Read The Psychology Book Online
Authors: Unknown
dressed in a gray laboratory
technician’s coat and maintained a
stern and emotionless demeanor
throughout each of the experiments.
Convincingly wired up
,
Mr. Wallace
occupations, including teachers,
The participants were told that
pretended to be an innocent volunteer.
postal workers, engineers, laborers,
the study intended to investigate
His screams failed to prevent 65 percent
of participants from administering the
and salesmen. They were each paid
the effects of punishment on
highest level of fake electric shock.
$4.50 for their participation; the
learning. They were told that of two
money was given to them as soon as
volunteers, one would be the learner
they arrived at the laboratory, and
and the other the teacher. In fact,
play, the draw was always rigged so
they were told that the payment was
one of the two “volunteers” in each
that Mr. Wallace took on the role of
theirs to keep regardless of what
case was not a participant but a
“learner” in every instance. In full
happened during the experiment.
stooge: he was a likeable accountant
view of the participant, the “learner”
In the laboratory, Milgram had
called Mr. Wallace, who had been
(Mr. Wallace) was strapped into an
created a phony (but very impressive
trained to play the role of the victim.
“electric chair” with an electrode
and realistic-looking) electric shock
When Mr. Wallace and the genuine
attached to his wrist; the participant
generator. This had 30 switches
participant drew paper from a hat to
was told that this electrode was
marked in 15-volt increments with
determine which role they would
attached to the shock generator ❯❯
Stanley Milgram
Stanley Milgram was born in 1933
he married Alexandra Menkin,
to a Jewish family in New York
with whom he had two children.
City. His Hungarian parents ran
In 1963, he returned to Harvard,
a bakery in the Bronx, and he
but was denied tenure because
attended James Monroe High
of the controversy surrounding
School with Philip Zimbardo.
his experiment, so he moved to
A high academic achiever and a
the City University of New York,
leader among his peers, Milgram
where he taught until his death
initially studied political science,
at the age of 51.
but went on to receive a PhD in
psychology from Harvard in 1960
Key works
under Gordon Allport. After
working with Solomon Asch on
1963
Behavioral Study of
conformity studies at Harvard, he
Obedience
became assistant professor at
1967
The Small World Problem
Yale, where he carried out his
1974
Obedience to Authority:
obedience experiments. In 1961,
An Experimental View
250 STANLEY MILGRAM
Milgram’s shock generator
produced totally
unexpected results. A team of 40 psychiatrists
100%
of the participants applied shocks
predicted that fewer than 5 percent of participants
would administer shocks as high as 300 volts;
up to 300 volts; the point at which the
in fact, every participant went to this level.
learner began to shout in apparent pain.
35%
of the participants applied
Very strong shock
shocks of between 300 and 375
Strong shock
volts, but then refused to apply
any more.
Extreme
Intense shock
Moderate shock
intensity shock
65%
of the participants continued
the experiment to the end, applying
Slight shock
Danger: severe shock
X X X
the maximum shock of 450 volts as
many times as requested.
0V
450V
located in an adjacent room. The
correct answer, announce the level
an incorrectly answered question
participant heard the “scientist”
of shock he was about to receive,
and apply the next level of shock
tell the “learner” (Mr.. Wallace) that
and press a switch to administer the
voltage. If he expressed misgivings
“although the shocks can be
shock. Participants were instructed
about continuing the experiment, he
extremely painful, they cause no
to increase the shock level by 15 volts
received a verbal prod from the
permanent damage.” To make the
(in other words, to keep moving up
“scientist” to encourage him, from
situation appear more authentic,
the shock scale on the machine)
a simple request to continue, to
the scientist then wired up the
with every wrong answer.
finally being told that he had no
participant and gave him a sample
choice but to go on. If he refused
shock of 45 volts—which was in fact
Applying the shocks
to obey after the last prod, the
the only shock strength that the
As part of the experiment, the
experiment was terminated.
generator could produce.
learner (Mr. Wallace) had been
At this point, the participant
briefed to answer incorrectly to
was moved to the room containing
around one question in every four,
the shock generator and asked to
to ensure that the participant would
assume the role of “teacher.” He was
be required to start applying electric
asked to read a series of word pairs
shocks. During the experiment, the
(such as “blue-girl”, “nice-day”)
learner would pound the wall once
With numbing regularity,
aloud for the learner to memorize.
the voltage had reached 300, and
good people were seen
After this he was to read out a series
shout: “I absolutely refuse to answer
to knuckle under the
of single words; the learner’s task
any more! Get me out of here! You
demands of authority
was to recall the pairing word in
can’t hold me here! Get me out!”
and perform actions that
each case and to indicate his answer
As the shock level increased, the
were callous and severe.
by pressing a switch that illuminated
learner would shout more frantically,
Stanley Milgram
a light on the shock generator. If the
and then eventually cease making
learner’s answer was correct, the
any noise at all; questions would
questions continued; if the answer
be met with nothing but an eerie
was incorrect, the participant was
silence. The participant was told to
instructed to tell the learner the
treat any unanswered question as
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 251
In advance of the experiment,
test that they were not emotionally
Milgram had asked several different
harmed by the experience. The
groups of people, including ordinary
participants were also reunited with
members of the public as well as
the “learner” (Mr. Wallace) so that
psychologists and psychiatrists,
they could see that no actual
how far they thought participants
shocks had been administered.
Ordinary people, simply
would go when asked to administer
doing their jobs, and
the electric shocks. Most people
Feeling obliged to obey
without any particular
thought participants would stop at
Milgram noted several features
hostility on their part,
a level that caused pain, and the
of the experiment that may have
can become agents in a
psychiatrists predicted that, at most,
contributed to such high levels of
terrible destructive process.
one in 1,000 would continue to the
obedience; for example, the fact
highest level of shock. Astonishingly,
that it took place at the prestigious
Stanley Milgram
when the experiment took place,
Yale University gave it credibility.
Milgram found that all 40 of the
In addition, participants believed
participants obeyed commands to
that the study was designed to
administer shocks up to 300 volts.
advance knowledge, and they had
Only five people refused to continue
been assured that the shocks were
at this point; 65 percent of the
painful but not dangerous. Being
participants obeyed the instructions
paid may have increased their
from the reactions and responses
of the “scientist” right to the end,
sense of obligation, as did the fact
of the participants that obeying the
obeying commands to administer
they had volunteered to take part.
“scientist” was violating their own
shocks to the top level of 450 volts.
To test these explanations, Milgram
sense of morality and negatively
Their discomfort at doing so
ran many variations on the study,
affecting them both physically and
was often evident: many showed
but changing the context had only
emotionally, but the pressure to
signs of severe distress, tension,
minor effects on the results.
comply was simply too powerful
and nervousness over the course
Milgram wanted to see if the
to defy in most cases.
of the experiment. They stuttered,
inclination to obey authority figures
This sense of obedience,
trembled, sweated, groaned, broke
can become the major factor in
Milgram felt, comes from the fact
out into nervous laughing fits, and
determining behavior, even in
that people are socialized from a
three people had full-blown seizures.
extreme circumstances. It is clear
very young age (by parents and ❯❯
In every instance of the experiment,
the participant stopped and
questioned it at some point; some
even offered to refund the money
they were paid at the beginning.
Interviews after the experiments
confirmed that, with only a few
exceptions, participants had been
completely convinced that the
“learning experiment” was real.
All participants were fully
debriefed so they understood what
had actually taken place, and they
were asked a series of questions to
By the 1960s, Yale University
was
known to the general public as being
highly prestigious; its authority may
have seemed literally unquestionable
to the participants of Milgram’s study.