Authors: Patricia-Marie Budd
Faial, having finished her silent communication, cuts Graham off. “That action was at the accused’s request. My client has made no such declaration!” She adds fervently, “And, any such request must come through me.”
“Or your aide,” Sabine adds gleefully. Faial’s instant anger is unusual, suggesting her back is against the wall—the exact position she hopes he and Elena Stiles believe she is in.
Faial ponders Sabine’s comment briefly. It is unlikely Gil would betray her. The two have worked closely for over twenty years. They are very close, Faial being Gil’s spouse’s son’s auntie. When Gil’s boy was diagnosed with leukemia, Faial had financed the boy’s treatment. Gil may have them convinced he is working for them, but the odds of his betrayal are very unlikely.
But why didn’t he say anything when I voc’d? Either they haven’t contacted him and are bluffing or I never gave him the opportunity.
Her messaging was sent like a Gatling gun. She had learned years ago how to text with a blink of the eye so she wouldn’t have to speak. Most people don’t use this feature because it is very hard to master, but master it she did for when she needed to let others know something important quickly; quietly pulling up the keyboard is the only way.
No,
she reasons,
Gil is trustworthy
—yet, Sabine and Stiles seem so sure. She finds herself asking, “Have you received Frank Hunter’s consent?”
Both Stiles and Sabine smile, suggesting the answer is yes. Yet Sabine’s eyes shift ever so slightly, betraying his confidence. They are waiting on it. Stiles, on the other hand, has the perfect poker face. Faial considers the vice president her real opponent. This woman has substantial power and is now running for president. This court case may very well destroy her chances of winning. Considering just how dangerous Elena Stiles could be, Faial decides to bargain. “Well, I’m not giving you an out of court option. What would you like instead?”
“Keep my daughter out of it!” Elena Stiles answers instead of Sabine. Faial has gauged his role correctly. He is merely Stiles’ tool.
Losing Crystal Albright’s testimony is huge. It is a key point in Faial’s
argument. Without the girl’s confession, Sabine might very well convince the court that the text message is fraudulent. Faial is only worried slightly over that; at best, Sabine might be able to cast some doubt as to Crystal’s authoring it, but there is enough damning information in the text for Faial to open up the idea that Todd Middleton was not a rapist but a young man in love. A young man who had been betrayed by his lover, the woman he loved; a young man who had then been raped while at reeducation camp. Her plan is to show how Todd’s mental state deteriorated to such an extent that he could never have accepted life as a homosexual—not after everything that had happened to him. Thus Frank Hunter is no longer a murderer but one who committed the lawful act of euthanasia. Would the text alone be enough? Probably. Even if Sabine does manage to cast some doubt over its authorship, the damage will be done. Graham Sabine is an opponent Faial feels confident in overcoming, but Elena Stiles—Vice President Stiles, soon to be President Stiles—founding family member Stiles—this woman is a hurdle Faial is unsure she can leap. “I’ll keep Crystal off the stand, but the text is being used as evidence.” Before Elena Stiles can explode, Faial adds, “It is already documented evidence.” Stiles’ glare is daunting, but Faial is not backing down on this point. She wants her client to live. Elena Stiles’ reaction is more subdued than Faial expected. She nods once, and though her face remains grim, her scowl fades ever so slightly. Faial has the sinking feeling that she has just given the woman exactly what she wanted all along. Everything prior to this moment has been a bluff. Faial comes to realize that as much power as a founding family may have, not even its members can circumvent their own laws. Elena Stiles had known all along that she couldn’t keep Faial from putting her daughter on the stand until she wrenched the offer out of her.
Thank Hadrian it’s Graham I will be up against in the courtroom and not this woman!
Faial takes a brief moment to remind herself never to play poker with Elena Stiles.
She’d clean me right out, down to the very last credit.
* * * * *
Defense Questioning of Geneticist Avery Gillis
Defense: | | Mr. Gillis, you are a geneticist for Hadrian’s Procreation Arm of the Government, are you not? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes. |
| | |
Defense: | | How long have you worked in this capacity? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Twenty years. |
| | |
Defense: | | So, for the last twenty years, you have been working to identify and create the genetically perfect homosexual human gene. Is that not so? |
| | |
Gillis: | | We do not consider our work as an attempt to create genetic perfection. We are simply working toward identifying, isolating, and ensuring the DNA most likely to produce homosexuals. |
| | |
Defense: | | Why is it so important that every human born in Hadrian be homosexual? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Everyone knows the answer to that. |
| | |
Defense: | | Of course we do, but humor me and provide us with your reasoning for the record. |
| | |
Gillis: | | Obviously, here in Hadrian our goal is to create a stable human population that will live in harmony with the earth. |
| | |
Defense: | | And being homosexual is crucial for living in harmony with the earth? |
| | |
Gillis: | | No, of course not. But it is critical for controlling human population. |
| | |
Defense: | | And why is that? |
| | |
Gillis: | | The evidence is all around us in the outside world. |
| | |
Defense: | | Once again, humor me, for the record. |
| | |
Gillis: | | Over twenty billion people populate the outside world of our earth. Hadrian, on the other hand, has for over fifty years created and maintained a stable population of approximately ten million. This stability has only been accomplished through radical measures with a homosexual population and licensed births. |
| | |
Defense: | | Very good. I am sure everyone here agrees with you. Let us go back to your work with genetics. How successful have Hadrian’s researchers, such as yourself, been at identifying the homosexual gene within an embryo? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Very successful. |
| | |
Defense: | | Define very successful for me. |
| | |
