The Book of Books (36 page)

Read The Book of Books Online

Authors: Melvyn Bragg

BOOK: The Book of Books
7.02Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
The classicist author, Edith Hamilton, has written that the Bible is the only book in the world up to the twentieth century which looks at women as human beings no better and no worse than men. The Old Testament writers, she argues, described them just as impartially as they did men, free from prejudice and even from condescension.
Eve is born out of the body of Adam to be the mother of the human race. Yet when she yields to the beguiling serpent and eats the apple she condemned that race, according to the early commentators. In some ways the story of the history of the Bible is how it is able to fit the story to the changing face of authority. The Middle
Ages especially targeted Eve for this original sin because it suited their rule, and Milton took it up in
Paradise Lost
.
Eve was punished for this sin, as forever after was woman. Hers was to be a life of sorrow and pain in childbirth and child loss and unquestioning obedience under the heel of her husband. Men who wanted to keep women in domestic slavery invoked the spoiling of the Garden of Eden at every turn: women, when they were allowed their full public voice, pointed out that Eve was created out of a man: all men and women since were created out of women. But Eve became the exemplar of satanic sexual temptation's greatest triumph: ‘and the serpent beguiled her, and she did eat.' From then on, until deep into the modern age, woman was cast as the temptress, the untrusted, the seducer, the sexually rapacious, ungovernable, to be kept chained. An extreme of this was in ‘Malleus Maleficarum' (The Hammer of Witches), in which two German Dominicans, in 1486, took the central notion, as they saw it, of the sin of women, to launch three centuries of persecution of ‘witches'.
Eve became the temptress long before the Bible was translated into the King James Version. All the women discussed in this chapter have histories which precede 1611. But the printing and the unprecedented distribution of the Bible to the ambitious, increasingly populous and avidly literate English-speaking world brought Eve and other biblical women to a wider, a more interrogative, a more intrigued public than ever before.
Biblical women were irresistible to writers. High culture stepped up to the plate from John Milton's
Samson Agonistes
to Oscar Wilde's and Cavafy's
Salome
. Popular culture weighed in through films – from
All About Eve
to the
Last Temptation
, which portrayed Mary Magdalene as Eve's direct prostituted heiress. There were popular songs, from ‘Jezebel' to ‘Delilah'. And in the layering of many novels, plays and poems we find direct and
glancing references to Mary the Mother of God, to Ruth, to Jezebel in Lesley Hazleton's trilogy
Jezebel: The Untold Story of the Bible's Harlot Queen
, and the many accounts that include Mary Magdalene. Sex and the treatment of women were widely discussed after the King James Version made its way.
One claim, which came after 1611, was that Adam and Eve hold out the model for monogamy. One woman is created for one man. Eve is wrested from Adam's rib which emphasises that they were once one. As they will be again. ‘Wherefore a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one flesh.' And in 1 Corinthians xi, 11 – 12, Paul says: ‘For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman.'
The consensus today is that Eve has been sinfully misused. Pamela Norris in her book
Eve: A Biography
argues that the story of Eve has been used consistently ‘to manipulate and control women'. Eve has also become a repository of male fears and fantasies. The story of Eve, to modern feminists, is the source of patriarchal misogyny in Christianity. The accusation in Genesis was that she had been tempted to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil despite being forbidden to do so by God. That act was the root of all wickedness and for that alone women must be kept subject to men. It was very convenient for men.
Then there is Hagar. The story of Hagar has grown in the consciousness of Christians over the last three centuries partly because of its resonance in the African-American Christian communities.
Sarah, wife of Abraham who was to be the fountainhead of not one but three monotheistic religions – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – could not conceive. She offered her slave Hagar to Abraham who takes her, and a child is born, Ishmael. Sarah in her envy torments Hagar but she stays to be with the child. Some years later, Sarah conceives and Isaac is born. Sarah then forces Abraham
to drive out Hagar and Ishmael with minimal provisions, destined for death by hunger. But Hagar's prayer to God saves them and they continue to live – though they stay outside society in the wilderness.
Hagar was victimised by the great commentators from St Augustine – who wrote that she symbolised the sinful condition of humanity – to Thomas Aquinas and John Wycliffe, who wrote that the children of Sarah were to be redeemed but the children of Hagar were ‘cursed by nature and mere exiles', and were not to be redeemed.
This transparent and (by non-patriarchal standards) grotesque injustice has since been recognised. In America, several black feminist biblical historians have seen Hagar as someone with whom it is easy and important for former slaves to identify. She is seen as a slave forced into a pregnancy for the convenience of Abraham and the determination of Sarah that he should fulfil his dynastic destiny. Then she is expelled for no fault of her own, out of jealousy and the possessiveness of the non-slave wife when she has no need for her. She is, like the African-American slaves, a thing, an object, to be used at will and rejected when the use is over and thrown out without a thought for her future life or that of her child.
The theologian Dolores S. Williams writes:
Hagar has ‘spoken' to generation after generation of black women because her story has been validated as true by suffering black people. She and Ishmael together, as family, like many black American families in which a lone woman/mother struggles to hold the family together in spite of the poverty to which ruling class economics consign it. Hagar, like many black women, goes into the wide world to make a living for herself and her child with only God by her side.
Hagar is a perfect example, I think, of how the contradictory and clashing nature of the Bible can re-address the world across the centuries. The Hagar ‘story' was changed utterly by a reading radically at odds, scarcely even resembling, the original and acclaimed progress of Abraham and his seed. The one does not eradicate the other but it stands in powerful opposition to it.
