di

(d. 1791), judged the saying to be authentic, though within that general category there was some uncertainty as to whether its line of transmission should be classified as “good”
ḥasan
) or “weak” (
ḍaʿi
f
).
134
Even scholars who were otherwise influenced by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah and his teacher Ibn Taymiyyah, such as Muhammad al-Saffārīnī and Muhammad al-Shawka

ni

, seem to have been content to leave the issue of authenticity open, rather than expressly denying it.
135
Authors of works on love, such as Da

wu

d al-Anṭa

ki

(d. 1599), the Ḥanbali

jurist Marʿi

ibn Yusuf al-Karmi

(d. 1624), and Muḥyi

al-Di

n al-Ṣalti
