Authors: Michel Farnac
“Dearest
Catherine,
my
soulmate,
The
canonical
term
in
French
for
soulmate
is
"âme
soeur"
which
translates
as
"sister
soul".
I
prefer
it
slightly
to
the
English
version
in
that
it
evokes
its
cousin
"kindred
soul"
with
stronger
implications.
In
"âme
soeur"
is
the
lingering
notion
of
two
sibling
souls
separated
that
have
found
each
other.
I
find
that
very
fitting
for
us.
Not
that
I
would
reject
soulmate,
by
any
means!
But
this
idea
of
a
separation
that
has
ended
is
closer
to
what
I
feel.
Your
love
of
language
is
but
another
indication
that
I
was
made
to
please
you.
It
seems
that
every
part
of
me
I
thought
wasted
or
useless
was
dormant
waiting
for
you
to
be
awakened...
Your
âme
soeur,
Michel”
In
his
mind,
they
were
perhaps
more
like
cousins,
come
together
for
a
summer
vacation
in
the
country,
for
a
season
of
discovery
that
neither
expected
full
of
the
freedom
and
immediacy
of
a
youth
he
had
somehow
forgotten
he
still
possessed.
They
were
each
other’s
Rosebud
the
mere
thought
of
which
projected
them
into
a
distant
place
where
the
daydreams
are
fragrantly
vivid
and
the
air
is
always
warm
and
soft.
Together
they
entered
a
distinct
liminal
state
whose
flux
was
soothing
in
mysterious
ways
and
from
which
they
emerged
more
balanced.
Of
the
two
of
them,
he
was
clearly
the
one
with
the
more
esoteric
imagination,
but
this
very
much
appealed
to
her.
She
knew
that
her
Catholic
upbringing
was
in
part
responsible
for
perhaps
stifling
in
her
that
creative
streak
but
her
remaining
tastes
were
a
testimony
to
her
true
leanings.
Some
of
his
writing
resonated
with
her
weeks
after
she
had
read
them.
I
sit
here
still,
daydreaming
of
you.
I
allowed
myself
a
few
moments
for
another
treat
and
went
back
and
read
a
little
of
the
‘Easy
Pieces’
series.
Just
marvelous.
Thank
you
again
for
all
the
words
you
have
shared
with
me.
They
never
fail
to
lift
my
spirits.
Is
it
not
amazing,
that
out
of
all
the
people
in
this
world,
we
have
found
each
other?
Your
soul-‐mate,
Catherine”
“Dear
Catherine,
It
is
your
gaze
that
turns
me
into
a
magus,
a
caster
of
ancient
spells.
If
I
were
not
in
a
state
of
stupor
following
each
of
our
conversations,
I
might
be
a
tad
amused
at
the
stupor
that
overcomes
you
in
reading
my
prose.
There
is
no
way
you
could
know
the
effect
you
have
on
me.
And
yet
you
must.
Sometimes
I
think
I
see
you.
Could
it
be?
I
am
not
sure.
I
dare
not
dream
of
this.
Or
dare
I,
and
seize
a
moment
of
bliss?
And
so
we
are
back
in
that
sunlit
room.
I
am
still
behind
you,
holding
you
tight,
one
hand
on
your
belly,
the
other
firmly
pressed
against
your
breast.
You
have
pleasured
me,
and
now
I
you,
but
this
was
just
the
antechamber,
and
the
inner
hall
beckons.
I
wait
patiently
for
the
tremors
to
subside
and
for
your
breathing
to
steady.
At
last
I
feel
you
are
ready
and
I
slowly
release
my
embrace.
You
position
yourself
to
receive
me
as
my
hands
move
to
your
hips.
You
reach
between
your
legs
and
find
me.
I
am
hard
as
rock.
Your
hand
guides
me,
but
I
know
not
yet
where....
Michel”
A
caster
of
spells
he
was
indeed,
his
magic
ancient
and
powerful,
redolent
of
forgotten
ages
and
timeless
tomorrows.
Even
to
her,
for
whom
the
supernatural
had
always
been
confined
to
a
single
book
whose
soul
allowed
interpretation
was
reinforced
every
seventh
day,
there
came
an
élan
to
share
the
thought
that
maybe
there
was
more
to
them
than
mere
chance:
if
two
people
have
the
same
dream,
is
it
a
dream?
“Dear
Michel,
How
you
make
me
smile!
Can
you
hear
it
in
my
voice?
We
have
barely
scratched
the
surface.
I
am
always
learning
new
things
from
you.
For
example,
how
your
foreskin
acts
as
a
natural
condom
(fascinating!)
Your
mention
of
French
filmmakers.
Weltanschauung.
And
your
childhood
stories
of
sexual
discovery
which
are
so
‘foreign’
to
me.
