Authors: Andy Miller
Tags: #Itzy, #Kickass.so
âHello,' I said, as I arrived in front of his table. âPlease could you write, “To Andy, with frank admiration”?'
Without saying a word or even glancing up, Adams reached over, took a copy of
Life, the Universe and Everything
from the top of the pile, grimly scribbled the requested dedication â as no doubt he was asked to do every single time he undertook a public signing â and pushed the book across the desk towards me. Nothing further was said and, without so much as a farewell glare, our first meeting was over.
I still have the book, of course. Looking at this inscription now, thirty years later, it occurs to me that âfrank admiration' was probably the precise opposite of what Adams was feeling towards us, me and all the other towel-packing dweebs who had dragged him all the way from Islington to Croydon on a hot Saturday afternoon. But I am not sorry I asked.
Fit the Second â Institute of Contemporary Arts, The Mall, London, 29 July 1987
Five years have passed. I am now a student at the University of Sussex in Brighton, where I am studying English Literature. I have just completed my first year's studies and am back at home for the summer holidays. In
Time Out
magazine, I notice that Douglas Adams will be appearing at the ICA in The Mall to discuss his new novel
Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency
. The ICA is where I once met Fat Puffin but I am older now and much, much cleverer; just a few weeks earlier, I sat at the feet of visiting lecturer Ian McEwan and asked him where he got his ideas from. I decide I will do Adams a favour and attend.
At the ICA, Adams is in conversation with his friend and occasional co-writer, TV producer John Lloyd. There must be seventy or eighty people in the audience, several of whom have brought towels with them. Sad! Adams seems far happier and more relaxed than at our last meeting. As the event goes on, I am struck by the disparity between how I have always thought of his work â i.e. funny sci-fi â and how everyone else here seems to think of it â i.e. art, philosophy, science â literature, in other words. But they have all got it wrong. I know literature; I have been studying it for nearly a year. Literature is Ian McEwan. Literature is not Douglas Adams. I must tell everyone this.
When the moment comes for questions from the floor, I raise my hand. Over the course of two minutes and twenty-three seconds, I stammer out a meandering and loaded question which, though I attempt to make it sound impressively lofty and erudite, can be summarised thus: âAre you as surprised as me that everyone here, including you, is taking you so seriously?'
In response, Adams is thoughtful and good-humoured and, wrestling with the baffling pretentiousness of his interlocutor, takes even longer to answer the question than it had taken me to ask it, though in essence his reply can be boiled down to three words: âYes. And no.'
In my seat in the audience, smiling and nodding while Adams gamely tries to untangle whatever it is I have just asked him â even I'm not sure â I wish I had something to wrap around my head, like a towel. My cheeks are burning and I have started to sweat. And with good reason: it dawns on me I have, with ill-concealed rudeness, told Adams to his face that his work is not worth taking seriously when, actually, it still means more to me than most of the âserious' literature I have studied over the previous nine months. In short, I have behaved like a total dick. At the end of the session, I queue to buy a copy of
Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency
and get it signed by the author. This time I am the one who can't make eye-contact.
17
The accidental triumph of
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
, I have belatedly realised, is that it is not merely literature but the best kind of literature â highbrow, lowbrow and middlebrow all at once. I say accidental because Adams had no such design in mind when he wrote it and these qualities are bestowed more by the audience than the author. But if you want big ideas about science or art or philosophy, there they are. If you want the poignant tale of a dispossessed man looking for a home, you have it. And if you want jokes â genuine, bona fide funny-ha-ha jokes â making fun of computers, digital watches and ape-descended life forms, no one has ever done it with more originality or genius or craft than Adams. If that isn't literature, I don't know what it is.
