Dirty Wars (10 page)

Even as he condemned the attacks, Awlaki pulled no punches in his analysis of the US posturing toward the Islamic world. In one sermon, a week after 9/11, Awlaki pushed back on the Bush administration's characterization of al Qaeda's motives. “We were told this was an attack on American civilization. We were told this was an attack on American freedom, on the American way of life,” Awlaki declared. “This wasn't an attack on any of this. This was an
attack on US foreign policy
.” As the United States began its push into Afghanistan in October 2001, Awlaki was interviewed by the Washington Times. “We're totally against what the terrorists [have] done. We want to bring those who [have] done this to justice,” he said. “But we're also against the
killing of civilians in Afghanistan
.” As the first Ramadan after 9/11 approached, Awlaki said, “There will be a higher level of anxiety in the community this year.” The Muslim holiday will be overshadowed by “a gloomy mood because of the events that happened in September and the ongoing war overseas,” he said, adding, “We always want Ramadan to come in quiet times, but unfortunately, this year that is
not going to happen
.” He also made clear he was opposed to the launch of the US war against the Taliban. “In my personal opinion I feel that the US
rushed into this war
,” he told an interviewer. “There could have been some other avenues to solve this problem, one of which was diplomatic pressure, taking advantage of all the Muslim countries who voiced their support for the US in this, and voiced their concern for what has happened on September 11. Very strong condemnations from all over the Muslim world. So that could
have been used and capitalized on to put some pressure on Afghanistan or whoever did this, rather than rushing into the war that we've seen.” More than a decade before the so-called Arab Spring, Anwar also criticized US support for autocratic leaders and their repressive regimes in Middle Eastern and predominantly Muslim countries. “There doesn't have to be a dramatic, sudden, overnight change in these regimes, but there needs to be at least some pressure on the part of the US for these regimes to open up a bit and provide more
freedom to the people
,” he said.

Driving around suburban Virginia during Ramadan in late 2001, Awlaki spoke to a camera held by a journalist from the
Washington Post.
“Since the war started there have been a lot of casualties among civilians. A lot. And unfortunately that hasn't been reported, or hasn't been reported in a fair proportion in the media, so there's a lot of concern that the common people in Afghanistan are paying the price for this. They're pawns in this game of politics,” he said.

After September 11th, the feelings of American Muslims were similar to the feeling of everybody else in America, feelings of sympathy for the families of the victims, and a sense that whoever did this needs to be brought to justice...that was the prevailing feeling amongst all American Muslims, in fact Muslims around the world. The war changed that a bit, because we have the memories of Iraq fresh in our minds. We were told in 1990 that this was going to be a war against Saddam Hussein. Well, after ten years he's still in power and the ones who are suffering are the Iraqi people. A million in Iraq died. So those memories are coming back to us now. They say it's to get the terrorists, but then here we go,
casualties from the civilians
.

The interviewer asked Awlaki what he thought of bin Laden and the Taliban. “They represent a very
radical understanding
, an extreme view, and a part of what feeds into [those] radical views are the conditions that exist in the Muslim world,” he said. “It's definitely a fringe group. There have been teaching[s] that were twisted. It's a method of justifying views by using religious texts, and that could exist in any religion.” Awlaki appears, in the video, to be struggling sincerely with how to respond to 9/11. He is also seen as a loving father, wiping his younger son's nose. At another point, he holds his trotting toddler's hand as they walk into the mosque. For a brief moment, Awlaki even sings part of the theme song from the children's show
Barney:
“I love you, you love me.” It is difficult to watch the hours of footage and conclude that he was simply a good actor.

