Read The Mystery of Olga Chekhova Online

Authors: Antony Beevor

Tags: #History, #General, #World, #Europe, #Military, #World War II, #Modern, #20th Century

The Mystery of Olga Chekhova (3 page)

BOOK: The Mystery of Olga Chekhova
13.04Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

The Knippers originally came from Saarbrücken, where the name was common. They were said to have been builders, which may explain the choice of family motto,
Per ardua ad astra.
Olga’s father, Leonard Knipper, had made enough money during those nineteenth-century boom years in the volatile Russian economy to allow his family to adopt the upper-middle-class style of the period. There was a grand piano in the drawing room and well-upholstered furniture. They had five servants, and the children were sent to private schools. Konstantin studied to become an engineer, while Olga, usually known as Olya, took lessons in languages, music and singing. She longed to be an actress, but her father and mother considered a career on the stage unthinkable for a well-brought-up girl.

When Leonard Knipper died in 1894, a shock awaited his family. He had concealed his bankruptcy, but his death revealed their desperate situation. His widow, Anna, had to move to a small apartment with Olya, by then twenty-five, and Vladimir, who was just starting as a law student. Konstantin had already embarked on his career as a railway engineer. In their dramatically reduced circumstances, the small apartment had to be shared with two eccentric uncles.

To make ends meet, Anna Salza-Knipper gave singing lessons. Her musical talents were clearly considerable. She eventually became a professor at the Moscow Conservatoire. Olya, meanwhile, gave music lessons to earn money to help her through drama school, opposition to a stage career having collapsed after her father’s death. Vladimir, the youngest in this handsome and talented family, later proved to have an even better voice than his mother and sister. After a brief career as a lawyer, he became a famous opera singer.

Olya Knipper, in spite of the memory of her father’s bankruptcy, showed little regard for the accumulation of money or personal possessions. The theatre was all that mattered to her. She impressed the theatre director Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko at the Moscow Philharmonic School, and was one of the young actors chosen in his crusade to revolutionize the theatre with Konstantin Stanislavsky. They wanted to throw out the pompous and melodramatic, and focus instead on everyday life, using new acting techniques which recreated that reality. Stanislavsky’s theory, which became known as the ‘System’—the idea that actors should immerse themselves totally in their part—later became famous in Hollywood as the ’Method‘.

Nemirovich-Danchenko and Stanislavsky, helped greatly by Stanislavsky’s family money and the subsidies of rich supporters, set up the Moscow Art Theatre in 1898. Olya became the mistress of Nemirovich-Danchenko, a great friend of Anton Chekhov and the champion of his play
The Seagull.
It was presumably quite an energetic relationship, since Nemirovich-Danchenko’s pet name for Olya was ‘my vaulting-horse’. But this did not stop her and Chekhov from falling in love after their first meeting that September, during rehearsals for
The Seagull.
Chekhov had sometimes railed against actresses—he once called them ‘cows who fancy they are goddesses’ and ’Machiavellis in skirts’—but this was partly due to his inability to keep away from them, and they from him.

The love affair between Anton Chekhov and Olya Knipper was mostly a curious long-distance process. Except for summer visits, she stayed in Moscow with the theatre. The consumptive writer, meanwhile, was forced to remain for much of the year in the far warmer climate of Yalta in the Crimea. He called this exile ‘my hot Siberia’. The gap was bridged by letters to and fro. They sparred, sometimes quite mercilessly. She joked about Anton’s adoring former mistresses, whom she nicknamed the
Antonovkas—
the name of a variety of luscious apple. He teased her about her relationship with her former lover, the theatre’s elegant director. ‘Have you been carried away by his moire silk lapels?’ he wrote. Occasionally, his jester’s mask slipped, revealing his jealousy. But he had little to fear. Nemirovich-Danchenko, a pragmatist more than a cynic, knew that Olya’s relationship with the playwright was of great importance to the Moscow Art Theatre. He and Stanislavsky privately viewed the relationship as the theatrical equivalent of an important dynastic marriage.

 

In the summer of 1900, as Chekhov settled down to write
The Three Sisters,
he resolved to marry Olya Knipper, his ‘little Lutheran’. But even when he had finished the play and they arranged their marriage the following year in Moscow, he still did not quite have the nerve to warn his mother and his utterly devoted sister, Mariya, always known as Masha. Olga’s mother, Anna Salza, was also unhappy about the marriage. After the brief service, Olya Knipper-Chekhova, as she now became, and Anton slipped away to see his friend and fellow playwright Maxim Gorky. An amazed Gorky slapped her on the back in congratulation. After this impromptu visit, the bride and groom departed for the railway station. Bewildered guests at the wedding reception were left to wait in vain, but this does not seem to have been that abnormal in the spontaneous chaos of the Chekhovian circle. Only after the wedding was over did Chekhov send his mother a telegram to announce it.

