conceded that “kissing, fondling, and intercrural intercourse (mufa khadhah) are minor sins ( sagha ʾir ),” but added that they became major sins if done with the wife of a neighbor, illustrating the general principle that a minor sin, such as nonpenetrative sex, becomes a major sin in conjunction with another minor sin such as abusing the trust of a neighbor. 124 He went on to assert that looking with lust at a boy did not contravene the juridical status of being “of good character” ( ʿadl ), which made one eligible to be a witness in a court of law. 125 The Egyptian Ma liki scholar Muhammad al-Dasu qi (d. 1815 made the same point: isolated instances of looking with lust at a woman or beardless boy did not disqualify one from being a witness in a court, though making a regular habit of it (al-idma n ) did. The principle applied in general to the antecedents of fornication—in other words to all nonpenetrative sexual acts (wa hiya ma ʿada al-i la j. 126 Another Egyptian Ma liki