Read The Origin of Evil Online
Authors: Ellery Queen
âBy God,' snarled Priam, âshe almost got me. Me!'
âThat was a dumb-bunny stunt, Miss Hill,' said Keats. âI'm going to have to take you in for attempted homicide.'
Laurel was looking in a glazed way from the gun in the detective's hand to the immobile Delia. Ellery felt the girl shrinking in his grip, in spasms, as if she were trying to compress herself into the smallest possible space.
âI'm sorry, Mrs. Priam,' Keats was saying. âI couldn't know she was carrying a gun. She never seemed the type. I'll have to ask you to come along and swear out a complaint.'
âDon't be silly, Lieutenant.'
âHuh?'
âI'm not making any charge against this girl.'
âBut Mrs. Priam, she shot to kill â'
âMe!' yelled Roger Priam.
âNo, it's me she shot at.' Delia Priam's voice was listless. âShe's wrong, but I understand how you can bring yourself to do a thing like this when you've lost somebody you've loved. I wish I had Laurel's spunk. Crowe, stop looking like a dead carp. I hope you're not going to be stuffy about this and let Laurel down. It's probably taken her weeks to work herself up to this, and at that she had to get drunk to do it. She's a good girl, Crowe. She needs you. And I know you're in love with her.'
Laurel's bones all seemed to melt at once. She sighed, and then she was silent.
âI think,' murmured Ellery, âthat the good girl has passed out.'
Macgowan came to life. He snatched Laurel's limp figure from Ellery's arms, looked around wildly, and then ran with her. The door opened before him; Wallace stood there, smiling.
âShe'll be all right.' Delia Priam walked out of the room. âI'll take care of her.'
They watched her go up the stairs behind her son, back straight, head high, hips swinging.
14
By the night of July thirteenth all the reports were in.
âIf I'm a detective,' Keats said unhappily to Ellery, âthen you've got second sight. I'm still not sure how you doped this without inside information.'
Ellery laughed. âWhat time did you tell Priam and the others?'
âEight o'clock.'
âWe've just got time for a congratulatory drink.'
They were in Priam's house on the stroke of eight. Delia Priam was there, and her father, and Crowe Macgowan, and a silent and drained-looking Laurel. Roger Priam had evidently extended himself for the occasion; he had on a green velvet lounging jacket and a shirt with starched cuffs, and his beard and hair had been brushed. It was as if he suspected something out of the ordinary and was determined to meet it full-dress, in the baronial manner. Alfred Wallace hovered in the background, self-effacing and ineffaceable, with his constant mocking, slightly irritating smile.
âThis is going to take a little time,' said Lieutenant Keats, âbut I don't think anybody's going to be bored ⦠I'm just along for atmosphere. It's Queen's show.'
He stepped back to the terrace-ward wall, in a position to watch their faces.
âShow? What kind of show?' There was fight in the Priam tones, his old hair-trigger belligerence.
âShowdown would be more like it, Mr. Priam,' said Ellery.
Priam laughed. âWhen are you going to get it through your heads that you're wasting your time, not to mention mine? I didn't ask for your help, I don't want your help, I won't take your help â and I ain't giving any information.'
âWe're here, Mr. Priam, to give you information.'
Priam stared. Of all of them, he was the only one who seemed under no strain except the strain of his own untempered arrogance. But there was curiosity in his small eyes.
âIs that so?'
âMr. Priam, we know the whole story.'
âWhat whole story?'
âWe know your real name. We know Leander Hill's real name. We know where you and Hill came from before you went into business in Los Angeles in 1927, and what your activities were before you both settled in California. We know all that, Mr. Priam, and a great deal more. For instance, we know the name of the person whose life was mixed up with yours and Hill's before 1927 â the one who's trying to kill you today.'
The bearded man held on to the arms of his wheel-chair. But he gave no other sign; his face was iron. Keats, watching from the sidelines, saw Delia Priam sit forward, as at an interesting play; saw the flicker of uneasiness in old Collier's eyes; the absorption of Macgowan; the unchanging smile on Wallace's lips. And he saw the colour of life creep back in Laurel Hill's cheeks.
