The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (81 page)

It is also vital to understand that whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things of significance happen almost immediately. The first thing is to name the ‘scapegoat’ or ‘patsy’. Then there are a multitude of diversions created, incorporating ‘eye-witness’ testimonies to back-up the version of events that has been pre-invented and made to seem like a reasonable story.
 
Once the initial reports have aired they then have time to assess their impact and subsequently either remove the initial reports from the airwaves for good, or misuse true testimonies to create false leads for investigators, diverting them from the real truth.

 
In the first act of the play, they make an immediate arrest, or expose the person to blame, which cancels out further need for investigation, because now we all ‘know’ who is responsible.

The second act, diversion, ensures that those critical hours and days after the event are wasted as investigators and the lower ranks of the media chase a whole morass of false leads and stories.

The next stage is to wait for the ‘official’ investigation to begin.
 
Once there has been enough time to incorporate all the information that was picked-up on, in the initial moments after the event and to add and merge it into the pre-planned version of events, the ‘official’ version is then propounded with vigour.
 
This ‘official’ story is then played out across the full spectrum of the media as the evidence is manufactured and manipulated to match the official version.
 
It is from that point onwards a relatively simple matter to control this process at editorial level and to filter-out all the evidence and facts that do not match the official version whilst strongly promoting those that do. .

In much the same way as the 9/11 debris and forensic evidence was cleared away with thoroughly indecent haste, this scene of a major accident involving arguably the most famous woman in the world, was destroyed in less time than it took to happen in the first place.
 
Of course this makes perfect sense when we consider that, as with 9/11, the evidence has to disappear as quickly as possible to hide the truth and to prevent any real investigation into the incident.
 
Indeed, everything relating to this murder is decidedly ‘fishy’, to say the least.

There were 17 security cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont de l’Alma tunnel, including those inside the tunnel itself.
 
Do these perpetrators really expect anyone with an even semi-functioning brain to believe that on that particular night in only that particular part of Paris, the cameras were malfunctioning?
 
On that single basis alone, anyone who declares themselves satisfied with the outcome of all the inquiries conducted so far and agrees with their findings, is either in league with them, or so incredibly stupid, as to beggar belief.
 
However as most people are terminally ‘asleep’ these days, maybe the concept is not that badly thought-out.

The cameras are controlled by the police and are powered by an independent power supply, yet the Paris police refused categorically to explain why the cameras were out of action in that particular place and time on that particular night.
 
Never before (or since) has this happened in Paris.
 
In a letter to the UK Daily Mail, a correspondent said the cameras in the tunnel were pointing towards the wall on the morning after the crash. There is no doubt whatsoever that the police would not have failed to notice this situation.

Even more significantly, at exactly the same time as the fateful journey and subsequent crash, all the police communication frequencies in central Paris mysteriously went off-line.
 
Simon Reagan in his book, Who Killed Diana, quotes a contact called Andre, who like many people enjoys listening-in to police radio messages.
 
That night, Andre was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes’ walk from the tunnel, on the night Diana died.
 
As was his usual practice, he was using a short-wave receiver to monitor the police communications, but suddenly and inexplicably at 12.20am, all the lines went down. There was a total police radio blackout which lasted for around 20 minutes and then, Andre said, the signal returned as quickly as it had disappeared and there was a sudden explosion of radio traffic as all police personnel realised it was active again.

12.20am was the exact time that Diana and her party was leaving the Ritz.
 
Just a co-incidence though, I’m sure.
 
By the time communication was restored, Diana was lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the Emergency team and according to the autopsy report, within a few minutes of clinical death.
 
However, according to the Stevens report, there was not a shred of evidence that there was a conspiracy surrounding the death of Diana.

As previously alluded-to, causing the accident is easy for the powers involved to arrange, but of course it is not possible to guarantee that the target will be killed immediately.
 
It is therefore essential to also be in control of the medical team, because although the target is not yet dead, there is now a credible reason for them to die, after the event as it were.

In this case, the job of the medical team is to ensure the target does not survive, no matter what condition they are in after the incident.
 
Even those poor dupes who dismiss the idea that Diana was murdered, question the astonishing delay in transporting her to hospital, when according to the ‘official’ medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required urgent surgery.
 
The doctors said that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart and that this was filling her lungs with blood in effect meaning that Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to death.
 
If that is indeed correct, then the only way to save her life would be with immediate surgery, so why was it more than an hour and a half before she arrived at hospital?

Doctor Frederic Mailliez, with an American ‘friend’ by the name of Mark Butt, just so happened to drive into the tunnel from the opposite direction in the immediate aftermath of the crash.
 
