98 Greenberg, The Construction of Homosexuality 274—77; Brundage, “Sex and Canon Law,” 43.
99 Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Radd al-muḥtār, 3:156; Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Munḥat al-khāliq, 5:18-19; Ramlī, Khayr al-Dīn, Nuzhat al-nawāẓir , 22; Munāwī, al-Fayḍ al-qadīr, 6:226. Ibn ʿAbidīn quotes Khayr al-Dīn al-Ramlī, who in turn quotes Dhayl al-Wishāḥ fī ʿilm al-nikāḥ, by Jalal al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī (d. 1505). Munāwī quotes al-Tadhkirah, by Ṣāliḥ al-Bulqīnī (d. 1464). Suyūṭī and Bulqīnī both quote from an unnamed work by Ibn ʿAqīl al-Ḥanbalī (d. 1119), who was a student of Abū ʿAlī ibn al-Walīd al-Muʿtazilī; see Makdisi, Ibn ʿAqil, 18-20.
116 Zurqānī, Sharḥ al-mukhtaṣar, 8 : 88 (the glosses of Bannānī).
117 The sources are intriguingly silent concerning oral intercourse, especially fellatio . I have not come across a single clear-cut reference to this act in the juridical sources, or indeed in any other source, from the period. There are references to fellatio in the erotic work Rujū‘al-shaykh ilā sibāh, attributed to Ahmad al-Tīfāshī (d. 1253), and this work was known to at least one author in the early Ottoman period (Ishāqī, Akhbār al-uwal, 115). For references to cunnilingus, see Buhūtī, Sharḥ muntahā al-irādāt, 3 : 8; Kharāshī, Sharḥ almukhtaṣar, 3:165-66 (the glosses of‘Adawī).
133 Ibn Qayyim al-jawziyyah, al-Dā‘wa al-dawā’, 372-75.
134 al-Qāriʾ al-Harawī, al-Asrār al-marfūʿah, 238-39; Zurqānī, Mukhtaṣar, 196; ʿAjlūnī, Kashf al-khafāʾ, 2:263-64; Zabīdī, Ithāf al-sādah al-muttaqīn, 7 : 439-40. A weak tradition is distinct from a fabrication; it may be used in moralistic and exhortatory literature, but not to establish a point of law; see Robson, “Hadīth,” 25a-b.