 

The Chekhov and the Knipper families could not have been more different, as the playwright had so often joked. Yet there were odd similarities. Anton’s father, Pavel Chekhov, who had been born the son of serf, became a hard-nosed shopkeeper in Taganrog on the Sea of Azov, but he also went bankrupt like Leonard Knipper.

The bankruptcy of a parent often proves a powerful influence on the children affected. Some become determined to make so much money that they will feel beyond such dangers, but others long to emancipate themselves from a poverty of experience and knowledge, even more than from financial hardship. The Chekhov children took the latter route. The eldest, Aleksandr, wanted to be a writer. Nikolai became an artist and caricaturist. Anton trained as a doctor while writing his early comic pieces and short stories. Ivan was a primary school teacher, Mariya a painter and Mikhail, the youngest, a translator and general dogsbody on a literary magazine.

Anton was the only one who made any money, so the others frequently turned to him for help and burdened him with their private catastrophes interrupting his work. Many friends and former mistresses who had fallen on hard times did likewise. In the prodigal and disordered world of the late-nineteenth-century Russian intelligentsia, few bothered to save money against unforeseen disaster. That was regarded as bourgeois and disgracefully un-Russian.

Chekhov’s choice of subject for the play
The Three Sisters
was not entirely surprising. He had always been fascinated by such trios. One family in particular, the Golden sisters, had become closely linked with Anton and two of his brothers in St Petersburg’s bohemia of the early 1880s, a smoky demi-monde of debts, drinking and fornication. It was no wonder that the young Dr Chekhov, like most of his medical contemporaries, had to spend a large part of his professional life coping with venereal infections.

The Chekhovs and Goldens lived and worked in the same round of literary weeklies, the boys as contributors, the girls as secretaries. The eldest of these three Jewish sisters, Anna Golden, a divorcee, became the common-law wife of Anton’s brother Nikolai, or Kolya. The youngest, darkest and thinnest of the three, Natalya Golden, fell in love with Anton, and their affair lasted two years. She was his ‘little skeleton’, even though her appetite for food was apparently as voracious as her sexual desire.

They drifted apart, but then, in October 1888, Anton received an astonishing letter from his brother Aleksandr. ‘Natalya is living in my apartment, running the household, fussing over the children and keeping me up to scratch. And if she crosses sometimes into concubinage, that’s none of your business.’ Perhaps the greatest surprise came at the end of the letter. ‘If our parents, whose old age I intend to console by exemplary behaviour, don’t view this “intimacy” as incest, fornication and onanism, then I have nothing against marriage in church.’ Natalya also wrote to Anton professing her own astonishment at how things had turned out. She too was now keen on the idea of middle-class respectability; in fact the ‘onanism’ mentioned by Aleksandr was almost certainly due to her fear of becoming pregnant before they were married. The condoms he bought at thirty-five kopecks apiece did not seem to work. He bragged to Anton that they burst because they were not large enough.

Nobody could accuse Natalya of being maritally ambitious. Aleksandr was a writer whose lack of financial and critical success was cruelly highlighted by the growing renown of his younger sibling. He was reduced to journalism for the right-wing Suvorin press in St Petersburg. Aleksandr was a big, powerful man with a ‘thunderous voice’ who loathed modern inventions such as the telephone or typewriter, preferring a goose-quill pen. He was also decidedly eccentric. He tried to train his chickens to use one door of the henhouse for entry and the other for exit, but they failed to understand such logic and neither threats nor inducements would alter their random behaviour. Utterly unpredictable in his own life, squalid in his surroundings and obscene in his language, both on the page and in public, he had often sought escape in the bottle and in the beds of indulgent women.

Anton, who visited the couple in St Petersburg just over two months later, was appalled by his eldest brother’s crude behaviour in front of children and servants and his mistreatment of Natalya. On 2 January 1889, he wrote a letter of devastating criticism. It had a marked effect. From then on, Natalya ruled the marital roost. Yet her position of virtual ostracism within the wider Chekhov family improved only when she gave birth to a son, Mikhail, on 16 August 1891. This was the first legitimate grandchild for Pavel and Evgenia Chekhov and they were overjoyed. Aleksandr was soon trying to convince Anton of the blessings of marriage - or ‘God-fearing coitus’, as he preferred to put it - but it was not long before he started to suffer from impotence, probably as a result of his semi-chronic alcoholism.

