‘accept our lot’ and carry on with a ‘stiff upper lip’ and all that, even in the face of extreme provocation.

This was all planned many years ago by the Zionist 'Frankfurt School' established in 1932 in the German city from where it takes its name.
 
It was subsequently relocated to California, which through no coincidence has now become the global epicentre of ‘political correctness.’
 

The Tavistock Institute is merely the British branch of this insidious organisation.
 
Its primary mission is to establish a global brainwashing and opinion-forming network.
 
Tavistock is the originator of the Aquarian Conspiracy, designed to weaken the fabric of society by encouraging widespread drug use, promiscuity, homosexuality and lesbianism.
 
It has been very successful in the United States as it works through many research institutes and think-tanks.
 
The principal ones in the United States are the Stanford Research Institute, Rand Research and Development Corporation, the Institute for Policy Studies, the Aspen Institute, the Hudson Institute and the Brookings Institute.
 
Tavistock in fact runs over 30 ‘research’ institutions in the United States.

These were some of the stated aims of the Frankfurt School as long as eighty years ago:

Create a culture of ‘political correctness’ thus disempowering free-thinking and individual opinions

Promote continual change to create confusion and instability

Expose very young children to sex and homosexuality

Make homosexuality and lesbianism and other sexual deviancy the norm and ‘positively discriminate’ for it

Undermine parents’, schools’ and teachers' authority

Encourage mass immigration to destroy national identity and engender social unrest

Create the crime of ‘racism’ to further facilitate a mass immigration policy in order to undermine individual nation states and build tension and resentment

Promote a binge-drinking culture in order to destabilise society especially youth culture

Undermine and discourage anything that brings people together socially

Introduce a legal system biased against the victims rather than the perpetrators of crime

Encourage a dependency on the state or state benefits

Impose greater control of and facilitate the dumbing-down of the media

Foster the breakdown of the nuclear family unit through the encouragement of promiscuity and ‘free love’

Does any of that seem familiar, perchance?
 
Does it possibly describe the society in which we all now live?

Political correctness has now become an obsession and a legitimate tool to deny us our rights and freedoms, wherever possible or practical.

Barely a day goes by where we do not read or hear of seemingly bizarre incidents that result from the above list of goals being fulfilled or from so-called politically incorrect attitudes.
 
Here are a few from a list that would fill an entire book, let alone one chapter…

An employee at a police training centre related that they are not allowed to ask for ‘black coffee’ in the staff cafeteria, it must be ‘coffee without milk’ or refer to plastic bin bags as 'black bags' and also that they cannot refer to a ‘blackboard’ or a ‘whiteboard’, it has to be a ‘pen board’. 

A ten-year-old boy was left to drown in a pond in England by two Police Community Support Officers and the police spokesman subsequently justified their actions by stating that no rescue was attempted because the officers in question were 'not trained to deal with such an incident'.

Paramedics in Somerset, England were prevented from treating a man with a broken back while he was lying in six inches of water.
 
They were informed that this action would breach Health and Safety rules because they were 'not trained for water rescues'.
 
A spokesman for the South West Ambulance Service then said that 'the incident was managed in accordance with procedures.'

Microsoft froze the account of a man who included the word 'gay' in his ‘Xbox Live’ profile.
 
He did this because he lives in Fort Gay, West Virginia but this mattered not a jot to Microsoft even when the town mayor intervened on his behalf.
 
They only reluctantly relented when the story was made public, probably in order to save face and not because they believed their policy was abjectly nonsensical or severely restrictive of personal freedoms.

Many British schools and nurseries (kindergartens) have changed the words of the previously popular nursery rhyme 'Baa, baa, black sheep' to 'Baa, baa, rainbow sheep.' Is there such a thing as a multi-coloured sheep, perhaps?
 
The City of Birmingham in England actually wanted to ban the rhyme altogether until black parents vehemently protested.

This is the real point.
 
Despite the pretence to the contrary, none of this utter stupidity is really about protecting peoples' feelings, freedoms, safety or preventing prejudice.
 
It is in fact the polar opposite of this and all about control of the population as in the novel 1984 where 'newspeak' replaced 'oldspeak'.
 
The language is being subtly modified and changed over time to eliminate words that allow us to express a strong opinion in order to dumb-down language to the point where people will eventually be unable to transmit ideas and concepts effectively.
 
This of course is exactly as George Orwell himself predicted because he was an insider who knew what the agenda for the future was and is.

 
In fact, the systematic introduction of the ‘jobsworth’ and ‘political correctness’ mentality to all areas of our lives is part of the overall, long-term plan for the transformation of human society.
 
We can accept this out of fear of being criticised or condemned or we can express our intelligence and consciousness and refuse to be told what we can and cannot say and in what context.
 
In other words the choice between freedom and enslavement is in our own hands.

“History is subjective, though it was never meant to be.  Real history has never been in [as much] danger as it is today. 
 
World War II wasn’t the ‘clean war’ we purport it to be but as dirty as World War I, with its secret deals and payoffs.  Everything in its aftermath has required a mythology, misrepresentation and disinformation, not only the war but it’s after-shocks and how the conflicts continue, almost endlessly.”
 
