The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (74 page)

There are alternatives to Armageddon.
 
They are attainable.
 
But they will not happen without coordinated efforts by millions of dedicated people in all nations of the earth.
 
We, the sponsors of The Georgia Guidestones, are a small group of Americans who wish to focus attention on problems central to the present quandary of humanity.
 
We have a simple message for other human beings, now and in the future.
 
We believe it contains self-evident truths, and we intend no bias for a particular creed or philosophy.
 
Yet our message is in some areas controversial.
 
We have chosen to remain anonymous in order to avoid debate and contention which might confuse our meaning, and which might delay a considered review of our thoughts.
 
We believe that our precepts are sound. They must stand on their own merits.

Stonehenge and other vestiges of ancient human thoughts arouse our curiosity but carry no message for our guidance.
 
To convey our ideas across time to other human beings, we erected a monument — a cluster of graven stones.
 
These silent stones will display our ideas now and when we have gone.
 
We hope that they will merit increasing acceptance and that through their silent persistence they will hasten in a small degree the coming age of reason.

We believe that each human being has purpose.
 
Every one of us is a small but significant bit of the infinite. The celestial alignments of the stones symbolize the need for humanity to be square with External principles which are manifest in our own nature, and in the universe around us. We must live in harmony with the infinite.

Four large stones in the central cluster are inscribed with ten precepts, each stone carrying the same text in two languages.
 
In the English version the message totals fewer than one hundred words.
 
The languages have been selected for their historical significance and for their impact on people now living.
 
Since there are three thousand living languages, not all could he chosen.

We envision a later phase in the development of the Georgia Guidestones.
 
It is hoped that other stones can be erected in outer circles to mark the migrations of the sun and perhaps certain other celestial phenomena. These stones would carry our words in the languages of other individuals who share our beliefs and will raise similar stones at international boundaries in the languages of friendly neighbors. They would serve as reminders of the difficulties which all humanity must face together, and would encourage mutual efforts to deal with them rationally and with justice.

We profess no divine inspiration beyond that which can be found in all human minds. Our thoughts reflect our analysis of the problems confronting humanity in this dawning of the atomic age.
 
They outline in general terms certain basic steps which must be taken to establish for humanity a benevolent and enduring equilibrium with the universe.

Human beings are special creatures.
 
We are shepherds for all earthly life.
 
In this world, we play a central role in an eternal struggle between good and evil – between the forces which build and those which would destroy.
 
The Infinite envelops all that exists, even struggle, conflict and change, which may reflect turmoil in the very soul of God.

We humans have been gifted with a small capacity to know and to act– for good or for evil. We must strive to optimize our existence, not only for ourselves but for those who come after us. And we must not be unmindful of the welfare of all other living things whose destinies have been placed in our trust.

We are the major agency through which good and evil qualities of the spirit become actors in our world.
 
Without us there is very little of love, mercy, or compassion.
 
Yet we can also be agents of hate, and cruelty and cold indifference.
 
Only we can consciously work to improve this imperfect world.
 
It is not enough for us to merely drift with the current.
 
The rational world of tomorrow lies ever upstream.

In 1980, as these stones were being raised, the most pressing world problem was the need to control human numbers.
 
In recent centuries technology and abundant fuels have made possible a multiplication of humanity far beyond what is prudent or long sustainable.
 
Now we can foresee the impending exhaustion of those energy sources and the depletion of world reserves of many vital raw materials.

Controlling our reproduction is urgently needed.
 
It will require major changes in our attitudes and customs.
 
Unfortunately, the inertia of human custom can be extreme.
 
This is especially true when those for whom custom is a dominant force are uninformed of the need for change.

Nearly every nation is now overpopulated in terms of a perpetual balance with nature.
 
We are like a fleet of overcrowded lifeboats confronted with an approaching tempest.
 
In the United States of America we are seriously overtaxing our resources to maintain our present population in the existing state of prosperity.
 
We are destroying our farmland and we have grown dangerously dependent upon external sources for oil, metals and other nonrenewable resources. Nations such as Japan, Holland and Haiti are even more seriously overpopulated and, therefore, in greater jeopardy.

