Authors: James Curran
Â
PRAISE FOR
UNHOLY FURY
âAn utterly compelling story wonderfully told. A new prime minister, Australia's first Labor head of government in almost a quarter of a century, confronts a wilful, no less spiteful US president newly re-elected yet one already under siege to domestic events which ultimately destroy him. The visitor is determined to set Australia on a more independent foreign policy. Washington, grown used to sycophants from Canberra, is equally adamant to bring him to heel. James Curran has written one of the most important books of recent memory.'
Alan Ramsey
âThis path-breaking book is filled with revelations and insights. It is the story of Australia coming to maturity.'
Paul Kelly, Editor at Large,
The Australian
âThis important book reveals for the first time the full depth of the rift between Australia and its key ally during the Whitlam years. Enlightening and entertaining in equal measure, sparkling with wit and insight,
Unholy Fury
shows how Gough Whitlam's effort to redefine the alliance so antagonised the Nixon administration that it considered abandoning ANZUS altogether. Drawing on rich research in newly declassified sources in both countries, the book provides a compelling, sometimes laugh-out-loud account of the personalities and politics of the eraâand offers much to ponder for anyone interested in the AustralianâUS relationship today.'
Barbara Keys, Associate Professor of History, University of Melboune
â
Unholy Fury
is both an elegant and illuminating account of a crucial moment in Australian and American diplomatic history, and a much-needed meditation on the tangle of risk and politics at the heart of the ANZUS alliance.'
Michael Wesley, Professor of International Affairs, Director,
Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific
âThe AustralianâAmerican relationship has probably only suffered one really bad moment: and this is it, the subject of James Curran's superbly researched and written account of the NixonâWhitlam era. It's more than a history of this moment, however. It's a book about the dilemma both Australia and America face in managing an alliance relationshipâbristling with dangers as well as mutual advantage.'
Bob Carr
Â
ALSO BY JAMES CURRAN
THE POWER OF SPEECH: AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTERS DEFINING THE NATIONAL IMAGE
(MUP, 2004)
âa rare and welcome beast: a work of scholarship that is eminently and compellingly readable'.
Adelaide Review
âCurran ⦠is persuasive in showing how much ideas matter. This comprehensive history of the stories our prime ministers have told is essential reading.'
James Walter,
Age
âAn important, intriguing book that demonstrates how politicians have wrestled with the idea of what makes an Australian and how we should relate to the world since the 1940s ⦠Curran is a subtle thinker who has distilled meaning from a mass of documents
Stephen Matchett,
Weekend Australian
âthis important book is not only a significant contribution to the identity debate and to prime ministerial biography but to contemporary Australian history. Curran has succeeded in showing how prime ministers from Curtin and Chifley to Keating and Howard have interpreted Australian history, Australian society and Australia's place in the world.'
NSW History Awards, 2005
THE UNKNOWN NATION: AUSTRALIA AFTER EMPIRE
With Stuart Ward (MUP, 2010)
âthis excellent study ⦠presents what is likely to be an influential interpretation of an important aspect of the recent past ⦠a significant book, and certainly a landmark.'
Frank Bongiorno,
History Australia
âilluminating and entertaining ⦠this book sheds new light on the political, cultural and intellectual history of the post-war period in Australia'.
Prime Minister's Prize for Australian History, 2011
A âthoughtful book ⦠Curran and Ward show skill in handling the history of ideas'.
Geoffrey Blainey,
Spectator Australia
CURTIN'S EMPIRE
(Cambridge University Press, 2011)
âa fine and important book ⦠sheds new light on the shadowy and evasive Curtin'.
Hugh White,
American Review
âan elegant mix of scholarly research and accessible prose ⦠an important addition to Australia's history'.
Canberra Times
âCurran is one of a number of historians who have identified this phenomenon of British race patriotism, which exercised such a powerful influence in this first half of the last century and is so incomprehensible today.'
Stuart Macintyre,
Australian Book Review
WHITLAM AND NIXON AT WAR
JAMES CURRAN
Â
For Priscilla, Pia and Ella
Â
MELBOURNE UNIVERSITY PRESS
An imprint of Melbourne University Publishing Limited
11â15 Argyle Place South, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
[email protected]
www.mup.com.au
First published 2015
Text © James Curran, 2015
Design and typography © Melbourne University Publishing Limited, 2015
This book is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968
and subsequent amendments, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means or process whatsoever without the prior written permission of the publishers.
Every attempt has been made to locate the copyright holders for material quoted in this book. Any person or organisation that may have been overlooked or misattributed may contact the publisher.
Cover design by Design By Committee
Typeset by Megan Ellis
Printed in Australia by McPherson's Printing Group
National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry
Curran, James, 1973- author.
Unholy fury: Whitlam and Nixon at war/James Curran.
9780522868203 (paperback)
9780522861754 (ebook)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Whitlam, Gough, 1916â2014.
Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913â1994.
Vietnam War, 1961â1975âAustralia.
Vietnam War, 1961â1975âUnited States.
AustraliaâForeign relationsâUnited States.
United StatesâForeign relationsâAustralia.
