Bill's state, in the short run, was equally bad.
“I was profoundly distressed by the election, far more than I ever let on in public,” he said later.
Gergen thought it took about two or three months for Bill to come out of his depression. But for Hillary, “it was a matter of many [more] months. I think she still must be scarred by that,” he said several years later, before she had decided to seek election to the Senate. “What was clear was not only her policy advice had failed, but she was politically at faultâ¦. Bill no longer asked her for political guidance after that.”
As the president and first lady sank into a fog of depression, one of the strangest episodes of modern American governance proceeded from it: the ascendancy of Dick Morris as presidential regent. For the next several months he virtually took over the White House. And for the period from 1994 to 1996, he was the real power in the Clinton administration after the president. Hillary had choked on her opportunity. Now it was Morris's turn (again), and the circumstances were ideal for his machinations. In the next two years, there would be two primary objectives: survive Kenneth Starr and the inevitable investigations led by Republicans in Congress, and win reelection. Morris could do relatively little about the former. But in terms of molding new policies and preparing for the next presidential campaign, Morris was the ideal fixer.
“We weren't moving after that election,” said Donna Shalala. “It was three or four months before we regrouped.” She said the president was “almost incoherent.”
“My friends [closest to the Oval Office] kept telling me that he was extremely distracted,” said Gergen, “and he would lash out, but then he would pull back. He just sort of seemed lostâ¦. Leon [Panetta, the new chief of staff] was sort of running the day-to-day, and then Morris came inâ¦. The fact is, for whatever else you think about Dick Morris, he helped to save the president.”
Hillary's instinct had been right in this instance. “I think she saw him as justâ¦the person you turn to when you're in real trouble,” Gergen said. “She saw how much trouble they were in politically. I mean, it was a comeback all over again. It was the two-year problem that they had in Arkansas. And he'd rescued them once before, and performed as an anchor.
“Morris replaced [Hillary] as consigliereâthough that may be a little simplistic. But there was a real passage of power away from her and to Morris. And to some degree, the president felt he was also liberated afterward from having to be deferential to Hillary. He took health care as a defeat, but because it was her defeat, it was okayâ¦. He still needed here motional support, but there had been a time in which he felt that he had to be very deferential.” No longer.
Though Bill did not criticize her openly, he was less hesitant about making his displeasureâand, for a while, real angerâknown with those whose advice he thought, in retrospect, had been just plain bad. TheyâMagaziner, Stan Greenberg, Mandy Grunwald among themâwere all widely regarded as “Hillary people,” though that, too, was an oversimplification. Stephanopoulos was also hung out to dry.
Morris was unambiguous about Clinton's attitude toward his wife at this point: in terms of the co-presidency, it was overâ“he pushed her aside. It's very clear to me that in 1995 and even 1996 he did not speak to Hillary very much about anything, because I would know. I mean, she never attended strategy meetings, and I never saw her gravitational pull in his thinking. He and I would talk on Monday. We'd talk on Tuesday. We'd talk on Wednesday. And we'd talk on Thursday. And, on Friday, he'd take an action. And over the five-day period, I couldn't see any of Hillary's fingerprints on anything.” (Unfortunately, her fingerprints would show upâliterallyâon the White House billing records, at the most inopportune of moments.)
After the election, said Harold Ickes, “she literally withdrew. I mean, you just didn't even see her. She would come over to her West Wing office from time to time. I would talk to her on the phone. But even I, who was as close to her as anybody on the president's staff, hardly saw her at all. And I don't know what she was doing. I don't know what she was thinking. It must have been a stinging timeâ¦. She wears a stiff upper lip, as we knowâ¦. But she no longer participatedâ¦. She didn't talk to the White House staff.”
Â
S
HE RETREATED
at first into the relative comfort of Hillaryland. “She didn't trust” most of the president's staff, said Ickes. “She didn't like a lot of them, and thought many of them were young, self-serving assholes who should have been fired a long time ago. And her staff was extremely loyal. There had been almost no turnover in her staff, which really puts the lie to the fact that she's a wicked witch.”
In the early weeks after the election, Hillary frequently turned to Morris in her frustration. “I had a conversation with her in November where she said, âYou know, I'm so confused. I just don't know what works anymore. I mean everything we're trying is screwed up. I just don't know how to do it, what we ought to be doing,'” Morris recalled. Despite her confident manner, Hillary could “lose her bearings when things didn't go right. Her strong and resolute leadership has a brittle quality to it; when her basic assumptions are proven wrong, they undermine her resolve. Hillary has less flexibility, less give than Bill. When her way works, she does very well. But when it doesn'tâas in 1994âit can paralyze her.”
Meanwhile, Morris, newly empowered, set up shop. Stephanopoulos watched it all happening:
[A]s Clinton withdrew from those of us on staff, the clues were silent but still visible, like the boldly inked crib sheets the president slipped out of his folder during meetings. Or the anonymous calls announced by Betty Currie that Clinton would take in the privacy of his study. Or the yellow Post-it notes left by his phone, reminding him that “Charlie called.”
“Charlie” was Dick's code name. The president had engaged him to run a covert operation against his own White Houseâa commander's coup against the colonels. The two of them plotted in secretâat night, on the phone, by fax. From December 1994 through August 1996, Leon Panetta managed the official White House staff, the Joint Chiefs commanded the military, the cabinet administered the government, but no single person more influenced the president of the United States than Dick Morris.
Twenty-four months earlier, in triumph, Hillary had demanded an office in the West Wing. Now she was a drag on the White House. It was time to decamp for long periods at a time, withdraw from the working White House altogether, to rethink and to travel. She had never been given to introspection, but she had also never failed on such a scale before. She knew that a midcourse correction of historic magnitude would be required if she and Bill were to remain in the White House a full eight years.
