Page 220 Bard College in upstate New York followed suit:
Lovell, “Students Call for Coke Boycott”; Baran, “Stop Killer Coke!”
Page 221 “Unfortunately, Bard College officials”:
Lovell, “Students Call for Coke Boycott.”
Page 221 passed by fewer than sixty votes:
Shane Hegarty, “Students Give Coke the Push,”
Irish Times
, October 18, 2003.
Page 221 won by an even higher margin:
Lovell, “Students Call for Coke Boycott.”
Page 221 $100,000-a-year budget:
Campaign to Stop Killer Coke grant requests, 2006 and 2007; Rogers, interview by the author.
Page 221 Coke’s $30 billion:
The Coca-Cola Company, Annual Report, 2010.
Page 221 mentioned the situation in Colombia:
Paul Klebnikov, “Coke’s Sinful World,”
Forbes
, December 22, 2003.
Page 222 voted twelve to eight to remove Carleton’s Coke machines:
The details of this account stem solely from Rogers; however, independent sources corroborate the fact that he attended the meeting and debated Coke’s representative. See Ian Werkheiser, “Killer Coke,”
Z Magazine
, August 1, 2004, and Margaret Webb, “Human Rights Charges Still Gnaw at Coca-Cola,”
Washington Post
, April 22, 2004.
Page 222 next campus to sever its ties with Coke:
Avi Chomsky, interview by the author.
Page 223 honored as a civil rights pioneer:
Brian C. Mooney, “Patrick’s Path from Courtroom to Boardroom,”
Boston Globe
, August 13, 2006.
Page 223 “from human rights violations”:
Letter from Terry Collingsworth to Equal Justice Works board members, October 2, 2003.
Page 223 “so we could see”:
Webb, “Human Rights Charges Still Gnaw at Coca-Cola.”
Page 223 “sources close to the situation”:
Webb, “Human Rights Changes Still Gnaw at Coca-Cola.”
Page 223 “confidence in the brand”:
Joan Vennochi, “Killer Coke’s Charges Go Flat,”
Boston Globe
, August 10, 2006.
Page 223 “either of two things”:
Mooney, “Patrick’s Path from Courtroom to Boardroom.”
Page 223 The company refused:
Vennochi, “Killer Coke’s Charges Go Flat.”
Page 224 $2.1 million consulting contract:
Mooney, “Patrick’s Path from Courtroom to Boardroom.”
Page 224 the campaign played a role in Daft’s own retirement:
Rogers, interview by the author.
Page 224 Rogers had a love-hate relationship:
Rogers, interview by the author.
Page 224 “Coke has shown”:
Final Report, “An Investigation of Allegations of Murder and Violence in Coca-Cola’s Bottling Plants,” NYC Fact-Finding Delegation on Coca-Cola in Colombia led by New York city councilman Hiram Monserrate, April 2004.
Page 224 first-quarter profits of $1.13 billion:
Scott Leith, “Coke’s First-Quarter Profit Climbs 35 Percent,”
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
, April 22, 2004.
Page 225 Daft addressed the Colombia situation . . . call for an independent investigation:
The account of the 2004 shareholders meeting draws on video shown on
Democracy Now!
, April 27, 2004, “Killer Coke: Activist Disrupts Coca Cola Shareholders Meeting” (
http://www.democracynow.org/2004/4/27/stream
), as well as Ray Rogers, interview by the author, and the following contemporaneous news reports: Grow, “Labor Activity Bubbly over Coca-Cola Fight”
;
Scott Leith and Matt Kempner, “Scuffle, Catcalls Spice Coca-Cola’s Annual Meeting in Delaware,”
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
, April 22, 2004; and Webb, “Human Rights Charges Still Gnaw at Coca-Cola.”
Page 225 hadn’t intended the meeting to turn physical:
Rogers, interview by the author.
Page 226 $5,000 check to Corporate Campaign, Inc.:
Note from B. Wardlaw to Ray Rogers, April 23, 2004.
Page 226 refusal to investigate in Colombia:
Betsy Morris, “The Real Story: How Did Coca-Cola’s Management Go from First-Rate to Farcical in Six Short Years? Tommy the Barber Knows,”
Fortune
, May 17, 2004.
CHAPTER 9 . ALL THE WATER IN INDIA
Page 228 fecal coliform bacteria count of 600,000:
“Up to Their Necks in It,”
The Economist
, July 17, 2008.