As incidents of anti-Muslim violence and bigotry spread, Awlaki watched as Muslim and Arab communities in the United States were targeted by
the federal government. The people who came to his sermons told him of harassment they endured because of their race or their faith. People were rounded up, mosques were infiltrated, Muslim businesses were targeted by
vigilantes and federal agents
. Like many American Muslims, Awlaki believed that his people were being singled out, profiled because of their religion or race. “There is an
element of feeling
among the Muslims that they are targeted, or at least they are the ones who are paying the highest price for what's going on,” Awlaki told National Public Radio in October 2001. “There has been a rise in negative reporting on Islam in the media since the events happened. There have been 1,100 Muslims detained in the US. There's a bombing going on over a Muslim country, Afghanistan. So there are some reasons that make the Muslims feel that, well, it is true that the statement was made that this is not a war against Islam, but for all practical reasons, it is the Muslims who are being hurt.” When two members of his former San Diego mosque were detained on the basis of allegedly “strong connections” to the hijackers who had worshipped there, Awlaki rebuked the FBI. “There was no need to round them up in a
crude fashion
,” he said. He and his colleagues had preached patience and cooperation with the authorities, Awlaki said, but argued that “our people won't listen to us when they see this is how the FBI is treating them. It strengthens our belief that we are a community under siege...whose civil rights are being violated.” “It is not right,” he went on, claiming that the two men had tried to voluntarily cooperate with authorities before being unfairly detained. “It gives the impression they have involvement in this. It just destroys their reputation. I am convinced they are innocent.”

As the weeks went on after 9/11, Awlaki described in scores of media interviews the struggle that he and other Muslim leaders were facing in their communities, sparked by the perception that the United States was waging a war against Muslims and Islam. “It is the
radical voices
that are taking over, the ones who are willing to enter into an armed confrontation with their governments. So, basically, what we have now is that all of the moderate voices are silenced in the Muslim world,” he said in one interview. In another, Awlaki said, “With
American Muslims
, there's this feeling of being torn between our nation and our solidarity with Muslims around the world.” Awlaki began warning the United States that if it launched what Muslims perceived as a war against their religion, it would bring blowback. “My worry is that because of this conflict, the views of Osama bin Laden will become appealing to some of the population of the Muslim world,” he said. “That's a very frightening thing, so the US needs to be very careful and not have itself perceived as an
enemy of Islam
.”

IN ONE OF THE ODDER TWISTS
in Awlaki's post-9/11 story, he was invited by officials at the US Department of Defense (DoD) to address a Pentagon luncheon on February 5, 2002. In a declassified e-mail, one of the organizers of the event, a Pentagon employee, wrote: “I had the
privilege
of hearing one of Mr. Awlaki's presentations in November and was impressed both by the extent of his knowledge and by how he communicated that information and handled a hostile element in the audience. I particularly liked how he addressed how the average Middle Eastern person perceives the United States and his views on the international media.” The e-mail concluded that the event needed to be booked soon because Awlaki “will be leaving for an extensive period of time,” adding, “I think you'll enjoy it if you come. [Awlaki] is very informative and this is certainly a hot topic that we all would like to learn a little more about.” According to declassified Pentagon documents, “At that period in time, the secretary of the Army (redacted) was eager to have a presentation from a moderate Muslim,” adding that Awlaki “was considered to be an ‘up and coming' member of the Islamic community.” After being vetted for security reasons, Awlaki “was invited to and
attended a luncheon
at the Pentagon in the
secretary of the Army's
Office of Government Counsel.” (It is unlikely Awlaki dined on the “
East Side West Side
” sandwich offered at the event, which included beef, turkey and bacon on marbled rye.)

The Pentagon appearance may have just been a freak event that occurred thanks to poor vetting and Awlaki's public reputation at the time, shaped by his scores of media appearances, but it would also fuel speculation that Awlaki was cooperating with the US government in its 9/11 investigations. When I asked Nasser Awlaki, Anwar's father, about the Pentagon luncheon, he lit up. “Yes! You know, you cannot believe it,” he told me. “At one time, he told me he will join the US Army in order to be Muslim chaplain.” In one conversation he had with his son during this time, Nasser said Anwar “told me he was mad not to be invited to the White House. Like other Muslim dignitaries during Ramadan, when Bush started this event, asking people to come to Ramadan. He thought, how come they didn't ask him, because he was the imam of a big religious center in America.” Awlaki may not have made it into the White House, but in early 2002, he was invited to lead a prayer service in the US Capitol. His sermon there was featured in the 2002
PBS documentary
Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.