In these circumstances, reproduction is no longer exclusively a personal matter.
 
Society must have a voice and some power of direction in regulating this vital function.
 
The wishes of human couples are important, but not paramount.
 
The interests of present society and the welfare of future generations must be given increasing consideration as we develop mechanisms to bring rational control to our childbearing.

Irresponsible childbearing must be discouraged by legal and social pressures.
 
Couples who cannot provide a decent income and support for a child should not produce children to be a burden for their neighbors.
 
Bringing unneeded children into an overcrowded lifeboat is evil.
 
It is unjust to those children.
 
It is harmful for the other occupants and all living things.
 
Society should not encourage or subsidize such behavior.

Knowledge and techniques for regulating human reproduction are now in existence.
 
Moral and political leaders throughout the world have a grave responsibility to make this knowledge and these techniques generally available.
 
This could be done with a fraction of the funds which the world now devotes to military purpose. In the long run, diverting funds into this channel could do more than anything else to reduce the tensions which lead to war.

A diverse and prosperous world population in perpetual balance with global resources will be the cornerstone for a rational world order.
 
People of good will in all nations must work to establish that balance.

With the completion of the central cluster of The Georgia Guidestones our small sponsoring group has disbanded.
 
We leave the monument in the safekeeping of the people of Elbert County, Georgia.

If our inscribed words are dimmed by the wear of wind and sun and time, we ask that you will cut them deeper.
 
If the stones should fall, or if they be scattered by people of little understanding, we ask that you will raise them up again.

We invite our fellow human beings in all nations to reflect on our simple message. When these goals are some day sought by the generality of mankind, a rational world order can be achieved for all.”

All very commendable you may think.
 
Who could argue with such noble sentiments?
 
However when one ‘reads between the lines’ of this message it is very simple to discern the fact that the message promotes a society that would fulfill the Elite goals, all of course dressed up in language that is designed to make this ‘New World Order’ sound like paradise and not as it would be, the world described by both Orwell and Huxley in their prophetic novels 1984 and Brave New World.

The Georgia Guidestones are a manifesto calling for a drastic change in the way the world is currently managed.
 
The monument is of a great importance in the understanding of the forces covertly shaping today and tomorrow’s world and it represents in stone the inextricable links between secret societies, the world Elite and the agenda for a New World Order.
 
This agenda for one world government, population control and environmentalism are issues that are today discussed on a daily basis in current events; however this was not the case in 1980, when the Guidestones were erected.

The crude but nevertheless heartfelt sentiments of those who oppose all that these monsters represent

Despite what the establishment and the Elite controlled, compliant media would like you to believe, there is absolutely no doubt that Diana was ritually and brutally murdered in line with Royal orders.

On the 31st August 1997, Princess Diana, the estranged wife of Prince Charles, and her lover, Dodi Fayed were killed in a car crash in the Pont de l’Alma road tunnel in the centre of Paris.
 
They were on their way to Dodi’s executive apartment just off the Champs Elysee after having had dinner together at the Ritz Hotel, owned by Dodi’s father, Mohammed Fayed.
 
(I will refer to him and his late son as ‘Fayed’ rather than ‘Al Fayed’ as this is the name with which he was born.
 
The ‘Al’ prefix is merely a later affectation).
 
The other occupants of the car were Henri Paul, head of security at the Ritz, the nominated driver for the evening and Trevor Rees-Jones another security man and the only survivor of the ‘accident’.

We are, as is always the case, faced with the usual confusion and subterfuge surrounding the events of that night.
 
Indeed there are so many conflicting versions of the story that it is extremely difficult for anyone to even come close to the actual truth without intensive, sustained research on the subject.
 
However, what follows is substantially more than an educated guess about what actually happened that fateful night.

The story began in 1980, seventeen years earlier with a teenage girl from a privileged background, Lady Diana Spencer, meeting and falling in love with her Prince Charming (Charles) in a storybook romance that captured the imagination of almost the whole of our royalty-obsessed nation and most of the rest of the world too.
 
The date was soon set for the wedding as the 29th July 1981 and little did poor Diana know that her troubles were only just about to begin.
 