Fit the Third â London 1992
Another five years have elapsed. Equipped with an English degree and some opinions, I have managed to find work in a West London bookshop. I am currently in charge of author events. Douglas Adams is about to publish
Mostly Harmless
, âthe fifth book in the increasingly inaccurately named
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
trilogy'. I have a proof copy I have already read twice. I call the publisher to see if Adams would like to come and read at our shop, maybe on a Sunday afternoon. They say yes immediately. I put down the phone and start to feel rather nervous.
Though
Mostly Harmless
is a better book than
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
, it isn't great. It isn't nearly as strong as
Last Chance to See
, Adams' account of his encounters with such elusive creatures as the Komodo dragon and the kakapo. However, this is not what I am nervous about; if I have learned one valuable lesson over the previous five years, it is to keep my true opinions to myself. No, I am nervous because this will be the third time I have met Douglas Adams and neither of our previous encounters has gone particularly well. I still blush when I recollect what occurred at the ICA and I guess Adams was trying to scrub Croydon from his memory even as it was happening. As the day of the reading approaches, I am not seeking closure or a moment of connection; I just don't want the event to suck.
âThis is Andy,' says the woman from the Pan publicity department. âHe's in charge today.'
âHi Andy,' says Douglas Adams who, though greying at the temples, remains exceptionally tall. He frowns and glances sharply at me. âWait a minute. Aren't you that little prat from the ICA?'
This is what I fear might happen but, of course, it doesn't.
âI love the new book,' I tell Adams when he actually arrives at the shop. âAbsolutely fantastic.' And I usher him upstairs to where a sold-out crowd of admirers awaits, many of whom have reserved seats at the front with towels.
The reading is a huge success and we sell a lot of books. Adams is affable and laughs often. Watching from the back, it occurs to me that he has had to learn how to do this, or at least, how to do it in front of strangers, some of whom inevitably seek to bamboozle him with their in-depth perception of his work â is it hot in here? â or enquire repeatedly if Marvin the Paranoid Android really is dead, his complete absence from
Mostly Harmless
notwithstanding. And rather than become frustrated or exasperated by this element of his working life, Adams grins and bears it all with politeness and good grace, a forbearance for which he receives my frank admiration.
After the signing is finished and the public have left, by way of thanks we usually let our visiting authors select a book to take away with them. I walk with Douglas Adams down to the basement floor of the shop, where there are heaps of new titles on display, the latest in philosophy and history and science. Flushed with the success of the afternoon, I am seized with the urge to make a grand gesture.
âTake what you want,' I tell him. âAs many as you like.'
And I accompany Adams around the basement, as he gathers a massive pile of hardbacks, for which he does not pay and which I do not have the authority to give away. He asks my advice, I offer it. Several times he asks me if I'm sure about this, it seems very generous, etc., and I wave away his objections with an air of easy and entirely assumed munificence.
Effectively, I am aiding and abetting a celebrity shoplifter. But again, thinking back, I am not sorry. For half an hour, it means Douglas Adams and I talked about books.
As Adams climbs into a waiting taxi, after I have helped him in with a clutch of carrier bags containing hundreds of pounds' worth of stock, he turns and thanks me for a very enjoyable afternoon. And I shake his hand and say what I failed to five years earlier, and five before that.
âThank you.'
Fit the Fourth â Queen Elizabeth Hall, Southbank Centre, London, March 1998
The twentieth century is almost over. I am now a commissioning editor; I have also started work on a book of my own. The young editor with whom I share an office tells me that Douglas Adams is giving a lecture on the South Bank this evening. He has a spare ticket. Do I want to go with him?
Adams now lives in LA, where he is still trying to get a
Hitchhiker's
movie off the ground, but he is currently in London to promote his latest project, an interactive CD-Rom video game called
Starship Titanic
. Onstage, he is full of enthusiasm, not just for the game as it stands, but for its potential in the future, as processing power increases and more people get involved via the Internet, once something called âbroadband' really takes off. After the lecture, my colleague and I eschew the queue for signed copies in favour of a drink in the Festival Hall bar. I don't mind games but I still prefer books.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
is not just a multi-brow piece of work; it also pioneered the concept of multi-platform content, back when terms like âbroadband' and âmulti-platform' were just twinkles in a crossword compiler's eye. Adams created bespoke variations of
Hitchhiker's
for radio, books, TV, audiobook and the theatre; he was still at it twenty years later, producing new drafts of the film script he hoped Disney might option.