327.94073
Â
1Â Â Â Â âOn the Right Side': Nixon in Australia
2Â Â Â Â âPut on Notice': Lessons from America
3Â Â Â Â âEntangled': Labor's Cold War Dilemma
4    âThe Most Generous ⦠Idealistic Nation': Whitlam and the Americans
5Â Â Â Â âPathfinder for Nixon': Whitlam's China Coup
6Â Â Â Â âAn Absolute Outrage': The Christmas Bombings
7Â Â Â Â On Nixon's âShit List': A âDownward Slide' in Relations
8Â Â Â Â American âTrouble Shooter': Marshall Green Comes to Canberra
9Â Â Â Â âOne Hour' in Washington: Defining the New âAmerican Connection'
10Â Â Â âHeating up the Crucible': An Alliance in Peril
Conclusion: âAlmost Incomprehensible'
Â
Â
âHe's one of the peaceniks ⦠[and] certainly putting the
Australians on a very, very dangerous path.'
PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON ON GOUGH WHITLAM, DECEMBER 1972
Â
âFor all its enduring importance, adherence to ANZUS
does not constitute a foreign policy.'
GOUGH WHITLAM, JANUARY 1973
Â
âHe is a bastard.'
HENRY KISSINGER ON GOUGH WHITLAM, JULY 1974
Â
1
In October 1953 the United States vice president, Richard Milhous Nixon, arrived in Australia as part of an extensive tour of Asia and the Pacific. He was the most senior serving American politician ever to visit the country. Coming only eight years after the end of World War II and barely two years after the signing of the ANZUS treaty in September 1951, Nixon's arrival served as a powerful reminder of American triumph in the battles of the Pacific and a symbol of the US commitment to Australia in a dangerous Cold War world. During a seventy-day international odyssey Nixon also called in on nineteen other countries, as well as Hong Kong and the Japanese island of Okinawa. None of these places had ever before had a visit from an American vice president or president. For a political figure whose later time in the Oval Office would come to be dominated by Asia, the trip was an unprecedented opportunity to meet many of the leaders with whom he would do business over the next two decades. It gave him a chance, he later recalled, to âassess Asian attitudes toward the emerging colossus of Communist China'. Nixon, who was well known for his relentless anti-communist crusade on the American home front, was now stepping onto the world stage.
1
During his short time in Australia, Nixon visited Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra, meeting with Prime Minister Robert Menzies and the federal Cabinet, Opposition leader HV Evatt and a number of trade union leaders. He addressed Australian parliamentarians at a lunch in Canberra, sat in on Question Time, laid a wreath at the war memorial and visited a nearby sheep station where he saw shearers in full cry. In Melbourne, the local press badgered him for his inability to hold a cricket bat properly during a visit to the Melbourne Cricket Ground while he inspected the progress of preparations for the 1956 Olympics. âOh, No, Mr Nixon, Not that way!' blared the
Argus
, its reporter marvelling at the vice president's âmock cricket strokes', as he held the bat and swung it âviolently in a baseballer's grip over his shoulder several times'. Flattering his hosts, Nixon told Australians to ignore the criticism and inevitable wrangles that came with the organisation of a world sporting event. âYou'll hold the best Olympic Games ever', he said. âYou have the climate, the stadium and one other assetâyou have a wonderfully sports-minded people'.
2
The vice president was characteristically meticulous in preparing for each leg of his Asian tour. He carried with him a message of goodwill from President Eisenhower and came armed with rhetoric of reassurance for regional friends and allies. En route to Australia he read of the country's struggle to emerge from the physical and psychological horrors of the Pacific War. The Australians had ânot forgotten the Japanese bombing of Darwin, nor the cruelties of prisoner of war camps'. Though his hosts were concerned by the threat of Communist China and Soviet Russia, âthe average Australian still thinks of Japan as the historic enemy', an anxiety which was âbut one aspect of the fear that the “teeming millions” of Asia might be attracted to the relatively empty spaces of Northern Australia'. Both political parties âfully realize that Australia's security depends on firm ties with the United States ⦠even if history, geography and the current power structure in the Pacific did not dictate that Australian foreign policy align itself closely with that of the United States, the similar democratic social institutions of the two countries would inevitably lead them to see world problems in
much the same light'.
3
In short, he was on the terra firma of a future staunch ally.
Nixon's credentials as a Cold War warrior were impeccable, and he gave full voice to this ideological fervour during a live radio broadcast over the ABC. He was speaking to a society which, much like his own, believed communism posed a fundamental threat to liberal democracy, religion and property. In the face of what many perceived to be an existential threat to their values and way of life, Nixon emphasised that the United States and Australia were âon the right side ⦠the side of freedom of justice'.
4
His country had âno intention of constituting itself as the sole bastion of military strength for the free world'. In a further clarion call for western unity, he said âwe must stand together or we will fall together ⦠the only people concerned in dividing us are the men in the Kremlin'. Addressing the people during his nationwide radio talk, Nixon assured them of American resolve in meeting this challenge, a homily honed over many years: âthe only major threat to the peace of the world today', he told listeners, âis the international Communist conspiracy, with its power centre in the Soviet Union'. History had shown that âfour times since they came to power in 1917 the Communists have talked peace while in reality preparing for war. We don't want to be fooled ⦠we cannot let down our guard'.
5
It was a classic enunciation of the lessons of Munich for Cold War geopolitics. Like many of his contemporaries in America, Europe and Australia, Nixon argued that the pusillanimous response of western leaders to the rise of Hitler in the 1930s, and especially at the September 1938 Munich conference, was a catastrophic loss of nerve that caused World War II and must not be repeated. If unchecked, the Kremlin's ambition, like Hitler's armies, would sweep all before it. Soviet aggression had to be stopped and the spread of communism contained. âAppeasement' was no longer an option.