The Founding Fish (36 page)
Authors: John McPhee
PETA:
Fish who are released can suffer such severe stress from being “played” that they may die even though they manage to swim away.
PETA has a point. Anglers who release fish are not releasing the same fish they hooked. “Prolonged playing of fish, particularly when they are returned to the water subsequently, is to be deprecated,” Gathorne Medway wrote in 1997, reporting to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals on the findings of
a Panel of Enquiry into Shooting and Angling. “When teleost fish are severely stressed and exercised to exhaustion, they make extensive use of their âwhite' muscle system,” he said. “This differs from the red skeletal muscle of higher vertebrates, in that it is anaerobic and, although very efficient in the short term, when exhausted contains a great accumulation of lactic acid during the elimination of which the muscle system remains in prolonged fatigue. A completely exhausted fish will thus be almost unable to move for several hours after capture. During this time it will be at risk to attack by predators or injury from its inanimate environment.” Gathorne Medway, Fifth Earl of Cranbrook, holds a doctorate in zoology.
a Panel of Enquiry into Shooting and Angling. “When teleost fish are severely stressed and exercised to exhaustion, they make extensive use of their âwhite' muscle system,” he said. “This differs from the red skeletal muscle of higher vertebrates, in that it is anaerobic and, although very efficient in the short term, when exhausted contains a great accumulation of lactic acid during the elimination of which the muscle system remains in prolonged fatigue. A completely exhausted fish will thus be almost unable to move for several hours after capture. During this time it will be at risk to attack by predators or injury from its inanimate environment.” Gathorne Medway, Fifth Earl of Cranbrook, holds a doctorate in zoology.
So there is no free pass from PETA. The points it makes are at least as applicable to catch-and-release anglers as they are to fishermen who fill up their ice chests with meat. The philosophy of catch-and-release is variously expressed, each exposition differing somewhat from the one in the next pool; and while you lay out that long drapefold cast or spin a dart high across the river, they tend to echo through the mindâsome with dissonance, some a little hollow, in the reach for rationale.
Catch-and-release fishing is the most certain method yet conceived for ensuring that the same quality fish we catch today will be available tomorrow. It's also a wonderfully satisfying thing to do.
âGEORGE REIGER,
Field & Stream
Field & Stream
Game fish are too valuable to be caught only once.
âLEE WULFF
I think our own catch-and-release thing is a wonderful thing philosophically, because I think we put the emphasis on the experience, not the reward.
âMEL KRIEGER,
in a video produced by Stephen Rider Haggard
in a video produced by Stephen Rider Haggard
There is strong circumstantial evidence that “pain” in fishes is not comparable to that of higher vertebrates, nor is catching a fish a very traumatic experience for the fish (otherwise catch-and-release regulations wouldn't work).
âROBERT BEHNKE,
Professor of Fisheries Biology, Colorado State University
Professor of Fisheries Biology, Colorado State University
The producers would like to point out that, although the Macleans kept their catch as was common earlier in this century, enlightened fishermen today endorse a “catch- and-release” policy to assure that this priceless resource swims free to fight another day.
â
Written message at the end of the film version of Norman Maclean's “A River Runs Through It”
Written message at the end of the film version of Norman Maclean's “A River Runs Through It”
Maybe catching them, even only hooking them, allows the angler to enter their pure state of being for a moment, the nonreflective alpha and omega of existence. It is what well-practiced hunting and fishing is all aboutâfocusing one's attention until the awareness of intention disappears.
âTED KERASOTE,
in
Orion
, with head in stars
in
Orion
, with head in stars
Kerasote writes of “the beauty of catch-and-release fishing in an age that has grown dubious about causing harm to other life forms,” and asserts in amplification: “When we consider that we're products of a century that has spawned many legal manifestations of justice to the unempoweredâwoman's suffrage, citizenship for Indians, civil rights legislation, the endangered species act, and global human rightsâthe act of releasing subdued fish resonates deeply in our psyches. Releasing what we have caught, we can indulge ourselves in all the uplifting emotions of the kind steward's noblesse oblige ⦔
We angle because we like the fight ⦠The hook allows us to control and exert power over fish, over one of the most beautiful and seductive forms of nature, and then, because we're nice to the fish, releasing them “unharmed,” we can receive both psychic dispensation and blessing. Needless to say, if you think about this relationship carefully, it's not a comforting one, for it is a game of dominance followed by cathartic pardons, which, as a non-fishing friend remarked, “is one of the hallmarks of an abusive relationship.”
