Rearing Wolves to Our Own Destruction: Slavery in Richmond Virginia, 1782–1865 (4 page)

Read Rearing Wolves to Our Own Destruction: Slavery in Richmond Virginia, 1782–1865 Online

Authors: Midori Takagi

Tags: #Social Science, #Ethnic Studies, #African American Studies, #test

BOOK: Rearing Wolves to Our Own Destruction: Slavery in Richmond Virginia, 1782–1865
10.93Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
 
Page 11
to shipment, tobacco agents and ship captains congregated at these sites. As a result, Richmond became an important center for inspecting, negotiating, and selling the lucrative leaf.
In addition to the inspection process, other tobacco-related businesses and services flourished in Richmond. Attendant industries such as coopering and stave making set up near the wharves and tobacco warehouses to meet the demand for hogsheads and boxes used to ship tobacco. Hotels, boardinghouses, and taverns appeared to lodge the inspectors, ship captains, and agents.
The changes in European tastes had an additional effect on Richmond's economic development. By the turn of the century European preference for a smoother, more refined tobacco product encouraged greater processing of the leaf. Tobacco growers and later tobacco manufacturers who had little to do with the growing process began to stem, boil, press, flavor, and twist the leaves into licorice-flavored plugs. As shops providing such services sprang up, more craftsmen and laborers came to Richmond seeking employment. The earliest manufacturing census of Richmond illustrates the industrial growth: in 1820 twenty tobacco manufactories employed a total of 760 workers. By 1850 there were nineteen manufactories employing 1,406 workers. During the next decade, the number of tobacco-processing factories and tobacco workers nearly tripled.
The growth of tobacco manufacturing was fairly steady even though the counties surrounding Richmond turned to other crops, such as wheat. Many local farmers diversified their crops because of soil exhaustion and wildly fluctuating tobacco prices, causing the nation's major source of raw tobacco to shift toward the lower piedmont region of Virginia during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Despite the increasing distance to tobacco farms, Richmond continued to receive large shipments of raw tobacco for processing. By 1820 the city was firmly established as a hub for tobacco processing and shipping, and it retained that position throughout the antebellum era.
The other staple crop that affected Richmond's development, though to a lesser degree than tobacco, was wheat. Wheat cultivation in the tidewater area throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries encouraged the growth of flour milling in Richmond, which was a prime location for such an industry because of its abundant waterpower. Although wheat never commanded the prices or profits of tobacco, wheat processing and exporting proved an important industry for the city.
The increase in European demand for flour, the steady rise in grain prices in comparison to unstable tobacco prices, and the rapid exhaustion of soil from tobacco growing encouraged many farmers to grow
 
Page 12
more wheat. Most of this wheat was for export and required a certain amount of processing and storage prior to shipping. To meet this need, the flour and gristmill industry moved from quaint riverside grinding shops to large, bustling mills.
5
By 1860 Richmond possessed the second and third largest flour mills in the country (the largest mill was in Oswego, New York), producing, respectively, 190,000 and 160,000 barrels of flour per year.
6
In addition to tobacco and wheat there was another "crop" that greatly affected Richmond's urban and industrial growth: coal. The city was located only miles from the eastern Virginia coalfields, which made the area one of the few mining centers with access to coastal vessels.
7
More important, coal was essential to the production of iron, a product with even greater economic implications for the city. Bituminous coal and its by-product, coke, were needed to heat the furnaces that made iron. Without them, iron could not be melted or cast into products. Iron foundries in Richmond were first established during the American Revolution to produce goods for the war, such as shells, castings, pikes, nails, and cannonballs. After the war the iron industry became an integral part of other Richmond businesses, providing them with parts for coaches, carts, machinery, tools, and most important, the railroad.
The city's three major products, combined with iron manufacturing, further stimulated industrial and commercial activity by creating a need for numerous attendant industries and businesses. New businesses that supported the tobacco, wheat, and iron industries quickly arose, producing goods such as barrels, tobacco boxes, machine parts, wagons, tobacco cutters, grain-grinding machines, sheet iron, and farm tools. In addition, a number of businesses and services appeared to serve the growing population. Among businesses that flourished were those producing clothing, shoes and boots, soap and candles, guns, hats, sashes and blinds, and furniture. There also was explosive growth in the service sector with the arrival of lawyers, doctors and hospitals, auctioneers, commission merchants, and slave traders.
Together, tobacco, wheat, coal, and ironmaking contributed greatly to Richmond's status within the eastern Virginia region. And because of these crops and products, Richmond did not remain merely a shipping or trading port. The tremendous volume of processing, marketing, and shipping of these goods, as well as the extensive development of attendant industries and services, allowed Richmond to diversify and become a commercial, industrial, and political center.
8
Essential to Richmond's development was the system of slavery. Slaves provided the labor for nearly all aspects of Richmond's economic, urban, and industrial growth, from cultivating and manufacturing tobacco and
 
