The Jane Austen Guide to Happily Ever After (28 page)

BOOK: The Jane Austen Guide to Happily Ever After
8.93Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
Anne’s detective work keeps her well clear of danger. When Mrs. Smith’s revelations about Mr. Elliot—that he married for money, was unkind to his wife until she died, treated old friends with callous cruelty, and got close to the Elliot family only to stop Sir Walter from remarrying so he could inherit a baronetcy one day—confirm him to be a “disingenuous, artificial, wordly man, who has never had any better principle to guide him than selfishness,” Anne isn’t really shocked.
11
From Elizabeth Bennet’s Hertfordshire to Our Global Village
In my old job as a book club editor, I read quite a lot about how technology is changing our lives. Social critics worry that the internet shortens our attention spans and teaches us to read differently; that email and cell phones exhaust our energy by forcing us to be “on” all the time, maintaining too many too shallow connections; that young kids are under relentless pressure to perform socially—to answer every text immediately and to maintain a Facebook presence that attracts and impresses—and that adult lives will be blighted by youthful indiscretions.
12
But if you think about how social life has changed since Jane Austen’s day, you notice that in some ways computers, cell phones, and social media are actually changing our lives
back
toward the way they were
then
. (Not in every way, obviously. Sexting is
not
advisable if you want to live like a Jane Austen heroine.)
One thing that makes social media really retro is the pressure to put a lot of effort into the image of yourself that you show the world. Up until the last ten or fifteen years, virtually every change in social relations for decades had been in the direction of less formal, more casual.
13
The great relaxation of dress and manners
14
continued apace until email, then blogs, then Facebook and Twitter began to change things back in the direction of putting more effort into shaping the appearance you showed in public.
At first email seemed like the next extension of the same relaxing trend.
15
But then something interesting began to happen. Electronic communication—beginning with email, but accelerating with blogs and social media—began to actually reverse what the telephone had done to make long-distance communication ephemeral. When you communicate by computer rather than phone, you’re not just expressing yourself, you’re also creating a lasting record that represents you. You know you may be judged by it after the passing moment. The opportunity for turning electronic interactions into a lasting representation, a kind of performance, became clearer to many people with blogging—and to almost everyone with the advent of MySpace and Facebook. Because a little extra thought and effort make you look so much more interesting, and because it’s so easy for friends and family to play appreciative audience with their comments and “likes,” everybody gets to cut a figure of sorts, to have a public persona. It does put us under some pressure—pressure that has a lot in common with the responsibility Jane Austen’s ladies and gentlemen feel to create and maintain a “character.”
16
A Jane Austen Heroine in the Twenty-first Century
M
ichelle Oddis is a twenty-something communications director for a non-profit in Washington, D.C.I got to know her when she was an editor for a weekly newspaper owned by the company I work for. Among friends and colleagues at the paper, Michelle was known and respected for her savvy vetting of guys by their electronic profiles. So I asked her to tell me how a twenty-first-century woman can exercise the kind of prudence that Elizabeth Bennet demonstrates by inquiring about Mr. Darcy’s character.
Social media, Michelle explained, are really much more useful than internet search engines for finding out about men’s personal lives, as opposed to their professional accomplishments. “There are two red flags,” Michelle told me, “if he doesn’t have a Facebook page, or if there’s no Wall or a very limited Facebook.” Those are warning signs that the man you think you’re getting to know doesn’t really want you to know about his life. Which in turn could very well mean he’s dating multiple girls and not being straight with you about it—and that you’re not the one he’s serious about.
But, I asked Michelle, what about guys who simply aren’t into social media, or who are just naturally shy, private, or technophobic? I give a male friend and colleague as an example. He’s a thirty-something single guy with a serious girlfriend, and he uses Facebook pretty much exclusively to renew contact with old friends; his Facebook page isn’t a contemporary record of his social life, the way it is for Michelle and her set. He doesn’t have much of a Wall, but he’s not hiding anything; he just hasn’t made the leap into social media—he’s slightly older (not running his social life on Facebook, still using email instead of messaging).