âI can even tell you,' continued Ellery, âexactly what was in the box you received the morning Leander Hill got the gift of the dead dog.'
Priam exclaimed, âThat's bull! I burned that box and what was in it the same day I got it. Right in that fireplace there! Is the rest of your yarn going to be as big a bluff as this?'
âI'm not bluffing, Mr. Priam.'
âYou know what was in that box?'
âI know what was in that box.'
âOut of the zillions of different things it could have been, you know the one thing it was, hey?' Priam grinned. âI like your nerve, Queen. You must be a good poker player. But that's a game I used to be pretty good at myself. So suppose I call you. What was it?'
He raised a glass of whisky to his mouth.
âSomething that looked like a dead eel
.'
Had Ellery said, âSomething that looked like a live unicorn,' Priam could not have reacted more violently. He jerked against the tray and most of the whisky sprayed out of his beard. He spluttered, swiping at himself.
As far as Keats could see, the others were merely bewildered. Even Wallace dropped his smile, although he quickly picked it up and put it on again.
âI was convinced from practically the outset,' Ellery went on, âthat these “warnings” â to use the language of the original note to Hill â were interconnected; separate but integral parts of an all-over pattern. And they are. The pattern is fantastic â for instance, even now I'm sure Lieutenant Keats still suspects what Hollywood calls a weenie. But fantastic or not, it exists; and the job I set myself was to figure out what it was. And now that I've figured it out, it doesn't seem fantastic at all. In fact, it's straightforward, even simple, and it certainly expresses a material enough meaning. The fantasy in this case, as in so many cases, lies in the mind that evolved the pattern, not in the pattern itself.
âAs the warnings kept coming in, I kept trying to discover their common denominator, the cement that was holding them together. When you didn't know what to look for â unlike Mr. Priam, who did know what to look for â it was hard, because in some of them the binding agent was concealed.
âIt struck me, after I'd gone over the warnings innumerable times,' said Ellery, and he paused to light a cigarette, so that nothing in the room was audible but the scratch of the match and Roger Priam's heavy breathing, âit struck me finally that
every warning centrally involved an animal
.'
Laurel said, âWhat?'
âI'm not counting the dog used to bring the warning note to Hill. Since it conveyed a warning to Hill and not to you, Mr. Priam, we must consider the dead dog entirely apart from the warnings sent to you. Still, it's interesting to note in passing that Hill's series of warnings, which never got beyond the first, began with an animal, too.
âOmitting for the moment the contents of the first box you received, Mr. Priam,' Ellery said, âlet's see how the concept “animal” derives from the warnings we had direct knowledge of. Your second warning was a poisoning attack, a non-fatal dose of arsenic. The animal?
Tuna fish
, the medium by which the poison was administered.
âThe third warning?
Frogs and toads
.
âThe fourth warning was one step removed from the concept â a wallet. But the wallet was leather, and the leather came from an
alligator
.
âThere was no mistaking the animal in the fifth warning. The ancient Greek comedy by Aristophanes â
The Birds
.
âAnd the sixth warning, Mr. Priam â some worthless old stock certificates â would have given me a great deal of trouble if you hadn't suggested the connection yourself. There's a contemptuous phrase applied to such stocks by market traders, you said â
“cats and dogs.”
And you were quite right â that's what they're called.
âSo ⦠fish, frogs, alligator, birds, cats and dogs. The fish, frogs, and alligator suggested literally, the birds and the cats and dogs suggested by allusion. All animals. That was the astonishing fact. What did you say, Mr. Priam?'
But Priam had merely been bumbling in his beard.
âNow the fact that each of the five warnings I'd had personal contact with concealed, like a puzzle, a different animal â astonishing as it was â told me nothing,' continued Ellery, throwing his cigarette into Priam's fireplace. âI realized after some skull work that the meaning must go far deeper. It had to be dug out.
âBut digging out the deeper meaning was another story.