She gave birth to William, the couple’s first child, through an induced birth on 21st June 1982 (significantly, the summer solstice – an important occult date) and he was shortly afterwards followed by his younger brother, Harry, the two boys being jokingly referred to as the ‘heir and the spare’.
 
Once Diana had fulfilled her always-intended role as brood-mare (her term) for the future monarch and his ‘back-up’, all pretence of love was immediately dropped by Charles and he immediately resumed his long-term, ongoing affair with Camilla Parker-Bowles (if indeed it had ever ceased).
 
Diana realised very quickly that the fairy-tale was over and she was basically shunned and treated as an interloper from that point onwards by the entire Royal family.
 
Had she not been the strong character that she undoubtedly was, then she may not have even had the mental strength to assert herself where her boys were concerned.
 
Ironically, that she did so, probably marked the beginning of the end for her.
 
Anyone who crosses these people, for any reason at all had better beware.

The full force of the Royal propaganda machine was unleashed upon her as she had to endure all kinds of mental torture and accusations of unfaithfulness (most of her alleged indiscretions were probably more than understandable, but nevertheless true) whilst Charles’ blame for the rapid disintegration of the marriage was deflected in her direction and for a considerable time she acquired a reputation as a ‘mad woman’ struggling with bulimia and mental illness.

In 1988, Diana was having a secret affair with her security guard, the detective Barry Mannakee which obviously became known to the Royals.
 
Shortly afterwards, Mannakee was killed in a road traffic ‘accident’ and Charles cruelly and sarcastically broke the news to Diana by saying to her with a smirk, before she even knew of his death, ‘Shame about poor Barry!’
 
David Icke, the geo-political researcher, spoke to Christine Fitzgerald, an alternative healer and Diana’s confidante at the time and she said to him..

“She was crying hysterically and I said ‘What’s the matter?’
 
‘I can’t believe it’, she sobbed, ‘They killed him, they killed him’.
 
I said ‘who did they kill’ and she told me that he [Barry] had been decapitated on his motorbike and how she thought at first it was a terrible accident.
 
But now she knows the Royal family killed him because Prince Charles’ detective just told her that if she didn’t cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him.
 
He told her that she should not think she was indispensible either.”
 
[My emphasis – JH]

Diana in fact was absolutely convinced that she was going to be disposed of in a fake ‘accident’ scenario.
 
She confided this fact to several friends and even wrote it in a

letter.

Diana’s letter to her butler, Paul Burrell

This was later confirmed by James Hewitt himself in a TV documentary, ‘Diana – secrets of the crash’ in 1998.
 
He also said that he too had been warned to stop seeing Diana or ‘the consequences would not be pleasant’.
 
He further said:

“The telephone calls were anonymous, but they left me in no doubt that they knew what the situation was.
 
They were threatening.
 
They said it was not conducive to my health to continue the relationship.”

He also said that he had other warnings from Diana’s personal protection unit, the Royal household itself and a specific ‘senior’ member of the Royal family whom he declined to identify.
 
This person said:

“Your relationship is known about.
 
It is not supported.
 
We cannot be responsible for your safety and security and suggest that you curtail it forthwith.”

However the clearest threat to him came when he was told outright that if he did not desist from seeing Diana, the same fate as befell Barry Mannakee would also befall him.

This latter statement alone, I believe tells anyone who was formerly in any doubt about the capabilities of these monsters, exactly what they are about and belies the ‘cosy’ homely image they love to project of their thoroughly evil-to-the-core family.
 
Every time I hear anyone say anything along the lines of ‘I am a staunch royalist’ or ‘I adore the Royal family’ (and there are millions of these sheeple) it makes me thoroughly sick to my stomach.
 
The time to wake up is long overdue.

But, back to the story…

After the end of her affair with James Hewitt, which had been duly ‘curtailed’ after the threats, which Hewitt obviously and understandably took fairly seriously, Diana’s next ‘public’ amour was with Dodi Fayed and as we all know now, it was destined to be her last.

Mohammed Fayed, Dodi’s overbearing father was instrumental in bringing the couple together.
 
