Read The Psychology Book Online
Authors: Unknown
62
PROFITLESS
IN CONTEXT
APPROACH
Connectionism
BEFORE
ACTS ARE
1885
In his book
On Memory
,
Hermann Ebbinghaus
describes the “forgetting
curve”—the rate at which
human memories fade.
1890s
Ivan Pavlov establishes
the principle of classical
STAMPED OUT conditioning.
AFTER
EDWARD THORNDIKE (1874–1949)
1918
John B. Watson’s “Little
Albert” experiments apply
conditioning to a human baby.
1923
English psychologist
Charles Spearman proposes
a single general factor—the
“g factor”—in measurements
of human intelligence.
1930s
B.F. Skinner develops
a theory of conditioning from
consequences—“operant
conditioning”.
A
t much the same time as
Pavlov was conducting his
experiments on dogs in
Russia, Edward Thorndike began
researching animal behavior for
his doctoral thesis in the US.
He was perhaps the first true
“behaviorist” psychologist,
although his research took place
long before the term was adopted.
Scientific psychology was
emerging as a fresh field of study
in universities when Thorndike
graduated in the 1890s, and he
was attracted by the prospect of
applying this new science to his
interest in education and learning.
Thorndike’s original intention had
been to study learning in humans,
BEHAVIORISM 63
See also:
Hermann Ebbinghaus 48–49 ■ Ivan Pavlov 60–61 ■ John B. Watson 66–71 ■ Edward Tolman 72–73 ■
B.F. Skinner 78–85 ■ Donald Hebb 163 ■ Hans Eysenck 316–21
When an
animal responds
to a stimulus…
Psychology helps to
measure the probability
that an aim is attainable.
Edward Thorndike
…the outcome may
…the outcome may
be
rewarding
be
profitless
(such as escaping from
(such as still being
a cage).
trapped in a cage).
but when he was unable to obtain
a suitable subject for his research,
he turned his attention to animals,
with the aim of examining the
The connection between
The connection between
processes of intelligence and
the action and the event
the action and the event
learning through observation in
is
strengthened
.
is
weakened
.
a series of controlled experiments.
Thorndike’s results went much
further than this, however,
laying down the foundations
of behaviorist psychology.
Learning environments
Thorndike’s first studies were
Rewarded responses are
of chicks learning to negotiate
“stamped in,” while profitless
mazes that he designed and built
acts are “stamped out.”
specifically for his experiments.
This later became a hallmark
of behaviorist experimental
technique—the use of a specially
created environment in which a
subject is given specific stimuli or
various devices, such as a loop of
box each time; this indicated how
tasks, now known as “instrumental
string, or a ring, or a button or
quickly the animal was learning
conditioning” or “instrumental
panel to be pressed, only one of
about its environment.
learning.” As his research
which would be connected to the
The experiment was carried out
progressed, Thorndike turned his
latch that would open the door of
using several different cats, placing
attention to cats, inventing “puzzle
the box. In time, the cat would
each one in a series of puzzle boxes
boxes” to observe their ability to
discover the device, which would
that were opened by different
learn mechanisms for escape.
allow it to escape and receive a
devices. What Thorndike noticed
A hungry cat was locked inside
reward of food. The process was
was that although the cats had all
a puzzle box, and by exploring its
repeated and it was noted how long
discovered the escape mechanism
environment would come across
it took for the cat to open the puzzle
by trial and error in their first ❯❯
64 EDWARD THORNDIKE
as a neural connection. When
stimulus-response sequences
are followed by an annoying or
unpleasant state of affairs (such
as continued imprisonment or
punishment), the neural connections
between the situation and response
are weakened, until eventually
“profitless acts are stamped out.”
This focus on the outcome of a
stimulus and its response, and the
idea that the outcome could work
back to strengthen the stimulus-
response connection, is an example
of what would later be called a
reinforcement theory of learning.
Reinforcement, and the importance
of outcomes, was virtually ignored
by psychologists in the next
generation of behaviorists, such
The Law of Effect
, proposed by Thorndike, forms
as John B. Watson, but the Law of
the foundation of all behaviorist psychology. He
Effect brilliantly anticipated the
demonstrated that animals learn by forging links
between actions and results, remembering more
work of B.F. Skinner and his theory
positive outcomes and forgetting negative ones.
of “operant conditioning.”
In later research, Thorndike
refined the Law of Effect to take
attempt, on successive occasions
between a stimulus (S) and a
into account other variables, such
the amount of trial and error
response (R), a corresponding
as the delay between response and
gradually decreased as the cats
neural connection is made in the
reward, the effect of repetition of a
learned which actions were going
brain. He referred to his brand of
task, and how quickly a task was
to be fruitless and which would
S-R learning as “connectionism,”
forgotten when it was not repeated.
lead to a reward.
asserting that the connections
From this, he derived his Law
made during learning are “stamped
of Exercise, which states that
The Law of Effect
in” the circuitry of the brain.
As a result of these experiments
What Thorndike proposed was
Thorndike proposed his Law of
that it is the outcome of an action
Effect, which states that a response
that determines how strongly or
to a situation that results in a
weakly the stimulus-response
satisfying outcome is more likely
connection is stamped in; in the
to occur again in the future; and
case of the puzzle boxes, whether
The intellect, character, and
conversely, that a response to
pulling a string or pushing a panel
skill possessed by any man
a situation that results in an
resulted in escape or frustration.
are the product of certain
unsatisfying outcome is less likely
In other words, when particular
original tendencies and
to occur again. This was the first
stimulus-response sequences are
the training which they
formal statement of an idea that lies
followed by a satisfying or pleasant
have received.
behind all behavorist psychology,
state of affairs (such as escape or a
Edward Thorndike
the connection between stimulus
reward), those responses tend to
and response and its relevance
become “more firmly connected
to the process of learning and
with the situation, so that, when it
behavior. Thorndike proposed
recurs, they will be more likely to
that when a connection is made
recur.” They become “stamped in”
BEHAVIORISM 65
intelligence, never about animal
stupidity,” he wrote. The fact that
his cats in puzzle boxes learned
gradually, rather than suddenly
gaining an insight into how to
escape, confirmed his theories.
The animals were forced to learn
by trial and error, because they
were unable to use reason to work
out the link between the door and
the operating handle.
Human intelligence
After the publication of
Animal
Edward Thorndike
Adult learners
were once thought to
Intelligence
, Thorndike turned his
be less capable of retaining information
attention to human intelligence.
The son of a Methodist
than children. Thorndike showed that
minister, Edward Thorndike
In his opinion, the most basic
the only significant difference was in
was born in Williamsburg,
intelligence is characterized by
speed of learning, not memory.
Massachusetts, USA, in 1874.
simple stimulus and response
He graduated in sciences from
association, resulting in a neural
Wesleyan University in 1895,
stimulus-response connections
connection. The more intelligent
proceeding to Harvard to
that are repeated are strengthened,
an animal, the more capable it will
study psychology under
while those that are not used again
be of making such connections.
William James. In 1897,
are weakened. Moreover, the rate
Therefore, intelligence can be
Thorndike moved to Columbia
at which connections strengthen
defined in terms of the ability to
University in New York City,
or weaken can vary. According
form neural bonds, which is
where he completed his
to Thorndike, “the greater the
dependent not only on genetic
doctorate thesis in 1898.
satisfaction or discomfort, the
factors, but also on experience.
Thorndike’s interest in
greater the strengthening or
To find a measurement of
educational psychology led
weakening of the bond.”
human intelligence, Thorndike