âTED KERASOTE,
in
Orion
, returning to earth
in
Orion
, returning to earth
Sanctimoniousness is where you find it. By the early years of the twenty-first century, plenty of it was wading in rivers.
Catch-and-release angling is becoming a religion. Although in some instances it is essential to the survival of the species sought, in others its major effect is to cloak its more evangelical practitioners in a mantle of righteousness.
âNELSON BRYANT,
New York Times
New York Times
To go a shade further than Bryant, catch-and-release fishing may be cruelty masquerading as political correctness. You can't help wondering what sorts of things people are doing today that seem clearly right and good, yet will one day seem wrong and bad. If I were strolling through the annals of incorrectnessâup past the invertible heroism of General Custer and on through the safaris of Dennis Finch-HattonâI would expect to discern, out in the future, catch-and-release fishing. At its best it is what Thomas McGuane calls “the thrill of the release, of a trout darting from your opening hands or resting its weight very slightly in your palms underwater, then easing off.” At its worst it is direâan unintended
failure. In the words of a shad biologist who works for a firm in Pennsylvania called Ecology III Environmental Services, “A lot of good Samaritans are killing fish.” You watch a guy in Connecticut catch a shad in a boat. He sticks a finger in past a gill cover and it comes out the mouth. He lifts the shad to show its size and beauty, then lowers the shad into the water and removes his finger. Roughing gills is what biologists call “a pure death sign.” Gill membranes are sensitive, elaborate, and easily broken. When they are damaged, a fish loses its ability to extract oxygen from water. In a video called “Fishing for the American Shad,” instructor John Punola reaches for a roe shad, saying, “Shad are very fragile. I can pick him up easily by the gills.” Even the most adroit underwater release can turn loose a fish sick with stress, destined not to recover. And the more the catch-and-release angler fumblesâthe more he manhandles fish up in air, twisting and yanking to disgorge the hookâthe lower the chance of survival. Boyd Kynard: “That airhandling time, it's the worst, it's the hardest thing on them.”
failure. In the words of a shad biologist who works for a firm in Pennsylvania called Ecology III Environmental Services, “A lot of good Samaritans are killing fish.” You watch a guy in Connecticut catch a shad in a boat. He sticks a finger in past a gill cover and it comes out the mouth. He lifts the shad to show its size and beauty, then lowers the shad into the water and removes his finger. Roughing gills is what biologists call “a pure death sign.” Gill membranes are sensitive, elaborate, and easily broken. When they are damaged, a fish loses its ability to extract oxygen from water. In a video called “Fishing for the American Shad,” instructor John Punola reaches for a roe shad, saying, “Shad are very fragile. I can pick him up easily by the gills.” Even the most adroit underwater release can turn loose a fish sick with stress, destined not to recover. And the more the catch-and-release angler fumblesâthe more he manhandles fish up in air, twisting and yanking to disgorge the hookâthe lower the chance of survival. Boyd Kynard: “That airhandling time, it's the worst, it's the hardest thing on them.”
According to New Jersey shad reports, anglers in the Delaware River release four out of five shad they catchâwith overall numbers in the many tens of thousands. The state has guessed that one per cent of the released fish die. Biologists guess at least half of them die. Some anglers use barbless hooks, which may reduce damage in a fish's mouth but do not reduce stress. Some say that when a fish hits a fly, that's it; that's what fishing is all about; the rest is just housekeepingâan anticlimax. A few of them have used hooks with neither barbs nor pointsâflies tied on hooks that have eyes at both ends. Others have used bits of fur and hackle tied to sawed-off toothpicks. This avenue leads back in history to a small Chinese sage who played a lute and meditated while fishing with utmost patience. Day after day, he caught nothing. Eventually, someone asked him what he was using for bait. He lifted his line out of the water. Nothing was on it, not even a hook.
