Read Financial Markets Operations Management Online
Authors: Keith Dickinson
We have seen in this chapter that securities financing consists of collateralised lending transactions of one form or another. Collateralisation is one of the tools used to mitigate counterparty risk (i.e. the risk that one or other of the counterparties defaults). The use of master agreements, haircuts and margin also helps in this process.
The master agreements for repo and securities lending contain provisions for unwinding transactions should a default occur. First, though, we need to know what event(s) could cause a default.
Both agreements contain similar descriptions of what constitutes an event of default. You will find a summary of the events in each agreement's Section 10.
Please refer to Section 10: Events of Default (pp. 18â19) and Section 11: Consequences of an Event of Default (pp. 19â23).
The following situations constitute an event of default:
Please refer to Section 10 (a): Events of Default (pp. 17â18).
The following situations constitute an event of default:
There are similarities in the way in which the obligations between buyer/seller (GMRA) and lender/borrower (GMSLA) are treated. Of the two parties involved, one will be the defaulting party and the other the non-defaulting party. The first step will be the delivery of a default notice by the non-defaulting party to the defaulting party.
Should an event of default occur, both parties' payment and delivery obligations to each other are replaced by a single obligation of one party to pay a cash sum to the other. It is the non-defaulting party that determines the amount of cash payable by determining the market value (referred to as the
default market value
) of deliverable and receivable securities together with cash collateral and any other cash.
This reduction of all the obligations into one single obligation is a key element of the agreement, as this netting should ensure that that the non-defaulting party receives or pays the correct
amount. Netting also helps to prevent the defaulting party from utilising some of the collateral to offset other obligations.
You can refer to the actual agreements for more details:
We looked at clearing houses and CCPs in Chapter 5 and noted their key role in the post-trade environment. Not all of these provide specialist services for securities financing, although this situation is changing.
Except for transactions that are executed using the alternative trading systems (ATS), securities financing has been an OTC product with bilateral negotiation. The post-transaction processing was predominantly managed in-house using internal systems and/or external, third-party solutions.
9
The clearing houses and CCPs would be involved at the delivery and payment stages; in fact, the clearing houses may not necessarily have been aware of the purpose of delivery and payment. This situation has changed and continues to evolve, with regulatory demands for OTC transactions to be cleared centrally. This results in the clearing houses and CCPs becoming involved much sooner after a transaction.
In this final section we will take a look at three CCPs and the two international CSDs that operate in this business:
The OCC manages two programmes in which it acts as a CCP on behalf of its clearing members:
Eurex Clearing offers CCP services for both securities lending and repo transactions.
LCH.Clearnet clears repo trades through its RepoClear service. It accepts classic fixed-rate repos with first leg settlement on
T
+0 or with a forward start with a term of up to 12 months. RepoClear clears transactions in the following government bond markets:
RepoClear can accept transactions executed directly, by voice broker and screen trading systems (ATSs) with LCH.Clearnet assuming the counterparty risk through novation.
For transactions that are delivery settled, RepoClear nets all deliveries due for next-day settlement, resulting in one delivery of securities against a single payment. Settlement netting might result in multiple deliveries depending on cross-border settlement requirements or limits on the maximum delivery size.
Where no actual bond delivery takes place, the cash amounts from both ATS-and bilaterally-traded transactions are netted out per currency and paid through the protected payments system (PPS).
CBL manages two automated securities lending services for participants and manages all the administrative activities:
Automated Securities Lending and Borrowing (ASL):
CBL automatically identifies ASL lenders' available positions and attempts to cover ASL borrowers' failed trades. CBL acts as a lending agent, collateral agent and guarantor so that the lenders and borrowers are unknown to each other. As soon as the borrowers' failed trades have settled, CBL returns the bonds to the lender. If the lenders subsequently sell their loaned bonds, CBL recalls them.
CBL also provides a case-by-case variation of ASL allowing participants to manage their own strategies (e.g. a participant might choose to delay borrowing to cover a failed transaction).
Collateral is pledged to CBL as guarantor and its quality and quantity monitored by CBL on a daily basis.
Euroclear enables its participants to manage their settlement fails by automatically borrowing sufficient bonds from lenders in order to settle the transactions. Acting as agent, Euroclear
identifies the borrowing requirements, administers the asset servicing and manages recalls as they are needed.
Participants can tailor their participation in the lending programme by excluding certain asset classes or individual securities (e.g. lending only USD-denominated Eurobonds, excluding bonds issued by a particular issuer). The provision and revaluation of collateral is also managed by Euroclear.
Securities financing is a powerful tool that allows us to perform a variety of activities:
Securities lending, repurchase agreements and sell/buy-backs are the three types of securities financing. Securities lending is primarily driven by the need to borrow securities using either cash or non-cash collateral as security.
Repo and sell/buy-back are driven by the need to either borrow cash (using margined securities as collateral) or lend specific securities (specials) using cash as collateral.
By contrast, reverse repo and buy/sell-back are driven by the need to either lend cash or borrow specific securities.
There can be some confusion in terminology, for example, on “margin”, “haircuts”, etc. Margin generally refers to the difference between the value of the loan and the collateral that secures it. So, if the loan is worth USD 100.00, the collateral should be worth, say, USD 105.00 and this “gap” should always be 5% in this example.
A haircut considers the collateral value of an asset rather than its market value. So, a bond with a market value of USD 1,000.00 might have a 2% haircut; its collateral value will be lower, i.e. USD 980.00.
Traditionally, securities financing was an OTC product with transactions dealt off-exchange, deliveries made by each counterparty and each responsible for monitoring the transactions (income, mark-to-market, corporate actions, etc.) and calling or returning collateral as needed. Today, we see CCPs playing an active role as quasi-exchange and clearer/administrator and the ICSDs offering automated, automatic lending and borrowing services, with the ICSDs acting in the middle as agent between the lenders and borrowers.
Rating Description | Moody's | S&P | Fitch |
 | Long-term | Long-term | Long-term |
Investment grade: | Â | Â | Â |
Prime | Aaa | AAA | AAA |
High grade | Aa1 | AA+ | AA+ |
Aa2 | AA | AA | |
Aa3 | AAâ | AAâ | |
Upper medium Ggade | A1 | A+ | A+ |
A2 | A | A | |
A3 | Aâ | Aâ | |
Lower medium grade | Baa1 | BBB+ | BBB+ |
Baa2 | BBB | BBB | |
Baa3 | BBBâ | BBBâ | |
Non-investment grade: | Â | Â | Â |
Speculative | Ba1 | BB+ | BB+ |
 | Ba2 | BB | BB |
 | Ba3 | BBâ | BBâ |
Highly speculative | B1 | B+ | B+ |
 | B2 | B | B |
 | B3 | Bâ | Bâ |
Substantial risks | Caa1 | CCC+ | CCC |
 | Caa2 | CCC |  |
 | Caa3 | CCCâ |  |
Extremely speculative | Ca | CC | Â |
 |  | C |  |
In default | C | D | RD |
Source:
Moody's Investor Services (
www.moodys.com/researchandratings
); Standard & Poor's (
www.standardandpoors.com
); Fitch Ratings (
www. fitchratings.com
).