Table 6. Slaveholding patterns, 1800 and 1840
| | Slaves per household
| | | | | 1
| | 121 (286)
|
| | | 121 (386)
|
| | 2
| | 80 (238)
|
| | | 160 (476)
|
| | 3
| | 43 (161)
|
| | | 129 (483)
|
| | 4+
| | 111 (298)
|
| | | 789 (2,892)
|
| | Total
| | 355 (983)
|
| | | 1,199 (4,237)
|
| | Source: Richmond, Personal Property Tax Lists, 1800 and 1840.
| Note: Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number.
|
|
Although these are but a few of the many statistics available for Richmond, they clearly show a region that had become markedly different from other places in Virginia.
|
During the first few decades of the nineteenth century, Richmond grew up. With new residences and businesses, cobblestone thoroughfares, a major banking facility, and the State Capitol, it began to resemble a city of importance. The most significant development, however, was the rise of industries, which greatly shaped both the landscape and the community to fit the needs of a manufacturing center. By 1840 tobacco manufactories and flour mills crowded the banks of the James River, and hundreds of workers, particularly male slave laborers, filled its stemming, pressing, and grinding rooms. These facts alone set Richmond apart from any other city south of the Mason-Dixon Line and any industrial center farther north. Of greater importance than how Richmond fared in comparison to other cities, however, was how the emerging industries and slavery became intertwined and affected the development and character of each other. The result was the creation of a city, an industrial center, and an urban slave system unlike any other in the South.
|
Origins of Urban Industrial Slavery
|
In the early decades of the nineteenth century, the use of slave workers as the main source of labor in craft shops and preindustrial factories was rare, and in some business circles practically unthinkable. Richmonders
|
|