I once had a waking dream in a large pavilion with open
sidesâpicnic tables, a smooth concrete floorâin a Forest Service campground in Arizona. No one else was there. I was thinking dark passing thoughts about playing fish: Never say playing. You are at best torturing and at worst killing a creature you may or may not eat. Playing at one end, dying at the otherâif playing is what it is, it is sadism. A man with a fly rod, waders, and Polaroids steps into the pavilion. I mean, can you see this fisherman baiting a hook with a bit of Gruyère and casting the line toward a chipmunk? The fisherman pinches some cheese on his hook. He flips the cheese to the chipmunk. The adorable little creatureâ
Eutamias quadrivittatus
âswallows. The fisherman sets the hook. The chipmunk leaps high in a shocked and wild, terrified rage. It races up posts and across beams, and somersaults through the air. It leaves the pavilion and runs flat out toward a line of trees, the reel drag clicking. Steady and attentive, the fisherman plays the chipmunk, keeping tension on the line. What is the difference between a chipmunk and a fish? “Some neurologists regard the ratio of brain to spinal cord as a promising measure of mental advance,” Stephen Jay Gould wrote. In a human being, the brain is fifty times heavier than the spinal cord. A cat? Four to one. A fish? “Fish generally dip below 1:1 (spinal cord heavier than brain).” So a fish is little more than a lively muscle, four times dumber than a cat, and the moral objection to catching one on a hook and line is pelletized anthropomorphism primed and shot from the pathetic fallacy.
sidesâpicnic tables, a smooth concrete floorâin a Forest Service campground in Arizona. No one else was there. I was thinking dark passing thoughts about playing fish: Never say playing. You are at best torturing and at worst killing a creature you may or may not eat. Playing at one end, dying at the otherâif playing is what it is, it is sadism. A man with a fly rod, waders, and Polaroids steps into the pavilion. I mean, can you see this fisherman baiting a hook with a bit of Gruyère and casting the line toward a chipmunk? The fisherman pinches some cheese on his hook. He flips the cheese to the chipmunk. The adorable little creatureâ
Eutamias quadrivittatus
âswallows. The fisherman sets the hook. The chipmunk leaps high in a shocked and wild, terrified rage. It races up posts and across beams, and somersaults through the air. It leaves the pavilion and runs flat out toward a line of trees, the reel drag clicking. Steady and attentive, the fisherman plays the chipmunk, keeping tension on the line. What is the difference between a chipmunk and a fish? “Some neurologists regard the ratio of brain to spinal cord as a promising measure of mental advance,” Stephen Jay Gould wrote. In a human being, the brain is fifty times heavier than the spinal cord. A cat? Four to one. A fish? “Fish generally dip below 1:1 (spinal cord heavier than brain).” So a fish is little more than a lively muscle, four times dumber than a cat, and the moral objection to catching one on a hook and line is pelletized anthropomorphism primed and shot from the pathetic fallacy.
Not so fast, Lefty. Are you really “playing” that shad on your line? The word is off-puttingâyou are attempting to end a creature's life. It was born here in the river, went to the Bay of Fundy, lived five years, and came back to the river to give birth to young, and now you have it on a hook at the end of a line and are moving its head from side to side as its body leaps and thrashes. Can you call that playing? Find a word for what you are doing that denigrates neither fish nor fisher. Meanwhile, Izaak W. Greenpeace, of the nail knot and the matched hatch, offers his quarry imitation
food, then tortures the victim with a steel point in the mouth until the victim exhausts and flops to one side, whereupon Greenpeace, his pleasure complete, removes the point of steel and releases the battered victim. “Imagine reaching for an apple on a tree and having your hand suddenly impaled by a metal hook that drags youâthe whole weight of your body pulling on that one handâout of the air and into an atmosphere in which you cannot breathe,” PETA suggests constructively. The chipmunk fisherman turns out to have companyâenough bizarre comparisons to fill an anthology. Try “lassoing a white-tailed deer and hauling it in until it's exhausted.”
food, then tortures the victim with a steel point in the mouth until the victim exhausts and flops to one side, whereupon Greenpeace, his pleasure complete, removes the point of steel and releases the battered victim. “Imagine reaching for an apple on a tree and having your hand suddenly impaled by a metal hook that drags youâthe whole weight of your body pulling on that one handâout of the air and into an atmosphere in which you cannot breathe,” PETA suggests constructively. The chipmunk fisherman turns out to have companyâenough bizarre comparisons to fill an anthology. Try “lassoing a white-tailed deer and hauling it in until it's exhausted.”
