Read Secondary Schizophrenia Online
Authors: Perminder S. Sachdev
(Ed.). 3rd ed. Baltimore,
medications. JAMA, 1994.
outcome of delirium in patients
Maryland: Williams and Wilkins,
272
:1518–22.
with advanced cancer: a
pp. 651–65.
31. Inouye S. K., Viscoli C. M.,
prospective study. Arch Intern
21. Francis J., Martin D., Kapoor W.
Horwitz R. I.,
et al.
A predictive
Med, 2000.
160
:786–94.
N. A prospective study of
model for delirium in hospitalised
10. Burns A., Gallagley A., Byrne J.
delirium in hospitalised elderly.
elderly medical patients based on
Delirium. J Neurol Neurosurg
JAMA, 1990.
263
:1097–101.
admission characteristics. Ann
Psychiatry, 2004.
75
:362–7.
22. Brauer C., Morrison R. S.,
Intern Med, 1993.
119
:474–81.
11. Schor J. D., Levkoff S. E., Lipsitz L.
Silberzweig S. B.,
et al.
The cause
32. Gustafson Y., Berggren D.,
A.,
et al.
Risk factors for delirium
of delirium in patients with hip
Brannstrom B.,
et al.
Acute
in hospitalised elderly. JAMA,
fracture. Arch Intern Med, 2000.
confusional states in elderly
1992.
267
:827–31.
160
:1856–60.
patients treated for femoral neck
fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1988.
12. Elie M., Cole M. G., Primeau F. J.,
23. Breitbart W., Gibson C., Tremblay
36
:525–30.
et al.
Delirium risk factors in
A. The delirium experience:
elderly hospitalised patients. J Gen
delirium recall and delirium-
33. Martin N. J., Stones M. J., Young J.
184
Intern Med, 1998.
13
:204–12.
related distress in hospitalised
E.,
et al.
Development of delirium:
Chapter 12 – Toxic psychosis
a prospective cohort study in a
44. Vezina P., Mohr E., Grimes D.
55. Cantu T. G., Korek J. S. Central
community hospital. Int
Deprenyl in Parkinson’s disease:
nervous system reactions to
Psychogeriatr, 2000.
12
:117–27.
mechanisms, neuroprotective
histamine-2 receptor blockers.
34. Inouye S. K., Charpentier P. A.
effect, indications and adverse
Ann Intern Med, 1991.
114
:1027–
Precipitating factors for delirium
effects. Can J Neurol Sci, 1992.
34.
in hospitalised elderly persons.
19
:142–6.
56. Morrison R. L., Katz I. R.
Predictive model and
45. Dubois M. J., Bergeron N.,
Drug-related cognitive
interrelationship with baseline
Dumont M.,
et al.
Delirium in an
impairment: current progress
vulnerability. JAMA, 1996.
intensive care unit: a study of risk
and recurrent problems.
275
:852–7.
factors. Intensive Care Med, 2001.
Am Rev Gerontol Geriatr, 1989.
35. Tune L. E., Blysma F. W.
27
:1297–1304.
9
:233–79.
Benzodiazepine-induced and
46. Litaker D., Locala J., Franco K., et
57. Henmann N. E., Carpenter D. U.,
anticholinergic-induced delirium
al. Preoperative risk factors for
Janda S. M. Famotidine-associated
in the elderly. Int Psychogeriatr,
postoperative delirium. Gen Hosp
mental confusion in elderly
1991.
3
:397–408.
Psychiatry, 2001.
23
:84–9.
patients. Drug Intell Clin Pharm,
36. Mach J. R., Dysken M. W.,
47. Fann J. R., Roth-Roemer S.,
1988.
22
:976–8.
Kuskowski M.,
et al.
Serum
Burington B. E.,
et al.
Delirium in
58. Morrison R. S., Magaziner J.,
anticholinergic activity in
patients undergoing
Gilbert M.,
et al.
Relationship
hospitalised older persons with
haematopoietic stem cell
between pain and opioid
delirium: a preliminary study.
transplantation. Cancer, 2002.
analgesics on the development of
J Am Geriatr Soc, 1995.
43
:491–5.
95
:1971–81.
delirium following hip fracture.
37. Meador K. J. Cognitive side effects
48. Ljubisavljevic V., Kelly B. Risk
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med, 2003.
of antiepileptic drugs. Can J
factors for development of
58
:76–81.
Neurol, 1994.
21
:512–16.
delirium among oncology
59. Jobst W. F., Bridges C. R.,
38. Preskorn S. H., Jerkovich G. S.
patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry,
Regan-Smith M. G.
Central nervous system toxicity of
2003.
25
:345–52.
Antirheumatic agents: CNS
tricyclic antidepressants:
49. Foy A., O’Connell D., Henry D., et
toxicity and its avoidance.
phenomenology, course, risk
al. Benzodiazepine use as a cause
Geriatrics, 1989.
44
:95–102.
factors and role of therapeutic
of cognitive impairment in elderly
60. Goodwin J. S., Regan M.
drug monitoring. J Clin
hospital inpatients. J Gerontol A
Cognitive dysfunction associated
Psychopharmacol, 1990.
10
:88–95.
Biol Sci Med Sci, 1995.