Page 228 toxic soup of heavy metals:
“Hazardous Heavy Metals Polluting Ganga,”
Times of India
, June 4, 2009.
Page 228 “a cloudy brown soup of excrement”:
“Up to Their Necks in It.”
Page 228 ambitious cleanup plan:
Dipak Mishra, “Clean Ganga Water Still a Dream,”
Times of India,
March 22, 2010; Samanth Subramanian, “The Monumental Decline of a Great River,”
MINT,
September 1, 2009.
Page 228 Nearly half of those who bathe:
“India’s Ganges River Brings Disease, Pollution; Believers Scarcely Notice,” Associated Press, May 9, 2002.
Page 229 “Lok Samiti follows”:
Nandlal Master, interview by the author.
Page 230 The plant here dates back to 1995:
Nandlal, interview by the author; Shira Wolf, “Thanda-Hearted Matlab: Coca-Cola in India,” University of Wisconsin College Year in India paper, 2003-2004.
Page 230 Coca-Cola India purchased the plant:
Nandlal, interview by the author; Wolf, “Thanda-Hearted Matlab”;
Independent Third Party Assessment of Coca-Cola Facilities in India,
Project Report No. 2006WM21 (New Delhi: The Energy and Resources Institute, 2006), 219 (hereafter TERI report).
Page 230 clashing with the company:
Nandlal, interview by the author.
Page 230 short-term contracts:
Kalyan Ranjan, interview by the author.
Page 230 workers appealed to company management:
Nandlal, interview by the author.
Page 230 “The first major problem”:
Urmika Vishwakarma, interview by the author.
Page 230 water pooled by the side of the highway:
Nantoo Banerjee,
The Real Thing: Coke’s Bumpy Ride Through India
(Kolkata, India: Frontpage, 2009), 79.
Page 231 “nothing would grow”:
Nandlal and Vishwakarma, interviews by the author.
Page 231 water shortages in 2002:
Shankkar Aiyar, “The Impact: Thirst Aid,”
India Today
, 2002; “Indian Economy: General Review,”
Finance India
, March 2003; “Drought May Undo Govt’s Plans for High GDP Growth,”
Press Trust of India
, July 25, 2004.
Page 231 one of ninety-seven wells that Lok Samiti says:
R. Chandrika, “Decreasing Water Levels: Status of Water Table in Mehdiganj and Surrounding Villages, Varanasi, U.P. (August 2006),” Lok Samiti Varanasi.
Page 231 villagers staged their first rally:
Nandlal, interview by the author; Mukesh Prabhan, president of Nagepur village committee, interview by the author.
Page 231 ordered Coke to clean up:
Nandlal, interview by the author; Banerjee, 79.
Page 231 canal overflowed into his fish pond:
Local farmer, interview by the author.
Page 232 Coke uses only 3 percent of the area’s groundwater:
Ranjan, interview by the author.
Page 232 “We have never dispensed biosolids to farmers”:
Press Trust of India
, July 31, 2003.
Page 233 problem persisted for months:
Banerjee, 79.
Page 233 15 million liters during June:
TERI report, 206.
Page 233 seven-step process of purification:
Sanjay Bansal, interview by the author.
Page 234 tank containing two ground fish:
Bansal, interview by the author.
Page 234 a lot of good for his village:
Dudh Nath Yadav, interview by the author.
Page 234 more than 150 people protesting:
Ranjan, interview by the author.
Page 234 thousands of people at a time protesting:
See, for example, India Resource Center, “Police Attack Coca-Cola Protest, over 350 Arrested,” press release, November 25, 2004; “UP Villagers Allege Coca-Cola of ‘Poisoning’ Their Drinking Water,”
Hindustan Times
, October 5, 2006.
Page 235 Thums Up, a drier and fruitier cola:
Tuck Business School of Dartmouth,
Coca-Cola India
, Case no. 1-0085, prepared by Jennifer Kaye, under the direction of Professor Paul A. Argenti, 2004 (hereafter, Tuck case).
Page 235 Coke simply bought up the company:
Banerjee, 19.
Page 235 at least 49 percent of shares:
Banerjee, 25.
Page 235 6 bottles per person per year:
Tuck case.
Page 236 Coke languishes in third place:
Banerjee, 43-46.
Page 236 stay of execution in divesting its shares:
Banerjee, 28-32.
Page 236 10 percent of the company is Indian-owned:
Banerjee, 33-42.