âYou either see it or you don't. It's all there. There's nothing up its sleeve. The trick lies in the fact that, like all great mystifications, it wears the cloak of invisibility. I do not use the word “great” loosely. It's just that â a great conception â and it wouldn't surprise me if it takes its place among the classic inventions of the criminal mind.'
âFor God's sake,' burst out Crowe Macgowan, âtalk something that makes sense!'
âMac,' said Ellery, âwhat are frogs and toads?'
âWhat are frogs and toads?'
âThat's right. What kind of animals are they?' Macgowan looked blank.
âAmphibians,' said old Mr. Collier.
âThank you, Mr. Collier. And what are alligators?'
âAlligators are reptiles.'
âThe wallet derived from a reptile. And to which family of animals do cats and dogs belong?'
âMammals,' said Delia's father.
âNow let's re-state our data, still ignoring the first warning, of which none of us had first-hand knowledge but Mr. Priam. The second warning was
fish
. The third warning was
amphibians
. The fourth warning was
reptiles
. The fifth warning was
birds
. The sixth warning was
mammals
.
âImmediately we perceive a change in the appearance of the warnings. From being an apparently unrelated, rather silly conglomeration, they've taken on a related, scientific character.
âIs there a science in which fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals are related â what's more,
in exactly that order?
âIn fact, is there a science in which fish are regarded as coming â as it were â second, amphibians third, reptiles fourth, birds fifth, and mammals last? â exactly as the warnings came?
âAny high school biology student could answer the question without straining himself.
âThey are progressive stages in the evolution of man
.'
Roger Priam was blinking steadily, as if there were a growing, rather too bright light.
âSo you see, Mr. Priam,' said Ellery with a smile, âthere was no bluff involved whatever. Since the second warning, fish, represents the second stage in the evolution of man, and the third warning, amphibians, represents the third stage in the evolution of man, and so on, then plainly the first warning could only have represented the first stage in the evolution of man. It's the lowest class of what zoologists call, I believe, craniate vertebrates â the lamprey, which resembles an eel but belongs to a different order. So I knew, Mr. Priam, that when you opened that first box you found in it something that looked like an eel. There was no other possibility.'
âI thought it was a dead eel,' said Priam rigidly.
âAnd did you know what the thing that looked like a dead eel meant, Mr. Priam?'
âNo, I didn't.'
âThere was no note in that first box giving you the key to the warnings?'
âNo â¦'
âHe couldn't have expected you to catch his meaning from the nature of the individual warnings themselves,' said Ellery with a frown. âTo see through a thing like this calls for a certain minimum of education which â unfortunately, Mr. Priam â you don't have. And he knows you don't have it; he knows you, I think, very well.'
âYou mean he sent all these things,' cried Laurel, ânot caring whether they were understood or not?'
The question was in Lieutenant Keats's eyes, too.
âIt begins to appear,' said Ellery slowly, âas if he preferred that they
weren't
understood. It was terror he was after â terror for its own sake.' He turned slightly away with a worried look.
âI never did know what they meant,' muttered Roger Priam. âIt was not knowing that made me â¦'
âThen it's high time you did, Mr. Priam.' Ellery had shrugged his worry off. âThe kind of mentality that would concoct such an unusual series of warnings was obviously not an ordinary one. Granted his motive â which was to inspire terror, to punish, to make his victim die mentally over and over â he must still have had a mind which was capable of thinking in these specialized terms and taking this specific direction. Why did he choose the stages of evolution as the basis of his warnings? How did his brain come to take that particular path? Our mental processes are directly influenced by our capacities, training, and experience. To have founded his terror campaign on the evolution theory, to have worked it out in such systematic detail, the enemy of Leander Hill and Roger Priam must have been a man of scientific training â biologist, zoologist, anthropologist ⦠or a naturalist.
âWhen you think of the stages of evolution,' continued Ellery, âyou automatically think of Charles Darwin. Darwin was the father of the evolutionary theory. It was Darwin's researches over a hundred years ago, his lecture before the Linnean Society in 1858 on
The Theory of Evolution
, his publication the following year of the amplification of his
Theory
which he called
On the Origin of Species
, that opened a new continent of scientific knowledge in man's exploration of his own development.