Read Who Let the Dogs In? Online

Authors: Molly Ivins

Who Let the Dogs In? (43 page)

BOOK: Who Let the Dogs In?
6.26Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

The report was completed late last year, but its publication was delayed by endless wrangles with the administration over what could be declassified. Former Georgia senator Max Cleland, who served on the committee, said the report’s release was deliberately delayed by the White House until after the war in Iraq was over because it undercuts the rationale for the war. The report confirms there was no connection between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.

“The administration sold the connection to scare the pants off the American people and justify the war,” Cleland said. “What you’ve seen here is the manipulation of intelligence for political ends.”

 

July 2003

 

The Wrong Way

 
 

T
HERE
ARE MESSY-DESK
people and there are clean-desk people. I’m a major messy. About every six months, I am seized by a desire to Get Organized, so I start doing archaeological excavations into the midden heap on my desk. The result this time was a sort of time-lapse photography of where the country is headed.

Going through stacks of old newspaper articles, speeches, reports, studies, and press releases at a high rate of speed left one overwhelming impression: deception . . . government by deception. I’d like pass along some of what I found without the usual journalistic standards of sourcing because I want to re-create the impression it all left—rather like leafing through a book rapidly, catching a sentence here and there. Leaving aside the missing weapons of mass destruction (hey, we found the oil), I found so many little things that fit the same pattern.

•  Administration announces with great fanfare new regs to control listeria, a deadly bacteria that can contaminate certain foods. Great, they put in new regs, but first they eviscerated them so they have no real impact.

•  U.S. Agency for International Development chief Andrew Natsios blasts NGOs (that’s the jargon for nongovernmental organizations—private groups engaged in humanitarian assistance) for not doing enough PR for the United States. They’re supposed to be helping starving and sick people, not flacking for America. Either talk up the United States, Natsios threatened, or he would personally tear up their contracts. (Great, some little Ethiopian kid on the edge of starvation, eyes dull, belly swollen, has to listen to a lecture on U.S. beneficence before he gets some oatmeal.)

•  New study shows eight million mostly low-income taxpayers will get no benefit from the latest round of tax cuts, despite repeated assurances that it would help everybody who pays income taxes.

•  Cost of photo-op with the president at a June fund-raiser: $20,000. Cost of a “leadership luncheon” with Karl Rove: must raise $50,000 for reelection.

•  “American officials are considering a plan to use Iraq’s future oil and gas revenues as collateral to raise cash to rebuild the country. Several U.S. companies, including Halliburton and Bechtel, which are jostling for the lucrative reconstruction contracts, are reportedly pushing the scheme to expedite the commissioning process.” That means there’s no Marshall Plan, we’re not going to rebuild Iraq, we’re going to take their oil to pay our corporations to fix what we messed up.

•  President nominates Daniel Pipes to the board of the United States Institute of Peace. This is one of a series of cruel-joke appointments: Pipes is a Middle East expert whose vision of ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is no negotiation, no hope for compromise, and no use for diplomacy. He wants the Palestinians defeated, period. Just the man for the Institute of Peace.

•  On Friday, April 11, three days after “coalition” forces entered Baghdad, the Interior Department announced a settlement with the state of Utah that effectively destroys the executive branch’s key powers to protect the wilderness, reversing three decades of environmental policy. Starting immediately, oil, gas, and mineral companies are granted access to more than two hundred million acres of public lands. Bet you saw a lot of headlines about that one.

•  Innumerable articles documenting the collapse of our dysfunctional health-care “system.”

•  “And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it’s clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again.”—Fox News commentator Bill O’Reilly on
Good Morning America,
March 18.

•  “The White House today defended the decision of congressional negotiators to deny millions of minimum-wage families the increased child tax credit, saying the new tax law was intended to help people who pay taxes, not those who are too poor to pay.” The poorest people in this country pay exactly the same percentage of their income in payroll taxes as wealthy people do in total taxes.