50
:M99–
with naproxen and ibuprofen in
39. Jefferson J. W., Griest J. H., Perse
M106.
the elderly. Arthritis Rheum, 1982.
T. L.,
et al.
Fluoxetine-associated
50. Sirios F. Steroid psychosis: a
25
:1013–5.
mania/hypomania in patients
review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry,
61. Sharon R. S., Glenn R. H. The
with obsessive compulsive
2003.
25
:27–33.
neurotoxicity of antibacterial
disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol,
51. Lewis D. A., Smith R. E.
agents. Ann Intern Med, 1984.
1991.
11
:391–2.
Steroid-induced psychiatric
101
:92–104.
40. Richelson E. Treatment of acute
syndromes: a report of 14 cases,
62. Trezpacz P. T. Is there a final
depression. Psychopharmacology,
and a review of the literature.
common neural pathway in
1993.
16
:461–478.
J Affect Disord, 1983.
5
:319–32.
delirium? Focus on acetylcholine
41. Rosen J., Bohon S., Gershon S.
52. Stoudemire A., Anfinson T.,
and dopamine. Semin Clin
Antipsychotics in the elderly. Acta
Edwards J. Corticosteroid-
Neuropsychiatry, 2005.
5
:
Psychiatr Scand, 1990.
82
:170–5.
induced delirium, and
132–48.
42. Bowen J. D., Larson E. B.
dependency. Gen Hosp Psychiatry,
63. Flacker J. M., Lipsitz L. A. Neural
Drug-induced cognitive
1996.
18
:196–202.
mechanisms of delirium: current
impairment. Defining the
53. Ling M. H. M., Perry P. J., Tsuang
hypotheses are evolving concepts.
problem and finding the solutions.
M. T. Side effects of corticosteroid
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med, 1999.
Drugs Ageing, 1993.
3
:349–57.
therapy: psychiatric aspects. Arch
54
:B239–46.
43. Friedman A., Sienkiewicz Z.
Gen Psychiatry, 1981.
38
:471–7.
64. Gaudreau J-D., Gagnon P.
Psychotic complications of
54. Lacomis D., Samuels M. A.
Psychotogenic drugs and delirium
long-term levodopa treatment of
Adverse neurological effects of
pathogenesis: the central role of
Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol
glucocorticosteroids. J Gen Intern
thalamus. Med Hypotheses, 2005.
Scand, 1991.
84
:111–3.
Med, 1991.
6
:367–76.
64
:471–5.
185
Section 3
Organic syndromes of schizophrenia: other neurological disorders
brain injury
Perminder S. Sachdev
Facts box
of severe TBI on the victim is almost always devastat-r
ing, but even mild TBI can result in serious and dis-The many anecdotal reports of
abling neuropsychiatric disorders, ranging from cog-schizophrenia-like psychosis (SLP) following
nitive deficits and personality change to severe and
traumatic brain injury (TBI) do not provide
chronic psychosis.
strong evidence for a link between the two
The association between TBI and schizophrenia-because of the likelihood of chance
like psychosis (SLP) has generated research interest for
association and the subjective nature of the
more than a century
[4],
but systematic studies have
determination.
been relatively few. The most important question is
r
One large cross-sectional study did not
whether TBI predisposes an individual to schizophre-provide strong evidence for an association
nia or SLP. If this can be unequivocally established,
between head injury and schizophrenia.
a number of other questions become relevant: What
r
The case control studies provide strong
is the prevalence of SLP following TBI? Are the clin-evidence that TBI does not substantially
ical features of SLP related to TBI different from
increase the risk of schizophrenia in the
schizophrenia? What is its prognosis? What factors,
general population, although a small increase
related to the injury as well as to the individual, predis-cannot be ruled out.
pose the person with TBI to develop SLP? Is the devel-r
The association may be stronger in those with
opment of SLP particularly related to injury to spe-a genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia or
cific brain regions? Does the study of SLP advance our
the presence of preinjury psychopathology.
understanding of the etiopathogenesis of schizophrer
nia? We first examine the epidemiological evidence
Psychosis following TBI has considerable
and then attempt to answer some of these questions.
overlap with primary schizophrenic disorder,
with a prominence of persecutory and other
delusions, auditory hallucinations, and a
Epidemiology
dearth of negative symptoms.
The evidence for an association between SLP and TBI
r
More severe and diffuse brain injuries,
has come from a number of sources, and the various
especially those involving the temporal and
studies can be grouped according to their design. The
frontal lobes, are the most prominent risk
most definitive study would be a longitudinal cohort
factor, and EEG and neuroimaging
design, in which a large number of head-injured indi-abnormalities are often present.
viduals across a wide age range, and a matched not
head-injured control group, would be followed up
prospectively using standard instruments and well-Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common problem
defined diagnostic criteria. Because this ideal study
with major public health implications. A conservative
does not exist, the evidence must be pooled from a
estimate of the annual incidence of TBI in the United
variety of sources.
States is 200 per 100,000 per year
[1],
and estimates of
its prevalence range from 2.5 to 6.5 million individuals
[2].
Disorders arising from traumatic injuries to the
Case reports
brain are more common than any other neurological
Observations by clinicians have been a major fac-