After all, Jane Austen expected
other human beings
—not money, not accomplishments, not “independence,” as much as she valued those things—to be the most reliable source of happiness in this life. Caring about people as she did (and understanding romantic love in all its glory), she must have been devastated never to marry and have children.
9
But she still treated relationships as the most important thing in her life. She was the kind of aunt her nephews adored, the one her niece turned to for advice on whether to marry a man she was dubious about. Jane Austen wasn’t impatient with them if they interrupted her work, or prickly about her reputation as a novelist. She was not just kind about but deeply interested in their (vastly inferior) literary creations. She arranged to do her own writing under conditions that allowed her to put it away quickly to attend to visitors.
10
And yet, all the time that she was living the life of a traditional woman—a typical English spinster, in fact—putting relationships first, Jane Austen managed to make herself the most accomplished female writer in the history of the English language. How did she do it? Not by shunting family aside for her art. And not by trying to “have it all,” either. At least not all at once. She did it, first, by picking an artistic project that played to her deepest interest—other human beings. And then she exercised almost superhuman patience. She wrote and revised and wrote some more. For decades. Her first novel wasn’t published until she was thirty-five years old—about twenty-five years after she began writing fiction, and more than fifteen years after she began writing
that particular novel
.
T
IP JUST FOR JANEITES
Don’t be afraid to put
relationships first in your life.
(You can get them right and still
succeed in a demanding career.)
A lot of us could have a lot more of what we want if we were willing to go about it the same way: Don’t be ashamed to admit to ourselves that the people in our lives matter more to us than any accomplishment of our own.
11
Don’t be embarrassed to choose a career that’s compatible with taking a big
chunk of time off to tend to family, or feel like we’re selling ourselves short if we pick a profession that’s associated with traditionally feminine interests. And then keep at our ambitions, when we can and as steadily as we can, in the interstices of paying attention to the people we love, until we’ve achieved something great.
If we want to bridge the chasm between Jane Austen heroines’ consummate relationship expertise and our own sad deficit in these matters, we can treat the rough spots in our friendships and relations with family members as opportunities for developing skills we may have to call on at any time, to get love right. And we can take an interest in the rights and wrongs of our behavior, and that of other people. Instead of idly or even maliciously gossiping about our co-workers, friends, and neighbors,
12
we can seriously discuss what kind of behavior is substandard, what kind we admire, and why. The point isn’t to build yourself up by cutting other people down, the way Bingley’s awful sisters do whenever they talk about Elizabeth. It’s to think yourself into a state of mind where you’re used to asking what kind of “conduct” will make you an admirable human being—a person of “character.” It’s a sophisticated way of evaluating behavior that we’re not really used to. Emma and Mr. Knightley demonstrate; turn to the next chapter, and you’ll see how it’s done.
A
DOPT AN AUSTEN ATTITUDE:
Notice that getting along with other people is a skill that improves with practice. Are you out of practice?
Ask yourself how much time and deliberate attention you spend on your relationships in general—compared to your job, your hobbies, your TV, the internet.
Jane Austen heroines take relationships seriously enough to think and talk quite a lot about how people should behave toward each other. Could you ramp up the attention you pay to this subject?
W
HAT WOULD JANE DO?
Even if she could afford to live on her own, she might actually choose to share with housemates, or even with family. Jane Austen complained about certain indignities and unfairnesses of her “dependent” situation.
13
But she derived enormous satisfaction from living, all her life, with people she really loved.
14
(Don’t neglect the possibility that living with family may provide Jane Austen heroines with at least some minimal protection against the disastrous glom-onto-a-guy-just-because-you’re-lonely mistake.)
Jane Austen would have no hesitation about being an arbiter of “conduct” and “character” in any set of circumstances.
She’d value relationships—all kinds of relationships—over any other possible source of happiness in this life.
I
F WE
REALLY
WANT TO BRING BACK JANE AUSTEN ...
Maybe colleges will stop building new dorms full of “singles” and expect freshmen to learn to live with another human being again!
Seriously, we’ll remember that loving and sharing our lives with other people (or not) is what makes us happy (or not) in the end.
We’ll learn again to pay deliberate attention to all our relationships, not just our “relationships.”
We’ll work to close the relationship-expertise gap between us and Jane Austen’s heroines. When your Jane Austen hero appears on the scene, you want to be ready.