“Ain’t gonna happen,” said House Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay. The only way DeLay would support tax cuts for the working poor would be if for every $1 in tax cuts to the working poor, rich people got another $22 in tax cuts. Lends new meaning to phrase “without DeLay.”

•  Two and half million jobs have disappeared since Bush took office. Real wages have stagnated or declined. Retirement savings have shrunk. People are losing health insurance, retirement benefits, and overtime.

•  The “death tax,” as the Republicans so cleverly misnamed the estate tax, which affects 2 percent of all Americans, has now been replaced by the Bush birth tax—if you’re born in this country, you’re in debt—you have to help pay back the money the Bushies took out of Social Security, plus the interest on the debts they’re running up.

My thanks to all the people and publications whose research I have used without credit today. You have all contributed to this brief portrait of a country headed in the wrong direction.

 

August 2003

 

Where’s the Accountability?

 
 

A
T
THE BEGINNING
of the summer, several of us who are not exactly upbeat about our prospects in Iraq urged the administration to Do Something before it was too late—like, by the end of the summer.

Now what? Our people are over there like staked goats in the desert, the administration won’t ask other countries or the United Nations for help, they won’t send more troops, and the NGOs are pulling out. There was no apparent connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda before this war, but there sure as hell is now. We have already lost more soldiers in the “peace” than we did during the war.

And still no weapons of mass destruction. I realize all the good little boys and girls are supposed to “get over” the missing weapons of mass destruction, but I cannot brush this aside with the careless élan of the neo-con hawks (“doesn’t matter,” “makes no difference,” “who cares?”). Public officials need to be held to some standard of accountability for what they say.

In a separate column, I will try to Be Constructive about our current plight, but I think it is important to remember how we got here. May I remind you of what we were repeatedly told?

 

“Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.”—
Dick Cheney, August 26, 2002

 

“Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.”—
George W. Bush, September 12, 2002

 

“The Iraqi regime possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons.”—
Bush, October 7, 2002

 

“We’ve also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that would be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We’re concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using the UAVs for missions targeting the United States.”
—Bush, October 7, 2002

 

“The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group he calls his ‘nuclear mujahideen’—his nuclear holy warriors. Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past.”
—Bush, October 7, 2002

 

“We know for a fact there are weapons there.”
—Ari Fleischer, January 9, 2003

 

“Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as five hundred tons of sarin, mustard, and VX nerve agent.”
—Bush, January 28, 2003

 

“We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more.”
—Colin Powell, February 5, 2003

 

“We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons—the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.”
—Bush, February 8, 2003

 

“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.”
—Bush, March 17, 2003

 

“Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical, particularly.”
—Fleischer, March 21, 2003

 

“There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. As this operation continues, those weapons will be identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who guard them.”
—General Tommy Franks, March 22, 2003

 

“I have no doubt we’re going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction.”
—Kenneth Adelman, Defense Policy Board, March 23, 2003

 

“We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad.”
—Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003

 

“We’ll find them. It’ll be a matter of time to do so.”
—Bush, May 3, 2003

 

“I never believed that we’d just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country.”
—Rumsfeld, May 4, 2003

 

“U.S. officials never expected that we were going to open garages and find weapons of mass destruction.”
—Condoleezza Rice, May 12, 2003

 

“They may have had time to destroy them, and I don’t know the answer.”
—Rumsfeld, May 27, 2003

 

“We based our decisions on good, sound intelligence, and the—our people are going to find out the truth. And the truth will say that this intelligence was good intelligence. There’s no doubt in my mind.”
—Bush, July 17, 2003

BOOK: Who Let the Dogs In?
6.26Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

A Vampire's Claim by Joey W. Hill
Carnal Sin by Allison Brennan
The Golden Hour by Todd Moss
Tales of Accidental Genius by Simon Van Booy
Snapped by Pamela Klaffke
Lost in Us by Heidi McLaughlin
The Bridegroom by Linda Lael Miller
Chronicler Of The Winds by Henning Mankell