Sarah is the establishment, the ruling caste, Hagar the slave, the abused outsider but also the survivor. These women bring other dimensions to the portrayal of women in the Bible. Though driven by procreation, it is not simply the gender and sex of Eve which shadows and colours other strong biblical women. As with Sarah and Hagar the context is vital. Sarah the unbearably barren and then unbearably jealous wife, only to become a competing mother is still with us now. Hagar's casting off is common.
Salome and Jezebel are more to be thought of as the expected daughters of the old Eve. Each of them has been revisited by modern feminists with rich rewards. We see how the characters become a caricature which fitted the dominant male culture of the time: more intriguingly, we are afforded subtler and plausible interpretations of the lives and actions of these women. Jezebel for example is traditionally a lustful unlicensed worshipper of the goddess of love who lured upstanding Israelites from their own God to Baal through her deployment of temple prostitutes. An evil power behind the throne, Jezebel is thrown, literally, to the dogs by fanatics. A modern reading sees her as an assertive woman baited and foully murdered by representatives of a male-dominated religion.
Judith gives us another strand: the use of sexuality to achieve greatness through service to her people. When Nebuchadnezzar's Persian army lays siege to Bethulia, the inhabitants think that God has abandoned them. Judith, a wealthy and beautiful widow, leaves the town at night, seeks out the leader of the army,
Holofernes (perhaps by posing as a prostitute?). She makes him drunk, hacks off his head, returns to the town and displays the severed head on the ramparts. The Persians panic: the Israelites charge out and slaughter them.
Judith is a heroine.
She was an example of the warrior queen, a woman as brave, cunning and successful in war as a man. She must have seduced Holofernes even if only through conversation and promises; she must have used those wicked feminine arts so feared and despised by the men who had cast women into the outer darkness and stigma of sinful sex. Yet her story rises above that. Judith is the most unexpected woman in the Bible: virtue and courage and leadership as an effective troika.
Mary Magdalene provokes inexhaustible reappraisals. Her presence in the life of Jesus Christ is unique. If we track her story, we begin in the Gospel according to St Luke. He reports that Jesus ‘went throughout every city and village, preaching and shewing the glad tidings of the Kingdom of God: and the twelve were with him. And certain women, which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities. Mary called Magdalene, out of whom went seven devils, and Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance.' Mary seems to be a woman of substance. As was to happen repeatedly over the next 2,000 years, women of a certain education and wealth were important early supporters of the Apostles and their heirs and successors.
There are four accounts of Mary Magdalene being present at the crucifixion – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John all refer to her. Luke and Matthew report that she was there when the body of Jesus was sealed in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea; she could confirm that he was dead and she prepared the spices needed for the proper burial. Most significantly of all, according again to all four Apostles,
it was Mary Magdalene who was the first person to see the risen Jesus, the first witness to the greatest of all miracles. This was the Christian proof of the God-in-Christ, the Resurrection with its promise of life everlasting. It was shown first before all others to Mary Magdalene. It was Mary Magdalene who told Peter and the other Apostles ‘He is Risen' – this again recorded in all four Gospels.
She had an outstandingly privileged and unique role in what for Christians is the stem narrative of their faith. Yet the curse of Eve has been on her until quite recently. She has been represented by male commentators and film makers, lasciviously and certainly voyeuristically, as a prostitute, albeit an ultimately repentant prostitute. Much more damning that she should have been a prostitute. It fits in with centuries of stereotyping. It also encompasses the wishful thinking of some men whose constructs of sin and sex have seen and still see prostitution as an exciting and irresponsible access to carnal pleasure.
Scholars have looked in the Apocryphal texts and found a different story. They often contain evidence which seems as reliable as that which was waved through into the New Testament. In the Apocrypha, Mary Magdalene is portrayed as ‘The Apostle to the Apostles' – which makes sense of her several key appearances in the Christ story. In some texts she is described as a visionary and a teacher of the early movement, and one who was loved by Jesus more than all other disciples.
We could be forgiven for seeing a conspiracy theory here: perhaps the excision of the Apocryphal books was not prissiness but yet another attempt in the institutional Church's ignominious history of reshaping the Word of God to suit the earthly politics of the men who led and ran the institution. These cuts arouse legitimate suspicions that a woman of such significance in the life and work of Christ disturbed the early Church's ordering of things too much to be tolerated. In several Gnostic Gospels, for
instance, Mary is seen as a special disciple of Jesus who has a deeper understanding of His work and is asked to interpret it to the other disciples.
Even with just the evidence we have in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, her ‘specialness' is unquestionable. Her closeness to Christ undeniable. Her maternal support for him is a stated fact. Not a big leap to speculation that she was more educated than the fishers of men who formed the core of the twelve? More used to the discussion of ideas? Not unlikely. Nor is it at all unlikely that had the centrality of Mary Magdalene been acknowledged and celebrated from the beginning of the written Gospels then perhaps the history of Christianity and certainly the history of women in Christianity would have been radically different.
Was Mary Magdalene rubbed out to preserve a monopolistic male mafia? It is within the bounds of possibility and the psychology of those who decided to organise a work that became such an attractive and substantial force in the empire. Organisers are often at a distance from the activists, the doers. The Church of wealth, the Church that crowned emperors and excommunicated kings had to be a matching Church militant in those masculine societies. A woman as favoured by Christ as Mary, perhaps a woman of independent mind and means, was not helpful.
Some have gone further, unsupported by enough evidence, and claimed that Mary Magdalene was the wife of Christ and bore his children. If it could be proved, that would change the Christian world for ever: and perhaps for the better?
 
