Warlord (Outlaw 4) (32 page)

We headed south-east, just Hanno and myself, he on his palfrey, I on my courser, making our way along the southern bank of the River Bièvre beyond the boundaries of Paris for less than a mile until we came to the high walls and stout gates of the Abbey. It was quiet and deeply peaceful out there, away from the bustle of the city streets and, as the fields outside the Abbey walls had been carefully cultivated by the canons over many years and sown with homely cabbages and leeks and onions, the whole area had a sleepy, village-like feel.

We told the porter at the gate, a half-deaf canon who must have been eighty or even older, that we had come from the cathedral of Notre-Dame with an urgent message from the Dean for Bishop de Sully. As I had hoped, it was enough to get us
inside the gates and the old man pointed out a path to follow that would lead us to the south of the Abbey where the Bishop had his apartments.

The Abbey sprawled over a very large area; it had almost as wide a precinct as the Paris Temple, though of course it was much older, and had filled the space within its walls with dozens of stone buildings, including a huge abbey-church in the centre, as well as scores of humbler wooden constructions. And inside the high walls, it was as busy as a small market town, and nearly as populous. Wide roads drove through the abbey in a cross-shaped formation, meeting at the centre, and were trod by canons, scholars, merchants, workmen and men-at-arms; several well-laden carts clopped along these thoroughfares too and a haze of dust hovered above them in shifting brown clouds. To the north of the Abbey where the River Bièvre flowed towards the Seine, there was a broad wooden dock and two large ships were moored there unloading and loading goods. Clearly the Abbey was rich – and I could assume that old Bishop de Sully would not lack for material comforts in his final days.

The Bishop’s lavish apartments, we were told by a passing canon, were tucked away in a secluded corner behind the abbey-church: they comprised a large stone house on two storeys, with outbuildings, a kitchen, a bakery, a private chapel for the Bishop’s use, and a big, square walled herb garden where food and medicines might be grown, which was surrounded by a well-swept path paved with flat yellow stones.

At the simple wooden gate of the garden, we were stopped by a servant, an old man, who demanded to know our business with the Bishop. Once again I lied and said that I came from the Dean of Notre-Dame with a message, and we were admitted, without further questioning. I was dressed in my finest clothes, a new silk tunic with a velvet-trimmed mantel, mounted on a fine horse and accompanied by an armed attendant – so I was clearly a knight and a man of consequence – but it was nonetheless surprisingly
easy to obtain access to the most powerful man in Paris after the King.

We left the horses tied to a stunted apple tree outside the garden, and Hanno and I pushed through the simple wicket gate. Bishop Maurice de Sully was sitting on a low stone bench in a patch of September sun with a bowl of cut thyme in his lap and he was carefully separating the tiny green leaves from the spindly stalks. He looked truly ill, thin and worn; his grey hair sparse, his face deeply cut with the marks of long years and hard struggles. He was perhaps seventy, I guessed, and in no little amount of pain. The heavenly smell of crushed thyme – fresh, woody and sweet – filled the air of the herb garden.

As we made our way over to the Bishop, I glanced around that square open space, admiring the blocks of plants arranged in the centre in neat geometrical patterns, and I noticed a figure in a dark robe on the far side, just leaving the garden and entering an outbuilding. He was a tall man and although he was turned away from me, and I glimpsed him for only a moment, there was something about the way he moved that stirred my memory.

‘Your Grace,’ said the servant, and Bishop de Sully glanced up from the thyme bowl. ‘I humbly beg your pardon for disturbing you, but this gentleman says he has a message from the Dean; he says—’

‘Your Grace, I must speak to you about a very urgent and private matter,’ I interrupted, and Maurice de Sully looked directly at me for the first time. He had pale, almost colourless eyes and seemed wary, even rather alarmed at my words.

I hastened to reassure him: ‘I mean you no harm, Your Grace,’ I said, ‘and I admit I lied to your servant about a message from the Dean. But I have a great need to speak with you about my father, Henri d’Alle, who was once a monk here in Paris. I only wish to trouble you for a few moments and then I will gladly leave you in peace.’

That was true: I had told the Seigneur that I would dine with him and his family that day, and had sworn to be at the Rue St-Denis by noon for the feast. The servant, a slight, elderly man, was now looking between Hanno and myself, his mouth working soundlessly, his arms waggling jerkily from the shoulders: he seemed not to know whether he should make an attempt to lay hands on us and forcibly eject us from the Bishop’s presence. He hesitated, flapping like a bird, torn between fear and his duty to his master.

