voudous, Matamoros coverage was a matter of information, not reproach. Nonvoudous, on the other hand, kept trying to draw me out, the supposition being that deep, deep down, weren't the killings in Matamoros, like the fictitious ones in movies such as Angel Heart or True Believers, what voudou was really about?
|
Wasn't voudou really about human sacrifice ?
|
Yes and no. In Yoruba tradition, human sacrificeas opposed to that of animals and fowlis a matter of historical evolution. For many centuries, voudous in Africa sacrificed humans to their gods, as did many religions, including Christianity, if you consider Jesus to have been sacrificed on the cross. But the practice, which had been almost exclusively limited to sacrifice of criminals and prisoners of warto state executions, in other wordsstopped in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, at least partly through pressure from European colonial governors who thought capital punishment should be reserved for themselves.
|
Yoruba legend accounts for the cessation in a different way. The story is that a famous Yoruba king was confronted with a demand from Ifa to sacrifice not criminals, but his own daughteras Abraham had been asked to sacrifice his son to prove his faith. The king anguished. He did not want to anger the gods, but he loved his daughter dearly. He consulted Ifa again, and from the reading concluded that perhaps he could substitute a warm-blooded mammal for his beloved child. It was worth a chance. The god accepted the offering and the piety of the king, and from that time, it has been considered acceptable in orisha voudou to offer mammals, not humans, as the highest type of blood sacrifice.
|
It is important to note, however, that the shift in attitude was about the kind of ebo, not the concept itself. Anyone considering following the path of the orisha must accept that. The Oba made that plain to me one afternoon in a singularly astringent analysis.
|
|