The impact happened at 12.25am and by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run across to the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive, and had also phoned the emergency services.
 
He is one of 160 Parisian doctors who are on constant call for emergencies in hospitals and private homes as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins.
 
He had treated accident victims many times when he was a member of SAMU the French emergency ambulance service and yet a doctor on constant call for emergencies says all he had in his car to help Diana was an ‘oxygen cylinder and mask’.
 
Mailliez was in control of Diana and her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers, the SAMU emergency team arrived to take over.
 

He claimed initially that Diana did not say anything to him, contradicting his later comments to the UK Times newspaper, when he said she apparently repeatedly said that she ‘hurt’ as he put a resuscitation mask over her mouth.
 
Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard, also said that he has flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back of the car: “…first it’s a groan, then Dodi’s name was called…and that can only be Princess Diana’s voice”, he told the UK Daily Mirror.

 
What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious when Mailliez arrived.
 
He told the CNN chat show host, Larry King, that, “…she looked pretty fine.
 
But inside you know, the internal injury was already starting… its really funny. That’s the only part, where she was sitting, that’s the only part, which was still intact.”
  
Eh?

 
Mailliez on the one hand told a French medical magazine that; “I thought her life could be saved”, and yet said on another occasion that “it was hopeless there was nothing we could do to save her.” This is the big problem with lying – it is so difficult to get the story correct and consistent on every occasion it is told.
 
He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed lady in the world, and that the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in the tunnel; he had no idea that she was the Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the following morning.
 
Err, yeah right.
 
What kind of an idiot is this man?
 
And more to the point, how stupid does he think we all are?
 
When the emergency team arrived, Mailliez said he then left the scene because there was nothing more he could do.
 

The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she was trapped in the wreckage.
 
This is complete and utter nonsense.
 
One of the ambulance crew told the French newspaper, La Parisien that when he arrived, Diana was lying with most of her body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. “She was agitated, semi knocked-out, but conscious… she was groaning and struggling feebly.
 
She murmured ‘Oh my God’ several times.”
 
The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on the 11th September 1997, established that Diana was removed from the car shortly after the fire service arrived and the excuse of her being ‘trapped’ does not stand up to close scrutiny at all.
 
Another excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood transfusion.
 
This again is an utter lie.
 
SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion equipment because they would be unable to determine the victim’s blood type and also to carry stocks of all the many different, available blood-types would be impractical.
 
When the ambulance eventually did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles per hour and some reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles to the La Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital whilst four other hospitals quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for ‘delicate interventions’, once whilst actually within sight of the hospital.

Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital at about 2.10am, an hour and 45 minutes after the crash happened.
 
By any medical criteria whatsoever this delay is completely ludicrous.
 
Of course it is only ludicrous unless it was meant to happen this way because they were performing horrendous occult practices.
 
It doesn’t take a genius to see why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been NO inquiry into the medical response that night.
 
According to Stevens report, they could not go at speed because of her injury but this is absolute nonsense.
 
1 hour and 45 minutes??

 
Waiting at the hospital was a surgical team headed by Professor Bruno Riou, the duty surgeon who we are told, first heard about the crash whilst on his routine rounds.
 
Is that not a strange enough sentence in itself, a renowned, senior surgeon doing his rounds in the early hours of the morning?
 
Waiting with him when Diana arrived was Professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, Professor Alain Pavie, a chest and heart specialist and Professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon.
 
They had been in telephone communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout and we are told that they opened Diana’s chest cavity, repaired the artery, and battled to save her for an hour and a half before admitting defeat. This is remarkable because the autopsy report shows that Diana was clinically dead at 12.45am whilst still lying in the tunnel.
 
She was therefore clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before she even arrived at the hospital and for three hours before the professors walked out of the operating theatre to announce that she had died.
 
Having the body examined at a location under the control of the perpetrators is vital in such assassinations.
 
This is indeed a very similar game to the one that was played with JFK.

So who was behind Diana’s assassination?
 
Of course those who gave the order and those who actually carried out the deed would be rather different people.
 
This is the spider’s web of the Elite networks and whilst the order will no doubt have come from the spider in the centre, it would certainly have been carried out by one of the many ‘flies’.
 
It is highly unlikely that it would have been carried out by British intelligence directly, because of course that would be too obvious.
 
Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to distance themselves from the incident and allow them to plausibly deny that they were responsible.
 
Not only that, the intelligence agency of the nationality of the victim is then ‘free’ to work on finding who was responsible.