Bombshell: Explosive Medical Secrets That Will Redefine Aging (45 page)

The diet the queen consumes is only royal jelly. That’s
her
diet! The workers are fed royal jelly only for three days of their life, and they live a short time.

SS:
So why do you think royal jelly slows down aging?

SB:
Certain flowers have molecular switches; the ones with the molecular switches turned “on” attract the honeybees.

SS:
Here we go again with the switches; it even extends to flowers.

SB:
It extends to all life. The flowers with the certain molecular switches that are ingredients of royal jelly have substances called
PG
(phenylacetylglutamine) and
PB
(phenylbutyrate). In fact, we decided to run experiments on these substances and a remarkable thing happened. When we injected the honeybees with PG or PB, the life span of those honeybees was almost five times longer than the honeybees who did not receive it. This is when we realized that royal jelly contains molecular switches that can activate the genes involved in lengthening aging.

SS:
This is fantastic. Do you have supplements with royal jelly in them?

SB:
Yes, we have supplements that contain the ingredients of royal jelly. Our theory is that by taking these ingredients, we can acquire new molecular switches that can try to reprogram the clock that protects our telomeres. If we can do that, then we can extend life.

SS:
So, knowing that, who wouldn’t want to take royal jelly supplements. You sell them, right?

SB:
Yes, these supplements contain ingredients present in royal jelly, and you can get them on my Aminocare website.

SS:
Finish this sentence for me: My dream is …

SB:
My dream is that we put an end to cancer … that people take control of their life choices seriously and take preventive measures to avoid this terrible disease.

Until that happens, my dream as a doctor is to be allowed to put to use a new approach to cancer that is genomic based and actually available right now. It’s frustrating to have the technology and medications available and not be allowed to use them because of bureaucratic control. Many doctors could be using these advancements and saving human lives now. It can only change if the American people get involved; if there are many of us protesting, then we could promote this change.

I dream for all doctors to have more freedom to practice medical art and use our discoveries to help people. This is why we became doctors; this is why I became a doctor. If medicine was not ruled by bureaucrats and lawyers, then we would have the freedom to move forward and win the war on cancer. If not, we’ll be waiting for another forty years for orthodox medicine to catch up.

It can be done, it should be done. People should understand that bureaucrats, lawyers, and big business should be removed from controlling medicine. Doctors should be allowed to utilize protocols and medications that will help people and be able to honor our oath, “Do no harm.”

SS:
Well, my dream is that your dream comes true. Another great conversation, Stan. I thank you for your time.

Given that cancer is about to be the biggest killer in the world, the odds are that someone reading this book is going to get it. I’ve already
had it, and as a result it put me on a path of good health, good diet, and good lifestyle habits, paying particular attention to prevention. Next we hear from Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez about the important work he does with cancer patients and the anticancer protocol he recommends. Once again it is very clear that we can avoid cancer, even genetic aberrations and environmental cancer, and that it is not inevitable if you know the steps to take to avoid this nasty killer. Following a preventative protocol such as Dr. Gonzalez’s is not for sissies, but it seems a small thing to do to be proactive about preventing cancer or a cancer recurrence. I have chosen to do this and the by-product for me is great energy, healthier-looking skin, and a well-working body.

Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez
is a physician in private practice in New York City. With his colleague, Dr. Linda Isaacs, he treats patients with advanced cancer and other serious degenerative diseases, utilizing a nutritional-dietary approach. For more information, consult his website at
www.dr-gonzalez.com
.

I do not have cancer but I did eleven years ago, so it made sense to me to use Dr. Gonzalez’s protocol preventatively. Of course, he does not have to prescribe for me the supplementation that is as aggressive as that for someone with active cancer, but still it’s a lot. I happily take my supplements and enzymes knowing I am keeping my body in an alkaline state with gobs of pancreatic enzymes to eat up the bad guys
.

SS:
Hello, Nick. Everyone is afraid of cancer; should they be?