The Song of Solomon begins:
The Song of Songs which is Solomon's. Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth: for thy love is better than wine. Because of the savour of thy good ointments thy name is as ointment poured forth. Therefore
do the virgins love thee. Draw me, we will run after thee. The King hath brought me into his chambers: we will be glad and rejoice in thee: we will remember thy love more than wine: the upright love thee. I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon . . . Behold, thou art fair, my love . . . Thou hast doves' eyes . . . Behold, thou art fair, my beloved, yes, pleasant: also our bed is green: the beams of our house are cedar and our rafters of fir . . . He brought me to the banqueting house and his banner over me was love . . . His left hand is under my head, and his right hand doth embrace me . . . thy two breasts are like two young roes that are twins, which feed among the lilies . . . my beloved put his hand by the hole of the door and my bowels were moved for him. I rose to open to my beloved and my hands dropped with myrrh, and my fingers with sweet smelling myrrh, upon the handles of the lock. I opened to my beloved but my beloved had withdrawn himself and was gone; my soul failed when he spake: I sought him, but I could not find him; I called him, but he gave me no answer . . . I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem, if ye find my beloved, that ye tell him that I am sick of love . . . there are three score queens, and four score concubines and virgins without number . . . Return, return, O Shulamite, return, return, that we may look upon thee . . . I am my beloved's, and his desire is toward me. Come, my beloved, let us go forth into the field: let us lodge in the villages . . . set me as a seal upon thine heart, as a seal upon thine arm; for love is strong as death, jealousy is cruel as the grave . . . many waters cannot quench love, neither can the floods drown it . . . Make haste, my beloved, and be thou like to a roe or to a young hart upon the mountains of spices.

Other books

FIT: #1 in the Fit Trilogy by Rebekah Weatherspoon
Witness Seduction by Kennedy, Elle
The Diary of Brad De Luca by Alessandra Torre
The Red Ripper by Kerry Newcomb
Lucky Stars by Kristen Ashley
Under the Surface by Katrina Penaflor
The Dowry Blade by Cherry Potts
Lupus Rex by John Carter Cash
Sailmaker by Rosanne Hawke