The marriage continued to undergo severe strains, mainly according to whether Aleksandr was on or off the bottle. Sometimes he just disappeared. A telegram would arrive saying: ‘Am in the Crimea’ or ’Am in the Caucasus‘. Sometimes Natalya threw him out of the house when he lapsed again into alcohol and impotence. It was perhaps typical of this morally anarchic circle that the demanding Natalya, Anton’s former mistress, should write to him, complaining of his brother’s inability to satisfy her. She asked what he, as a doctor, could do to help. The answer was clearly discouraging.

Natalya nevertheless remained devoted to Anton, especially if he came to see them on visits to St Petersburg and praised his young nephew Mikhail’s emerging talents. ‘Misha is an amazingly intelligent boy,’ he wrote in February 1895. ‘There’s a nervous energy shining in his eyes. I think he’s going to grow into a talented man.’ Aleksandr was also boastful of his son’s precocious prowess. He later claimed that, as well as speaking French and German, Misha at the age of twelve was already chasing girls. Natalya, however, had been so determined to protect her precious Misha from bad influences that she had made Aleksandr send Kolya, the unruly fourteen-year-old elder son from his previous liaison, away to the merchant navy. She became increasingly eccentric. Misha could do no wrong in her eyes, but her overpowering possessiveness evidently unbalanced him. He later told friends that she had seduced him. This was almost certainly untrue, but the brilliant youth who was to marry Uncle Anton’s niece by marriage was slightly unbalanced. He seems to have inherited his father’s self-destructive streak.

 

 

During these turn-of-the-century years, Anton Chekhov’s brother-in-law Konstantin Knipper, had become a successful engineer in the great days of Russian railroad expansion. With his immaculate beard and the official frock-coated uniform of the imperial railways, Konstantin Knipper had the air of a better-looking version of the Tsar himself. He directed the construction of the Trans-Caucasian line, living with his young family near Tiflis. His wife, Yelena, usually known as Lulu, was also German, and also musical. Their daughter Olga, Mikhail Chekhov’s future wife, later claimed that Tchaikovsky had been her mother’s first love, a particularly improbable invention. She also claimed, in her exasperatingly disingenuous memoirs, that her mother was close friends with Tolstoy, Rachmaninov and the Tsarina.

A slight confusion even surrounds Olga’s birth on 26 April 1897. Official Soviet documents, including later reports of the NKVD and SMERSh, record her place of birth as Pushkin (the former Tsarskoe Selo, near St Petersburg), yet she was undoubtedly born at Aleksandropol in the southern Caucasus. The family did not move to St Petersburg until several years later.

Olga Chekhova’s first recollection of childhood in Georgia focused on a summer afternoon. She and her elder sister, Ada, tiptoed about the house outside Tiflis, because their parents were nervous and irritable. Their little brother, Lev, lay in a darkened room, with his feet fastened to the end of the bed. Traction was exerted on his back through weights attached to his feet and a leather loop under his chin. Anton Chekhov, then the lover but not quite yet the husband of their Aunt Olya, as they called her, had come to see the invalid child. He diagnosed tuberculosis of the bone. Their mother, Lulu, having tried many medical practitioners who all agreed with this diagnosis, had turned in desperation to Chekhov, the only doctor close to the family. In later years, Lev’s sister Olga could not resist embroidering the event in her memoirs, with the unlikely detail that Anton Chekhov had brought the two-year-old a gramophone as a present because he was already aware of this future composer’s musical gifts. Lev’s love for music did not become evident until much later.

The house—Olga later described it as ‘a hunting lodge’—was made with wood from the mountain forest. It had a library, a billiard room and a sitting room with a piano on which Olga and Lev’s parents played four-handed duets. A nanny supervised them from breakfast until bedtime prayers, but they still seem to have had adventures. Olga claimed that, as a baby, she had been dragged from the garden by a jackal which emerged from the surrounding wilderness, and that, at the age of five, she was molested by the gardener. Neither experience appears to have daunted her.

BOOK: The Mystery of Olga Chekhova
13.04Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

Watson, Ian - SSC by The Very Slow Time Machine (v1.1)
The Devil's Dozen by Katherine Ramsland
A Dolphin's Gift by Watters, Patricia
Nightmare by Steven Harper
The Reinvention of Moxie Roosevelt by Elizabeth Cody Kimmel
A Simple Thing by Kathleen McCleary
The Sea Runners by Ivan Doig
Mr. Kill by Martin Limon