In
browsing
through
some
of
my
earlier
writing
efforts,
I
found
the
following
story
which
I
had
composed
a
few
weeks
before
we
met.
I
think
you
will
find
it
interesting:
I
am
staying
at
a
friend’s
house
on
the
beach
along
with
others
whom
I
do
not
know.
I
awaken
in
the
morning
and
go
down
to
the
kitchen
to
make
some
tea.
I
am
wearing
an
oversized
shirt
and
panties.
A
much
younger
man
begins
to
enter
the
room
but
then
stops
in
the
doorway.
I
look
in
that
direction
and
feeling
slightly
exposed,
I
return
to
my
position
in
front
of
the
sink
without
exchanging
any
words.
The
stranger
approaches
and
rather
than
passing
me,
stops
when
he
is
directly
immediately
behind
me.
I
am
startled
and
slightly
uncomfortable
as
I
feel
an
unmistakable
hardness
close
to
my
buttocks.
Before
I
can
react,
he
moves
on
through
the
room
and
out
the
back
door.
Later
I
am
seated
alone
in
one
of
the
local
restaurants
where
I
am
about
to
order
a
drink.
The
mystery
man
slips
into
the
seat
opposite
me
and
asks
if
he
can
join
me.
He
begins
his
conversation
by
commenting
on
my
long
legs
which
he
had
noticed
earlier
today.
He
falls
silent
as
he
slowly
watches
for
my
reaction.
I
squirm
under
his
gaze
but
am
very
intrigued.
We
sip
our
cocktails
and
from
time
to
time,
he
drops
some
hints
as
to
how
he
might
like
to
spend
the
afternoon.
-‐
Michel,
have
I
always
been
searching
for
you?
Your,
Catherine”
By
weaving
this
new
thread
into
the
tapestry
of
their
affair,
she
was
tapping
into
a
well
of
feelings
bordering
on
mystical
beliefs
that
few
people
around
Michel
knew
of.
Perhaps
the
fairest
way
to
phrase
it
would
be
to
say
that
he
believed
in
patterns.
He
had
long
struggled
as
a
youth
to
decide
whether
to
embrace
science
or
the
arts
and
had
in
fact
attempted
to
study
physics
and
mathematics
with
paltry
results
which
landed
him
eventually
in
the
Paris
conservatory
instead
of
the
Grandes
Écoles
he
(and
his
family)
had
once
aspired
to.
He’d
learned
enough
about
science
to
know
that
what
fascinated
him
were
things
such
as
chaos
theory,
fluid
dynamics
and
information
theory,
and
that
the
common
denominator
to
his
fascination
was
patterns:
their
emergence,
recognition
and
taxonomy.
His
approach
to
music
and
his
eclectic
influences
were
not
dissimilar
in
origin.
He
gave
great
importance
to
wisdom
of
the
ages
and
its
dictums
such
as
the
notion
that
ignorance
of
the
past
leads
to
needles
repetition
of
mistakes.
He
believed
that
there
are
tales
that
must
be
told
at
every
generation
lest
they
be
forgotten
and
relived
in
full
tragedy,
for
it
is
the
tales
that
are
the
pattern
of
history
and
every
generation
brings
to
the
tale
those
who
will
play
its
parts.
Every
age
has
its
kings
and
its
priests,
its
poets
and
its
lovers.
For
years
I
had
been
groomed
for
your
arrival,
and
in
dream
you
had
been
told
of
my
coming.
Being
who
I
am,
of
course,
the
question
of
'why'
has
no
meaning
and
therefore
I
am
not
burdened.
For
an
existentialist,
there
is
no
intrinsic
meaning
to
such
coincidences
other
than
the
one
we
assign
to
them.
That
leaves
me
with
the
sole
obligation
of
making
you
a
happier
person
as
a
just
payment
for
making
me
a
better
human
being.
While
I
am
content
to
not
create
an
external
'why'
for
our
relationship,
there
are
two
things
that
I
do
believe
in:
first,
that
if
we
had
not
wanted
and
subsequently
crafted
our
bond,
it
would
not
exist,
and
second
that
there
are
patterns
in
human
history
that
we
are
not
exempt
from,
archetypes
of
humanity
that
we
fall
into,
and
that
you
and
I
are
not
the
first
to
share
this
bond,
nor
the
last.
We
are
reenacting,
and
by
doing
so
being
,
a
piece
of
human
history.
There
are
songs
about
us,
books
about
us,
and
among
those
who
read
and
listen
are
many
who
envy
us.
I
used
to
envy
us.
Of
course,
we
are
not
those
who
came
before
us
and
we
have
enveloped
the
old
tale
in
our
own
little
twists
and
flourishes.
We
do,
after
all,
have
free
will
(interesting
to
find
yet
another
point
on
which
we
agree
for
very
different
reasons…)
and
the
internet.