Gordon Duff, historical researcher

“World War Two was the most egregious hoax in history.
 
A cult of satanic Jews and Masons, financed by the Rothschild syndicate is responsible for destroying more than sixty million lives.
 
Hitler proved by his actions that he was a traitor.
 
He was installed by the Illuminati to destroy Germany so that it would slip neatly into the NWO.”
 
Henry Makow, researcher, 14th May 2011

World Wars I and II were planned as early as the latter part of the nineteenth century and promoted as a stepping-stone toward achieving the ultimate goals of the Elite in the work known as ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’ which was written in the late nineteenth century and first came to light in the first decade of the twentieth century.
 
The secondary intention was the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine as a guaranteed future means of generating further conflicts as and when necessary with all the international protections afforded legitimate countries as opposed to ‘rogue’ states.
 
How much more provocative could it be than to install an overtly aggressive and acquisitive Jewish ‘state’ in the centre of the Arab / Muslim world?
 
However, as we will see, the events that transpired in the first half of the twentieth century were but a means toward both these ends.

Both World Wars were in actuality nothing less than cynically disguised attempts to totally subjugate Germany and its peoples and to destroy her growing influence in world affairs in order to remove her share of world trade markets which was ultimately depriving the British and more significantly, Elite industrialists of profit they regarded as their own and also, importantly to achieve the Zionist goal of a Jewish Homeland.

The cryptically-worded Balfour Declaration during WWI was merely Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for enticing the United States into the war and was as a result described by one contemporary commentator as ‘just as phony as a three dollar bill’.
 
The rest, as they ironically say, is ‘history’.
 
The United States with a little help from its allies, Britain and France, crushed Germany as was expected and all parties attended the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 to determine the punitive reparations to be imposed in order to further decimate Germany.
 
At this conference were 117 Zionist Jews, there as a delegation representing Zionist interests, headed by Bernard Baruch, the American bankster.

It was there at the conference where the Balfour declaration was made public.
 
As the victorious nations were slicing up the map of Europe to share the spoils among the victors, the declaration was produced.
 
At this point the Germans realised what the plan had been all along, but were powerless in the face of their unconditional surrender to do or say anything to affect the outcome of the talks and the resulting Treaty of Versailles.
 
The Zionists coveted Palestine in order to further their secret agenda and were determined to get it at any cost, either monetarily or in the form of human suffering.

Germany, unsurprisingly regarded this as the ultimate treachery on the part of the Jews.
 
To illustrate the point, a comparison would be to suppose that Britain was at war with Russia and was winning comfortably but in a humanitarian action, approached the Russians and offered them generous peace terms.
 
Then suddenly China entered the war as an ally of Russia and their joining the war results in Britain’s devastating defeat.
 
Bear in mind also that this is not just an ordinary defeat; this is a crushing defeat, with post-war reparations demanded, the likes of which had never before or since been seen.

Further suppose then after that defeat, if it was then discovered that it was the ethnic Chinese in our own country, the Chinese-British citizens, whom we had previously thought were loyal citizens, were ‘selling us out’ to Russia and that it was through them that their mother country was brought into the war against us.
 
How would we feel then, in the UK about our Chinese ethnic citizens?
 
Would there be uncontained rage and bloodshed, countrywide?
 
I submit that there would indeed.
 
British indignation would know no limits at all and would be turned upon all far-easterners regardless of background and indeed anyone of even slight far-eastern appearance.

This then is exactly how the Germans felt towards the Jews.
 
In 1905, when the first attempted Communist revolution in Russia failed and many Jews had to flee from Russia, almost all of them fled to Germany and Germany gave them unconditional refuge.
 
They were treated with great respect and kindness and were for the most part made welcome.
 
This then was how German generousity was repaid, for no reason at all other than the fact that the Jewish Zionists wanted Palestine as their so-called ‘Jewish commonwealth.’
 
Treachery is too mild a word to describe their actions accurately.

The Zionists themselves admitted that there were no racial or religious ill-feelings towards them from Germans; it was all political and economic.
 
But the views that later manifested themselves in Germany were due to one thing only and that is that the German people held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat and subsequent inhuman subjugation via the devastating reparations inflicted on them by the Treaty of Versailles.
 
Once the pattern began to repeat itself in the early 1930s with the Jewish/Zionist declaration of war against Germany in 1933, then the situation began to escalate out of control.

When Germans first realised that the Zionist Jews were responsible for their defeat, they naturally resented it, but to their credit not a single Jew was physically harmed.
 
Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the US State Department, wrote in his book and quoted from a US State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, regarding a Jew who went to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners and wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.
 
Everyone was treated well despite the fact that the camps were filled with Communists.
 
They were mainly Jewish Communists because about 98% of the Communists in Europe at that time were Jews.
 
There were also some priests and ministers, labour-union leaders, Freemasons and others with internationalist affiliations.

Meanwhile, the Jews attempted to cover-up the fact that they had betrayed Germany and that the Germans naturally resented it.
 
