he simply asks you to ignore him, his victim "demands action, engagement, and remembering." 155
|
Kathleen Barry states that surviving is the other side of being a victim. 156 I agree that a woman's survival of sexual intimidation involves her developing coping mechanism and formulating strategies in response to her abuse, strategies, that require a willful subject. I have argued, however, that from the "view from somewhere different," surviving places a woman's sexual victimization under patriarchy in a dialectical relation, to her active capacity for sexual agency and self-definition. From the "view from somewhere different," being a survivor, just is being both a victim or potential victim of institutionalized male dominance and an autonomous agent who has the capacity to transcend that victimization and move toward a sexuality more fully defined in her own terms. From this perspective, women's sexuality under patriarchy constitutes a dialectical relation between defining sexual subject and abused sexual object. This relation describes women's sexual desires and preferences as constrained by social institutions that are oppressive to women at the same time, that women's capacity to define the terms and conditions of our sexual lives affords us the determination to resist oppressive individuals and institutions and, ultimately, to transcend them. Valerie Heller, a feminist survivor of years of sexual abuse as a child, reports, "I think that our sexuality cannot and has not been taken from us. It has without a doubt been thwarted. . . . My sexualitythe inner experience of my sexual energyis, in actuality, something that I am becoming aware of and experiencing for the first time." 157
|
The "view form somewhere different" can accommodate the diversity of feminist voices that speak to the issue of women's sexual intimidation, because the subject/object dialectic on which surviving such intimidation is based invites viewing women as both victims of men's pervasive and institutionalized sexual violation and as willful agents taking responsibility for the direction of our sexual lives. Thinking and talking about women's sexual intimidation from the "view from somewhere different" does not reinvigorate the debilitating stereotype of the fragile and vulnerable woman in need of protection from and by men, because this perspective affords women the capacity to develop a self-confidence and self-reliance that can liberate her from her dependence on abusive men; nor does such a perspective absolve women of all personal responsibility, for our heterosexual relationships. Indeed, taking responsibility for one's sexuality is a feature of the ethic of care respect implied by this perspective, which asks women and men to look at how and why we choose, the sexual partner, we do, and how those choices are affected by the particular cultural and political contexts in which we live. Interpreted from this perspective, men's sexual violation, terrorization, coercion, and dehumanization of woman under institutionalized male dominance can be experiences that motivate women to seek out better relationships for ourselves and richer lives for our families and friends. Therefore, regarding women as survivors from the "view from somewhere different" is neither antimale nor antisex, since such a perspective encourages viewing women's sexuality not merely as externally defined by an oppressive patriarchy but also as subjectively determined by each woman through her own personal exploration of sexual passion and pleasure. From this perspective, it is through the unique dialectical interplay of
|
|