It
can
be a generational thing, Michelle concedes. Older men (from her perspective, that can mean men in their thirties) might have no or a very limited Facebook for innocent reasons. But among guys her age, pretty much everybody uses it, no matter how shy or private they are. (Michelle has even dated a CIA agent who had a Facebook page!) But in any case, she points out, with a little prudent investigation you ought to be able to tell the difference between a guy who just doesn’t use Facebook much and a man who’s deliberately hiding something from you. Even if he doesn’t spend a lot of time on Facebook, he’s going to have friends who do. And even if he limits what you can see about his life there in order to keep you from knowing what he’s really like, you may still be able to put the pieces together.
“I met a guy through
Match.com
,” Michelle tells me. “His photo there was kind of blurry, so right up front I asked to see his Facebook page. There were a few photos there, including one that looked like him with an old girlfriend, but his Facebook was really limited. When I’d been dating him for about a month and he was out of town ‘on business,’ I looked on her page (she was tagged in the photo). The girl’s profile picture turned out to be another photo of her with the guy; it looked like they were on vacation together. I called him and asked if he had a girlfriend.” The guy told Michelle that the girl in the picture was an ex-girlfriend; they were just friends now. But she found his story hard to believe, and she became increasingly skeptical about whether he was being honest with her. Michelle decided she didn’t want to be in a relationship that—the evidence indicated—was “supplemental” to what the man had going with a serious girlfriend. Elinor Dashwood would approve!
We’re all leaving a trail behind us, a really permanent record. So all this twenty-first-century technology makes it much harder to be an entirely anonymous stranger whenever you meet new people. The virtual “global village” that the internet is creating has something in common with the real English country villages that Jane Austen’s heroines all lived in.
In Jane Austen’s day, women didn’t socialize with men who hadn’t been formally introduced by somebody who at least knew somebody who knew somebody who...knew enough about their pasts to vouch for them. Men’s reputations—their “characters”—were expected to precede them, or at least not to lag too far behind. Elizabeth Bennet is frantic when she suddenly realizes that she doesn’t really know anything about Wickham’s past.
17
But then, over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, it became easier to leave your past behind—
without
having to run away and join the army.
18
It became normal to accept a strange man at face value. The internet takes that trend further—so far, in fact, that it starts to collapse in on itself and work in reverse. Sure, computers make it even easier to get together with a total stranger. On the other hand, social media shrink the world so much that even total strangers are getting easier to find out about. Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, blogs, and so forth have created a kind of virtual society in which our pasts all leave traces that can’t be so easily erased.
19
A man’s past has likely created a cyber-trail, a rough equivalent to the reputation a man had built for himself in Jane Austen’s day.
Those cyber-trails certainly make Jane Austen heroine-style detective work about the men we meet easier.
20
It’s as natural for you to look around the Facebook page of a guy you’re getting to know as it was for Elizabeth Bennet to ask Darcy’s housekeeper about her master’s character—and it can be just as revealing.
Men of Real Quality
Jane Austen’s women don’t take an interest in men’s principles
only
to avoid unprincipled men—and the unhappiness they inevitably create
21
—like the plague. Her heroines are also on a positive quest for principled men.
Elinor Dashwood, Elizabeth Bennet, Fanny Price, Anne Elliot, Catherine Morland (in her own naïve way), and even Emma (when she isn’t tripping herself up in manipulative schemes) are all keen discoverers and honest judges of real quality in human beings. Catherine, plain and honest herself, is as naturally attracted to Henry Tilney’s integrity as she is repelled by John Thorpe’s braggadoccio; she feels the difference even though she’s not sophisticated enough to be able to explain it. Elinor loves Edward because he cares about the things that really matter. Coming from a family impressed by nothing but money and making a splash in the world, he’s somehow managed to acquire simple tastes, honest principles, and a natural bent for domestic happiness.
22
Fanny Price, even as a little girl, admires the good principles that make Edmund consider her feelings when the rest of the family are too selfish to notice or care that she’s miserable. Anne is originally smitten with Wentworth’s honest, energetic masculinity. Seven and a half years later she’s bewitched again by the easy, generous, really genuine friendships he enjoys with his brother officers, who share a “hospitality so uncommon, so unlike the usual style of give-and-take invitations, and dinners of formality and display.”