Page 13
wheat to building supporting industries and creating the physical structures of the city.
Tobacco, for example, could not have been cultivated in such high volume without slaves. Their labor was crucial at every juncture in the growing, harvesting, and manufacturing of the plant. From the painstaking activities of planting, picking, and drying to stemming, pressing, and twisting the brown leaves, slaves constituted the majority of the workforce throughout the antebellum years. As a result, at every stage of cultivation and production slavery and tobacco became intertwined.
9
Slavery and tobacco cultivation became linked initially during the late seventeenth century when the numbers of white immigrant laborers who earlier performed these tasks began to decline rapidly. Several factors precipitated this decline, including improved employment opportunities in Europe and in northern colonies that proved more enticing than a stint of indentured servitude in Virginia. As a result, planters in need of a cheap source of labor began to substitute African slaves for white servants.
10
By the turn of the eighteenth century, most large tobacco farms were fully manned by slave labor.
By the early to middle nineteenth century, slave labor had become equally important to the processing of the leaf. As tobacco production moved from plantations to factories, so did the labor force. Slaves frequently were purchased or hired by tobacco manufacturers to process the dried leaves into flavored chewing plugs. Manufacturers, like planters, employed slaves because they were viewed as a cheaper and more tractable source of labor, because many slaves already were skilled at processing tobacco (having been trained on the plantations), and because there were few white laborers willing to do such labor.
11
For all of these reasons, there was little resistance to the use of slave labor in tobacco factories.
Slaves also played a major role in the harvesting and processing of grains, both in the countryside and in the city of Richmond. Not only did they manage the wheat fields surrounding the city, they were responsible for turning the grain into flour. In the water-powered mills beside the James River, slaves could be found grinding the wheat into several grades of flour as well as making the barrels in which the product was shipped.
The increase in wheat cultivation in the immediate countryside had an additional impact on Richmond's slave system: the creation of a labor surplus. As more farmers began growing wheat instead of tobacco, they found themselves with more workers than they could use because the new crop was far less labor-intensive. Rather than keeping idle hands on the farms, planters began to hire out their slaves to other farms or to
 
Page 14
Richmond businesses, including the tobacco manufactories. This transfer of surplus slave labor was an important part of Richmond's industrialization. The intermittent labor demands of wheat cultivation and the resulting release of slave labor greatly encouraged practices such as hiring out.
A third important factor that influenced the development and growth of slavery in Richmond was the prior use of slaves for industrial tasks beginning in the Revolutionary War. Although bondmen had been working for ironworks and other craft shops across Virginia as early as 1721, it was not until the 1770s and 1780s that industrial slave employment took hold in the city.
12
During those decades slave workers from the city and nearby counties were forcibly moved from households and crafts shops to state-owned industries. The public ropewalks in Warwick and in Richmond were manned entirely by slave workers who spent long hours "manipulating the dressed hemp [and twisting] the strands into rope."
13
A major portion of the workforce at the lead mines run by the government during the Revolutionary War was slave labor with duties that included chipping the lead from the earthen walls, removing the gravel from the shaft, and separating ore from rocks through coarse grinding. Construction of the capital also was based on slave labor. Most if not all of the government buildings such as the State Capitol, the governor's mansion, and the new arms manufactory were built by slave workers.
The extensive use of slave labor in the various wartime industries and public projects was hailed by the state government as a resounding success. Encouraged by this, the Virginia government not only continued to purchase and employ slaves but demanded that all public development projects of the late eighteenth century do the same. The James River Company was quick to respond to the governor's wish; in 1791 its directors wrote that "having been instructed to make the purchase of negroes for the use of the Company, & wishing to comply therewith at a sale shortly to be made in the county of Gloster, we have to request of your Excellency & the Hon'ble Board for supply of money, or tobacco at the present value, as will enable [us] to make the purchase."
14
The use of slaves in war-related industries and later public projects set an important example that encouraged other employers to consider slave labor. A range of documents indicate the private sector's response was enthusiastic. Colonel Davies, who was in charge of the state ropewalks, was approached by several businesses interested in hiring the slave rope makers. In a letter to the governor in 1782, Davies informed the executive council that a local rope-making company presented such an offer: "Drawing attention to the condition of the Public works at
 
Page 15
Warwick, little or nothing is done there at present, and yet there are `the hands kept there' belonging to the state, who could be hired out to advantage, most of them are Rope-makers, but as the public ropewalk is burnt, the proprietors of the private rope-walks near Richmond are very anxious to hire these negroes and will give high wages for them."
15
The ropewalk was not the only company interested in hiring state slaves. During that same year the original lead mine owners petitioned Governor Harrison, through Thomas Madison, for the return of the mines and specifically asked to hire the state slaves who had been working there since the war. Harrison gave his reply to Madison and specified the terms of his agreement: "Sir, I am ready to receive proposals from the proprietors of the lead mines for delivering up the said mines to them, and hiring the public negroes provided they will furnish the state with one hundred tons of lead."
16
From these few documents it is clear that government use of slave workers during the war did help city employers and slave owners see the potential of slave labor for a variety of nonagricultural businesses. By providing solid evidence that slaves could be used effectively and efficiently in industries that brought profits to both the owner and employer, the state helped open the door to large-scale employment of slave workers in the industries during the antebellum era.
Many historical works have played up the drama and romance of Richmond's history. They have highlighted events such as the arrival of Captain Christopher Newport, who in the seventeenth century reportedly claimed the area for England by planting a wooden cross at the falls and shouting, "For our King and our prosperous success in this his action." This history instead focuses on typical city residents and the less romantic factors that created this urban industrial center in the South.
17
Such an approach seemed more sensible, given that the development of Richmond's industries and slave system had little to do with the actions of larger-than-life individuals and much to do with geography, economics, politics, greed, racism, and fear.

Other books

An Indian Affair by Doreen Owens Malek
Longings of the Heart by Bonnie Leon
Stephen King's N. by Marc Guggenheim, Stephen King, Alex Maleev
My Favorite Countess by Vanessa Kelly
Adam's Peak by Heather Burt
Never Never: Part Two (Never Never #2) by Colleen Hoover, Tarryn Fisher
Name To a Face by Robert Goddard
Redeemed by Becca Jameson
Boardwalk Bust by Franklin W. Dixon