di
(d. 1791), judged the saying to be authentic, though within that general category there was some uncertainty as to whether its line of transmission should be classified as “good”
ḥasan
) or “weak” (
ḍaʿi
f
).
134
Even scholars who were otherwise influenced by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah and his teacher Ibn Taymiyyah, such as Muhammad al-Saffārīnī and Muhammad al-Shawka
ni
, seem to have been content to leave the issue of authenticity open, rather than expressly denying it.
135
Authors of works on love, such as Da
wu
d al-Anṭa
ki
(d. 1599), the Ḥanbali
jurist Marʿi
ibn Yusuf al-Karmi
(d. 1624), and Muḥyi
al-Di
n al-Ṣalti