Page 236 Volume grew by nearly 40 percent:
Tuck case.
Page 237 fast-tracked approval:
A. Krishnan, Perumutty Gram Panchayat president, interview by the author.
Page 237 “When Coca-Cola first”...“Many villages have boycotted”:
R. Ajayan, interview by the author.
Page 237 distributed sludge for use as fertilizer:
Ajayan, interview by the author; several anonymous villagers, interviews by the author.
Page 238 never enough water:
Anonymous villagers, interviews by the author.
Page 238 bitter aftertaste:
Taste test by the author.
Page 238 literacy rate of over 90 percent:
Kerala Fact Sheet, 2005-2006, National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India,
http://www.nfhsindia.org/pdf/KE.pdf
.
Page 238 antibusiness climate had led to high unemployment:
See Banerjee, 128-129.
Page 238 returned a portion of their ancestral lands:
C. R. Bijoy, “Kerala’s Plachimada Struggle” (Thiruvananthapuram [Trivandrum], India: Plachimada Coca-Cola Virudha Samara Samithi and Plachimada Struggle Solidarity Committee, November 2006), 4; C. R. Bijoy, interview by the author.
Page 239 “I told them their strength was in the local”:
Bijoy, interview by the author.
Page 239 around-the-clock sit-in:
Bijoy and Veloor Swaminathan, interviews by the author; Bijoy, “Kerala’s Plachimada Struggle,” 7-10.
Page 239 “unfit for human consumption”:
Sangram Metals report, April 3, 2002; Bijoy, “Kerala’s Plachimada Struggle,” 10.
Page 239 “In the beginning”:
Krishnan, interview by the author.
Page 239 Indian branch of Greenpeace:
D. Rajeev, “Coca-Cola’s Cup of Woes Overflows,” Inter Press Service, August 7, 2003.
Page 240 Sympathetic stories in the media:
For example, “Kerala Villagers Up in Arms Against Coca-Cola,”
Press Trust of India
, June 21, 2002.
Page 240 declared their support:
“Communist Parties Throw Support,”
Press Trust of India
, February 3, 2003.
Page 240 “They were just too arrogant”:
Krishnan, interview by the author.
Page 240 revoking the plant’s operating license:
Krishnan, interview by the author; Bijoy, “Kerala’s Plachimada Struggle,” 13;
Press Trust of India
, July 31, 2003.
Page 240 solid waste as fertilizer:
“India Coca-Cola Investigation” (transcript), presenter John Waite, BBC Radio 4, July 25, 2003.
Page 240 useless as fertilizer:
P. Venugopal, “Toxicity in Plachimada Sludge,”
The Hindu
, July 27, 2003.
Page 240 toxic levels of lead and cadmium:
BBC Test Results, “Analytical Results for Sample NGP03020”; Bijoy, “Kerala’s Plachimada Struggle,” 11; “Coke’s ‘Toxic Sludge’ Raises Hackles in Kerala; State Pollution Control Board to Probe BBC Charge Against Coca-Cola,”
India Abroad
, August 8, 2003.
Page 240 prostate and kidney cancer:
National Toxicology Program, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “11th Report on Carcinogens,” January 31, 2005.
Page 241 evidence from a respected British university:
For an excellent exploration of modern India in all its complexity and contradictions, see Mira Kamdar,
Planet India: How the Fastest-Growing Democracy Is Transforming America and the World
(New York: Scribner, 2007). For a discussion of cultural factors relating to the issue of pesticides in cola, see Neeraj Vedwan, “Pesticides in Coca-Cola and Pepsi: Consumerism, Brand Image, and Public Interest in a Globalizing India,”
Cultural Anthropology
22, no. 4 (2007), 659-684.
Page 241 Kerala Pollution Control Board did its own tests:
Press Trust of India
, July 31, 2003.
Page 241 four times the tolerable limit:
Press Trust of India
, August 6, 2003; Kerala State Pollution Control Board, “Presence of Heavy Metals in Sludge Generated in the Factory of M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Palakkad, A Study Report,” September 2003.
Page 241 vowed to pursue legal action:
Press Trust of India
, August 7, 2003.
Page 241 pesticides at thirty-seven times the European standards:
Banerjee, 85-86; Ranjit Devraj, “Indian Coke and Pepsi Laced with Pesticides, Says NGO,” Inter Press Service, August 5, 2003.