Hillary was well aware that many of her husband's advisers blamed her for the situation now confronting them. She was bound emotionally, professionally, parentally, and publicly to her husband, but she'd have to step aside as a visible policy presence.
Hillary appears to have kept to herself her deepest feelings about the wreckage of the twenty months between inauguration day and election day. And to whatever extent she shared those feelings with her husband is known only to the two of them. Except for conveying her general despondency she did not even discuss with her close friends like Diane Blair, Sara Ehrman, or Linda Bloodworth-Thomason her role in the debacle. As always, there was prayer, and the support of those in her prayer group, who included the wives of some of the men who had led the assault on the Clintons' presidency.
Hillary did not need to be pushed into exile. She was ready to go. Her stunning withdrawal from the inner sanctum of power was encouraged by Morris. Bill was having difficulty enough regaining his own composure and was hardly going to object to her disengagement. But given her dominant position in the White House for almost two years, her leave-taking represented the passing of a huge presence.
First she made sure Morris was installed. If she had to go, it was essential that Bill have a handmaiden who could take her place, engage him, and help him lead. Over the next weeks, she would remind Morris of the little things that she knew Bill liked and needed, as if she wanted to be sure he'd continue to have the fullness of his presidential life.
“To help get to the bottom of the Clintons' loss,” Morris devised a series of surveys in November and December. Shortly after the new year, he reported the results to Bill. “I told the depressed president [he later wrote] one third of the people feel you are immoral and one third think you are weak.” Such brutal candor at a delicate time was just the kind of thing Morris reveled in. He defined the president's “perceived moral failings” as his “draft avoidance, the Gennifer Flowers scandal, Travelgate, Whitewater, or the innumerable scrapes to which the First Family seemed forever prone”âthe latter referring, apparently, to the occasional stumbles of Roger Clinton and Hillary's two brothers.
There was nothing we could do about his perceived moral failings. But as I examined the reasons that people gave explaining why they thought that the president was weak [wrote Morris] one concern kept coming up over and over again: Hillary. “She's the power,” the respondents complained. “She wears the pants.” “She thinks she's president.” “I voted for him, but she's in charge now.” I read them to Clinton, one after another, letting their cumulative effect wash over him.
Morris suggested that, rather than nourish the perception that Hillary was continuing to manipulate events behind the scenes, she should do something in which “her outspokenness before audiences can be an antidote to the perception of hidden power. The voters know she's not sitting there doing nothing. The more they read about her public role, the less they will speculate about her private doings.”
A week later, said Morris, Bill asked him to “start sending Hillary memos suggesting new directions for her public advocacy, always making sure to send him copies.” Soon, said Morris, “she withdrew from
all
White House strategy meetings. For a year she didn't even send a representative. She totally cut herself off from overinvolvement in White House strategizing. She was less involved in decision-making than she had been at any point since the early two-career-couple days of the late 1970s.”
Â
T
HE BOOK
It Takes a Village,
conceived at her post-electoral ebb, was intended to define Hillary Clinton as she saw herself and wanted to be seen, and to establish a public persona based on thoughtfulness, seriousness, and traditional family values.
For nine Christmas seasons before Bill's election as president, Hillary, Bill, and Chelsea together had attended Renaissance Weekends with the families of other prominent Americans. Scientists, journalists, educators, business executives, and political figures were afforded a chance at these gatherings to participate in off-the-record panel discussions and workshops that focused as much on individual empowerment and public service as policy. In contrast to Washington political discussions, the Renaissance meetings tended to include a spiritual or religious dimension, from mainstream Protestantism to New Age.
Of all the New Age thinkers the Clintons had gotten to know from these weekends, few had intrigued Hillary (and millions of other Americans) more than Texas-born Marianne Williamson. Like many New Age authors and circuit-riders, Williamson's résumé was a mix of the serious (infusing politics with spiritual principles), the celebritized (presiding over Elizabeth Taylor's eighth wedding), and the silly (promoting a version of solitaire with a fifty-card “miracle deck”). She was five years younger than Hillary, and her “underlying message,” according to one reviewer, “encourag[ed] women to seek and find God via the love inside themselves and to reinforce their sense of self-esteem.”
In December, when Hillary seemed near the point of emotional collapse, with Bill deeply depressed and dysfunctional and their political future imperiled, Hillary reached out to Williamson. New Age thought borrowed heavily from traditional theology, especially its message of going deep within and finding personal strength in adversity. No one had preached this message more effectively, or profitably, than Williamson, who took the initiative to suggest that Hillary and Bill consider getting together with her and a group of people far removed from the political establishment to discuss alternative ways of looking at the next two years of the presidency, and the difficulties of the previous two.
Hillary was receptive, and the weekend of December 30 and 31 was set aside at Camp David. Williamson, with Hillary's approval, picked the other participants, including Anthony (Tony) Robbins, the motivational infomercial king and author of
Awaken the Giant Within,
and Stephen Covey, author of
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
and its successor best-sellers. The titles were suggestive both of the participants' approach and Hillary's sense of what might have been missing in their first two years.
Since Don Jones's counsel to Hillary during her depression at Wellesley, she had been receptive to a pep talk that advised digging down into yourself to call on your inner resources, while maintaining belief in some sort of higher power. Though she had come to see herself since the inauguration as a victim, she was not one to collapse in a heap of self-pity. Even her decision to retreat from the front lines of the administrationâregarded by many acolytes and opponents alike as a kind of abdication (when her withdrawal became more obvious)ârepresented this precept of taking action.
For the Camp David weekend, Williamson had also engaged two lesser-known women on the seminar and lecture circuit whom she thought Hillary would take comfort in talking to in her current state: Mary Catherine Bateson and Jean Houston, who often worked in tandem.