NG:
I’ve been in practice now nearly twenty-five years. I was researching cancer five years before that, and I’ve seen so many patients with advanced cancer get well. I feel it’s sad that most of us still harbor some great terror about the illness. It’s understandable; after all, cancer is a common problem, affecting one out of two Americans, killing one out of three. And despite all the hoopla and the media excitement, conventional cure rates really aren’t changing much. For most cancers, once it has spread it’s going to kill—so the fear is reasonable. But I have a much different experience with most of our patients, even those with advanced cancer, who come through smiling and well.

SS:
Does everyone get well?

NG:
No, not everyone gets well. There are so many factors involved
with a patient’s course—extent of disease, stress, family situation, amount of previous toxic therapy, even issues from childhood—all these things impact progress and prognosis. But most who do the work in our world get well, and get back to their lives. So with that kind of experience, in my mind, fear is unnecessary. Just make reasoned, thoughtful choices about treatment should you be diagnosed with the disease.

SS:
I can hear my readers asking, “But how do you avoid it in the first place?”

NG:
The rest of us without cancer should do the work to prevent the disease from occurring—you know, from the basics on up, no smoking, no junk food, no whites—white flour, white sugar, white bread—no chemicals, or as few as possible in the food, or in and on our bodies. Take supplements, take pancreatic enzymes, live clean and eat clean, and immediately your risk drops.

Cancer tends to be frightening because most look at the disease as some wanton force, striking its helpless victims without warning, randomly, without rhyme or reason, but that’s not the case at all. Good habits, good food, lower our risk substantially. So to get rid of the fear, become proactive; make the choices that minimize the chances of this ever striking your life.

SS:
You once told me that cancer was manageable. Can you explain?

NG:
We—my colleague, Dr. Isaacs, and I—approach cancer the way an endocrinologist approaches diabetes—as a chronic disease that can be managed for years, for decades, while patients lead normal or near-normal lives. A diabetic who sticks to the prescribed diet, who avoids the junk and sugar, who eats whole foods and takes insulin can lead a perfectly normal, productive life. You don’t technically “cure”
the diabetes, but patients can do fine with a disease that before the advent of insulin could kill in months.

We have patients initially diagnosed with stage IV cancer of various types who have been with us in excess of fifteen and twenty years. They may not be completely “cured.” They may even have residual tumors in their bodies, but they do fine as long as they follow their prescribed diet and take the pancreatic enzymes we use to treat cancer.

SS:
Do you ever cure them of cancer?

NG:
Yes, we have patients, even patients with poor-prognosis cancers such as pancreatic cancer, who have been with us for years whose tumors on CT or PET scans have completely resolved. Yet even such patients may still harbor residual microscopic disease, but as long as they follow their diet and take their enzymes, they appear safe.

My mentor, the brilliant but eccentric Dr. William Kelley, first suggested forty years ago that we need to change our thinking about cancer. In those days, and even during my training, oncologists and physicians in general looked at cancer as an “all or nothing” situation. You either destroy every single cancer cell, or eventually you are going to die. We don’t see this to be the case; if patients follow our therapy they can live a normal life span with their disease nicely controlled, if not always completely eradicated.

SS:
So you’re hopeful about the future of cancer treatment?

NG:
It’s been gratifying in recent years to read editorials in mainstream journals in which experts themselves are changing their minds about the disease, actually evoking the diabetes model as the correct approach to cancer, thinking of malignancy as a disease that can be managed and controlled for many, many years. That change in thinking should help lessen the pervasive fear of the disease that is everywhere. People used to be terrified of diabetes because it, like cancer, was so deadly, but though we all know diabetes can be nasty, it just isn’t the life-threatening illness it was a hundred years ago. Someday I hope we look at cancer the same way, as a potentially nasty situation that can be overcome and managed nicely.

SS:
As I mentioned in the introduction to your piece, I wanted to be proactive about preventing a cancer recurrence, so I asked you a while ago to design a protocol for me. Would you explain my program?