Starship Titanic
had a precursor too; there was a
Hitchhiker's
computer game as early as 1984, though back then I lacked a computer to play it on. Some of these versions are more artistically successful than others but Adams was always a confirmed believer in the unique virtues of new media.
Adams' last project before he died was a four-part radio series for the BBC entitled, to his slight chagrin,
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Future
. The series was an enquiry into how science might affect our lives in the new millennium. The second programme, first broadcast in April 2001, concerned the likely prospects for books in an electronic age. Adams already sounds excited by ebooks and the implications of epublishing. At about the halfway mark, he offers a typically warm and witty appraisal of the sentimental attachment many of us have â or had â for reconstituted wood-pulp:
âWhen people talk about their fondness for books, I wonder if they're really talking about their fondness for reading. It's rather like confusing the plate for the food. I mean, I like a beautifully printed and bound book as much as anybody else but I don't need a houseful of them, any more than I need a houseful of beautiful dinner plates. About twelve would do fine; that, and a good recipe book.'
He was right, of course. And yet I can't help feeling some food tastes better when eaten off a plate; and that, just because science can give us a whole meal in a tablet, we don't necessarily have to swallow it. In the future, the beautifully printed and bound book may become an endangered species, like the tiger or the kakapo. Surely that's not what Douglas would have wanted.
In the Festival Hall, we finish our drinks and make for the elevators. The lift doors open, we step inside and I find myself once again in the presence of a giant, Adams being no shorter than the last time we met. He smiles, though I am certain he doesn't recognise me. Why would he? He is talking to someone; I don't recall what about â perhaps his baby daughter or some mutual acquaintance or a new piece of tech. I do remember he was laughing. We reach the ground floor. As the elevator doors open, I stand aside to let him and his friend past.
âAfter you,' I say.
The last time I see him alive he is walking towards Hungerford Bridge, deep in conversation and still laughing. Our
paths will not cross again for thirteen years.
Fit the Fifth â Hammersmith Apollo, London, Sunday, 11 March 2012
Douglas Adams may be neither as tall nor alive as he once was but he remains remarkably popular. At his virtual sixtieth birthday party at the Hammersmith Apollo in London, there are towels everywhere. I am in the closing stages of writing my third book. I have taken thousands of baths and eaten many, many sandwiches, as a result of which the book is late to an extent even Adams might find outrageous. This is the first day off I have taken since Christmas.
The proceeds from this virtual birthday party / fan convention / rock concert will go to Save the Rhino (www.savetherhino.org), the charity of which Adams was a founding patron. Many of his friends and family are here. On stage, a succession of comedians, writers and scientists tell personal stories about Douglas or explain what he meant to their lives and career choices. For some,
Hitchhiker's
was the trigger for a lifelong fascination with physics or astronomy. For others,
Last Chance to See
inspired them to join the cause of conservation. A couple of the original cast members perform a specially written sketch. Terry Jones from Monty Python explains how no one read Douglas's novels for the plot or the characters but
for the ideas
. It all feels well-meaning but also listless and unfunny. And I sit there and think: I don't give a monkey's about physics or astronomy or, if I am being scrupulously honest, the rhino, though I do put ten pounds in a bucket on the way out. These Douglas Adamses seem to have meant a lot to many of the people here but none of them was my Douglas Adams. As a reader, I loved Adams' ear for humorous inflection, the rhythm and flow of his sentences, the glorious linguistic precision of his phrasing: âmostly harmless'; âtotal perspective vortex'; âand me with this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left side'; âa liquid that was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea'. I read Adams
for the words
.