‘It is quite all right, Alban,’ said the Bishop to his man. ‘Calm yourself. Please be so good as to go and fetch us some wine, and perhaps a little bread and cheese.’ Then to me: ‘Be seated, young man, here, sit beside me, and tell me how I might be of service to you.’

The Bishop put the bowl of thyme down on the warm yellow slabs at his feet, and I took a seat beside him on the stone bench. Hanno stood behind me, his back leaning comfortably against the sun-warmed bricks of the garden wall, alert and yet relaxed at the same time.

‘I have an ailment of the stomach,’ the Bishop said. ‘It discomforts me a good deal and my new doctor – a Jewish fellow, but very well regarded among the brotherhood of physicians – advises that I drink an infusion of honey and thyme every night. I pick the herb myself each morning, and tell my servants that it is part of the cure but, in truth, I come here mostly so that I may be alone with my thoughts for a while. So you have chosen a good time to speak to me, my son – we will not be disturbed. You said that this matter concerned your father, yes?’

‘Do you remember him, Your Grace? Henri d’Alle; a singer in the cathedral twenty years ago, a tall, blond man who I’m told has a good deal of resemblance to me?’

De Sully looked closely at me, his pale eyes crawling over my face, and then let out a long heavy breath. ‘Yes,’ he said, ‘oh yes, I remember Henri d’Alle. And I see him in you. I remember well
the manner of his leaving us, too – I may be old and not in the best of health, but my recall is still reliable.’

‘Would you be so kind as to tell me the circumstances leading up to his departure from the cathedral …’

The Bishop picked up his bowl of thyme and began plucking the leaves from the stalks again as he spoke, his white fingers and thumbs moving with speed and delicacy to strip off the tiny green rounds from the woody stalks.

‘Henri was not comfortable being a monk,’ he began. ‘I don’t think it was his true calling; I think God did not mean him for that, although He had endowed him with an exceptionally fine voice. Your father was, I recall, unruly and disobedient – and I think lecherous, too. I know that the Dean was forced to discipline him on a number of occasions for minor transgressions. Having said that, I believe he was a good man and a true Christian.’

The Bishop paused for a moment, and put down the bowl of thyme again. He laid an almost translucent, blue-veined hand, blotched here and there with the brown spots of old age, along his cheek, remembering. ‘The visit of Bishop Heribert, God rest his soul, was a grand affair – it must have been in the thirty-sixth year of the reign of King Louis, oh, twenty-one years ago – it smacked of rather too much pomp and ceremony for my liking, but Heribert came from a powerful family in the south, and his wealth allowed him to make an occasion of his visit – and he was an important man, after all, a bishop, one mustn’t forget that. His money also allowed him to indulge his two great passions in life: Heavenly music and holy relics.

‘He came to Paris to hear the monks of Notre-Dame sing – your father being one of the leading choristers at the time – and I believe he found the experience rewarding. He spent many hours in the old cathedral listening to the holy offices being sung – and in my grand new cathedral, too, though in those days only the choir had been built and it was hellishly cold in wintertime. But
while he was in Paris he also purchased a sacred relic – I think it was supposed to be a toe bone of John the Baptist – from a trader in such items and he had it mounted in a beautiful golden reliquary with a crystal top and sides, so that the bone could be viewed – and venerated. He had a collection of such pieces – a hair from Christ’s beard, the dried arm of St Gregory of Tours, and as many as four fragments of the True Cross – and he took them with him wherever he travelled, which I thought foolish. Indeed, so it proved to be.

‘I am afraid that I am somewhat wary of relics – perhaps it is a foible of my upbringing, or perhaps I merely lack the proper amount of faith – you young people all seem to be very keen on them and rush to pray before them whenever they are revealed, but I have always felt that, while there are undoubtedly some genuine relics, which do indeed have tremendous spiritual power, there are also a goodly number of charlatans offering items for sale that are no more than midden-fodder in a golden box. I have twice personally been shown a scrap of dried leather that was claimed – each time in earnest by a most pious and respected high churchman – to be the foreskin of Christ. And yet there is nothing in the Holy scriptures about Our Lord being so unusually endowed as to require two circumcisions!’ The Bishop gave a dry chuckle – but Hanno shifted uneasily behind me and when I turned to glance at him I swear that tough old Bavarian warrior looked deeply shocked by the Bishop’s crude words.