There is no question that the actions that the Germans took against the Jews were appropriate.
 
They naturally discriminated against them wherever they could and shunned them, stopping short however of actually physically harming them in any way.

Naturally, the Germans questioned who these people thought they were to declare a boycott against them and cause their industries to come almost to a standstill.
 
They naturally resented it and under the circumstances, one can almost sympathise with the fact that swastikas were painted on the doors of shops owned by Jews.
 
In their view, why should a German give his money to a shopkeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Zionists of the world?
 
The boycott continued for some time and tensions escalated, until on the 7th November 1938 a young Jewish man, Herschel Grynszpan from Poland casually walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot Ernst vom Rath a German diplomat five times, leaving him for dead.
 
He died sometime later in hospital.
 
According to Hans-Jurgen Dosscher, a German historian, this was not a politically-motivated event as commonly believed, but the result of a homosexual love affair gone-awry between the diplomat and the young man.
 
But I personally believe that it was a ‘set-up’, a ‘false flag’ operation to provide an excuse for a violent series of reprisals and if it was, it definitely worked.
 

This was most probably the ‘straw that broke the camel’s back’ as far as Germany and her people were concerned and from that point on, the ethnic German people’s relationship with the German Jews changed from one of grudging tolerance to overt hatred and open violence.
 
This incident was the catalyst to ‘Kristallnacht’ on the 9th November 1938, a night of infamy which saw the violence escalate, Jewish shops burned and looted and Jews attacked, of whom 91 died.
 
I do not attempt for one moment to pretend that the Jewish population deserved the violence directed at them or defend it in any way, but merely try to explain that there were underlying reasons for it, valid or not, which are hidden from general view in order to deliberately falsify history.
 
However, violence of any kind and for whatever reason has no place in a civilised society.

Is it evil to persecute all the members of one particular race or religion for the sins and crimes of a few?
 
Yes, of course it is.
 
Any such actions should not be sanctioned at all, but unfortunately we humans are imperfect and emotions such as hate, thoughts of revenge, jealousy and anger will always exist in the psyche of mankind.
 
However, all stories have two sides and relating these events of the 1930s as they actually happened, puts into perspective the fact that what you ‘know’ and have been taught as fact all your life about the sequence of events leading to the tragic war of 1939-45 is not necessarily the ‘whole truth and nothing but the truth’.
 

Yes, the Nazis were an intrinsically evil organisation and Jews and other targeted groups were persecuted and many tragically died in the prelude to war, but these were not just the random acts and whims of an inherently racist regime and people with an irrational hatred of one small minority group, there were complex, underlying reasons for their actions.
 
These reasons have been for the most part and still continue to be, deliberately hidden from you in an attempt to corrupt and distort history in order to benefit the Zionist minority by eliciting largely unwarranted sympathy for a small section of human society.

“All the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players.
 
They have their exits and their entrances; and one man in his time plays many parts.”
  
William Shakespeare, ‘As You Like It’

So exactly who was Adolf Hitler?
 
Hitler (Heidler) was born at 6.30am on the 20th April 1889 in Braunau, Austria.
 
He was the fourth child of his father Alois Heidler’s third wife, Klara Pölzl, granddaughter of Johann Nepomuk Heidler, brother of Alois' deceased stepfather.

Alois’ father was ostensibly a certain Johann Georg Heidler although many historians have now come to seriously doubt this fact.
 
In the 1930s, Chancellor Engelbert Döllfuss of Austria conducted an investigation into Hitler’s heritage, the result of which was a document that proved that Maria Anna Schicklgruber, Johann’s wife and Hitler’s grandmother was in fact living away from the family home in Spital at the time of her conception of Alois.
 
She was employed as a live-in servant at the home of Baron Rothschild in Vienna and as soon as her pregnancy became known to the Rothschilds, she was immediately, conveniently dispatched back home to her husband in Spital, where Alois was eventually born.
  

If all this is true (and Döllfuss and many other researchers certainly believed it to be so) then this means that Hitler was not only one quarter Jewish, but also the grandson of a Rothschild.
 
The significance of this fact should not be underestimated.

Hitler himself knew of the existence of this document and the incriminating evidence it contained and so in order to obtain it he initiated the assassination of Döllfuss on the 25th July 1934, an event which also ultimately precipitated the Anschlüss in Austria.

As I say, the fact that Hitler was a Rothschild is far from insignificant.
 
The Rothschilds are a major Zionist-Jewish Elite family and the ultimate driving force of the world of banking (and indeed much of the Elite covert operations) today.
 
It is at their behest (among others) that world events are stage-managed and manipulated and this has been the case for centuries.
 
It would very succinctly explain how a lowly army lance-corporal could be groomed and manipulated into becoming a powerful world leader in the space of a little over ten years or so.
 
Hitler’s so-called master work ‘Mein Kampf’ (my struggle) was in fact provably written on his behalf by a Jesuit priest named Father Bernhardt Staempfle who subsequently became a victim of the ‘Night of the Long Knives’ in June 1934 whereby as many as 400 of Hitler’s black-listed enemies were disposed of in one night of bloody violence.