In 1872, it was not infra dig to relish the joy of killing, and the standards of 1872, having withstood ever amplified assault, are not exactly absent now. In 1872, fourteen-year-old Teddy Roosevelt cruised up the Nile shooting birds by the dozen with his 12-gauge Lefaucheux, blasting away, in the words of his biographer David McCullough, “at anything in sight,” and slaughtering ibises, pelicans, larks, doves, wagtails, warblers, chats, grosbeaks, plovers, cranes, pigeons, peewees, zick-zacks, and snipes. The mature T.R., defender of the environment, shot elks and grizzlies in Wyoming in such numbers that he wrote: “I have had good sport; and enough excitement and fatigue to prevent over much thought.” After Elliott Roosevelt killed a tiger south of Hyderabad, he wrote to his brother Teddy: “Finished her ⦠with a spare shot from the Bone Crusherâby George, what a hole that gun makes.” And a stubborn elephant in Ceylon: “It was only after I had put sixteen bullets into him that his great, crushing weight fell down in the bamboos.” Not long after Karen Blixen arrived in Kenya, in 1913, she went on a month-long safari in the Masai Reserve, near her farm. Known to friends as Tanne and to readers as Isak Dinesen, she is described here by her biographer Judith Thurman:
This was to be Tanne's first prolonged experience of the wild and her initiation to the rigors of safari life. She had
never slept in a tent, sat up in a boma, handled a big gun, or taken a life, and before they left Bror gave her a rifle with a telescopic sight and some instruction. There is a photograph of her doing target practice outside the house, dressed in a very smart tweed suit, black pumps, and a felt hat. She was, in fact, quite unprepared for her own blood lust. A week into the safari, drunk with it, she offered her apologies to all hunters for any prior skepticism toward their “ecstasy.”
never slept in a tent, sat up in a boma, handled a big gun, or taken a life, and before they left Bror gave her a rifle with a telescopic sight and some instruction. There is a photograph of her doing target practice outside the house, dressed in a very smart tweed suit, black pumps, and a felt hat. She was, in fact, quite unprepared for her own blood lust. A week into the safari, drunk with it, she offered her apologies to all hunters for any prior skepticism toward their “ecstasy.”
From bases like these evolved not only Charlton Heston and the NRA but such branching antitheticals as PETA and catch-and-release fishing. In English fishing, according to Howell Raines, the Teddy Roosevelt branch consists of aristocrats and moral descendants of aristocrats, who kill fish and use the k-word to emphasize their approach to the sport. Great Britain's catch-and-release fishermen are largely underclass blokes, who stand shoulder to shoulder on the edges of canals and mutually enforce their beneficent code. In England, working-class fishermen are known as “coarse fishermen,” Raines says. “They are the most militant catch-and-release fishermen in the world.”
Looking back through history at such attitudes, pause in the days of Grover Cleveland. You find him lamenting not that people thought ill of him for killing fish but that fishermen in his time were looked upon as lazy, a viewpoint that did not exclude presidents. Cleveland fished all his life, and was the author of “Fishing and Shooting Sketches” (1906). It is fair to call him an aggressive live-bait angler. On Duncan Lake in New Hampshire, luckless, he noticed a kid in a boat catching bass. He rowed over, got into the kid's boat, baited his own hook with one of the kid's live crickets, and said, “Just call me Cleve.” He started catching bass. In time, a carriage appeared on the shore of the lake and its driver called out, “Mr. President, it's time to leave.” The kid grew up to be the
Chief Constable of Tamworth, New Hampshire, and told his story to Marjory Gane Harkness (“The Tamworth Narrative,” Shiver Mountain Press, 1958).
Chief Constable of Tamworth, New Hampshire, and told his story to Marjory Gane Harkness (“The Tamworth Narrative,” Shiver Mountain Press, 1958).
Other books
White Cargo by Stuart Woods
The Future We Left Behind by Mike A. Lancaster
The Outrider (Redbourne Series #5 - Will's Story) by Kelli Ann Morgan
The Eastern Front 1914-1917 by Norman Stone
Chemistry by Jodi Lamm
Charming the Shrew by Laurin Wittig
The 97th Step by Steve Perry
The Governess' Examination by Tamsin Taite
Art of Betrayal by Gordon Corera
The Ruins of California by Martha Sherrill