‘And so, when Heribert showed me his newly acquired holy toe at dinner one day, I was not as awestruck as perhaps I might have been. The good Bishop sensed this and my indifference to it seemed to make him desperate to impress me with the sacred grandeur of his collection. He mentioned this item and that, and extolled the special powers of this object and the rarity of another – I am afraid he did not command my full attention. And while, God knows, I tried to show the proper enthusiasm for his collection of old rags
and bones, I was not successful. And eventually Heribert became quiet and sulky, and spent the rest of the meal indulging his prodigious appetite.

‘I regretted it the next day, of course, for that same night someone broke into the storeroom where the Bishop’s possessions were kept, and the thief made away with several of his much-vaunted relics – and it was the ones that were closest to his heart that were taken.’

‘Do you remember which particular relics were stolen?’ I asked, interrupting the old man for the first time.

‘Yes I do,’ he said, looking at me with his colourless eyes. ‘He was reluctant to tell me at first, but I pressed him and it all came flooding out eventually.’

‘And what were they?’ I asked. I could feel my pulse beating faster; a bead of sweat ran down my spine.

‘They were the most preposterous cluster of costly rubbish imaginable: a silver carving plate, a pair of golden candlesticks, an old lance head, and something he called a “
graal
”, a sort of serving bowl. I never fathomed the significance of the carving plate and the candlesticks, though Heribert claimed they had vague miraculous qualities – but the lance head, he told me, came from the weapon that a Roman soldier used to pierce the side of Our Lord Jesus Christ while he suffered on the Cross – and this
graal
, well, that was the vessel that Christ used at the Last Supper and also, rather conveniently, I must say, it was the vessel used by Joseph of Arimathea to collect the blood of Christ after he had been cut down from the tree at Calvary.’

Despite the Bishop’s dismissive, almost blasphemous, tone, I felt a jolt of lightning run down my spine at his words. This
graal
, this Grail – if it were indeed the true artefact – was claimed to be the very bowl that Christ had used and drunk from and blessed with the touch of his hands; and as if that weren’t enough, it had held his sacred blood! If it were real, I could scarcely imagine an object more
worthy of deep veneration. This Grail had held the sacred blood of Our Lord, it had cradled the life fluid of God himself! To those who believed, it was indeed a wondrous object – that would be well worth killing for. Indeed, for some, it would be worth dying for. It was without a doubt the holiest thing that I had ever heard of.

I pulled myself together and dampened my excitement – though I noticed that Hanno had stepped a little closer, to listen, and that his face seemed to be all eyes. Then I asked the question that had been nagging at the back of my mind. ‘Who else was at this dinner when Bishop Heribert spoke so eloquently of his collection of holy relics?’

‘No one – it was just Heribert and me. And the duty monks who served the meal, of course.’

‘And my father, Henri d’Alle, was he one of the monks who served at the dinner table that day?’

‘He was – him and some of his young friends had been chosen to serve. I don’t recall exactly. It was one dull meal, with a dull, greedy, credulous fool, twenty-one years ago.’

‘Do you believe that my father was the man who stole this
graal
?’ My question came out flat and heavy, like a sheet of lead being dropped on wet turf. At first I thought that Bishop de Sully would not answer me, so lengthy was the pause between my question and his response.

‘A bishop must be a man of God, a devout follower of Christ’s teachings,’ said de Sully, ‘and as such, I shall answer you truthfully: no, I do not now believe that Henri d’Alle stole any of Heribert’s ludicrous collection of relics. But a bishop is also a lord of men, and a power in the land, and sometimes it is necessary to do things that a good Christian would not normally countenance. I shall answer to God for my actions, of course, but at that time I deemed that it was necessary for your father to shoulder the blame for that crime. I was not certain of his innocence, I may even have convinced myself of his guilt at the time; but I knew that I needed
Heribert’s goodwill. And Heribert demanded a scapegoat for his loss. You must understand that the Bishop of Roda was a very wealthy man, absurdly wealthy, and he had agreed to make a vast contribution to the building of the cathedral, to Notre-Dame, to my life’s work. I decided that the building of a sacred monument to God’s greatness, a sublime edifice that would proclaim the glory of Our Lord, which would stand as a testament to the Christian faith for a thousand years – I decided that this work was more important than the continued employment of a young monk who did not have a true vocation for a life in the Church. Would you have made a different decision? I think not. So I sent Henri d’Alle away – he was not punished for the crime; he was asked to leave Notre-Dame and make his way elsewhere in the world. And, as I say, God will judge me for this, but I think not harshly.’