T
IP JUST FOR JANEITES
Jane Austen’s heroines are
discerning judges of
real quality in human beings.
Here’s where else practicing “right conduct,” self-knowledge, and “delicacy toward the feelings of other people” pays off. Those self-evident rules for living are the very best “principles” a man can have. The Jane Austen heroine who has made them a habit naturally recognizes other principled people as kindred spirits.
23
This is a big part of what makes Jane Austen heroines seem so dignified to us. They, their real friends, and the principled men they love are walking on more solid ground; they’re breathing a freer air.
“There Goes a Temper Which Would Never Cause Pain!”
But “principle” is only the first skeleton key Jane Austen heroines make use of to unlock a man’s potential. “Temper” comes next. It’s the more
practical
as opposed to the
theoretical
part of what makes a man worthy of admiration, trust, and respect. Having high standards isn’t enough; a guy also has to have enough “self-command” to be able to live up to those standards.
Jane Austen’s men with bad tempers aren’t monsters who murder, lock up, or beat their wives. Lack of self-control on that scale, it should go without saying, absolutely disqualifies a man from consideration as a possible Jane Austen hero. John Knightley, Dr. Grant, and General Tilney aren’t violent.
24
They just offload the unavoidable frustrations of ordinary life onto other people. They speak sharply; they complain freely. Essentially, they make a lot of fuss about whatever inconveniences and frustrations come
their
way, while overlooking the fact that other people have their own difficulties. In fact, they
create
unpleasantness for other people, by outsourcing their own share of the discomforts that plague everbody in this life onto the people closest to them.
25
Think of Dr. Grant in
Mansfield Park
, who can’t “get the better of” his “disappoint ment about a green goose.” Whenever Mrs. Grant serves a dinner that falls below his high expectations for epicurean enjoyment, Dr. Grant makes life miserable for everybody else. So miserable that the rest of the family is “driven out” of the house—leaving poor Mrs. Grant behind to apply her patience to soothing him down again. If you don’t want to end up in her position, avoid bad-tempered men.
T
IP JUST FOR JANEITES
Having a bad temper
means living at other people’s
emotional expense.
Jane Austen had
very
high standards where temper is concerned. You don’t have to be even rude (not to mention violent) for her to make it clear that you are, as it were, living at other people’s emotional expense. There are all kinds of different ways to take your frustrations out on other people—imposing discomfort on them to make yourself more comfortable—ranging
from loud and incessant complaining to habitual sulking.
26
Jane Austen expected her heroes and heroines to undertake a positive effort to make life pleasant for other people. That can consist of simply taking the trouble to keep the conversation going. (That’s where Colonel Fitzwilliam’s civility is superior to Darcy’s pre-Elizabeth’s-refusal manners.) Or it can mean stepping in to smooth things over when someone else has said an angry or insulting thing, as Mary Crawford does when Mrs. Norris publicly reminds Fanny of her dependent position. “There,” thinks Edmund of Mary, “goes a temper which would never give pain!”
Of course Mary Crawford’s temper isn’t quite as perfect as Edmund thinks it is. Fanny’s impressions of Miss Crawford’s temper are quite different from Edmund’s.
27
When the two girls are alone together, Mary isn’t shy about letting Fanny know her displeasure at Fanny’s choices—particularly, Fanny’s refusal of her brother—in terms that seem quite strong to a person as shy as Fanny is. Like many of us, both men and women, Mary is on her best behavior in the presence of the person of the opposite sex that she’s romantically interested in—which is why it can be very instructive to see a man in the company of his friends, his family, his co-workers, waiters, and store clerks. And even more interesting to learn how he treats those people when you’re not around. Because if you get close to him, there will inevitably come a time when he’s no longer on his best behavior with you. You want to know in advance what his ordinary or habitual standard of self-control is.

Other books

Vatican Waltz by Roland Merullo
A Quiet Belief in Angels by R. J. Ellory
Death of a Salesperson by Robert Barnard
Refresh by S. Moose
Cold Day In Hell by Jerrie Alexander
The Paris Deadline by Max Byrd