In March 2002, US federal agents conducted a series of
sweeping raids
against more than a dozen Muslim nonprofit organizations, businesses and private homes. The raids were conducted under the banner of an interagency task force and were part of a broad investigation into terror finances,
code-named
Operation Green Quest
. Among the raided organizations were respected Islamic think tanks, such as the
International Institute of Islamic Thought
, as well as the
Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences
at Cordoba University in Virginia. The homes of various leaders and staffers of the organizations were also searched and their
property seized
. The raids were allegedly conducted as part of a targeted operation against terrorism financing. The agents seized computer hard drives, confidential files and books. The raids filled
five hundred boxes
with files seized in the actions. No charges were ever filed against any leaders of these institutions or the organizations themselves in connection with the raids. Mainstream Muslim organizations and civil liberties groups condemned the raids as a witch hunt. Awlaki delivered a stinging sermon saying Operation Green Quest “was an
attack on every one of us
” in “the Muslim community,” warning, “If today this happened to these organizations, tomorrow you're going to be next.” In another sermon, Awlaki declared, “Maybe the next day the Congress will pass a bill about Islam that it is illegal in America. Don't think that this is a strange thing to happen; anything is probable in the world of today because there are no rights unless there's a
struggle for those rights
.”

Unbeknownst to Awlaki, he had been identified by the Green Quest task force as an
active subject
of its investigation, though it ultimately determined he had no connection to the targeted groups. At the same time, the FBI was actively trying to force him to cooperate in
various investigations
. Awlaki believed they were using the prostitution busts back in San Diego to try to
flip him
. Actually, his theory was not far-fetched. In fact, this was precisely what the feds were trying to do in the months after 9/11 when Awlaki was in Virginia. “FBI agents hoped al-Awlaki might cooperate with the 9/11 probe if they could nab him on similar charges in Virginia,”
US News & World Report
later reported. “FBI sources say agents observed the imam allegedly taking Washington-area prostitutes into Virginia and contemplated using a federal statute usually reserved for nabbing pimps who transport prostitutes
across state lines
.”

Awlaki was being feted in the media and presented as a voice of moderate Islam; a man who spoke eloquently of the Muslim community's struggle to navigate feelings of outrage at the 9/11 attacks and opposition to the wars the United States had launched in response. But privately, Awlaki was plotting his departure from America. Imam Johari Abdul Malik, who was the outreach director at Awlaki's Virginia mosque, said that he tried to persuade Anwar to stay in the United States in 2002. “
Why are you leaving
?” Malik asked him. He recalled Awlaki saying, “Because the climate here, you can't really do your work, because it's always antiterrorism, investigating this. The FBI wants to talk to you. That's not what I signed
up for. I would rather go somewhere where I can preach, I can teach, I can have a discourse that's not about 9/11 every day.” Awlaki also said he was considering
running for parliament
in Yemen and that he was interested in having
his own TV show
in the Gulf. Malik added that “Awlaki knew that he had been arrested for the solicitation of prostitutes, and that any revelation of this by US authorities would have
ruined him
.”

Awlaki had also changed his tone about the United States. He was outraged over the crackdowns on Muslims and the wars abroad in Muslim countries. The raids, combined with the US war in Afghanistan and the threats of war against Iraq, spurred Awlaki to become sharper in his critique of the US government. “This is not now a war on terrorism. We need to all be clear about this. This is a
war against Muslims
. It is a war against Muslims and Islam. Not only is this happening worldwide but it is happening right here, in America, that is claiming to be fighting this war for the sake of freedom, while it is infringing on the freedom of its own citizens, just because they are Muslims,” Awlaki said during a sermon. It was one of the last he would deliver in the United States. The US government surveillance of Muslims and mosques and imams enraged Awlaki, according to Nasser. “So Anwar suddenly was finding himself in a very difficult position. The country which he was born in, the country which he loved, the country where he wanted to preach his religion,” in Anwar's eyes, “became really against Muslims. And he was mad. And he could not really practice his religion freely in America. So he thought maybe Britain will be a good country to go to,” recalled Nasser. “And so he called me and said, ‘Father, I cannot finish my PhD.'” Nasser was devastated. His dream was for his son to finish his PhD in America and return to Yemen to teach at the university, as he had done.