He had ingratiated himself with Diana in the past and always made a point of greeting her personally when she visited Harrods for her ‘retail therapy’.
 
They had built up quite a cosy relationship – she found him ‘charming and funny’ or so she said and when he invited her and the two teenage boys to join him and Dodi on his yacht Jonikal in the Mediterranean in the July of 1997, the relationship blossomed.
 
At this point, it must be noted, Dodi was still engaged to his American fiancée, Kelly Fisher but father had spoken and Dodi had to obey.

Kelly was originally invited to be the guest on the yacht that summer but Dodi blanked her several times, would not answer her calls and she was told by the Fayed staff in no uncertain terms that they had been instructed not to connect her calls to either Fayed senior or Fayed junior.
 
Eventually she did manage to speak with Dodi who cruelly cut her short and told her the engagement was off.
 
They were never to speak again.

After a relaxing few days on the yacht, the boys were dispatched back home to Charles whilst Dodi and Diana flew to Paris to spend a couple more romantic nights together before the end of the holiday and their both going their separate ways again, albeit it was hoped, temporarily.

So, the 3oth August, the last full day either of them would ever see, as it turned out, dawned and after a pleasant day spent together in Paris, Dodi had planned a romantic meal for two in an exclusive restaurant close to the Ritz Hotel.
 
However, their plans were about to be thwarted.
 
A huge posse of ‘paparazzi’ reporters had gathered outside the main doors of the hotel, making it almost impossible for the couple to pass through on their way to the restaurant and so they had a change of plan.
 
Instead of going to the restaurant, they decided to eat in the hotel restaurant before making their way across Paris to Dodi’s apartment in the Rue Arsene-Houssaye, where they intended to spend the night.

Just after midnight, they made their move.
 
The paparazzi were still thronged outside the front door of the hotel in great numbers and would no doubt harass the couple all the way to the car and probably all the way to Dodi’s apartment too.
 
So, a plan was hatched by Mohammed Fayed whereby a decoy car would arrive at the front door, purportedly to take the couple to their destination and meanwhile the couple would sneak out of the rear door and into another car waiting to whisk them away before the reporters knew what was afoot.
 
So far so good and the Mercedes sped away from the Ritz driven by Henri Paul, with Rees-Jones in the front passenger seat and Diana and Dodi in the rear seats.

None of the two cars or motorcycle chasing the Mercedes at this point contained any paparazzi; they all appeared in the first couple of minutes after the crash.
 
As the Mercedes approached the tunnel it was being chased by the two cars and one motorcycle and one of the vehicles (a white Fiat Uno) rammed the Mercedes just before the crash.
 
As the Mercedes got nearer the tunnel, another motorcycle prevented one car from taking the approach road that lead to the tunnel.
 

A remote-controlled device was likely used, causing an explosion (as initially reported by CNN and then mysteriously omitted from subsequent reports) which was heard by witnesses and which disabled the driving controls and electronics of the Mercedes.
 
A laser strobe light was also seen by witnesses, which was used to blind the driver in the final seconds before it entered the tunnel - which incidentally, some witnesses claim was completely dark as the lights had been turned-off minutes earlier.
 
A laser beam was being flashed into the eyes of the chauffeur, Henri Paul, causing the Mercedes to crash inside the Pont d'Alma tunnel.
 
Witnesses told British detectives they saw a motorcyclist point a laser into the eyes of Paul.
 
One witness said he saw ‘an enormous radar-like flash of light.’

After hearing an explosion and then a bang, witnesses ran to the scene, only to be told to ‘get back’ by an unknown person who ran towards them out of the tunnel from the direction of the crashed car.
 
A second person, whose identity is also still unknown, was seen in the Mercedes lifting the already dead driver’s head from the blaring car horn.
 
Witnesses also report that a helicopter was seen above just before the crash, presumably monitoring or even directing events on the ground.
 
Since the electricity had been cut-off in the tunnel, the traffic cameras did not work, thus ensuring that there was no video evidence of the Mercedes final approach to the tunnel or of what vehicles may have been leaving it.
 
One witness, Gary Hunter, saw two vehicles race out of the tunnel and others also saw a motorcycle tearing away at high speed.