The “idealist” position shared the negative evaluation of illicit lust, but nonetheless maintained a positive evaluation of love. Such a combination of attitudes rested on maintaining a clear distinction between the two. “Love
(al-mah
abbah)
is different from sexual desire
(al-shahwah),
and this everyone knows from himself if he abandons obstinacy,” said ʿAbd al-Ghani
al-Na
bulusi
, one of the most fervent defenders of chaste love in the early Ottoman period.
155
On several occasions, poets expressed the chaste nature of their passion. ʿAbd al-H
ayy T
arrazalrayh
a
n, purporting to address a beloved, assured:
Have you not known chastity from an ailing person who does not enter the alleys of vice,
And by nature disdains any indecency not accepted by the schools of religious law?
156