Gillis: | | What’s to define? Very successful is very successful. |
| | |
Defense: | | Excuse my ignorance, but I am not a geneticist, so I need you to be very specific. For example, can you guarantee that 100 percent of all genetic tracing in embryos will in fact identify if a child will have no homosexual tendencies at all? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes. |
| | |
Defense: | | Really? One hundred percent? No homosexual tendencies at all? Guaranteed? Absolutely? Beyond any shadow of a doubt? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes. |
| | |
Defense: | | And what happens to these embryos? |
| | |
Gillis: | | They are destroyed. |
| | |
Defense: | | So, is this why you believe you have eradicated all zeros and ones from the Kinsey scale? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes. |
| | |
Defense: | | Does this mean you are able to distinguish the exact ratio of homosexual tendencies that are blended in with hetero-sexual tendencies—in each embryo, of course, prior to it being approved for maturation? |
| | |
Gillis: | | No, of course not. But we are so close we honestly believe we have eradicated the majority of zeros and ones from the Kinsey scale. |
| | |
Defense: | | The majority of? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes. |
| | |
Defense: | | I’m sorry, Mr. Gillis, but you just stated unequivocally, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that any embryo lacking the gene for homosexuality—every single one—is destroyed, ensuring absolutely no zeros—no pure heterosexuals—exist today in Hadrian. Yet, now you use the phrase “The majority of.” When one says the majority, one suggests a minority exists. |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes, but— |
| | |
Defense: | | Wait for the question, Mr. Gillis. Please, correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t the Kinsey scale based on behavior patterns? His research, if I recall correctly, was not founded on any genetic studies. |
| | |
Gillis: | | You are correct. |
| | |
Defense: | | So how can you claim to have eliminated only “the majority of ” the zeros and ones on this scale if it is not a genetic scale? |
| | |
Prosecution: | | M’Lady, I fail to see the purpose behind this line of questioning. |
| | |
Judge: | | Nor I. I would ask the Defense to please explain herself. |
| | |
Defense: | | I am looking to establish the deceased’s sexual orientation and the motivation behind my client’s act of euthanasia. |
| | |
Prosecution: | | Correction, M’Lady. The defendant is on trial for murder. |
| | |
Defense: | | I am aware of the charges against my client, but it is my intent, M’Lady, to prove his act was, in fact, euthanasia and not murder. |
| | |
Judge: | | And you intend to accomplish this through a study of genetics? |
| | |
Defense: | | Yes, M’Lady. |
| | |
Judge: | | Proceed. |
| | |
Defense: | | Once again, Mr. Gillis, how is it geneticists are able to use a behavioral scale in their genetic research? |
| | |
Gillis: | | We are simply using terminology laypersons can understand. |
| | |
Defense: | | So, the Kinsey scale is not, in fact, an accurate representation of what you are capable of with genetics? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Well, yes and no. |
| | |
Defense: | | Explain. |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes, in the sense that we are very close to identifying the homosexual gene. No, because no work in genetic research will ever be 100 percent. |
| | |
Defense: | | Thank you, Mr. Gillis. That brings me to my next point. Let us refer back to your wording “the majority of.” Prior to just admitting that any work in genetic research will ever be 100 percent, did you not claim to guarantee—100 percent guarantee—that every fetus could in fact be genetically altered, ensuring all Hadrian’s children be born homosexual? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Yes. |
| | |
Defense: | | Really? A 100 percent guarantee? |
| | |
Gillis: | | All right, no, but really, yes. |
| | |
Defense: | | No, but really yes? Please explain. |
| | |
Gillis: | | We do what is called genetic screening of the fetus. Tests will then reveal if the child to be born has the genetic makeup of someone who is homosexual. |
| | |
Defense: | | That sounds straightforward enough, so why did you preface your response with no? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Because, as much as we now know about human DNA, it is such a condense microscopic heliograph, it is impossible to ever say fully, 100 percent, exactly what an individual’s sexual orientation will be. |
| | |
Defense: | | Interesting. |
| | |
Gillis: | | That being said— |
| | |
Defense: | | That being said, it is possible, is it not, that some of Hadrian’s children may in fact be born heterosexual? That perhaps a one or even a zero on the Kinsey scale could be born. |
| | |
Gillis: | | It is very unlikely. |
| | |
Defense: | | Unlikely does not mean impossible. If it is “unlikely,” then you have to admit it is possible; even the most remote possibility still exists, does it not? |
| | |
Gillis: | | Not likely. |
| | |
Defense: | | Does it not? |
| | |
Gillis: | | All right, yes. But we are very careful in our screening process. |
| | |
Defense: | | Regardless of how careful you are, did you not just say it is not possible ever to be 100 percent certain of anything when it comes to human DNA? |
| | |
Gillis: | | You are correct. |
| | |
Defense: | | So it is possible then that one, two, or maybe even more of Hadrian’s children may in fact be born not only with heterosexual tendencies but be a zero on the Kinsey scale, to use your own terminology. |
| | |
Gillis: | | Although very unlikely, it is possible. |
| | |
Defense: | | Thank you, Mr. Gillis. No more questions. |
| | |
Judge: | | Does the prosecution wish to ask any questions of the witness at this time? |
| | |
Prosecution: | | No, M’Lady, but I would like to ask that we approach the bench. |
| | |
Judge: | | Would the prosecution and defense please approach the bench? |
| | |
Prosecution: | | What was the point of all that? |
| | |
Defense: | | My point, M’Lady, is that Todd Middleton was a heterosexual living closeted in a homosexual world. Fearful of reeducation camp, fearful of losing family and friends, fearful of losing the opportunity presented to him by Antinous Uni, Todd Middleton was a young man diminished in morale and esteem. The final toll destroying his will to live was being brutally raped by Mr. Weller— |